Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary DiseasePhase 4INCOGNITONCT03152149
INvestigating COPD Outcomes, Genomics and Neutrophilic Inflammation With Tiotropium and Olodaterol
A Phase 4 study testing Tiotropium & olodaterol and fluticasone furoate & vilanterol in people with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, run by University of Dundee at 4 sites in United Kingdom.
Trial summary
This protocol describes a randomised controlled trial to test the hypothesis that 6 months of treatment with tiotropium and olodaterol will result in a reduction in bacterial load, an improvement in neutrophilic inflammation and clinical benefits compared with treatment with inhaled fluticasone furoate and vilanterol… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 40 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
- What is being tested?
- Tiotropium & olodaterol and fluticasone furoate & vilanterol
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 80 participants
- Where
- 4 sitesUnited Kingdom
- Study dates
- 1 Jun 2017to 26 Nov 2019
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 40 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Male and female patients aged > 40 years
- Current or ex-smokers having at least a 10 pack year smoking history
- A clinical diagnosis of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) made by a physician
- Post-bronchodilator Forced Expiratory Volume 1 (FEV1)/Forced Vital Capacity ratio at screening of <70%
- Moderate to Very Severe COPD (GOLD II-IV) according to consensus guidelines consisting of a post-bronchodilator FEV1 <80% predicted at screening.
- Currently treated with inhaled corticosteroids (with or without long acting bronchodilators) for at least 12 months prior to screening.
Show all 9Show fewer
- Able to perform all study procedures including spirometry and questionnaires with minimal assistance
- Blood eosinophil count less than 300 eosinophil cells per microlitre on bloods taken at screening.
- Able to produce a sputum sample at the baseline visit (either spontaneously or with nebulised saline induction)
Who cannot join
- Inability to give informed consent
- Asthma
- Acute Antibiotics within 28 days prior to screening
- Long term macrolide therapy if newly commenced in the past 3 months
- Current use of the following: roflumilast, ritonavir, itraconazole, telithromycin, or ketoconazole (or other strong CYP3A4 inhibitors).
- Systemic Immunosuppressive medication including current oral corticosteroids at a dose >5mg for >28 days.
Show all 16Show fewer
- Glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) below 30ml/min/1.73m2 or requiring dialysis. This will be determined at screening.
- Use of any investigational drugs within five times of the elimination half-life after the last study dose or within 30 days, whichever is longer.
- Known allergy, intolerance or contraindication to any of the study drugs
- Unstable co-morbidities (cardiovascular disease, active malignancy) which in the opinion of the investigator would make the patient unsuitable to be enrolled in the study
- An exacerbation of COPD occurring during the 28 days prior to screening requiring treatment with either oral corticosteroids or antibiotics.
- An exacerbation requiring treatment with antibiotics or corticosteroids between the screening and randomization visit
- Pregnancy or breast feeding
- Women of child bearing potential who are not practicing an acceptable method of contraception
- Long term oxygen therapy
- Lapp lactase deficiency, glucose-galactose malabsorption or another inherited disorder of galactose metabolism.
Trial locations and contacts
4 sites in 1 country.
United Kingdom4 sites
NHS Tayside
Dundee, DD1 9SY
NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde
Glasgow
Northumbria Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust
North Shields, NE29 8NH
Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust
Nottingham, NG7 2UH
About this study
This protocol describes a randomised controlled trial to test the hypothesis that 6 months of treatment with tiotropium and olodaterol will result in a reduction in bacterial load, an improvement in neutrophilic inflammation and clinical benefits compared with treatment with inhaled fluticasone furoate and vilanterol in patients with neutrophilic Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).
COPD is the third leading cause of death worldwide and a major cause of morbidity in the UK. Exacerbations drive disease progression and worsening quality of life and therefore prevention of exacerbations has been a major goal of treatment.
