AzTrials
AzTrials

Injection SiteNCT03147118

Evaluating Palpation Guided Injections in Trapeziometacarpal Arthritis

An observational study of Injection Site and Arthritis;Hand/Finger(S), run by Prisma Health-Upstate at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The objective of this study is to evaluate the accuracy of trapeziometacarpal injections using palpation alone. The importance of this study is one of education, cost containment, and decreased risk to the patient. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Injection Site, Arthritis;Hand/Finger(S)
What is being tested?
Arthrogram
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
How many people
37 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
1 May 2017to 15 Sep 2017
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: All patients diagnosed with trapeziometacarpal arthritis and a treatment plan including intra-articular steroid injections

Who may be able to join

  • The patient has clinical signs of trapeziometacarpal arthritis and are willing to obtain a post injection x-ray
  • The patient is over the age of 18 years of age.

Who cannot join

  • The patient has a known allergy to contrast dye
  • The patient has a planned surgery on the trapeziometacarpal joint within 6 weeks following injection
  • Patients who are pregnant or believe they may be pregnant
  • Prisoners
  • Patients who are unable to provide informed consent

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • The Hand Center

    Greenville, South Carolina, 29615

Other trials in United States

About this study

The objective of this study is to evaluate the accuracy of trapeziometacarpal injections using palpation alone. The importance of this study is one of education, cost containment, and decreased risk to the patient. If it can be shown that the accuracy of trapeziometacarpal injections using palpation alone is similar to the reported accuracy of ultrasound and fluoroscopy, then these guided techniques may not be needed.

Read the detailed description

The objective of this study is to evaluate the accuracy of trapeziometacarpal injections using palpation alone. If it can be shown that the accuracy of trapeziometacarpal injections using palpation alone is similar to the reported accuracy of ultrasound and fluoroscopy, then fluoroscopy and ultrasound guided techniques may not be needed. Due to the expenses associated with medications and testing, it is important to not accrue unnecessary costs if there is no perceived benefit. The investigators plan to enroll 50 patients presenting with trapeziometacarpal joint arthritis who agree to participate. These participants will undergo an injection technique consisting of palpating the base of the thumb and placing the needle into the trapeziometacarpal joint without the guidance of ultrasound or fluoroscopy. Contrast dye will be included in the standard injection of lidocaine and corticosteroid. After injection, the participant will have 2 fluoroscopy views of the thumb. The images will not be evaluated for injection accuracy prior to the patient leaving the clinic, so as to not introduce any bias by the treating physician. These images will be blindly reviewed by three investigators at a later date, and determined by consensus if there is contrast material in the joint. The accuracy rate can then be compared to data regarding accuracy of fluoroscopic and ultrasound guided injections of the trapeziometacarpal joint. If there is a similar accuracy rate between modalities, it can be concluded that ultrasound may not be worth the added cost to the patient and fluoroscopy may not be worth the added cost or radiation to the participant. Additionally, participants will be contacted at 6 weeks post injection to evaluate post-injection arthritis symptoms.

Being tested
Arthrogram
Keywords
trapeziometacarpal arthritis

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • ArthrogramDiagnostic test

    Contrast dye will be included in the standard injection of lidocaine and corticosteroid. After injection, the participant will have 2 radiograph views of the thumb.

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Accuracy of injection

    Accuracy judged in a blinded fashion, rated injection in joint or out of joint

    Measured: radiograph immediately after injection (<5 mins)

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted10 May 2017
  2. Study start1 May 2017
  3. Primary completion15 Sep 2017
  4. Study completion15 Sep 2017

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Case only
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
37 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03147118
Sponsor's protocol ID
PRO00059888
Status last verified
Sep 2024
First submitted
8 May 2017
Last updated
24 Sep 2024
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Injection Site and Arthritis;Hand/Finger(S), run by Prisma Health-Upstate at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 24 Sep 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Accuracy of injection (time frame: radiograph immediately after injection (<5 mins)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 24 Sep 2024.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in