AzTrials
AzTrials

Smoking, TobaccoNCT03148613

Carbon Monoxide Breath Sensor System Performance, Human Factors, and Usability Assessment Conducted in a Single Visit

A study testing Carbon Monoxide Breath Sensor System (COBSS) and Bedfont - Micro+™ Smokerlyzer® in people with Smoking, Tobacco, run by David Utley, MD at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Prospective, open label, single center clinical study enrolling 70 subjects to study Performance, Human Factors, and Usability for the Carbon Monoxide Breath Sensor System (COBBS) Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 80 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Smoking, Tobacco
What is being tested?
Carbon Monoxide Breath Sensor System (COBSS) and Bedfont - Micro+™ Smokerlyzer®
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
70 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
2 Feb 2017to 30 Aug 2017
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 80 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • 18-80 years of age
  • English speaking
  • Owns and uses a smartphone
  • Willing to sign the Informed Consent Form

Who cannot join

  • Pregnancy

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Carrot Sense

    Redwood City, California, 94063

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Carbon Monoxide Breath Sensor System (COBSS) Performance, Human Factors, and Usability Assessment in a Single Visit

Prospective, open label, single center clinical study enrolling 70 subjects to study Performance, Human Factors, and Usability for the Carbon Monoxide Breath Sensor System (COBBS)

Read the detailed description

Performance:

  • Non-invasively measure carbon monoxide (CO) levels in the exhaled breath of study subjects using two different types of measurement devices.
  • Assess the correlation between the measured CO levels (in parts per million, or ppm) of the study CO breath sensor (Carrot Sense) and the predicate CO breath sensor (Bedfont).

Human Factors and Usability:

  • Ensure that representative intended users are able to operate the COBSS independently.
  • Validate appropriate mitigations of use related hazards identified in risk management documentation.
  • Uncover previously unforeseen use errors.

NOTES:

  • The study design allows for the assessment of a performance endpoint and human factors endpoint in a single study.
  • Each participant will complete the study in a single visit which will include the consent process, entry into the study, the study session, and conclusion of the study. The study session is completed on a single day requiring up to 90 minutes.
Being tested
Carbon Monoxide Breath Sensor System (COBSS), Bedfont - Micro+™ Smokerlyzer®
Medical subject headings
Tobacco Smoking

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Carbon Monoxide Breath Sensor System (COBSS)Device

    Carbon Monoxide Breath Sensor System (COBSS): Device to measure carbon monoxide levels in one's breath and inform the user.

  • Bedfont - Micro+™ Smokerlyzer®Device

    Bedfont - Micro+™ Smokerlyzer® : Predicate Device to measure carbon monoxide levels in one's breath.

Study groups in NCT03148613
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
18-49 year old smokers using COBSSOtherYounger smokers - Assessment of intended user performance in use scenarios, user documentation assessment, subjective feedback and rating scales. NOTE: 18-49 year Age Arm intended to evaluate human factors and usability of COBSS in younger smokers
Receives: Device: Carbon Monoxide Breath Sensor System (COBSS); Device: Bedfont - Micro+™ Smokerlyzer®
≥50 year old smokers using COBSSOtherOlder smokers- Assessment of intended user performance in use scenarios, user documentation assessment, subjective feedback and rating scales. NOTE:≥50 year Age Arm intended to evaluate human factors and usability of COBSS in younger smokers
Receives: Device: Carbon Monoxide Breath Sensor System (COBSS); Device: Bedfont - Micro+™ Smokerlyzer®

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Performance Variable - Correlation of Carbon Monoxide (CO) Measurements Between COBSS and Predicate Devices

    CO concentrations in parts per million (ppm) in exhaled breath from subjects at a single visit will be assessed and reported in order to compare the CO measurements from COBSS to a control (predicate) device. The correlation will be reported as an R value.

    For each participant, the single visit includes the consent process, entry into the study, the study session, and conclusion of the study. The study session is completed on a single day requiring up to 90 minutes.