Read more
In recent years, attempts have been made to phenotype COPD patients in order to target therapies to the correct groups of patients that will benefit. Inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) are primarily effective for patients with eosinophilic inflammation, while there are few established therapies for patients with neutrophilic disease. In recent years, all ICS preparations have been associated with a significant increased risk of pneumonia and this risk appears to be greatest in patients with non-eosinophilic inflammation. Combined treatment with long acting beta-agonists (LABA) and long acting muscarinic antagonists (LAMA) combinations appears to be a safer and more effective alternative for patients with non-eosinophilic disease. The combination of tiotropium and olodaterol in particular, has strong preclinical data supporting beneficial effects on neutrophilic inflammation.
The trial is a multi-centre randomised open label controlled parallel group study with two treatment arms in 80 participants. Moderate to very severe COPD patients and currently treated with inhaled corticosteroid therapy will be randomised to treatment with either the combination of tiotropium and olodaterol (LABA/LAMA) or fluticasone furoate and vilanterol (ICS/LABA). Participants will return at 1 month, 2 months, 3 months and 6 months for sampling of the lower airway by sputum samples and the upper airway using oropharyngeal and nasopharyngeal swabs. Sputum will be used to test for airway neutrophilic inflammation.
This study will make an important contribution to understanding "phenotyping" in COPD by identifying whether the combination of tiotropium and olodaterol improves airway bacterial load and restores neutrophil function in patients with neutrophilic COPD.
Read the detailed description
BACKGROUND Inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) are commonly prescribed for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), but their role in the management of COPD is currently being re-evaluated in light of new evidence and the emergence of alternative treatments. Recent concerns have been expressed about the safety of ICS in COPD following several randomized controlled trials of fluticasone propionate and fluticasone furoate demonstrating an increase in rates of pneumonia as an adverse event. Several systematic reviews and observational studies confirm an association between ICS use and risk of pneumonia.
A series of post-hoc analyses of large randomized controlled trials of ICS/ long acting beta-agonists (LABA) or ICS alone have suggested that benefits of ICS in terms of exacerbation reduction and preventing lung function decline are limited to a subgroup of patients with eosinophilic airway inflammation. Eosinophils are highly sensitive to ICS, and so there is a compelling rationale for this association, and therefore an emerging consensus that ICS should be reserved for those patients with eosinophilic disease. This can be identified on the basis of blood eosinophil count although the precise cut-off is yet to be determined. This is strongly supported by a post-hoc analysis of the WISDOM randomized controlled trial of ICS withdrawal in which ICS withdrawal was only associated with an increase in exacerbations above blood eosinophil counts of 300 cells per ul. Furthermore in the FLAME study which excluded patients with very high eosinophils counts, LABA/long acting muscarinic antagonists (LAMA) was superior to ICS/LABA in terms of reducing exacerbations.
If there is an emerging consensus regarding the treatment of "eosinophilic COPD", then the unmet need in the management of COPD is for the majority of patients that have neutrophilic airway inflammation. Neutrophilic inflammation does not respond to inhaled corticosteroids and indeed there is in-vitro evidence that inhaled corticosteroids may exacerbate neutrophilic inflammation by delaying neutrophil apoptosis. Neutrophilic inflammation is associated with disordering of the lung microbiome with overgrowth of Proteobacteria, a process that may be exacerbated by ICS. Release of proteolytic enzymes such as elastase and matrix metalloproteinase from neutrophils are associated with disease progression and lung function decline in COPD.
RATIONALE FOR STUDY It is hypothesised that the combination of tiotropium and olodaterol may be an ideal treatment option for patients with neutrophilic COPD because
- Tiotropium and olodaterol have both been shown to have potentially beneficial effects in suppressing neutrophilic inflammation without impairing bacterial killing
- These effects may reverse the detrimental impact of inhaled corticosteroids on airway neutrophil function and the microbiome.
