Hypoxemic Respiratory FailurePhase 4HOT-ICUNCT03174002
Handling Oxygenation Targets in the Intensive Care Unit
A Phase 4 study testing Oxygen in people with Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure and Oxygen Toxicity, run by Aalborg University Hospital at 37 sites in 7 countries.
Trial summary
Handling oxygenation targets (HOT) is standard of care in the intensive care unit (ICU), however the quality and quantity of evidence is low and potential harm has been reported. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure, Oxygen Toxicity
- What is being tested?
- Oxygen
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 2,928 participants
- Where
- 37 sitesin 7 countries
- Study dates
- 19 Jun 2017to 3 Aug 2021
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Acutely admitted to the ICU AND
- Aged ≥ 18 years AND
- Receives supplemental oxygen with a flow of at least 10 L per minutes in an open system including high-flow systems OR at least a FiO2 of 0.50 in a closed system including invasive or non-invasive ventilation or CPAP systems AND
- Expected to receive supplemental oxygen for at least 24 hours in the ICU AND
- Having an arterial line for PaO2 monitoring
Who cannot join
- Cannot be randomised within twelve hours after present ICU admission
- Chronic mechanical ventilation for any reason
- Use of home oxygen
- Previous treatment with bleomycin
- Organ transplant during current hospital admission
- Withdrawal from active therapy or brain death deemed imminent
Show all 15Show fewer
- Fertile woman (< 50 years of age) with positive urine human gonadotropin (hCG) or plasma-hCG
- Carbon monoxide poisoning
- Cyanide poisoning
- Methaemoglobinaemia
- Paraquat poisoning
- Any condition expected to involve the use of hyperbaric oxygen (HBO)
- Sickle cell disease
- Consent not obtainable according to national regulations
- Previously randomised into the HOT-ICU trial
Trial locations and contacts
37 sites in 7 countries.
37 sites in 7 countries
Denmark21 sites
Dept. of Intensive Care, Aalborg University Hospital
Aalborg, 9000
Dept. of Intensive Care East Section, Øst, Skejby, Aarhus University Hospital
Aarhus, 8000
Dept. of Intensive Care Section Nord, Skejby, Aarhus University Hospital
Aarhus, 8000
Dept. of Intensive Care, University Hospital Skejby
Aarhus, 8200
Dept. of Intensive Care 4131, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet
Copenhagen, 2100
Dept. of Intensive Care, Bispebjerg Hospital
Copenhagen, 2400
Dept. of Intensive Care, Herlev Hospital
Herlev, 2730
Dept. of Intensive Care, Herning Hospital
Herning, 7400
Dept. of Intensive Care, Hillerød Hospital
Hillerød, 3400
Dept. of Intensive Care, Hjørring Hospital
Hjørring, 9800
Dept. of Intensive Care, Holbæk Hospital
Holbæk, 4300
Department of Intensive Care, Holstebro
Holstebro, 7500
Dept. of Intensive Care, Holstebro Hospital
Holstebro, 7500
Dept. of Intensive Care, Horsens Hospital
Horsens, 8700
Dept. of Intensive Care, Hvidovre Hospital
Hvidovre, 2650
Dept. of Intensive Care, Køge Hospital
Køge, 4600
Dept. of Intensive Care, Kolding Hospital
Kolding, 6000
Dept. of Intensive Care, Randers Hospital
Randers, 8930
Dept. of Intensive Care, Roskilde Hospital
Roskilde, 4000
Dept. of Intensive Care, Slagelse Hospital
Slagelse, 4200
Department of Intensive Care, Viborg Hospital
Viborg, 8800
United Kingdom6 sites
Department of Intensive Care, University Hospital of Wales
Cardiff, Wales
Kingston Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
Kingston upon Thames, KT2 7QB
Royal Glamorgan Hospital
Llantrisant, CF72 8XR
Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust
Manchester, M13 9WL
Wythenshawe Hospital
Manchester, M23 9LT
Royal Berkshire NHS Foundation Trust
Reading, Berkshire, RG1 5AN
Finland4 sites
Dept. of Intensive Care, Helsinki University Hospital
Helsinki
Dept. of Intensive Care, Central Finland Central Hospital
Jyväskylä, 40620
Dept. of Intensive Care, Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio
Kuopio, 70210
Dept. of Intensive Care, Turku University Hospital, Turku
Turku, 20520
Netherlands2 sites
Dept. of Intensive Care, University Medical Center Groningen
Groningen, 9713
Dept. of Intensive Care, Canisius Wilhelmina Hospital
Nijmegen, 6532 SZ
Switzerland2 sites
Dept. of Intensive Care, Basel University Hospital
Basel, 4056
Dept. of Intensive Care, Bern University Hospital
Bern, 3010
Iceland1 site
Dept. of Intensive Care, Landspitali University Hospital Reykjavik
Reykjavik
Norway1 site
Dept. of Intensive Care, National Hospital, University of Oslo
Oslo
About this study
Official title: Handling Oxygenation Targets in Adults With Acute Hypoxaemic Respiratory Failure in the Intensive Care Unit: A Randomised Clinical Trial of a Lower Versus a Higher Oxygenation Target
