Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection FractionRESPOND-HFNCT03160625
Evaluation of Rate Adaptive Pacing on Chronotropic Response in Preserved Ejection Fraction HF
A study testing Rate Adaptive Pacing in people with Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction, run by Medtronic Cardiac Rhythm and Heart Failure at 5 sites in United States.
Trial summary
RESPOND-HF is a prospective, multi-center, non-significant risk pilot study with cross-over design. The purpose of the study is to investigate if rate adaptive pacing has the potential to provide benefit to HF patients with preserved ejection fraction, referred to as HFpEF patients. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Any age
- Conditions the study is for
- Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction
- What is being tested?
- Rate Adaptive Pacing
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 0 participants
- Where
- 5 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- 1 Jul 2017to 31 May 2018
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages Any age
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Age ≥ 18 years or legal age to provide informed consent
- Willing and be able to provide informed consent
- Previous clinical diagnosis of HF and exhibits HF signs and symptoms consistent with NYHA II or III (or class B or C)
- Chronic Rx for heart failure with loop diuretic or a mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist (MRA)
- LVEF ≥ 45% within previous 12 months. Acceptable methods include echo, ventriculogram (angiography or nuclear), nuclear stress test. If patient has a prior history of significant left ventricular systolic dysfunction defined as EF < 0.40, patient must have a HF event within previous 12 months defined as:
- Hospitalization for decompensated HF
Show all 11Show fewer
- Unscheduled treatment for HF with intravenous loop diuretic or hemofiltration
- On stable HF medical therapy for previous 30 days. Dose changes of ACEI / ARB and beta blockers of less than 50% increase or decrease are acceptable for stability
- Treadmill exercise time using modified Naughton protocol of greater than 3 min and less than 15 min for men and 14 for women
- Medtronic dual chamber pacemaker implanted for ≥ 30 days
- Sinus rhythm at rest
Who cannot join
- Women who are pregnant or plan to become pregnant
- Life expectancy less than 1 year
- Enrollment in any concurrent study that could potentially be confounding
- Orthopedic, neuromuscular or any other condition limiting exercise testing
- Unstable angina or MI or have undergone CABG/PTCA within previous 60 days
- A candidate for CABG/PTCA at the time of informed consent
Show all 24Show fewer
- Use of inotrope therapy on a regular basis (e.g. daily, weekly etc.)
- Severe and/or poorly controlled major active comorbidity, including (but not limited to):
- Diabetes: Hb1AC > 9.5
- Severe COPD: e.g. end stage emphysema managed using 2 or more inhalers and/or using home oxygen
- Severe pulmonary disease limiting functional capacity
- Hypertension: SBP > 160 mmHg at time of screening
- Cancer: Ongoing therapy or therapy within previous 3 months
- Severe valvular disease
- Renal impairment with serum creatinine > 3 mg/dL
- Anemia with hemoglobin < 8 g/dL or major bleeding event within the past 60 days
- Primary diagnosis of pulmonary arterial hypertension with ongoing severe pulmonary hypertension and treatment
- Known familial hypertrophic cardiomyopathy or hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy
- Known restrictive cardiomyopathy or systemic illness known to be associated with infiltrative myocardial disease (e.g. amyloidosis, sarcoidosis, hemochromatosis)
- Pericardial restriction or hemodynamically significant pericardial effusion
- Patients expected to undergo device or lead replacement within study follow-up duration
- Allergies to hydrogel in SEEQ/AVIVO patch
- Patients who are expected to be ventricular paced over 40% of the time
- Long standing persistent AF Or Ongoing episode of persistent AF
Trial locations and contacts
5 sites in 1 country.
