Smoking, TobaccoNCT03148613
Carbon Monoxide Breath Sensor System Performance, Human Factors, and Usability Assessment Conducted in a Single Visit
A study testing Carbon Monoxide Breath Sensor System (COBSS) and Bedfont - Micro+™ Smokerlyzer® in people with Smoking, Tobacco, run by David Utley, MD at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
Prospective, open label, single center clinical study enrolling 70 subjects to study Performance, Human Factors, and Usability for the Carbon Monoxide Breath Sensor System (COBBS) Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 80 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Smoking, Tobacco
- What is being tested?
- Carbon Monoxide Breath Sensor System (COBSS) and Bedfont - Micro+™ Smokerlyzer®
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 70 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 2 Feb 2017to 30 Aug 2017
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 80 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- 18-80 years of age
- English speaking
- Owns and uses a smartphone
- Willing to sign the Informed Consent Form
Who cannot join
- Pregnancy
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Carbon Monoxide Breath Sensor System (COBSS) Performance, Human Factors, and Usability Assessment in a Single Visit
Prospective, open label, single center clinical study enrolling 70 subjects to study Performance, Human Factors, and Usability for the Carbon Monoxide Breath Sensor System (COBBS)
Read the detailed description
Performance:
- Non-invasively measure carbon monoxide (CO) levels in the exhaled breath of study subjects using two different types of measurement devices.
- Assess the correlation between the measured CO levels (in parts per million, or ppm) of the study CO breath sensor (Carrot Sense) and the predicate CO breath sensor (Bedfont).
Human Factors and Usability:
- Ensure that representative intended users are able to operate the COBSS independently.
- Validate appropriate mitigations of use related hazards identified in risk management documentation.
- Uncover previously unforeseen use errors.
NOTES:
- The study design allows for the assessment of a performance endpoint and human factors endpoint in a single study.
- Each participant will complete the study in a single visit which will include the consent process, entry into the study, the study session, and conclusion of the study. The study session is completed on a single day requiring up to 90 minutes.
- Conditions
- Smoking, Tobacco
- Being tested
- Carbon Monoxide Breath Sensor System (COBSS), Bedfont - Micro+™ Smokerlyzer®
- Medical subject headings
- Tobacco Smoking
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Carbon Monoxide Breath Sensor System (COBSS)Device
Carbon Monoxide Breath Sensor System (COBSS): Device to measure carbon monoxide levels in one's breath and inform the user.
Bedfont - Micro+™ Smokerlyzer®Device
Bedfont - Micro+™ Smokerlyzer® : Predicate Device to measure carbon monoxide levels in one's breath.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| 18-49 year old smokers using COBSS | Other | Younger smokers - Assessment of intended user performance in use scenarios, user documentation assessment, subjective feedback and rating scales.
NOTE: 18-49 year Age Arm intended to evaluate human factors and usability of COBSS in younger smokers Receives: Device: Carbon Monoxide Breath Sensor System (COBSS); Device: Bedfont - Micro+™ Smokerlyzer® |
| ≥50 year old smokers using COBSS | Other | Older smokers- Assessment of intended user performance in use scenarios, user documentation assessment, subjective feedback and rating scales.
NOTE:≥50 year Age Arm intended to evaluate human factors and usability of COBSS in younger smokers Receives: Device: Carbon Monoxide Breath Sensor System (COBSS); Device: Bedfont - Micro+™ Smokerlyzer® |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Performance Variable - Correlation of Carbon Monoxide (CO) Measurements Between COBSS and Predicate Devices
CO concentrations in parts per million (ppm) in exhaled breath from subjects at a single visit will be assessed and reported in order to compare the CO measurements from COBSS to a control (predicate) device. The correlation will be reported as an R value.
For each participant, the single visit includes the consent process, entry into the study, the study session, and conclusion of the study. The study session is completed on a single day requiring up to 90 minutes.
COBSS breath sample will take approximately 1 minute. Breath sample with the control device will take approximately 1 minute. The breath samples will be collected within 5-10 minutes of each other.
Measured: 1 minute
Human Factors - User Performance in Use Scenarios Assessment With Observer Ratings
User performance of participants in intended use scenarios will be assessed at a single visit. Participants will be observed if they can set up the device, use the device and interpret results. Observer ratings include 'Successful' and 'Unsuccessful'. Specific attention will be given to assess if any harms can occur from observed use errors. Outcome measure data table is tally of participants who were 'Successful' in each use scenario.
For each participant, the single visit includes the consent process, entry into the study, the study session, and conclusion of the study. The study session is completed on a single day requiring up to 90 minutes.
