AzTrials
AzTrials

Atrial ArrhythmiaZFA-RAANCT03151278

Zero Fluoroscopic Ablation Versus Conventional Fluoroscopic Ablation for Right Atrial Arrhythmias

A study testing Zero-fluoroscopy ablation and Conventional fluoroscopy ablation in people with Atrial Arrhythmia and Atrial Premature Complexes, run by Tongji Hospital at 1 site in China.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This study is intended to compare the feasibility, safety and efficacy of a zero-fluoroscopic approach with conventional fluoroscopic approach as performing catheter ablation of right atrial arrhythmias. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 90 years
What is being tested?
Zero-fluoroscopy ablation and Conventional fluoroscopy ablation
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
212 participants
Where
1 siteChina
Study dates
Jan 2011to Dec 2018
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 90 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Atrial Tachycardia
  • Atrial Premature Complexes

Who cannot join

  • Left Atrial Premature Complexes
  • Left Atrial Tachycardia

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

China1 site
  • Tongji Hospital

    Wuhan, Hubei, 430030

Other trials in China

About this study

Official title: Multi-center, Randomized, Controlled Trial to Compare Feasibility, Safety and Efficacy of Zero-Fluoroscopic Navigation With Conventional Fluoroscopic Navigation for the Ablation of Right Atrial Arrhythmias

This study is intended to compare the feasibility, safety and efficacy of a zero-fluoroscopic approach with conventional fluoroscopic approach as performing catheter ablation of right atrial arrhythmias.

Read the detailed description

Catheter ablation is a well-established treatment to treat patients with a wide range of heart rhythm disturbances.

Fluoroscopy is the imaging modality routinely used for cardiac device implantation and electrophysiological procedures. Due to the rising concern regarding the harmful effects of radiation exposure to both the patients and operation staffs, novel three-dimensional mapping systems such as Ensite NavX have been developed and implemented in electrophysiological procedure for the navigation of catheters inside the heart chambers.

Ensite NavX is a promising system to guide catheters inside the cardiac chambers and vessels without the use of fluoroscopy.

This study is intended to compare the feasibility, safety and efficacy of a zero-fluoroscopic approach with conventional fluoroscopic approach as performing catheter ablation of right atrial arrhythmias.

Being tested
Zero-fluoroscopy ablation, Conventional fluoroscopy ablation
Keywords
Fluoroscopy, Ablation, Three dimensional, Atrial arrhythmia, Radiation
Medical subject headings
Atrial Premature Complexes

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Zero-fluoroscopy ablationProcedure or surgery

    Catheter ablation will be performed under the guidance of one kind of three-dimensional navigation system and without fluoroscopic guidance.

  • Conventional fluoroscopy ablationProcedure or surgery

    Catheter ablation will be performed using fluoroscopy plus one kind of three-dimensional navigation system.

Study groups in NCT03151278
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Zero-fluoroscopy ablationExperimentalAtrial arrhythmias will be mapped and ablated under the guidance of three-dimensional mapping system without fluoroscopy.
Receives: Procedure: Zero-fluoroscopy ablation
Conventional fluoroscopy ablationActive comparatorAtrial arrhythmias will be mapped and ablated under fluoroscopic guidance plus three-dimensional mapping system.
Receives: Procedure: Conventional fluoroscopy ablation

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Total success rates

    The patients have no related arrhythias or recurrence during follow up.

    Measured: 3 months

Secondary outcomes (5)
  1. Total procedure time

    The patients have no related arrhythias or recurrence during follow up.

    Measured: during procedure

  2. Fluoroscopy time

    From skin puncture to withdrawal of all the catheters.

    Measured: during procedure

  3. Complications

    The patients have no related complications during follow up.

    Measured: 6 months

  4. Immediate success rate

    Electrophysiologic study shows success of ablation

    Measured: 24 hours

  5. Recurrence rate

    The patients have no related arrhythias or recurrence during follow up.

    Measured: 6 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted12 May 2017
  2. Study startJan 2011
  3. Primary completionDec 2017
  4. Study completionDec 2018

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Participant
Enrolment
212 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03151278
Sponsor's protocol ID
TJHCDD-ZF-RAA-20110131
Acronym
ZFA-RAA
Status last verified
Nov 2023
First submitted
11 May 2017
Last updated
24 Nov 2023
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Gelsomino S, La Meir M, Luca F, Lorusso R, Crudeli E, Vasquez L, Gensini GF, Maessen J. Treatment of lone atrial fibrillation: a look at the past, a view of the present and a glance at the future. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2012 Jun;41(6):1284-94. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezr222. Epub 2012 Jan 10.

    PubMed 22233800
  • Birnie D, Healey JS, Krahn AD, Ahmad K, Crystal E, Khaykin Y, Chauhan V, Philippon F, Exner D, Thibault B, Hruczkowski T, Nery P, Keren A, Redfearn D. Prevalence and risk factors for cervical and lumbar spondylosis in interventional electrophysiologists. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2011 Sep;22(9):957-60. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8167.2011.02041.x. Epub 2011 Mar 8.

    PubMed 21385267
  • Sra J, Krum D, Hare J, Okerlund D, Thompson H, Vass M, Schweitzer J, Olson E, Foley WD, Akhtar M. Feasibility and validation of registration of three-dimensional left atrial models derived from computed tomography with a noncontact cardiac mapping system. Heart Rhythm. 2005 Jan;2(1):55-63. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2004.10.035.

    PubMed 15851266
  • Oral H, Crawford T, Frederick M, Gadeela N, Wimmer A, Dey S, Sarrazin JF, Kuhne M, Chalfoun N, Wells D, Good E, Jongnarangsin K, Chugh A, Bogun F, Pelosi F Jr, Morady F. Inducibility of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation by isoproterenol and its relation to the mode of onset of atrial fibrillation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2008 May;19(5):466-70. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8167.2007.01089.x. Epub 2008 Feb 4.

    PubMed 18266669
  • Razminia M, Manankil MF, Eryazici PL, Arrieta-Garcia C, Wang T, D'Silva OJ, Lopez CS, Crystal GJ, Khan S, Stancu MM, Turner M, Anthony J, Zheutlin TA, Kehoe RF. Nonfluoroscopic catheter ablation of cardiac arrhythmias in adults: feasibility, safety, and efficacy. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2012 Oct;23(10):1078-86. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8167.2012.02344.x. Epub 2012 May 9.

    PubMed 22571735

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Zero-fluoroscopy ablation and Conventional fluoroscopy ablation in people with Atrial Arrhythmia and Atrial Premature Complexes, run by Tongji Hospital at 1 site in China.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 24 Nov 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Total success rates (time frame: 3 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03151278, which also lists 5 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 24 Nov 2023; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 29 Oct 2026.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in