Handling oxygenation targets (HOT) is standard of care in the intensive care unit (ICU), however the quality and quantity of evidence is low and potential harm has been reported. The aim of the HOT-ICU trial is to assess the overall benefits and harms of two levels of oxygenation targets in adult critically ill patients with acute hypoxaemic respiratory failure in the ICU.
Read the detailed description
Acutely ill adults with hypoxaemic respiratory failure admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) are at risk of life-threatening hypoxia, and thus oxygen is administered. However, the evidence on the optimal level of oxygenation is of low quantity and quality with no firm evidence for benefit or harm. Importantly, liberal use of supplementary oxygen may increase the number of serious adverse events including death. The aim of the HOT-ICU trial is to assess the benefits and harms of two targets of partial pressure of oxygen in arterial blood (PaO2) in guiding the oxygen administration in acutely ill adults with hypoxaemic respiratory failure at ICU admission.
- Conditions
- Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure, Oxygen Toxicity
- Being tested
- Oxygen
- Keywords
- Oxygenation, Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Mechanical ventilation, Critical illness, Critical care
- Medical subject headings
- Respiratory Insufficiency, Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Critical Illness
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
OxygenDrug
Also called Inspired oxygen
Oxygen administration to achieve a PaO2 of 8 kPa (60 mmHg) from ICU admission to ICU discharge
OxygenDrug
Also called Inspired oxygen
Oxygen administration to achieve a PaO2 of 12 kPa (90 mmHg) from ICU admission to ICU discharge
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Low oxygenation target | Experimental | Partial pressure of oxygen in arterial blood (PaO2) 8 kPa (60 mmHg) Receives: Drug: Oxygen |
| High oxygenation target | Active comparator | Partial pressure of oxygen in arterial blood (PaO2) 12 kPa (90 mmHg) Receives: Drug: Oxygen |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
90-days mortality
Landmark mortality 90-days after randomisation
Measured: 90 days
Secondary outcomes (8)
Days alive without organ support
Percentage of days alive and free from mechanical ventilation, circulatory support and renal replacement therapy
Measured: Within 90 days
Days alive out of the hospital
Percentage of days alive out of the hospital
Measured: Within 90 days
Number of patients with one or more serious adverse events
Serious adverse events are defined as new episode of shock and new episodes of ischaemic events including myocardial or intestinal ischaemia or ischaemic stroke
Measured: Until ICU discharge, maximum 90 days
1-year mortality
Landmark mortality 1 year after randomisation
Measured: 1 year
Quality of life assessement using the EuroQual-5D-5L telephone interview in selcted sites
EQ-5D-5L 1-year after randomisation
Measured: 1 year
Cognitive function 1-year after randomisation as assessed using the Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS) score in selected sites
RBANS score 1 year after randomisation at selected sites
Measured: 1 year
Pulmonary function
Bodyplethysmography and carbon monooxide diffusion capacity 1 year after randomisation at sellected sites
Measured: 1 year
A health economic analysis
The analytic details will be based on the result of the trial and specified (cost-effectiveness versus cost-minimisation analyses)
Measured: 90 days
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted2 Jun 2017
- Study start19 Jun 2017
- Primary completion3 Nov 2020
- Study completion3 Aug 2021
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (15)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Hypoxemic Respiratory FailureStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 2,928 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Aalborg University Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen Trial Unit, Center for Clinical Intervention Research
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Bodil Steen Rasmussen, Aalborg University Hospital
- Investigators
- Bodil Steen Rasmussen, MD, PhD, Principal investigator, Aalborg University HospitalAnders Perner, MD, PhD, Study chair, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03174002
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- AAUH-ICU-01
- Other IDs
- 2017-000632-34, 2017
- Acronym
- HOT-ICU
- Status last verified
- Oct 2021
- First submitted
- 30 May 2017
- Last updated
- 26 Oct 2021
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: All original records (incl. consent forms, eCRFs, and relevant correspondences) will be archived at trial sites for 15 years. The clean electronic trial database file will be delivered to the EudraCT Database and Zenodo (https://zenodo.org/about) and maintained for 15 years and anonymised if requested by the authorities.