Observations are made throughout the study session. Assessments for individual tasks will take approximately 1 minute and assessments will be made over the study session which can last up to 90 minutes.
Measured: 1 minute for each question; up to 90 minutes for study session
Secondary outcomes (3)
User Documentation Assessment With Questionnaire With Observer Ratings
Participant understanding of user documentation will be assessed at single visit. User documentation includes packaging information, quick start guide, reference card, and user manual. Observer ratings include 'Successful' and 'Unsuccessful'.
For each participant, the single visit includes the consent process, entry into the study, the study session, and conclusion of the study. The study session is completed on a single day requiring up to 90 minutes.
Observations are made throughout the study session. Assessments for individual tasks will take approximately 1 minute each. The User documentation assessment portion of the study session will last up to 30 minutes.
The 5-Point Likert Scale for Clarity has the following answer options: 5 - Very Clear; 4 - Clear; 3 - Neither Clear nor Unclear; 2 - Unclear; and 1 - Very Unclear.
Higher values of this scale represent a better outcome, which is greater clarity/understanding.
Measured: Up to 90 minutes
Number of Participants Answering "No" for the Subjective Feedback With Questionnaire
Subjective feedback focusing on any concerns (i.e. 'yes', 'no') on using device will be assessed at single visit.
For each participant, the single visit includes the consent process, entry into the study, the study session, and conclusion of the study. The study session is completed on a single day requiring up to 90 minutes.
*Row title truncated due to character limit. Actual question asked: Were there any points during this portion of the study that you experienced difficulty or had concerns about the product? Subjective feedback focusing on any concerns prior to the conclusion of the study session. Subjective feedback questions will take approximately 1-3 minutes each. The Subjective feedback portion of the study session will last up to 5 to 15 minutes.
Measured: Up to 90 minutes
Participant Assessment With Questionnaire Rating Scales
Participant will be asked to provide ratings on the following:
- How would you rate the ease or difficulty using the device and phone app? 5 - Very Clear; 4 - Clear; 3 - Neither Clear nor Unclear; 2 - Unclear; 1 - Very Unclear
- How easy or difficult was it to understand and interpret the test results?
For each participant, the single visit includes the consent process, entry into the study, the study session, and conclusion of the study. The study session is completed on a single day requiring up to 90 minutes.
Participant will provide the ratings prior to the conclusion of the study session. Participant assessment with questionnaire rating scales will take approximately 1-2 minutes each. The Subjective feedback portion of the study session will last up to 5 minutes.
Measured: Up to 90 minutes
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted11 May 2017
- Study start2 Feb 2017
- Primary completion15 Mar 2017
- Study completion30 Aug 2017
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for Smoking, TobaccoStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- All subjects experience device use compared to a control device (predicate).
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 70 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- David Utley, MD
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- UserWise, LLC
- Responsible party
- Sponsor-investigator, David Utley, MD, Pivot Health Technologies Inc.
- Investigators
- David Utley, MD, Principal investigator, Pivot Health Technologies Inc.
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03148613
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CS-401
- Status last verified
- Oct 2022
- First submitted
- 26 Apr 2017
- Last updated
- 18 Oct 2022
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 18 Oct 2022. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Carbon Monoxide Breath Sensor System (COBSS) Performance, Human Factors, and Usability Assessment in a Single Visit
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03148613
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CS-401
- Conditions
- Smoking, Tobacco
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 70 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- David Utley, MDIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- UserWise, LLC
- Study start
- 2 Feb 2017 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 15 Mar 2017 (actual)
- Study completion
- 30 Aug 2017 (actual)
- First posted
- 11 May 2017 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 13 Oct 2022
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Prospective, open label, single center clinical study enrolling 70 subjects to study Performance, Human Factors, and Usability for the Carbon Monoxide Breath Sensor System (COBBS)
Detailed description
Performance:
- Non-invasively measure carbon monoxide (CO) levels in the exhaled breath of study subjects using two different types of measurement devices.
- Assess the correlation between the measured CO levels (in parts per million, or ppm) of the study CO breath sensor (Carrot Sense) and the predicate CO breath sensor (Bedfont).
Human Factors and Usability:
- Ensure that representative intended users are able to operate the COBSS independently.
- Validate appropriate mitigations of use related hazards identified in risk management documentation.
- Uncover previously unforeseen use errors.
NOTES:
- The study design allows for the assessment of a performance endpoint and human factors endpoint in a single study.
