Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease COPDPhase 3AERISTONCT03162055
Efficacy and Safety of Glycopyrronium/Formoterol Fumarate Fixed-dose Combination Relative to Umeclidinium/Vilanterol Fixed-dose Combination Over 24 Weeks in Patients With Moderate to Very Severe Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
A Phase 3 study testing Glycopyrronium/Formoterol Fumarate and umeclidinium/vilanterol in people with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease COPD, run by AstraZeneca at 107 sites in 7 countries.
Trial summary
This is a phase IIIb randomised, double-blind, double-dummy, multicentre, parallel group, 24 week study to assess the efficacy and safety of Glycopyrronium/Formoterol Fumarate (GFF) fixed-dose combination 7.2/4.8 μg 2 inhalations twice daily compared to Umeclidinium/Vilanterol (UV) 62.5/25 μg fixed-dose combination 1… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 40 to 95 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease COPD
- What is being tested?
- Glycopyrronium/Formoterol Fumarate and umeclidinium/vilanterol
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 1,119 participants
- Where
- 107 sitesin 7 countries
- Study dates
- 25 May 2017to 4 May 2018
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 40 to 95 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Age 40-95 years at screening
- Current or former smoker with a history of at least 10 pack-years of cigarette smoking
- Current clinical diagnosis of COPD, with COPD symptoms > 1 year prior to screening, as defined by GOLD criteria or other current guidelines
- COPD Severity defined by FEV1/FVC ratio <0.70 and FEV1 <80% of predicted normal value at screening and at randomisation
- COPD treatment with rescue medication only, or stable dose of maintenance monotherapy (LAMA, LABA or ICS), or stable dose of double maintenance therapy (LAMA/LABA or ICS/LABA), for one month prior to screening
- COPD Assessment Test (CAT) score ≥10 at randomisation
- Documentation of a chest x-ray (as per local practice) or computed tomography (CT) within 6 months prior to screening, with no clinically significant pulmonary abnormalities other than related to COPD
Who cannot join
- Respiratory disease other than COPD, including:
- Current diagnosis of asthma
- Alpha-1 Antitrypsin Deficiency as the cause of COPD
- Other respiratory disorders and conditions as listed in the protocol
- Severe COPD exacerbation (resulting in hospitalisation) not resolved within 8 weeks prior to screening, or moderate exacerbation not resolved within 4 weeks, or during screening
- Pneumonia or lower respiratory tract infection that required antibiotics within 8 weeks prior to screening, or during screening.
Show all 9Show fewer
- Significant diseases or conditions other than COPD which may put the patient at risk, or influence the results of the study or the patient's ability to participate, including cardiac disease, advanced renal disease, and cancer that has not been in complete remission for at least 5 years.
- Patients who have needed additions or alterations to their usual maintenance therapy for COPD due to worsening symptoms within 1 month prior to and during screening
- Treatment with depot corticosteroids within 6 weeks, or other systemic corticosteroids within 4 weeks, prior to screening. (Patients maintained on an equivalent of 5 mg prednisone per day for at least 3 months prior to screening are allowed.)
Trial locations and contacts
107 sites in 7 countries.