In particular olodaterol was evaluated in cigarette smoke- and Lipolpolysaccharide - induced- models of neutrophil lung inflammation in mice and guinea pigs. The results showed Olodaterol to suppress neutrophil recruitment to the lung (by up to 90%) while preserving chemotactic function (which is required for effective phagocytosis of pathogens). Tiotropium has also been extensively investigated and is known to suppress neutrophil recruitment and neutrophil dependent remodelling in a number of in-vivo models and may work synergistically with olodaterol in reducing neutrophil retention in the lung.
This extensive preclinical work justifies a study of olodaterol/tiotropium in human subjects evaluating its impact on neutrophilic inflammation. This could establish the combination of olodaterol/tiotropium as the first line therapy for patients with neutrophilic COPD.
This trial will compare treatment of patients with COPD previously treated with ICS randomized to either tiotropium/olodaterol combination or fluticasone furoate/vilanterol combination. The objective of the trial is to evaluate in-vivo effects of these drugs on the lung microbiota and airway neutrophil function. In particular, we expect that 6 months treatment with olodaterol/tiotropium will result in a reduced airway bacterial load (through restored neutrophil function allowing neutrophils to kill airway bacteria), an increase in microbiota diversity, an enhanced ex-vivo killing of Haemophilus influenzae and reduced markers of neutrophilic airway inflammation.
HYPOTHESIS Tiotropium and olodaterol combination treatment will result in a reduced airway bacterial load at 6 months compared to fluticasone furoate and vilanterol. The reduced bacterial load will be associated with improvements in the airway microbiota and reduced markers of neutrophilic inflammation and restored neutrophil function.
- Conditions
- Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
- Being tested
- Tiotropium & olodaterol, fluticasone furoate & vilanterol
- Keywords
- Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
- Medical subject headings
- Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Tiotropium & olodaterolDrug
Also called Spiolto Respimat
Spiolto Respimat (Tiotropium 2.5 micrograms,olodaterol 2.5 micrograms) 2 puffs once daily for 6 months
fluticasone furoate & vilanterolDrug
Also called Relvar Ellipta
Relvar Ellipta (fluticasone furoate 92 micrograms, vilanterol 22 micrograms) 1 puff once per day for 6 months
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| 1. Spiolto Respimat | Active comparator | Spiolto Respimat (Tiotropium 2.5 micrograms,olodaterol 2.5 micrograms) 2 puffs once daily for 6 months Receives: Drug: Tiotropium & olodaterol |
| 2. Relvar Ellipta | Active comparator | Relvar Ellipta (fluticasone furoate 92 micrograms, vilanterol 22 micrograms) 1 puff once per day for 6 months Receives: Drug: fluticasone furoate & vilanterol |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change in bacterial load of total bacteria determined by quantitative polymerase chain reaction
To determine the effects of the Tiotropium and olodaterol combination vs fluticasone furoate and vilanterol on airway bacterial load from sputum
Measured: From baseline to 1, 2, 3 and 6 months
Secondary outcomes (4)
Change in bacterial community composition determined by 16S microbiome sequencing as measured by the Shannon Diversity index.