Publications
Schjorring OL, Perner A, Wetterslev J, Lange T, Keus F, Laake JH, Okkonen M, Siegemund M, Morgan M, Thormar KM, Rasmussen BS; HOT-ICU Investigators. Handling Oxygenation Targets in the Intensive Care Unit (HOT-ICU)-Protocol for a randomised clinical trial comparing a lower vs a higher oxygenation target in adults with acute hypoxaemic respiratory failure. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2019 Aug;63(7):956-965. doi: 10.1111/aas.13356. Epub 2019 Mar 18.
PubMed 30883686Barbateskovic M, Schjorring OL, Jakobsen JC, Meyhoff CS, Rasmussen BS, Perner A, Wetterslev J. Oxygen supplementation for critically ill patients-A protocol for a systematic review. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2018 Aug;62(7):1020-1030. doi: 10.1111/aas.13127. Epub 2018 Apr 30.
PubMed 29708586Barbateskovic M, Schjorring OL, Russo Krauss S, Jakobsen JC, Meyhoff CS, Dahl RM, Rasmussen BS, Perner A, Wetterslev J. Higher versus lower fraction of inspired oxygen or targets of arterial oxygenation for adults admitted to the intensive care unit. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Nov 27;2019(11):CD012631. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012631.pub2.
PubMed 31773728Rasmussen BS, Perner A, Wetterslev J, Meyhoff CS, Schjorring OL. Oxygenation targets in acutely ill patients: still a matter of debate. Lancet. 2018 Dec 8;392(10163):2436-2437. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32201-3. No abstract available.
PubMed 30527413Schjorring OL, Klitgaard TL, Perner A, Wetterslev J, Lange T, Keus F, Laake JH, Morgan M, Backlund M, Siegemund M, Thormar KM, Rasmussen BS. The handling oxygenation targets in the intensive care unit (HOT-ICU) trial: Detailed statistical analysis plan. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2020 Jul;64(6):847-856. doi: 10.1111/aas.13569. Epub 2020 Mar 4.
PubMed 32068884Crescioli E, Klitgaard TL, Riis JO, Weinreich UM, Jensen JS, Vestergaard SR, Bunzel AG, Eriksen ASB, Gudbjerg SH, Poulsen LM, Brochner AC, Mortensen CB, Haberlandt T, Meyer CN, Braagaard L, Mortensen J, Lange T, Perner A, Schjorring OL, Rasmussen BS. Oxygenation Targets and Long-Term Cognitive and Pulmonary Functions in Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure: A Clinical Trial. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2026 Mar 1;212(3):464-473. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202412-2499OC.
PubMed 40920961Nielsen FM, Klitgaard TL, Bruun NH, Moller MH, Schjorring OL, Rasmussen BS. Lower or higher oxygenation targets in the intensive care unit: an individual patient data meta-analysis. Intensive Care Med. 2024 Aug;50(8):1275-1286. doi: 10.1007/s00134-024-07523-3. Epub 2024 Jul 11.
