AnesthesiaInprove4largeNCT03157479
Intraoperative Protective Ventilation for Obese Patients Undergoing Gynaecological Laparoscopic Surgery
A study testing Intravenous anesthetic, Crystalloid Solutions and Esophageal pressure measurement in people with Anesthesia and Surgery--Complications, run by Catholic University of the Sacred Heart at 1 site in Italy.
Trial summary
Background. The use of a comprehensive strategy providing low tidal volumes, peep and recruiting maneuvers in patients undergoing open abdominal surgery improves postoperative respiratory function and clinical outcome. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older, women only
- Conditions the study is for
- Anesthesia, Surgery--Complications
- What is being tested?
- Intravenous anesthetic, Crystalloid Solutions and Esophageal pressure measurement
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 60 participants
- Where
- 1 siteItaly
- Study dates
- 1 May 2017to 31 Mar 2019
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- Women only
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- scheduled for gynaecological laparoscopic surgery in the Trendelenburg position
- Obesity with body mass index>35 kg/m^2
- written informed consent
Who cannot join
- Clinical history or signs of chronic heart failure
- history of neuromuscular disease
- history of thoracic surgery
- pregnancy
- chronic respiratory failure requiring long-term oxygen administration
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Intraoperative Protective Ventilation for Obese Patients Undergoing Gynaecological Laparoscopic Surgery. A Single-centre Randomized, Controlled Trial
Background. The use of a comprehensive strategy providing low tidal volumes, peep and recruiting maneuvers in patients undergoing open abdominal surgery improves postoperative respiratory function and clinical outcome. It is unknown whether such ventilatory approach may be feasible and/or beneficial in patients undergoing laparoscopy, as pneumoperitoneum and Trendelenburg position may alter lung volumes and chest-wall elastance.
Objective. The investigators designed a randomized, controlled trial to assess the effect of a lung-protective ventilation strategy on postoperative oxygenation in obese patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery.
- Conditions
- Anesthesia, Surgery--Complications
- Being tested
- Intravenous anesthetic, Crystalloid Solutions, Esophageal pressure measurement, Lung volume measurement with the nitrogen washin-washout technique
- Keywords
- Mechanical ventilation
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Intravenous anestheticDrug
Anaesthesia induction will be obtained with i.v. 2-3 mg/kg propofol, 0,6-0,8 mcg/kg fentanyl, and 0.9-1,2 mg/kg rocuronium. Anaesthesia will be maintained with i.v. propofol continuous infusion, with a dose titrated to achieve a bi-spectral index value between 40 and 50
Crystalloid SolutionsDrug
Balanced crystalloids will be administered to patients in both groups as a standard rate of 3-5 ml/kg/h. Treatment of eventual hemodynamic instability will be left to the attending physician
Esophageal pressure measurementDiagnostic test
A nasogastric polyfunctional tube (Nutrivent, Sidam, Italy) will be placed after anaesthesia induction in all enrolled patients to measure esophageal pressure, estimate pleural pressure and compute transpulmonary pressure
Lung volume measurement with the nitrogen washin-washout techniqueDiagnostic test
Lung volume will be measured through nitrogen wash-in wash-out technique and low-flow Pressure-volume curve will be recorded to estimate differences in alveolar recruitment between the two study groups.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Protective ventilation | Experimental | Volume controlled ventilation with tidal volume 6-7 ml/kg of predicted body weight (45.5 + 0.91 (height [cm] -152.4)), FiO2 0.4 and PEEP 10 cmH2O during the whole study period. Respiratory rate will be titrated to keep end-tidal CO2 values between 30 and 40 mmHg. I:E ratio will be set in order to obtain an inspiratory time of 0.8 seconds and an inspiratory pause of 0.3 seconds and FiO2 will be kept unchanged during the whole study period. In patients in this group, recruiting maneuvers will be performed throughout a stepwise 5 cmH2O PEEP increase every 30 seconds to achieve a PEEP of 35 cmH2O during Pressure Controlled Ventilation (10 cmH2O of inspiratory pressure while keeping respiratory rate unmodified), followed by a stepwise 5 cmH2O PEEP reduction every 30 seconds until the baseline set peep is reached. Receives: Drug: Intravenous anesthetic; Drug: Crystalloid Solutions; Diagnostic Test: Esophageal pressure measurement; Diagnostic Test: Lung volume measurement with the nitrogen washin-washout technique |