To determine the effects of the Tiotropium and olodaterol combination vs fluticasone furoate and vilanterol on the airway microbiota. Microbiota will be characterised in sputum, oropharyngeal swabs and nasopharyngeal swabs
Measured: From baseline to 1, 2, 3 and 6 months
Sputum neutrophil elastase activity determined using an activity based immunoassay
To determine the effects of the Tiotropium and olodaterol combination vs fluticasone furoate and vilanterol on sputum neutrophil elastase activity
Measured: From baseline to 1, 2, 3 and 6 months
Change in sputum neutrophil extracellular traps determined using a validated ELISA
To determine the effects of the Tiotropium and olodaterol combination vs fluticasone furoate and vilanterol on concentration sputum neutrophil extracellular traps
Measured: From baseline to 1, 2, 3 and 6 months
Change in sputum cytokines and inflammatory markers including but not limited to CXCL-8, IL17, IL-1beta, resistin, IL13
To determine the effects of the Tiotropium and olodaterol combination vs fluticasone furoate and vilanterol on sputum cytokines and inflammatory markers
Measured: From baseline to 1, 2, 3 and 6 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted12 May 2017
- Study start1 Jun 2017
- Primary completion26 Nov 2019
- Study completion26 Nov 2019
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary DiseaseStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Basic science
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 80 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Dundee
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Boehringer Ingelheim, NHS Tayside
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- James Chalmers, MBChB, MRCP, Principal investigator, University of Dundee
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03152149
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2016RC22
- Other IDs
- 2016-004473-41, 2016
- Acronym
- INCOGNITO
- Status last verified
- Jul 2020
- First submitted
- 1 May 2017
- Last updated
- 20 Jul 2020
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 20 Jul 2020. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- INvestigating COPD Outcomes, Genomics and Neutrophilic Inflammation With Tiotropium and Olodaterol
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03152149
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- INCOGNITO / 2016RC22
- Conditions
- Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
- Keywords
- Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 80 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of DundeeUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Boehringer Ingelheim, NHS Tayside
- Study start
- 1 Jun 2017 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 26 Nov 2019 (actual)
- Study completion
- 26 Nov 2019 (actual)
- First posted
- 12 May 2017 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This protocol describes a randomised controlled trial to test the hypothesis that 6 months of treatment with tiotropium and olodaterol will result in a reduction in bacterial load, an improvement in neutrophilic inflammation and clinical benefits compared with treatment with inhaled fluticasone furoate and vilanterol in patients with neutrophilic Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).
COPD is the third leading cause of death worldwide and a major cause of morbidity in the UK. Exacerbations drive disease progression and worsening quality of life and therefore prevention of exacerbations has been a major goal of treatment.
In recent years, attempts have been made to phenotype COPD patients in order to target therapies to the correct groups of patients that will benefit. Inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) are primarily effective for patients with eosinophilic inflammation, while there are few established therapies for patients with neutrophilic disease. In recent years, all ICS preparations have been associated with a significant increased risk of pneumonia and this risk appears to be greatest in patients with non-eosinophilic inflammation. Combined treatment with long acting beta-agonists (LABA) and long acting muscarinic antagonists (LAMA) combinations appears to be a safer and more effective alternative for patients with non-eosinophilic disease. The combination of tiotropium and olodaterol in particular, has strong preclinical data supporting beneficial effects on neutrophilic inflammation.
The trial is a multi-centre randomised open label controlled parallel group study with two treatment arms in 80 participants. Moderate to very severe COPD patients and currently treated with inhaled corticosteroid therapy will be randomised to treatment with either the combination of tiotropium and olodaterol (LABA/LAMA) or fluticasone furoate and vilanterol (ICS/LABA). Participants will return at 1 month, 2 months, 3 months and 6 months for sampling of the lower airway by sputum samples and the upper airway using oropharyngeal and nasopharyngeal swabs. Sputum will be used to test for airway neutrophilic inflammation.
This study will make an important contribution to understanding "phenotyping" in COPD by identifying whether the combination of tiotropium and olodaterol improves airway bacterial load and restores neutrophil function in patients with neutrophilic COPD.
Detailed description
BACKGROUND Inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) are commonly prescribed for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), but their role in the management of COPD is currently being re-evaluated in light of new evidence and the emergence of alternative treatments. Recent concerns have been expressed about the safety of ICS in COPD following several randomized controlled trials of fluticasone propionate and fluticasone furoate demonstrating an increase in rates of pneumonia as an adverse event. Several systematic reviews and observational studies confirm an association between ICS use and risk of pneumonia.