5 sites in 1 country
United States5 sites
Lindner Research Center
Cincinnati, Ohio, 45219
Ohio State University
Columbus, Ohio, 43210
Mid America Heart Institute (MAHI)
Kansas City, Missouri, 64111
Lancaster General Hospital
Lancaster, Pennsylvania, 17602
Mayo Clinic (Rochester MN)
Rochester, Minnesota, 55000
About this study
RESPOND-HF is a prospective, multi-center, non-significant risk pilot study with cross-over design. The purpose of the study is to investigate if rate adaptive pacing has the potential to provide benefit to HF patients with preserved ejection fraction, referred to as HFpEF patients. Findings from this pilot study may be used to guide subsequent efforts to design and conduct a prospective, randomized, multi-center pivotal trial powered to show improvement in patient outcomes.
Read the detailed description
The RESPOND-HF is a prospective, multi-center, investigational, pilot study with cross-over design. Patients with existing pacemakers who have been diagnosed with HFpEF and meet study inclusion/exclusion criteria will be included in the study.
The study is expected to be conducted at up to 5 centers in the United States and up to 300 patients will be consented to enroll up to 100 qualifying patients . Up to 60 patients meeting chronotropic incompetence (CI) criterion will be enrolled. The study will be conducted in subjects who have previously (≥ 30 days) been implanted with Medtronic, dual chamber pacemaker (IPG) device with rate adaptive pacing (RAP) feature. Additionally, up to 40 patients who do not meet CI criterion will be enrolled to collect ambulatory activity and heart rate data using AVIVO/SEEQ patch. These patients will be followed for only 1 week. It is estimated that subject enrollment will take approximately 12 to 18 months, with a study follow-up of 18 weeks.
- Being tested
- Rate Adaptive Pacing
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Rate Adaptive PacingDevice
Rate Adaptive Pacing varies the pacing rate in response to the patient's physical motion as detected by an activity sensor.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Rate Adaptive Pacing ON | Active comparator | The Rate Adaptive Pacing (RAP) feature in the Medtronic implantable pulse generator (IPG) will be programmed to level 4 (More Active Lifestyle) with ADL rate of 95 bpm or higher, and Upper sensor rate that is subject's age predicted maximum heart rate. The age predicted maximum heart rate (APMHR) will be computed as: APHMR = 220 - age Receives: Device: Rate Adaptive Pacing |
| Rate Adaptive Pacing OFF | Active comparator | The Rate Adaptive Pacing (RAP) feature in the Medtronic implantable pulse generator (IPG) will be turned off for this arm of the study. Receives: Device: Rate Adaptive Pacing |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Exercise time
Exercise time on a treadmill guided by respiratory exchange ratio (RER) during cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET).
Measured: 18 Weeks
Secondary outcomes (12)
Peak VO2
Maximum rate of oxygen consumption during treadmill testing
Measured: 18 Weeks
Peak metabolic equivalents (METs)
Ratio of the rate of energy expended during treadmill testing to the rate of energy expended at rest
Measured: 18 Weeks
Peak respiratory exchange ratio (RER)
Maximum ratio between the amount of carbon dioxide (CO2) produced and oxygen (O2) used during treadmill testing
Measured: 18 Weeks
VE/VO2 slope
Minute ventilation oxygen consumption relationship
Measured: 18 Weeks
VO2 at Ventilator Anaerobic Threshold (VAT)
Rate of oxygen consumption at VAT during treadmill testing
Measured: 18 Weeks
VCO2 at Ventilator Anaerobic Threshold (VAT)
Rate of carbon dioxide production at VAT during treadmill testing
Measured: 18 Weeks
KCCQ
Subject's quality of life measure using KCCQ
Measured: 18 Weeks
6 Minute Hall Walk
Subject's activity of daily living as measure by 6 minute hall walk
Measured: 18 Weeks
Daily Activity
Activity data collected by the implantable device and wearable sensor (SEEQ/AVIVO patch)
Measured: 18 Weeks
Global Patient Health Assessment
Global patient health status using 0-100 visual analog scale
Measured: 18 Weeks
NT-proBNP
N-terminus pro Brain Natriuretic Peptide
Measured: 18 Weeks
Correlation between activity and HR
Correlation between activity and heart rate
Measured: 18 Weeks
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted19 May 2017
- Study start1 Jul 2017 (estimated)
- Primary completion30 Apr 2018 (estimated)
- Study completion31 May 2018 (estimated)
Why it stopped: Lack of eligible patient.