PubMed 38990335Nielsen MB, Klitgaard TL, Weinreich UM, Nielsen FM, Perner A, Schjorring OL, Rasmussen BS. Effects of a lower versus a higher oxygenation target in intensive care unit patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and acute hypoxaemic respiratory failure: a subgroup analysis of a randomised clinical trial. BJA Open. 2024 Apr 29;10:100281. doi: 10.1016/j.bjao.2024.100281. eCollection 2024 Jun.
PubMed 38711834Klitgaard TL, Schjorring OL, Severinsen MT, Perner A, Rasmussen BS. Lower versus higher oxygenation targets in ICU patients with haematological malignancy - insights from the HOT-ICU trial. BJA Open. 2022 Sep 23;4:100090. doi: 10.1016/j.bjao.2022.100090. eCollection 2022 Dec.
PubMed 37588787Crescioli E, Lass Klitgaard T, Perner A, Lilleholt Schjorring O, Steen Rasmussen B. Lower versus higher oxygenation targets in hypoxaemic ICU patients after cardiac arrest. Resuscitation. 2023 Jul;188:109838. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2023.109838. Epub 2023 May 16.
PubMed 37196799Crescioli E, Klitgaard TL, Poulsen LM, Brand BA, Siegemund M, Grofte T, Keus F, Pedersen UG, Backlund M, Karttunen J, Morgan M, Ciubotariu A, Bunzel AG, Vestergaard SR, Jensen NM, Jensen TS, Kjaer MN, Jensen AKG, Lange T, Wetterslev J, Perner A, Schjorring OL, Rasmussen BS. Long-term mortality and health-related quality of life of lower versus higher oxygenation targets in ICU patients with severe hypoxaemia. Intensive Care Med. 2022 Jun;48(6):714-722. doi: 10.1007/s00134-022-06695-0. Epub 2022 Apr 20.
PubMed 35441849Klitgaard TL, Schjorring OL, Lange T, Moller MH, Perner A, Rasmussen BS, Granholm A. Lower versus higher oxygenation targets in critically ill patients with severe hypoxaemia: secondary Bayesian analysis to explore heterogeneous treatment effects in the Handling Oxygenation Targets in the Intensive Care Unit (HOT-ICU) trial. Br J Anaesth. 2022 Jan;128(1):55-64. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2021.09.010. Epub 2021 Oct 19.
PubMed 34674834Rasmussen BS, Klitgaard TL, Perner A, Brand BA, Hildebrandt T, Siegemund M, Hollinger A, Aagaard SR, Bestle MH, Marcussen KV, Brochner AC, Solling CG, Poulsen LM, Laake JH, Aslam TN, Backlund M, Okkonen M, Morgan M, Sharman M, Lange T, Wetterslev J, Schjorring OL. Oxygenation targets in ICU patients with COVID-19: A post hoc subgroup analysis of the HOT-ICU trial. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2022 Jan;66(1):76-84. doi: 10.1111/aas.13977. Epub 2021 Sep 20.
PubMed 34425016Schjorring OL, Klitgaard TL, Perner A, Wetterslev J, Lange T, Siegemund M, Backlund M, Keus F, Laake JH, Morgan M, Thormar KM, Rosborg SA, Bisgaard J, Erntgaard AES, Lynnerup AH, Pedersen RL, Crescioli E, Gielstrup TC, Behzadi MT, Poulsen LM, Estrup S, Laigaard JP, Andersen C, Mortensen CB, Brand BA, White J, Jarnvig IL, Moller MH, Quist L, Bestle MH, Schonemann-Lund M, Kamper MK, Hindborg M, Hollinger A, Gebhard CE, Zellweger N, Meyhoff CS, Hjort M, Bech LK, Grofte T, Bundgaard H, Ostergaard LHM, Thyo MA, Hildebrandt T, Uslu B, Solling CG, Moller-Nielsen N, Brochner AC, Borup M, Okkonen M, Dieperink W, Pedersen UG, Andreasen AS, Buus L, Aslam TN, Winding RR, Schefold JC, Thorup SB, Iversen SA, Engstrom J, Kjaer MN, Rasmussen BS; HOT-ICU Investigators. Lower or Higher Oxygenation Targets for Acute Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure. N Engl J Med. 2021 Apr 8;384(14):1301-1311. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2032510. Epub 2021 Jan 20.