A series of post-hoc analyses of large randomized controlled trials of ICS/ long acting beta-agonists (LABA) or ICS alone have suggested that benefits of ICS in terms of exacerbation reduction and preventing lung function decline are limited to a subgroup of patients with eosinophilic airway inflammation. Eosinophils are highly sensitive to ICS, and so there is a compelling rationale for this association, and therefore an emerging consensus that ICS should be reserved for those patients with eosinophilic disease. This can be identified on the basis of blood eosinophil count although the precise cut-off is yet to be determined. This is strongly supported by a post-hoc analysis of the WISDOM randomized controlled trial of ICS withdrawal in which ICS withdrawal was only associated with an increase in exacerbations above blood eosinophil counts of 300 cells per ul. Furthermore in the FLAME study which excluded patients with very high eosinophils counts, LABA/long acting muscarinic antagonists (LAMA) was superior to ICS/LABA in terms of reducing exacerbations.
If there is an emerging consensus regarding the treatment of "eosinophilic COPD", then the unmet need in the management of COPD is for the majority of patients that have neutrophilic airway inflammation. Neutrophilic inflammation does not respond to inhaled corticosteroids and indeed there is in-vitro evidence that inhaled corticosteroids may exacerbate neutrophilic inflammation by delaying neutrophil apoptosis. Neutrophilic inflammation is associated with disordering of the lung microbiome with overgrowth of Proteobacteria, a process that may be exacerbated by ICS. Release of proteolytic enzymes such as elastase and matrix metalloproteinase from neutrophils are associated with disease progression and lung function decline in COPD.
RATIONALE FOR STUDY It is hypothesised that the combination of tiotropium and olodaterol may be an ideal treatment option for patients with neutrophilic COPD because
- Tiotropium and olodaterol have both been shown to have potentially beneficial effects in suppressing neutrophilic inflammation without impairing bacterial killing
- These effects may reverse the detrimental impact of inhaled corticosteroids on airway neutrophil function and the microbiome.
In particular olodaterol was evaluated in cigarette smoke- and Lipolpolysaccharide - induced- models of neutrophil lung inflammation in mice and guinea pigs. The results showed Olodaterol to suppress neutrophil recruitment to the lung (by up to 90%) while preserving chemotactic function (which is required for effective phagocytosis of pathogens). Tiotropium has also been extensively investigated and is known to suppress neutrophil recruitment and neutrophil dependent remodelling in a number of in-vivo models and may work synergistically with olodaterol in reducing neutrophil retention in the lung.
This extensive preclinical work justifies a study of olodaterol/tiotropium in human subjects evaluating its impact on neutrophilic inflammation. This could establish the combination of olodaterol/tiotropium as the first line therapy for patients with neutrophilic COPD.
This trial will compare treatment of patients with COPD previously treated with ICS randomized to either tiotropium/olodaterol combination or fluticasone furoate/vilanterol combination. The objective of the trial is to evaluate in-vivo effects of these drugs on the lung microbiota and airway neutrophil function. In particular, we expect that 6 months treatment with olodaterol/tiotropium will result in a reduced airway bacterial load (through restored neutrophil function allowing neutrophils to kill airway bacteria), an increase in microbiota diversity, an enhanced ex-vivo killing of Haemophilus influenzae and reduced markers of neutrophilic airway inflammation.
HYPOTHESIS Tiotropium and olodaterol combination treatment will result in a reduced airway bacterial load at 6 months compared to fluticasone furoate and vilanterol. The reduced bacterial load will be associated with improvements in the airway microbiota and reduced markers of neutrophilic inflammation and restored neutrophil function.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Basic science
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| 1. Spiolto Respimat | Active comparator | Drug: Tiotropium & olodaterolSpiolto Respimat (Tiotropium 2.5 micrograms,olodaterol 2.5 micrograms) 2 puffs once daily for 6 months |
| 2. Relvar Ellipta | Active comparator | Drug: fluticasone furoate & vilanterolRelvar Ellipta (fluticasone furoate 92 micrograms, vilanterol 22 micrograms) 1 puff once per day for 6 months |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 40 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (9 listed)
- Male and female patients aged > 40 years
- Current or ex-smokers having at least a 10 pack year smoking history
- A clinical diagnosis of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) made by a physician
- Post-bronchodilator Forced Expiratory Volume 1 (FEV1)/Forced Vital Capacity ratio at screening of <70%
- Moderate to Very Severe COPD (GOLD II-IV) according to consensus guidelines consisting of a post-bronchodilator FEV1 <80% predicted at screening.