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection FractionStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Medtronic Cardiac Rhythm and Heart FailureThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Model description
- To assess whether rate adaptive pacing provides benefit to HFpEF patients, a pool of up to 60 qualifying subjects with pre-existing pacemaker and established diagnosis of HFpEF who demonstrate chronotropic incompetence (CI) with RAP turned off will be enrolled. Subjects who meet CI criterion during Visit 2 will be randomized. Subjects' principal investigator and study team will be blinded to the randomization assignment. However clinical site personnel performing the device programming will not be blinded. Site personnel performing the CPET and 6-min hall walk assessments will be blinded to the randomization assignment. Crossover of study subjects will occur during Visit 3, which will occur 12 weeks after subject enrollment. Subjects who were randomized with RAP ON first will have the device programmed to RAP OFF and conversely, subjects who were randomized to RAP OFF first will have the device programmed to RAP ON.
- Masking
- Triple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 0 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Medtronic Cardiac Rhythm and Heart Failure
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Aida Cicic, MD, Study director, Medtronic
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03160625
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- RESPOND-HF
- Acronym
- RESPOND-HF
- Status last verified
- Apr 2018
- First submitted
- 22 Mar 2017
- Last updated
- 19 Apr 2018
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 19 Apr 2018. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Evaluation of Rate Adaptive Pacing on Chronotropic Response in Preserved Ejection Fraction HF
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03160625
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- RESPOND-HF / RESPOND-HF
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- WithdrawnReason stopped: Lack of eligible patient.
- Enrolment
- 0 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Medtronic Cardiac Rhythm and Heart FailureIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 1 Jul 2017 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- 30 Apr 2018 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 31 May 2018 (estimated)
- First posted
- 19 May 2017 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
RESPOND-HF is a prospective, multi-center, non-significant risk pilot study with cross-over design. The purpose of the study is to investigate if rate adaptive pacing has the potential to provide benefit to HF patients with preserved ejection fraction, referred to as HFpEF patients. Findings from this pilot study may be used to guide subsequent efforts to design and conduct a prospective, randomized, multi-center pivotal trial powered to show improvement in patient outcomes.
Detailed description
The RESPOND-HF is a prospective, multi-center, investigational, pilot study with cross-over design. Patients with existing pacemakers who have been diagnosed with HFpEF and meet study inclusion/exclusion criteria will be included in the study.
The study is expected to be conducted at up to 5 centers in the United States and up to 300 patients will be consented to enroll up to 100 qualifying patients . Up to 60 patients meeting chronotropic incompetence (CI) criterion will be enrolled. The study will be conducted in subjects who have previously (≥ 30 days) been implanted with Medtronic, dual chamber pacemaker (IPG) device with rate adaptive pacing (RAP) feature. Additionally, up to 40 patients who do not meet CI criterion will be enrolled to collect ambulatory activity and heart rate data using AVIVO/SEEQ patch. These patients will be followed for only 1 week. It is estimated that subject enrollment will take approximately 12 to 18 months, with a study follow-up of 18 weeks.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- Triple blind (participant, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- To assess whether rate adaptive pacing provides benefit to HFpEF patients, a pool of up to 60 qualifying subjects with pre-existing pacemaker and established diagnosis of HFpEF who demonstrate chronotropic incompetence (CI) with RAP turned off will be enrolled. Subjects who meet CI criterion during Visit 2 will be randomized. Subjects' principal investigator and study team will be blinded to the randomization assignment. However clinical site personnel performing the device programming will not be blinded. Site personnel performing the CPET and 6-min hall walk assessments will be blinded to the randomization assignment. Crossover of study subjects will occur during Visit 3, which will occur 12 weeks after subject enrollment. Subjects who were randomized with RAP ON first will have the device programmed to RAP OFF and conversely, subjects who were randomized to RAP OFF first will have the device programmed to RAP ON.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Rate Adaptive Pacing ON | Active comparator | Device: Rate Adaptive PacingThe Rate Adaptive Pacing (RAP) feature in the Medtronic implantable pulse generator (IPG) will be programmed to level 4 (More Active Lifestyle) with ADL rate of 95 bpm or higher, and Upper sensor rate that is subject's age predicted maximum heart rate. The age predicted maximum heart rate (APMHR) will be computed as: APHMR = 220 - age |
