AzTrials
AzTrials

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2OSI-DMNCT03160196

Efficacy of an Electronic System to Support Clinical Decisions in Adults With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.

A study testing Clinical Decision Support System in people with Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, run by Sanitas University.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

To assess the efficacy of an electronic system to support clinical decisions based on an evidence-based clinical practice guide for metabolic control of adults with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus through Clinical and cluster-randomized controlled trial in a Colombian population. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 100 years
Conditions the study is for
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
What is being tested?
Clinical Decision Support System
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
1,768 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
Jan 2018to Sep 2019
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 100 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • No prior exposure to the tool (through development and beta testing)
  • Access to an organized diabetes pathway consistent with the Sanitas EPS (Entidad Promotora de Salud) diabetes mellitus 2 guideline.

Who cannot join

  • Terminally ill

Trial locations and contacts

No sites are listed yet.

Abel González, PhD contact

+573132578216

abegonzalez@colsanitas.com

About this study

Official title: Efficacy of an Electronic System to Support Clinical Decisions Based on an Evidence-based Clinical Practice Guide for Metabolic Control of Adults With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: Clinical and Cluster-randomized Controlled Trial.

To assess the efficacy of an electronic system to support clinical decisions based on an evidence-based clinical practice guide for metabolic control of adults with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus through Clinical and cluster-randomized controlled trial in a Colombian population.

Being tested
Clinical Decision Support System, Usual care based on clinical practice guideline
Keywords
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Hemoglobin A, Glycosylated
Medical subject headings
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Clinical Decision Support SystemOther

    It is about a Clinical Decision Support System based on a diabetes mellitus clinical practice guideline.

  • Usual care based on clinical practice guidelineOther

    It is about usual care aligned with the diabetes guideline.

Study groups in NCT03160196
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Experimental practicesExperimentalThe decision support tool is a Web-based software program accessed via a GP computer desktop icon. Clicking the icon opens a single page of tick boxes asking for relevant aspects of the presenting illness. Most fields for relevant medical history and patient demographics are automatically populated from data in the electronic health record. Depending on diagnosis and risk estimation, the tool recommends a guideline-based management strategy. Override options exist but require a justification from the GP. The tool also provides relevant prescriptions, radiology access, and referral forms, and a variety of patient information leaflets. GPs in practices randomized to the intervention group will have to initiate the tool but will not have to follow the tool's advice.
Receives: Other: Clinical Decision Support System
Control practicesActive comparatorControl practices will be aware of the tool but will be unable to access it and managed patients by usual care, which could include care aligned with the Guidelines. Prior to randomization, GPs from all participating practices (control and intervention) will attend a 1-hour face-to-face didactic education session on diabetes mellitus 2 management and the Colombia diabetes mellitus 2 Guidelines. The intervention pertains to the cluster level.
Receives: Other: Usual care based on clinical practice guideline

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Proportions of participants with normal Hb1Ac

    Measured: 6 months and a year of enrollment

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted19 May 2017
  2. Study startJan 2018 (estimated)
  3. Primary completionSep 2019 (estimated)
  4. Study completionSep 2019 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
1,768 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03160196
Acronym
OSI-DM
Status last verified
May 2017
First submitted
17 May 2017
Last updated
19 May 2017
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Clinical Decision Support System in people with Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, run by Sanitas University.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 19 May 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Abel González, PhD (+573132578216, abegonzalez@colsanitas.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Proportions of participants with normal Hb1Ac (time frame: 6 months and a year of enrollment). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 19 May 2017.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in