CancerNCT03154671
Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment and Management for Canadian Elders With Cancer
A study testing Geriatric assessment and management in people with Cancer, run by University of Toronto at 2 sites in Canada.
Trial summary
A multicentre two-group parallel single-blind (outcome assessor) randomized controlled trial (RCT). A cost effectiveness study alongside a clinical trial using a payer and societal perspective to study the cost-effectiveness of geriatric assessment and management compared to usual care will be conducted. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 70 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Cancer
- What is being tested?
- Geriatric assessment and management
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 351 participants
- Where
- 2 sitesCanada
- Study dates
- 10 Apr 2018to 1 Apr 2021
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 70 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients aged 70+ with any solid tumor (excluding pancreatic) or lymphoma/myeloma referred for first/second line adjuvant/curative or palliative chemotherapy (cannot have received more than 1 cycle),
- Able to speak English/French,
- Have a physician-estimated life expectancy >6 months,
- Have an ECOG Performance Score 0-2 (indicating participants are ambulatory and able to complete all self-care activities),
- Able to give informed consent.
Who cannot join
- Receiving palliative care services upon recruitment
- Already participating in another psychosocial/educational intervention study (new treatment study is allowed if the participants would like to participate in 2 studies)
Trial locations and contacts
2 sites in 1 country.
Canada2 sites
Lakeridge Health
Oshawa, Ontario, L1G 2B9
Princess Margaret Cancer Centre
Toronto, Ontario, M5T 2M9
About this study
Official title: Clinical and Cost-effectiveness of a Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment and Management for Canadian Elders With Cancer: the 5C Study
A multicentre two-group parallel single-blind (outcome assessor) randomized controlled trial (RCT). A cost effectiveness study alongside a clinical trial using a payer and societal perspective to study the cost-effectiveness of geriatric assessment and management compared to usual care will be conducted.
Participants allocated to the control group will receive usual oncology care. Participants allocated to the intervention group will receive a comprehensive geriatric assessment and management in addition to their usual oncology care. The intervention will take 6 months to be completed. Total study follow-up will be 12 months for each participant.
- Conditions
- Cancer
- Being tested
- Geriatric assessment and management
- Keywords
- older adult;, comprehensive geriatric assessment, chemotherapy, integrated care, randomized controlled trial
- Medical subject headings
- Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Geriatric assessment and managementOther
Each participant will receive a comprehensive geriatric assessment at baseline. Based on the issues identified, a tailored care plan will be developed with the participant to address the issues identified.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention group | Experimental | At study enrollment participants allocated to the intervention arm will complete a comprehensive geriatric assessment with the study intervention team (nurse and physician). Based on these findings a care plan tailored to the needs of the older adult with cancer will be developed and implemented. The study intervention nurse will call the participant at least monthly to follow up and evaluate the care (e.g. whether adjustments are required) and more if needed. All participants will receive a monthly healthy aging newsletter. Receives: Other: Geriatric assessment and management |
| Control group | No intervention | The participant will receive usual care from their treating oncology team. All participants will receive a monthly healthy aging newsletter. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Quality of Life questionnaire (QLQ) C30 Questionnaire Global quality of Life scale
Quality of Life questionnaire (QLQ) C30 Questionnaire Global quality of Life scale
Measured: 6 months
Quality of Life questionnaire (QLQ) C30 Questionnaire Global quality of Life scale
Quality of Life questionnaire (QLQ) C30 Questionnaire Global quality of Life scale
Measured: 12 months
Secondary outcomes (11)
Cost-effectiveness
Cost-effectiveness will be determined alongside the clinical trial following standard guidelines. 2 methods to collect data needed for the cost-effectiveness analyses: 1) EQ-5D-5L and 2) patient health care use diaries
Measured: 12 months
Functional status
Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (OARS IADL questionnaire)
Measured: 6 months
Functional status
Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (OARS IADL questionnaire)
Measured: 12 months
The number of geriatric issues successfully addressed for participants in intervention group
The number of referrals/recommendations made to the participant and the number implemented by the participant
Measured: 6 months
Treatment toxicity
Grade 3-5 chemotherapy treatment toxicity using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v4.0 (CTCAE)[12] and treatment completion rate (number of cycles received) will be abstracted from the medical chart
Measured: 6 months
Unplanned health care use
Unplanned hospitalization and emergency department visits abstracted from patient diary and medical chart
Measured: 6 months
Satisfaction with care provided
Older adult and medical oncologists will be asked to rate their satisfaction with the intervention
Measured: 6 months
Satisfaction with intervention
Older adult and medical oncologists will be asked to rate their satisfaction with the intervention
Measured: 12 months
Cancer treatment plan modification
Whether the medical oncologist changed the treatment plan after receiving the geriatric assessment results
Measured: 3 months
Overall survival
Overall survival will be abstracted from the medical chart
Measured: 12 months
Intervention fidelity by treatment centre
A detailed process evaluation looking at the implementation of the intervention by centre will be conducted
Measured: 12 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted16 May 2017
- Study start10 Apr 2018
- Primary completion1 Apr 2021
- Study completion1 Apr 2021
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (3)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of TorontoThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 351 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Toronto
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- University Health Network, Toronto, The Ottawa Hospital, Sir Mortimer B. Davis - Jewish General Hospital, R.S. McLaughlin Durham Cancer Centre, Lakeridge Health, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Fraser Health, Mount Sinai Hospital, Canada
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Martine Puts, University of Toronto
- Investigators
- Martine Puts, RN PhD, Principal investigator, University of Toronto
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03154671
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 705046
- Status last verified
- May 2022
- First submitted
- 10 May 2017
- Last updated
- 20 May 2022
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Habib MH, Alibhai SMH, Puts M. How representative are participants in geriatric oncology clinical trials? The case of the 5C RCT in geriatric oncology: A cross-sectional comparison to a geriatric oncology clinic. J Geriatr Oncol. 2024 Mar;15(2):101703. doi: 10.1016/j.jgo.2024.101703. Epub 2024 Jan 15.