| Standard Ventilation | Active comparator | Volume controlled ventilation with tidal volume 10 ml/kg of PBW (45.5 + 0.91 (height [cm] -152.4)), FiO2 0.4 and PEEP 5 cmH2O during the whole study period. Respiratory rate will be titrated to keep end-tidal CO2 values between 30 mmHg and 40 mmHg. I:E ratio will be set in order to obtain an inspiratory time of 0.8-1 seconds and an inspiratory pause of 0.3 second Receives: Drug: Intravenous anesthetic; Drug: Crystalloid Solutions; Diagnostic Test: Esophageal pressure measurement; Diagnostic Test: Lung volume measurement with the nitrogen washin-washout technique |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Postoperative oxygenation
PaO2/FiO2 ratio 1 hour after extubation, while the patient is receiving oxygen through VenturiMask 40%
Measured: One hour after extubation
Secondary outcomes (14)
Postoperative forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1)
volume exhaled during the first second of a forced expiratory maneuver started from the level of total lung capacity
Measured: 48 hours after the end of surgery
Postoperative forced vital capacity (FVC)
the total amount of air exhaled during a forced expiratory maneuver started from the level of total lung capacity
Measured: 48 hours after the end of surgery
Postoperative Tiffeneau index
computed as FEV1/FVC
Measured: 48 hours after the end of surgery
Postoperative Dyspnea
Dyspnea assessed by Borg dyspnea scale
Measured: 1 hour after surgery
Pulmonary infection
modified clinical pulmonary infection score (mCPIS)
Measured: 24 hours after the end of surgery
Postoperative pulmonary infiltrates
Evaluated with the chest x-ray by two independent clinicians blinded to treatment assignment
Measured: 24 hours after the end of surgery
Intraoperative driving pressure
driving pressure, computed as Plateau pressure-PEEP
Measured: during surgery, recorded on a 60-minute basis
Intraoperative lung driving pressure
transpulmonary driving pressure, computed as Transpulmonary end-inspiratory pressure-transpulmonary total end-expiratory pressure
Measured: during surgery, recorded on a 60-minute basis
Intraoperative oxygenation
PaO2/FiO2
Measured: during surgery, recorded on a 60-minute basis
Intraoperative dead space
Approximated as the difference between End-tidal CO2 and PaCO2 divided by PaCO2
Measured: during surgery, recorded on a 60-minute basis
Lung recruitment
lung recruitment/changes in end expiratory lung volume between the two groups
Measured: during surgery, recorded on a 60-minute basis
Intraoperative blood pressure
Arterial blood pressure
Measured: during surgery, recorded on a 60-minute basis
Intraoperative respiratory system compliance
computed as Tidal volume/airway driving pressure
Measured: during surgery, recorded on a 60-minute basis
Intraoperative lung compliance
computed as Tidal volume/lung driving pressure
Measured: during surgery, recorded on a 60-minute basis
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted17 May 2017
- Study start1 May 2017
- Primary completion31 Mar 2019
- Study completion31 Mar 2019
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for AnesthesiaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 60 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Catholic University of the Sacred Heart
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Massimo Antonelli, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart
- Investigators
- Massimo Antonelli, MD, Principal investigator, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03157479
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- InproveForLarge
- Acronym
- Inprove4large
- Status last verified
- May 2019
- First submitted
- 12 May 2017
- Last updated
- 20 May 2019
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Publications
Grieco DL, Russo A, Anzellotti GM, Romano B, Bongiovanni F, Dell'Anna AM, Mauti L, Cascarano L, Gallotta V, Rosa T, Varone F, Menga LS, Polidori L, D'Indinosante M, Cappuccio S, Galletta C, Tortorella L, Costantini B, Gueli Alletti S, Sollazzi L, Scambia G, Antonelli M. Lung-protective ventilation during Trendelenburg pneumoperitoneum surgery: A randomized clinical trial. J Clin Anesth. 2023 May;85:111037. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2022.111037. Epub 2022 Dec 7.