107 sites in 7 countries
Russia21 sites
Research Site
Barnaul, 656038
Research Site
Barnaul, 656045
Research Site
Chelyabinsk, 454021
Research Site
Izhevsk, 426035
Research Site
Moscow, 109544
Research Site
Novosibirsk, 630051
Research Site
Penza, 440026
Research Site
Penza, 440067
Research Site
Ryazan, 390005
Research Site
Saint Petersburg, 191015
Research Site
Saint Petersburg, 191180
Research Site
Saint Petersburg, 194291
Research Site
Saint Petersburg, 196084
Research Site
Saint Petersburg, 197022
Research Site
Saint Petersburg, 197342
Research Site
Saint Petersburg, 198260
Research Site
Saratov, 410012
Research Site
Smolensk, 214006
Research Site
Tomsk, 634050
Research Site
Ulyanovsk, 432009
Research Site
Yekaterinburg, 620028
Bulgaria20 sites
Research Site
Dupnitsa, 2600
Research Site
Dupnitsa, 2602
Research Site
Haskovo, 6305
Research Site
Kozloduy, 3320
Research Site
Pazardzhik, 4400
Research Site
Petrich, 2850
Research Site
Pleven, 5800
Research Site
Plovdiv, 4002
Research Site
Razlog, 2760
Research Site
Rousse, 7002
Research Site
Sliven, 8800
Research Site
Smolyan, 4700
Research Site
Sofia, 1002
Research Site
Sofia, 1233
Research Site
Sofia, 1407
Research Site
Sofia, 1408
Research Site
Sofia, 1618
Research Site
Stara Zagora, 6000
Research Site
Varna, 9000
Research Site
Vidin, 3700
United States15 sites
Research Site
Dublin, Ohio, 43016
Research Site
Escondido, California, 92025
Research Site
Farmington Hills, Michigan, 48336
Research Site
Gastonia, North Carolina, 28054
Research Site
Greenville, South Carolina, 29615
Research Site
Hollywood, Florida, 33021
Research Site
Lawrenceville, Georgia, 30046
Research Site
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15243
Research Site
Rincon, Georgia, 31326
Research Site
Sacramento, California, 95821
Research Site
Sherman, Texas, 75092
Research Site
Spartanburg, South Carolina, 29303
Research Site
Tempe, Arizona, 85283
Research Site
The Bronx, New York, 10455
Research Site
Tomball, Texas, 77375
Ukraine15 sites
Research Site
Chernivtsi, 58000
Research Site
Chernivtsi, 58001
Research Site
Ivano-Frankivsk, 76012
Research Site
Kharkiv, 61002
Research Site
Kharkiv, 61035
Research Site
Kharkiv, 61058
Research Site
Kyiv, 03680
Research Site
Kyiv, 04107
Research Site
Lutsk, 43000
Research Site
Lviv, 79066
Research Site
Odesa, 65025
Research Site
Poltava, 36040
Research Site
Vinnytsia, 21001
Research Site
Vinnytsia, 21029
Research Site
Zaporizhzhya, 69096
Canada14 sites
Research Site
Burlington, Ontario, L7M 4Y1
Research Site
Burlington, Ontario, L7N 3V2
Research Site
Etobicoke, Ontario, M9W 4L6
Research Site
Gatineau, Quebec, J8Y 6S8
Research Site
Lévis, Quebec, G6W 0M5
Research Site
Québec, Quebec, G1G 3Y8
Research Site
Québec, Quebec, G1V 4G5
Research Site
Québec, Quebec, G3K 2P8
Research Site
Saint-Charles-Borromée, Quebec, J6E 2B4
Research Site
Sherwood Park, Alberta, T8L 0N2
Research Site
Truro, Nova Scotia, B2N 1L2
Research Site
Windsor, Ontario, N8X 1T3
Research Site
Windsor, Ontario, N8X-5A6
Research Site
Winnipeg, Manitoba, R2V 4W3
Hungary14 sites
Research Site
Balassagyarmat, 2660
Research Site
Budapest, 1135
Research Site
Debrecen, 4032
Research Site
Debrecen, H-4031
Research Site
Farkasgyepü, 8582
Research Site
Hajdúnánás, 4080
Research Site
Komárom, 2900
Research Site
Komló, 7300
Research Site
Miskolc, 3529
Research Site
Püspökladány, 4150
Research Site
Siófok, 8600
Research Site
Szeged, H-6722
Research Site
Szombathely, 9700
Research Site
Vásárosnamény, 4800
France8 sites
Research Site
Besançon, 25030
Research Site
Brest, 29609
Research Site
Lyon, 69317
Research Site
Montpellier, 34295
Research Site
Nantes, 44277
Research Site
Pessac, 33604
Research Site
Poitiers, 86021
Research Site
Reims, 51092
About this study
Official title: A Randomised, Double-Blind, Double-Dummy, Multicentre, Parallel Group Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Glycopyrronium/Formoterol Fumarate Fixed-dose Combination Relative to Umeclidinium/Vilanterol Fixed-dose Combination Over 24 Weeks in Patients With Moderate to Very Severe Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (AERISTO)
This is a phase IIIb randomised, double-blind, double-dummy, multicentre, parallel group, 24 week study to assess the efficacy and safety of Glycopyrronium/Formoterol Fumarate (GFF) fixed-dose combination 7.2/4.8 μg 2 inhalations twice daily compared to Umeclidinium/Vilanterol (UV) 62.5/25 μg fixed-dose combination 1 inhalation once daily in Patients with moderate to very severe COPD.