| Rate Adaptive Pacing OFF | Active comparator | Device: Rate Adaptive PacingThe Rate Adaptive Pacing (RAP) feature in the Medtronic implantable pulse generator (IPG) will be turned off for this arm of the study. |
Who may qualify
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (11 listed)
- Age ≥ 18 years or legal age to provide informed consent
- Willing and be able to provide informed consent
- Previous clinical diagnosis of HF and exhibits HF signs and symptoms consistent with NYHA II or III (or class B or C)
- Chronic Rx for heart failure with loop diuretic or a mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist (MRA)
- LVEF ≥ 45% within previous 12 months. Acceptable methods include echo, ventriculogram (angiography or nuclear), nuclear stress test. If patient has a prior history of significant left ventricular systolic dysfunction defined as EF < 0.40, patient must have a HF event within previous 12 months defined as:
Key exclusion criteria (24 listed)
- Women who are pregnant or plan to become pregnant
- Life expectancy less than 1 year
- Enrollment in any concurrent study that could potentially be confounding
- Orthopedic, neuromuscular or any other condition limiting exercise testing
- Unstable angina or MI or have undergone CABG/PTCA within previous 60 days
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Rate Adaptive PacingRate Adaptive Pacing varies the pacing rate in response to the patient's physical motion as detected by an activity sensor. | Device | Rate Adaptive Pacing OFF, Rate Adaptive Pacing ON |
Primary outcome
Exercise time
Time frame: 18 Weeks
Exercise time on a treadmill guided by respiratory exchange ratio (RER) during cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET).
12 secondary outcomes
Peak VO2
Time frame: 18 Weeks
Peak metabolic equivalents (METs)
Time frame: 18 Weeks
Peak respiratory exchange ratio (RER)
Time frame: 18 Weeks
VE/VO2 slope
Time frame: 18 Weeks
VO2 at Ventilator Anaerobic Threshold (VAT)
Time frame: 18 Weeks
VCO2 at Ventilator Anaerobic Threshold (VAT)
Time frame: 18 Weeks
KCCQ
Time frame: 18 Weeks
6 Minute Hall Walk
Time frame: 18 Weeks
Daily Activity
Time frame: 18 Weeks
Global Patient Health Assessment
Time frame: 18 Weeks
NT-proBNP
Time frame: 18 Weeks
Correlation between activity and HR
Time frame: 18 Weeks
Results and safety
The study was withdrawn before enrolling participants, so there are no results.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 19 Apr 2018.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
A Study of Bimagrumab in Participants With HFpEF
Heart Failure, Diastolic, Diastolic Heart Failure
RecruitingPhase 4
The Effects of Ferric Derisomaltose in Patients With Acute Heart Failure and Iron Deficiency on Exercise Capacity and Quality of Life
Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction, Iron Deficiencies
RecruitingObservational study
Descriptive Study of Circulating Gene or Protein Inflammatory Biomarkers and Bioimpedance Parameters in a Population of Patients Hospitalized for Decompensated Heart Failure With Preserved or Mildly Reduced Cardiac Function
Inflammation Biomarkers, Heart Failure
Recruiting
Remote Rehabilitation in Patients With HFpEF (PATRON-HF)
Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction
Recruiting
ELEVATE-HFpEF Clinical Study
Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction (HFpEF)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Aida Cicic, MD study director
Medtronic
5 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Rate Adaptive Pacing in people with Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction, run by Medtronic Cardiac Rhythm and Heart Failure at 5 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 11 inclusion and 24 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: withdrawn, as of the sponsor's last update on 19 Apr 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 5 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study was withdrawn before enrolling participants, so there are no results.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Exercise time (time frame: 18 Weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 19 Apr 2018.