PubMed 36495775
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 20 May 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Intraoperative Protective Ventilation for Obese Patients Undergoing Gynaecological Laparoscopic Surgery. A Single-centre Randomized, Controlled Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03157479
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- Inprove4large / InproveForLarge
- Conditions
- Anesthesia, Surgery--Complications
- Keywords
- Mechanical ventilation
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 60 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Catholic University of the Sacred HeartUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 May 2017 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Mar 2019 (actual)
- Study completion
- 31 Mar 2019 (actual)
- First posted
- 17 May 2017 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Background. The use of a comprehensive strategy providing low tidal volumes, peep and recruiting maneuvers in patients undergoing open abdominal surgery improves postoperative respiratory function and clinical outcome. It is unknown whether such ventilatory approach may be feasible and/or beneficial in patients undergoing laparoscopy, as pneumoperitoneum and Trendelenburg position may alter lung volumes and chest-wall elastance.
Objective. The investigators designed a randomized, controlled trial to assess the effect of a lung-protective ventilation strategy on postoperative oxygenation in obese patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Protective ventilation | Experimental | Drug: Intravenous anesthetic, Drug: Crystalloid Solutions, Diagnostic Test: Esophageal pressure measurement, Diagnostic Test: Lung volume measurement with the nitrogen washin-washout techniqueVolume controlled ventilation with tidal volume 6-7 ml/kg of predicted body weight (45.5 + 0.91 (height [cm] -152.4)), FiO2 0.4 and PEEP 10 cmH2O during the whole study period. Respiratory rate will be titrated to keep end-tidal CO2 values between 30 and 40 mmHg. I:E ratio will be set in order to obtain an inspiratory time of 0.8 seconds and an inspiratory pause of 0.3 seconds and FiO2 will be kept unchanged during the whole study period. In patients in this group, recruiting maneuvers will be performed throughout a stepwise 5 cmH2O PEEP increase every 30 seconds to achieve a PEEP of 35 cmH2O during Pressure Controlled Ventilation (10 cmH2O of inspiratory pressure while keeping respiratory rate unmodified), followed by a stepwise 5 cmH2O PEEP reduction every 30 seconds until the baseline set peep is reached. |
| Standard Ventilation | Active comparator | Drug: Intravenous anesthetic, Drug: Crystalloid Solutions, Diagnostic Test: Esophageal pressure measurement, Diagnostic Test: Lung volume measurement with the nitrogen washin-washout techniqueVolume controlled ventilation with tidal volume 10 ml/kg of PBW (45.5 + 0.91 (height [cm] -152.4)), FiO2 0.4 and PEEP 5 cmH2O during the whole study period. Respiratory rate will be titrated to keep end-tidal CO2 values between 30 mmHg and 40 mmHg. I:E ratio will be set in order to obtain an inspiratory time of 0.8-1 seconds and an inspiratory pause of 0.3 second |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- scheduled for gynaecological laparoscopic surgery in the Trendelenburg position
- Obesity with body mass index>35 kg/m^2
- written informed consent
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Clinical history or signs of chronic heart failure
- history of neuromuscular disease
- history of thoracic surgery
- pregnancy
- chronic respiratory failure requiring long-term oxygen administration
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Intravenous anestheticAnaesthesia induction will be obtained with i.v. 2-3 mg/kg propofol, 0,6-0,8 mcg/kg fentanyl, and 0.9-1,2 mg/kg rocuronium. Anaesthesia will be maintained with i.v. propofol continuous infusion, with a dose titrated to achieve a bi-spectral index value between 40 and 50 | Drug | Protective ventilation, Standard Ventilation |
| Crystalloid SolutionsBalanced crystalloids will be administered to patients in both groups as a standard rate of 3-5 ml/kg/h. Treatment of eventual hemodynamic instability will be left to the attending physician | Drug | Protective ventilation, Standard Ventilation |