    COBSS breath sample will take approximately 1 minute. Breath sample with the control device will take approximately 1 minute. The breath samples will be collected within 5-10 minutes of each other.

    Measured: 1 minute

  2. Human Factors - User Performance in Use Scenarios Assessment With Observer Ratings

    User performance of participants in intended use scenarios will be assessed at a single visit. Participants will be observed if they can set up the device, use the device and interpret results. Observer ratings include 'Successful' and 'Unsuccessful'. Specific attention will be given to assess if any harms can occur from observed use errors. Outcome measure data table is tally of participants who were 'Successful' in each use scenario.

    For each participant, the single visit includes the consent process, entry into the study, the study session, and conclusion of the study. The study session is completed on a single day requiring up to 90 minutes.

    Observations are made throughout the study session. Assessments for individual tasks will take approximately 1 minute and assessments will be made over the study session which can last up to 90 minutes.

    Measured: 1 minute for each question; up to 90 minutes for study session

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. User Documentation Assessment With Questionnaire With Observer Ratings

    Participant understanding of user documentation will be assessed at single visit. User documentation includes packaging information, quick start guide, reference card, and user manual. Observer ratings include 'Successful' and 'Unsuccessful'.

    For each participant, the single visit includes the consent process, entry into the study, the study session, and conclusion of the study. The study session is completed on a single day requiring up to 90 minutes.

    Observations are made throughout the study session. Assessments for individual tasks will take approximately 1 minute each. The User documentation assessment portion of the study session will last up to 30 minutes.

    The 5-Point Likert Scale for Clarity has the following answer options: 5 - Very Clear; 4 - Clear; 3 - Neither Clear nor Unclear; 2 - Unclear; and 1 - Very Unclear.

    Higher values of this scale represent a better outcome, which is greater clarity/understanding.

    Measured: Up to 90 minutes

  2. Number of Participants Answering "No" for the Subjective Feedback With Questionnaire

    Subjective feedback focusing on any concerns (i.e. 'yes', 'no') on using device will be assessed at single visit.

    For each participant, the single visit includes the consent process, entry into the study, the study session, and conclusion of the study. The study session is completed on a single day requiring up to 90 minutes.

    *Row title truncated due to character limit. Actual question asked: Were there any points during this portion of the study that you experienced difficulty or had concerns about the product? Subjective feedback focusing on any concerns prior to the conclusion of the study session. Subjective feedback questions will take approximately 1-3 minutes each. The Subjective feedback portion of the study session will last up to 5 to 15 minutes.

    Measured: Up to 90 minutes

  3. Participant Assessment With Questionnaire Rating Scales

    Participant will be asked to provide ratings on the following:

    • How would you rate the ease or difficulty using the device and phone app? 5 - Very Clear; 4 - Clear; 3 - Neither Clear nor Unclear; 2 - Unclear; 1 - Very Unclear
    • How easy or difficult was it to understand and interpret the test results?

    For each participant, the single visit includes the consent process, entry into the study, the study session, and conclusion of the study. The study session is completed on a single day requiring up to 90 minutes.

    Participant will provide the ratings prior to the conclusion of the study session. Participant assessment with questionnaire rating scales will take approximately 1-2 minutes each. The Subjective feedback portion of the study session will last up to 5 minutes.

    Measured: Up to 90 minutes

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted11 May 2017
  2. Study start2 Feb 2017
  3. Primary completion15 Mar 2017
  4. Study completion30 Aug 2017

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Non-randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
All subjects experience device use compared to a control device (predicate).
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
70 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03148613
Sponsor's protocol ID
CS-401
Status last verified
Oct 2022
First submitted
26 Apr 2017
Last updated
18 Oct 2022
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Carbon Monoxide Breath Sensor System (COBSS) and Bedfont - Micro+™ Smokerlyzer® in people with Smoking, Tobacco, run by David Utley, MD at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 18 Oct 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 13 Oct 2022). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Performance Variable - Correlation of Carbon Monoxide (CO) Measurements Between COBSS and Predicate Devices (time frame: 1 minute). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 18 Oct 2022.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in