- Being tested
- Glycopyrronium/Formoterol Fumarate, umeclidinium/vilanterol
- Keywords
- COPD
- Medical subject headings
- Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Glycopyrronium/Formoterol FumarateDrug
Metered dose inhaler (MDI), contains glycopyrronium/formoterol fumarate fixed-dose combination 7.2/4.8 μg per actuation
umeclidinium/vilanterolDrug
Dry powder inhaler (DPI), Each metered dose contains umeclidinium/vilanterol 62.5/ 25μg fixed-dose combination per inhalation
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Experimental | Experimental | glycopyrronium/formoterol fumarate 7.2/4.8 μg per actuation, twice daily Receives: Drug: Glycopyrronium/Formoterol Fumarate |
| Active comparator | Active comparator | umeclidinium/vilanterol 62.5/ 25μg per inhalation, once daily Receives: Drug: umeclidinium/vilanterol |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Mean Change From Baseline in Morning Pre-dose Trough Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) Over 24 Weeks
To assess the effects of GFF relative to UV on lung function as measured by change from baseline in morning pre-dose trough FEV1 is defined as the average of the -60 and -30 minute pre-dose values at each visit minus baseline using spirometry. Baseline is defined as the mean of the non-missing -60 and -30 minute values obtained prior to dosing at randomization (Day 1). BR a/s = bronchodilator responsiveness to albuterol/salbutamol.
Measured: From Baseline (Day 1) up to 24 weeks
Mean Peak Change From Baseline in FEV1 Within 2 Hours Post-dosing Over 24 Weeks in PP Analysis Set Population
To assess the effects of GFF relative to UV on lung function in PP analysis set population as measured by peak change from baseline in FEV1 is defined as the maximum of the FEV1 assessments within the 2 hours post-dosing time windows at each visit minus baseline using spirometry. Baseline is defined as the mean of the non-missing -60 and -30 minute values obtained prior to dosing at randomization (Day 1).
Measured: From Baseline (Day 1) up to 24 weeks
Mean Peak Change From Baseline in FEV1 Within 2 Hours Post-dosing Over 24 Weeks in FAS Population
To assess the effects of GFF relative to UV on lung function in FAS population as measured by peak change from baseline in FEV1 is defined as the maximum of the FEV1 assessments within the 2 hours post-dosing time windows at each visit minus baseline using spirometry. Baseline is defined as the mean of the non-missing -60 and -30 minute values obtained prior to dosing at randomization (Day 1).
Measured: From Baseline (Day 1) up to 24 weeks
Secondary outcomes (4)
Percentage of Participants With Increase of FEV1 of >=100 mL From Baseline at 5 Minutes Post-dosing on Day 1
The percentage of participants with an increase in FEV1 of >=100 mL from baseline at 5 minutes post-dosing on Day 1 was determined to assess the early onset of action. Baseline is defined as the average of available evaluable -60 and -30 minute pre-dose assessments conducted at randomization (Day 1). Only data assigned to the 5 minute window was used to determine response. Participants with missing data were considered non-responders for the analysis.
Measured: 5 minutes post-dose on Day 1
Mean Peak Change From Baseline in Inspiratory Capacity (IC) Within 2 Hours Post-dosing Over 24 Weeks
Peak change from baseline in IC is defined as the maximum of the IC assessments within the 2 hours post-dosing time windows at each visit minus baseline. Baseline is defined as the average of available evaluable -60 and -30 minute pre-dose assessments conducted at randomization (Day 1).
Measured: From Baseline (Day 1) up to 24 weeks
Mean Transition Dyspnea Index (TDI) Focal Score Over 24 Weeks
The baseline dyspnea index (BDI) and TDI consist of 3 individual components: functional impairment, magnitude of task, and magnitude of effort. For the BDI, each of these 3 components were rated in 5 grades from 0 (very severe) to 4 (no impairment), and were summed to form a baseline total score from 0 to 12. For the TDI, changes in dyspnea were rated for each component by 7 grades from -3 (major deterioration) to +3 (major improvement), and were added to form a TDI focal score from -9 to +9. Baseline is defined as the latest BDI assessment within 7 days before or at randomization (Day 1).
Measured: From Baseline (Day -7 or 1) up to 24 weeks
Mean Change From Baseline in Early Morning Symptoms of COPD Instrument (EMSCI) Over 24 Weeks
Change from baseline in the 6-item EMSCI Symptom Severity Score was derived by averaging the responses from a participant on the 6 item-level symptom scores (scored on a 4-point scale from 1 to 4, whereas 1= mild and 4= very severe). The EMSCI collected data about the frequency and severity of early morning symptoms and the impact of COPD symptoms on early morning activity in participants with COPD. Participants completed a daily electronic patient-reported outcome (ePRO) questionnaire for their COPD symptoms. Baseline is defined as the average of the non-missing values from the ePRO data collected in the last 7 days before the randomization (Day 1). TI = Time interval.