| Esophageal pressure measurementA nasogastric polyfunctional tube (Nutrivent, Sidam, Italy) will be placed after anaesthesia induction in all enrolled patients to measure esophageal pressure, estimate pleural pressure and compute transpulmonary pressure | Diagnostic test | Protective ventilation, Standard Ventilation |
| Lung volume measurement with the nitrogen washin-washout techniqueLung volume will be measured through nitrogen wash-in wash-out technique and low-flow Pressure-volume curve will be recorded to estimate differences in alveolar recruitment between the two study groups. | Diagnostic test | Protective ventilation, Standard Ventilation |
Primary outcome
Postoperative oxygenation
Time frame: One hour after extubation
PaO2/FiO2 ratio 1 hour after extubation, while the patient is receiving oxygen through VenturiMask 40%
14 secondary outcomes
Postoperative forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1)
Time frame: 48 hours after the end of surgery
Postoperative forced vital capacity (FVC)
Time frame: 48 hours after the end of surgery
Postoperative Tiffeneau index
Time frame: 48 hours after the end of surgery
Postoperative Dyspnea
Time frame: 1 hour after surgery
Pulmonary infection
Time frame: 24 hours after the end of surgery
Postoperative pulmonary infiltrates
Time frame: 24 hours after the end of surgery
Intraoperative driving pressure
Time frame: during surgery, recorded on a 60-minute basis
Intraoperative lung driving pressure
Time frame: during surgery, recorded on a 60-minute basis
Intraoperative oxygenation
Time frame: during surgery, recorded on a 60-minute basis
Intraoperative dead space
Time frame: during surgery, recorded on a 60-minute basis
Lung recruitment
Time frame: during surgery, recorded on a 60-minute basis
Intraoperative blood pressure
Time frame: during surgery, recorded on a 60-minute basis
Intraoperative respiratory system compliance
Time frame: during surgery, recorded on a 60-minute basis
Intraoperative lung compliance
Time frame: during surgery, recorded on a 60-minute basis
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 20 May 2019.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 36495775Grieco DL, Russo A, Anzellotti GM, Romano B, Bongiovanni F, Dell'Anna AM, Mauti L, Cascarano L, Gallotta V, Rosa T, Varone F, Menga LS, Polidori L, D'Indinosante M, Cappuccio S, Galletta C, Tortorella L, Costantini B, Gueli Alletti S, Sollazzi L, Scambia G, Antonelli M. Lung-protective ventilation during Trendelenburg pneumoperitoneum surgery: A randomized clinical trial. J Clin Anesth. 2023 May;85:111037. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2022.111037. Epub 2022 Dec 7.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for Anesthesia
Not yet recruitingObservational study
"Comparison of Oxygen Reserve Index (ORI), End-Tidal Oxygen, and Time-Based Preoxygenation Targets With Arterial Blood Gas During Preoxygenation
Preoxygenation Adequacy Assessed by Oxygen Reserve Index, End-tidal Oxygen and Arterial Blood Gas
RecruitingObservational study
Comparison of Hemodynamic Responses During Anesthesia Induction Using Eleveld and Schnider
Spinal (Fusion) Surgery, Total Intravenous Anesthesia
Not yet recruiting
A Randomized Controlled SaCo-VLM Trial
General Anaesthesia Using Supraglotic Airway
Not yet recruiting
Bispectral Index-Guided Propofol Sedation During Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography
Deep Sedation, Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography
RecruitingPhase 4
Comparison of Hemodynamics and Respiratory Function Between Ciprofol and Propofol in Elderly Patients Undergoing Non-intubated General Anesthesia
Comparison of Hemodynamics and Respiratory Function Between Ciprofol and Propofol in Elderly Patients Undergoing Non-intubated General Anesthesia
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Massimo Antonelli, MD principal investigator
Catholic University of the Sacred Heart
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Intravenous anesthetic, Crystalloid Solutions and Esophageal pressure measurement in people with Anesthesia and Surgery--Complications, run by Catholic University of the Sacred Heart at 1 site in Italy.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 20 May 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Italy. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Postoperative oxygenation (time frame: One hour after extubation). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03157479, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 20 May 2019.