PubMed 38228054Puts M, Alqurini N, Strohschein F, Koneru R, Szumacher E, Mariano C, Monette J, Hsu T, Brennenstuhl S, McLean B, Wills A, Berger A, Amir E, Romanovsky L, Li A, Mehta R, Krzyzanowska M, Elser C, Jang R, Prica A, Wan-Chow-Wah D, Pitters E, Emmenegger U, Menjak IB, Bergman S, Lemonde M, Breunis H, Beland F, Alibhai SMH. Impact of Geriatric Assessment and Management on Quality of Life, Unplanned Hospitalizations, Toxicity, and Survival for Older Adults With Cancer: The Randomized 5C Trial. J Clin Oncol. 2023 Feb 1;41(4):847-858. doi: 10.1200/JCO.22.01007. Epub 2022 Dec 6.
PubMed 36473126Puts MTE, Hsu T, Mariano C, Monette J, Brennenstuhl S, Pitters E, Ray J, Wan-Chow-Wah D, Kozlowski N, Krzyzanowska M, Amir E, Elser C, Jang R, Prica A, Krahn M, Beland F, Bergman S, Koneru R, Lemonde M, Szumacher E, Zidulka J, Fung S, Li A, Emmenegger U, Mehta R, Flemming K, Breunis H, Alibhai SMH. Clinical and Cost-effectiveness of a Comprehensive geriatric assessment and management for Canadian elders with Cancer-the 5C study: a study protocol for a randomised controlled phase III trial. BMJ Open. 2019 May 10;9(5):e024485. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024485.
PubMed 31079079
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 20 May 2022. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Clinical and Cost-effectiveness of a Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment and Management for Canadian Elders With Cancer: the 5C Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03154671
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 705046
- Conditions
- Cancer
- Keywords
- older adult;, comprehensive geriatric assessment, chemotherapy, integrated care, randomized controlled trial
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 351 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of TorontoUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- University Health Network, Toronto, The Ottawa Hospital, Sir Mortimer B. Davis - Jewish General Hospital, R.S. McLaughlin Durham Cancer Centre, Lakeridge Health, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Fraser Health, Mount Sinai Hospital, Canada
- Study start
- 10 Apr 2018 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Apr 2021 (actual)
- Study completion
- 1 Apr 2021 (actual)
- First posted
- 16 May 2017 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
A multicentre two-group parallel single-blind (outcome assessor) randomized controlled trial (RCT). A cost effectiveness study alongside a clinical trial using a payer and societal perspective to study the cost-effectiveness of geriatric assessment and management compared to usual care will be conducted.
Participants allocated to the control group will receive usual oncology care. Participants allocated to the intervention group will receive a comprehensive geriatric assessment and management in addition to their usual oncology care. The intervention will take 6 months to be completed. Total study follow-up will be 12 months for each participant.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention group | Experimental | Other: Geriatric assessment and managementAt study enrollment participants allocated to the intervention arm will complete a comprehensive geriatric assessment with the study intervention team (nurse and physician). Based on these findings a care plan tailored to the needs of the older adult with cancer will be developed and implemented. The study intervention nurse will call the participant at least monthly to follow up and evaluate the care (e.g. whether adjustments are required) and more if needed. All participants will receive a monthly healthy aging newsletter. |
| Control group | No intervention | –The participant will receive usual care from their treating oncology team. All participants will receive a monthly healthy aging newsletter. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 70 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Patients aged 70+ with any solid tumor (excluding pancreatic) or lymphoma/myeloma referred for first/second line adjuvant/curative or palliative chemotherapy (cannot have received more than 1 cycle),
- Able to speak English/French,
- Have a physician-estimated life expectancy >6 months,
- Have an ECOG Performance Score 0-2 (indicating participants are ambulatory and able to complete all self-care activities),
- Able to give informed consent.