Measured: From Baseline (Day -7) up to 24 weeks
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted22 May 2017
- Study start25 May 2017
- Primary completion4 May 2018
- Study completion4 May 2018
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease COPDStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by AstraZenecaThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator
- Enrolment
- 1,119 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- AstraZeneca
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- Parexel International Ltd, Cognizant Technology Solution, CISCRP, eResearchTechnology, QuintilesIMS Limited, Corporate Translations Inc
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03162055
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- D5970C00002
- Acronym
- AERISTO
- Status last verified
- Apr 2019
- First submitted
- 19 May 2017
- Last updated
- 22 May 2019
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Publications
Maltais F, Ferguson GT, Feldman GJ, Deslee G, Bourdin A, Fjallbrant H, Siwek-Posluszna A, Jenkins MA, Martin UJ. A Randomized, Double-Blind, Double-Dummy Study of Glycopyrrolate/Formoterol Fumarate Metered Dose Inhaler Relative to Umeclidinium/Vilanterol Dry Powder Inhaler in COPD. Adv Ther. 2019 Sep;36(9):2434-2449. doi: 10.1007/s12325-019-01015-3. Epub 2019 Jul 2.
PubMed 31267366
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 22 May 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Randomised, Double-Blind, Double-Dummy, Multicentre, Parallel Group Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Glycopyrronium/Formoterol Fumarate Fixed-dose Combination Relative to Umeclidinium/Vilanterol Fixed-dose Combination Over 24 Weeks in Patients With Moderate to Very Severe Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (AERISTO)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03162055
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- AERISTO / D5970C00002
- Keywords
- COPD
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 1,119 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- AstraZenecaIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- Parexel International Ltd, Cognizant Technology Solution, CISCRP, eResearchTechnology, QuintilesIMS Limited, Corporate Translations Inc
- Study start
- 25 May 2017 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 4 May 2018 (actual)
- Study completion
- 4 May 2018 (actual)
- First posted
- 22 May 2017 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 22 May 2019
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This is a phase IIIb randomised, double-blind, double-dummy, multicentre, parallel group, 24 week study to assess the efficacy and safety of Glycopyrronium/Formoterol Fumarate (GFF) fixed-dose combination 7.2/4.8 μg 2 inhalations twice daily compared to Umeclidinium/Vilanterol (UV) 62.5/25 μg fixed-dose combination 1 inhalation once daily in Patients with moderate to very severe COPD.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, investigator)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Experimental | Experimental | Drug: Glycopyrronium/Formoterol Fumarateglycopyrronium/formoterol fumarate 7.2/4.8 μg per actuation, twice daily |
| Active comparator | Active comparator | Drug: umeclidinium/vilanterolumeclidinium/vilanterol 62.5/ 25μg per inhalation, once daily |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 40 to 95 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Age 40-95 years at screening
- Current or former smoker with a history of at least 10 pack-years of cigarette smoking
- Current clinical diagnosis of COPD, with COPD symptoms > 1 year prior to screening, as defined by GOLD criteria or other current guidelines
- COPD Severity defined by FEV1/FVC ratio <0.70 and FEV1 <80% of predicted normal value at screening and at randomisation
- COPD treatment with rescue medication only, or stable dose of maintenance monotherapy (LAMA, LABA or ICS), or stable dose of double maintenance therapy (LAMA/LABA or ICS/LABA), for one month prior to screening
Key exclusion criteria (9 listed)
- Respiratory disease other than COPD, including:
- Current diagnosis of asthma
- Alpha-1 Antitrypsin Deficiency as the cause of COPD
- Other respiratory disorders and conditions as listed in the protocol
- Severe COPD exacerbation (resulting in hospitalisation) not resolved within 8 weeks prior to screening, or moderate exacerbation not resolved within 4 weeks, or during screening
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Glycopyrronium/Formoterol FumarateMetered dose inhaler (MDI), contains glycopyrronium/formoterol fumarate fixed-dose combination 7.2/4.8 μg per actuation | Drug | Experimental |
| umeclidinium/vilanterolDry powder inhaler (DPI), Each metered dose contains umeclidinium/vilanterol 62.5/ 25μg fixed-dose combination per inhalation | Drug | Active comparator |
Primary outcome
Mean Change From Baseline in Morning Pre-dose Trough Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) Over 24 Weeks
Time frame: From Baseline (Day 1) up to 24 weeks
To assess the effects of GFF relative to UV on lung function as measured by change from baseline in morning pre-dose trough FEV1 is defined as the average of the -60 and -30 minute pre-dose values at each visit minus baseline using spirometry. Baseline is defined as the mean of the non-missing -60 and -30 minute values obtained prior to dosing at randomization (Day 1). BR a/s = bronchodilator responsiveness to albuterol/salbutamol.