- Each participant will complete the study in a single visit which will include the consent process, entry into the study, the study session, and conclusion of the study. The study session is completed on a single day requiring up to 90 minutes.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- All subjects experience device use compared to a control device (predicate).
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| 18-49 year old smokers using COBSS | Other | Device: Carbon Monoxide Breath Sensor System (COBSS), Device: Bedfont - Micro+™ Smokerlyzer®Younger smokers - Assessment of intended user performance in use scenarios, user documentation assessment, subjective feedback and rating scales. NOTE: 18-49 year Age Arm intended to evaluate human factors and usability of COBSS in younger smokers |
| ≥50 year old smokers using COBSS | Other | Device: Carbon Monoxide Breath Sensor System (COBSS), Device: Bedfont - Micro+™ Smokerlyzer®Older smokers- Assessment of intended user performance in use scenarios, user documentation assessment, subjective feedback and rating scales. NOTE:≥50 year Age Arm intended to evaluate human factors and usability of COBSS in younger smokers |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 80 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- 18-80 years of age
- English speaking
- Owns and uses a smartphone
- Willing to sign the Informed Consent Form
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Pregnancy
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Carbon Monoxide Breath Sensor System (COBSS)Carbon Monoxide Breath Sensor System (COBSS): Device to measure carbon monoxide levels in one's breath and inform the user. | Device | 18-49 year old smokers using COBSS, ≥50 year old smokers using COBSS |
| Bedfont - Micro+™ Smokerlyzer®Bedfont - Micro+™ Smokerlyzer® : Predicate Device to measure carbon monoxide levels in one's breath. | Device | 18-49 year old smokers using COBSS, ≥50 year old smokers using COBSS |
Primary outcome
Performance Variable - Correlation of Carbon Monoxide (CO) Measurements Between COBSS and Predicate Devices
Time frame: 1 minute
CO concentrations in parts per million (ppm) in exhaled breath from subjects at a single visit will be assessed and reported in order to compare the CO measurements from COBSS to a control (predicate) device. The correlation will be reported as an R value. For each participant, the single visit includes the consent process, entry into the study, the study session, and conclusion of the study. The study session is completed on a single day requiring up to 90 minutes. COBSS breath sample will take approximately 1 minute. Breath sample with the control device will take approximately 1 minute. The breath samples will be collected within 5-10 minutes of each other.
Human Factors - User Performance in Use Scenarios Assessment With Observer Ratings
Time frame: 1 minute for each question; up to 90 minutes for study session
User performance of participants in intended use scenarios will be assessed at a single visit. Participants will be observed if they can set up the device, use the device and interpret results. Observer ratings include 'Successful' and 'Unsuccessful'. Specific attention will be given to assess if any harms can occur from observed use errors. Outcome measure data table is tally of participants who were 'Successful' in each use scenario. For each participant, the single visit includes the consent process, entry into the study, the study session, and conclusion of the study. The study session is completed on a single day requiring up to 90 minutes. Observations are made throughout the study session. Assessments for individual tasks will take approximately 1 minute and assessments will be made over the study session which can last up to 90 minutes.
3 secondary outcomes
User Documentation Assessment With Questionnaire With Observer Ratings
Time frame: Up to 90 minutes
Number of Participants Answering "No" for the Subjective Feedback With Questionnaire
Time frame: Up to 90 minutes
Participant Assessment With Questionnaire Rating Scales
Time frame: Up to 90 minutes
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 18 Oct 2022.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Smoking, Tobacco
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
Using Smartwatches to Monitor Smoking in Real-life Situations
Smoking
Not yet recruiting
Flavored Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems to Lower Smoking and Exposure to Tobacco Toxicants Among Cigarette Smokers Interested in Quitting, REFLECT Trial
Tobacco Cessation, Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems
Not yet recruiting
Contingency Management to Promote Smoking Cessation Study
Smoking Cessation
Recruiting
Smoking Cessation in Patients With Cancer
Cancer, Tobacco Use
Not yet recruiting
Effectiveness Of Project EX: A Classroom-Based Smoking Prevention And Cessation Intervention Program
Focus of the Study is Smoking Cessation and Prevention, Smoking Prevention
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
David Utley, MD principal investigator
Pivot Health Technologies Inc.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Carbon Monoxide Breath Sensor System (COBSS) and Bedfont - Micro+™ Smokerlyzer® in people with Smoking, Tobacco, run by David Utley, MD at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 18 Oct 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 13 Oct 2022). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Performance Variable - Correlation of Carbon Monoxide (CO) Measurements Between COBSS and Predicate Devices (time frame: 1 minute). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 18 Oct 2022.