Key exclusion criteria (16 listed)
- Inability to give informed consent
- Asthma
- Acute Antibiotics within 28 days prior to screening
- Long term macrolide therapy if newly commenced in the past 3 months
- Current use of the following: roflumilast, ritonavir, itraconazole, telithromycin, or ketoconazole (or other strong CYP3A4 inhibitors).
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Tiotropium & olodaterolAlso: Spiolto RespimatSpiolto Respimat (Tiotropium 2.5 micrograms,olodaterol 2.5 micrograms) 2 puffs once daily for 6 months | Drug | 1. Spiolto Respimat |
| fluticasone furoate & vilanterolAlso: Relvar ElliptaRelvar Ellipta (fluticasone furoate 92 micrograms, vilanterol 22 micrograms) 1 puff once per day for 6 months | Drug | 2. Relvar Ellipta |
Primary outcome
Change in bacterial load of total bacteria determined by quantitative polymerase chain reaction
Time frame: From baseline to 1, 2, 3 and 6 months
To determine the effects of the Tiotropium and olodaterol combination vs fluticasone furoate and vilanterol on airway bacterial load from sputum
4 secondary outcomes
Change in bacterial community composition determined by 16S microbiome sequencing as measured by the Shannon Diversity index.
Time frame: From baseline to 1, 2, 3 and 6 months
Sputum neutrophil elastase activity determined using an activity based immunoassay
Time frame: From baseline to 1, 2, 3 and 6 months
Change in sputum neutrophil extracellular traps determined using a validated ELISA
Time frame: From baseline to 1, 2, 3 and 6 months
Change in sputum cytokines and inflammatory markers including but not limited to CXCL-8, IL17, IL-1beta, resistin, IL13
Time frame: From baseline to 1, 2, 3 and 6 months
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 20 Jul 2020.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
Active, not recruiting
Symptoms and Functions in Patients With COPD and Chronic Bronchitis Switching From CIG to THS
COPD, Smoking
Not yet recruitingPhase 2/3
An Open-Label Extension Study to Evaluate Inhaled Treprostinil SMI in Participants With Pulmonary Hypertension Associated With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (PH-COPD)
Pulmonary Hypertension Associated With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
Not yet recruiting
The Aim of the Study is to Decipher the Alterations in Signalling Pathways of Skeletal Muscle Stem Cells (Satellite Cells (SCs)) in Individuals With COPD, as Well as to Examine the Effect of Exercise Training on SCs.
COPD (Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease), Sarcopenia in Elderly
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Study of Treprostinil Administered Via Soft Mist Inhaler (SMI) in Participants With Pulmonary Hypertension Associated With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (PH-COPD)
Pulmonary Hypertension Associated With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study to Investigate the Efficacy and Safety of Belumosudil Compared With Best Available Therapy in Participants Aged 12 Years or Older With Chronic Graft-versus-host Disease
Chronic Graft Versus Host Disease
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
James Chalmers, MBChB, MRCP principal investigator
University of Dundee
4 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing Tiotropium & olodaterol and fluticasone furoate & vilanterol in people with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, run by University of Dundee at 4 sites in United Kingdom.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 9 inclusion and 16 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 20 Jul 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 4 sites in United Kingdom. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change in bacterial load of total bacteria determined by quantitative polymerase chain reaction (time frame: From baseline to 1, 2, 3 and 6 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 20 Jul 2020.