Mean Peak Change From Baseline in FEV1 Within 2 Hours Post-dosing Over 24 Weeks in PP Analysis Set Population
Time frame: From Baseline (Day 1) up to 24 weeks
To assess the effects of GFF relative to UV on lung function in PP analysis set population as measured by peak change from baseline in FEV1 is defined as the maximum of the FEV1 assessments within the 2 hours post-dosing time windows at each visit minus baseline using spirometry. Baseline is defined as the mean of the non-missing -60 and -30 minute values obtained prior to dosing at randomization (Day 1).
Mean Peak Change From Baseline in FEV1 Within 2 Hours Post-dosing Over 24 Weeks in FAS Population
Time frame: From Baseline (Day 1) up to 24 weeks
To assess the effects of GFF relative to UV on lung function in FAS population as measured by peak change from baseline in FEV1 is defined as the maximum of the FEV1 assessments within the 2 hours post-dosing time windows at each visit minus baseline using spirometry. Baseline is defined as the mean of the non-missing -60 and -30 minute values obtained prior to dosing at randomization (Day 1).
4 secondary outcomes
Percentage of Participants With Increase of FEV1 of >=100 mL From Baseline at 5 Minutes Post-dosing on Day 1
Time frame: 5 minutes post-dose on Day 1
Mean Peak Change From Baseline in Inspiratory Capacity (IC) Within 2 Hours Post-dosing Over 24 Weeks
Time frame: From Baseline (Day 1) up to 24 weeks
Mean Transition Dyspnea Index (TDI) Focal Score Over 24 Weeks
Time frame: From Baseline (Day -7 or 1) up to 24 weeks
Mean Change From Baseline in Early Morning Symptoms of COPD Instrument (EMSCI) Over 24 Weeks
Time frame: From Baseline (Day -7) up to 24 weeks
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 22 May 2019.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 31267366Maltais F, Ferguson GT, Feldman GJ, Deslee G, Bourdin A, Fjallbrant H, Siwek-Posluszna A, Jenkins MA, Martin UJ. A Randomized, Double-Blind, Double-Dummy Study of Glycopyrrolate/Formoterol Fumarate Metered Dose Inhaler Relative to Umeclidinium/Vilanterol Dry Powder Inhaler in COPD. Adv Ther. 2019 Sep;36(9):2434-2449. doi: 10.1007/s12325-019-01015-3. Epub 2019 Jul 2.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease COPD
Active, not recruiting
Symptoms and Functions in Patients With COPD and Chronic Bronchitis Switching From CIG to THS
COPD, Smoking
Not yet recruitingPhase 2/3
An Open-Label Extension Study to Evaluate Inhaled Treprostinil SMI in Participants With Pulmonary Hypertension Associated With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (PH-COPD)
Pulmonary Hypertension Associated With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
Not yet recruiting
The Aim of the Study is to Decipher the Alterations in Signalling Pathways of Skeletal Muscle Stem Cells (Satellite Cells (SCs)) in Individuals With COPD, as Well as to Examine the Effect of Exercise Training on SCs.
COPD (Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease), Sarcopenia in Elderly
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Study of Treprostinil Administered Via Soft Mist Inhaler (SMI) in Participants With Pulmonary Hypertension Associated With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (PH-COPD)
Pulmonary Hypertension Associated With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
Active, not recruitingPhase 1
A Study for GSK3862995B in Healthy Participants and Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
107 sites in 7 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Glycopyrronium/Formoterol Fumarate and umeclidinium/vilanterol in people with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease COPD, run by AstraZeneca at 107 sites in 7 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 22 May 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 107 sites in Russia, Bulgaria, United States, Ukraine, Canada and 2 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 22 May 2019). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Mean Change From Baseline in Morning Pre-dose Trough Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) Over 24 Weeks (time frame: From Baseline (Day 1) up to 24 weeks). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03162055, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 22 May 2019.