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Receiving palliative care services upon recruitment
- Already participating in another psychosocial/educational intervention study (new treatment study is allowed if the participants would like to participate in 2 studies)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Geriatric assessment and managementEach participant will receive a comprehensive geriatric assessment at baseline. Based on the issues identified, a tailored care plan will be developed with the participant to address the issues identified. | Other | Intervention group |
Primary outcome
Quality of Life questionnaire (QLQ) C30 Questionnaire Global quality of Life scale
Time frame: 6 months
Quality of Life questionnaire (QLQ) C30 Questionnaire Global quality of Life scale
Quality of Life questionnaire (QLQ) C30 Questionnaire Global quality of Life scale
Time frame: 12 months
Quality of Life questionnaire (QLQ) C30 Questionnaire Global quality of Life scale
11 secondary outcomes
Cost-effectiveness
Time frame: 12 months
Functional status
Time frame: 6 months
Functional status
Time frame: 12 months
The number of geriatric issues successfully addressed for participants in intervention group
Time frame: 6 months
Treatment toxicity
Time frame: 6 months
Unplanned health care use
Time frame: 6 months
Satisfaction with care provided
Time frame: 6 months
Satisfaction with intervention
Time frame: 12 months
Cancer treatment plan modification
Time frame: 3 months
Overall survival
Time frame: 12 months
Intervention fidelity by treatment centre
Time frame: 12 months
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 20 May 2022.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 38228054Habib MH, Alibhai SMH, Puts M. How representative are participants in geriatric oncology clinical trials? The case of the 5C RCT in geriatric oncology: A cross-sectional comparison to a geriatric oncology clinic. J Geriatr Oncol. 2024 Mar;15(2):101703. doi: 10.1016/j.jgo.2024.101703. Epub 2024 Jan 15.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 36473126Puts M, Alqurini N, Strohschein F, Koneru R, Szumacher E, Mariano C, Monette J, Hsu T, Brennenstuhl S, McLean B, Wills A, Berger A, Amir E, Romanovsky L, Li A, Mehta R, Krzyzanowska M, Elser C, Jang R, Prica A, Wan-Chow-Wah D, Pitters E, Emmenegger U, Menjak IB, Bergman S, Lemonde M, Breunis H, Beland F, Alibhai SMH. Impact of Geriatric Assessment and Management on Quality of Life, Unplanned Hospitalizations, Toxicity, and Survival for Older Adults With Cancer: The Randomized 5C Trial. J Clin Oncol. 2023 Feb 1;41(4):847-858. doi: 10.1200/JCO.22.01007. Epub 2022 Dec 6.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 31079079Puts MTE, Hsu T, Mariano C, Monette J, Brennenstuhl S, Pitters E, Ray J, Wan-Chow-Wah D, Kozlowski N, Krzyzanowska M, Amir E, Elser C, Jang R, Prica A, Krahn M, Beland F, Bergman S, Koneru R, Lemonde M, Szumacher E, Zidulka J, Fung S, Li A, Emmenegger U, Mehta R, Flemming K, Breunis H, Alibhai SMH. Clinical and Cost-effectiveness of a Comprehensive geriatric assessment and management for Canadian elders with Cancer-the 5C study: a study protocol for a randomised controlled phase III trial. BMJ Open. 2019 May 10;9(5):e024485. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024485.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Cancer
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
Hepatic Artery Infusion of Carfilzomib in Participants With Liver Metastatic Disease Previously Treated With Hepatic Artery Infusion Pump Therapy
Colorectal Neoplasms, Neoplasms
RecruitingPhase 2
Tafasitamab With Acalabrutinib and Venetoclax for the Treatment of Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia/Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma
Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia/Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma
Active, not recruitingPhase 1/2
Selumetinib in Treating Young Patients With Recurrent or Refractory Low Grade Glioma
Low Grade Glioma, Recurrent Childhood Pilocytic Astrocytoma
Enrolling by invitationPhase 2
A Single-Arm Study of Nimotuzumab Combined With NALIRIFOX as First-Line Treatment for Pancreatic Cancer
Pancreatic Cancer Metastatic
Recruiting
Methylation Profiling in Self-Samples for Identification of (Epi)Genetic Biomarkers for Gynecological Cancers
Gynaecological Cancers, Ovarian Cancer
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Martine Puts, RN PhD principal investigator
University of Toronto
2 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Geriatric assessment and management in people with Cancer, run by University of Toronto at 2 sites in Canada.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 20 May 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 2 sites in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Quality of Life questionnaire (QLQ) C30 Questionnaire Global quality of Life scale (time frame: 6 months). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03154671, which also lists 3 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 20 May 2022.