PubMed 33471452Klitgaard TL, Schjorring OL, Lange T, Moller MH, Perner A, Rasmussen BS, Granholm A. Bayesian and heterogeneity of treatment effect analyses of the HOT-ICU trial-A secondary analysis protocol. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2020 Oct;64(9):1376-1381. doi: 10.1111/aas.13669. Epub 2020 Aug 5.
PubMed 32659856
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 26 Oct 2021. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Handling Oxygenation Targets in Adults With Acute Hypoxaemic Respiratory Failure in the Intensive Care Unit: A Randomised Clinical Trial of a Lower Versus a Higher Oxygenation Target
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03174002
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- HOT-ICU / AAUH-ICU-01
- Conditions
- Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure, Oxygen Toxicity
- Keywords
- Oxygenation, Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Mechanical ventilation, Critical illness, Critical care
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 2,928 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Aalborg University HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen Trial Unit, Center for Clinical Intervention Research
- Study start
- 19 Jun 2017 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 3 Nov 2020 (actual)
- Study completion
- 3 Aug 2021 (actual)
- First posted
- 2 Jun 2017 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Handling oxygenation targets (HOT) is standard of care in the intensive care unit (ICU), however the quality and quantity of evidence is low and potential harm has been reported. The aim of the HOT-ICU trial is to assess the overall benefits and harms of two levels of oxygenation targets in adult critically ill patients with acute hypoxaemic respiratory failure in the ICU.
Detailed description
Acutely ill adults with hypoxaemic respiratory failure admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) are at risk of life-threatening hypoxia, and thus oxygen is administered. However, the evidence on the optimal level of oxygenation is of low quantity and quality with no firm evidence for benefit or harm. Importantly, liberal use of supplementary oxygen may increase the number of serious adverse events including death. The aim of the HOT-ICU trial is to assess the benefits and harms of two targets of partial pressure of oxygen in arterial blood (PaO2) in guiding the oxygen administration in acutely ill adults with hypoxaemic respiratory failure at ICU admission.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Low oxygenation target | Experimental | Drug: OxygenPartial pressure of oxygen in arterial blood (PaO2) 8 kPa (60 mmHg) |
| High oxygenation target | Active comparator | Drug: OxygenPartial pressure of oxygen in arterial blood (PaO2) 12 kPa (90 mmHg) |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Acutely admitted to the ICU AND
- Aged ≥ 18 years AND
- Receives supplemental oxygen with a flow of at least 10 L per minutes in an open system including high-flow systems OR at least a FiO2 of 0.50 in a closed system including invasive or non-invasive ventilation or CPAP systems AND
- Expected to receive supplemental oxygen for at least 24 hours in the ICU AND
- Having an arterial line for PaO2 monitoring
Key exclusion criteria (15 listed)
- Cannot be randomised within twelve hours after present ICU admission
- Chronic mechanical ventilation for any reason
- Use of home oxygen
- Previous treatment with bleomycin
- Organ transplant during current hospital admission
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| OxygenAlso: Inspired oxygenOxygen administration to achieve a PaO2 of 8 kPa (60 mmHg) from ICU admission to ICU discharge | Drug | Low oxygenation target |
| OxygenAlso: Inspired oxygenOxygen administration to achieve a PaO2 of 12 kPa (90 mmHg) from ICU admission to ICU discharge | Drug | High oxygenation target |
Primary outcome
90-days mortality
Time frame: 90 days
Landmark mortality 90-days after randomisation
8 secondary outcomes
Days alive without organ support
Time frame: Within 90 days
Days alive out of the hospital
Time frame: Within 90 days
Number of patients with one or more serious adverse events
Time frame: Until ICU discharge, maximum 90 days
1-year mortality
Time frame: 1 year
Quality of life assessement using the EuroQual-5D-5L telephone interview in selcted sites
Time frame: 1 year
Cognitive function 1-year after randomisation as assessed using the Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS) score in selected sites
Time frame: 1 year
Pulmonary function
Time frame: 1 year
A health economic analysis
Time frame: 90 days
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 26 Oct 2021.
- Background: PubMed 30883686Schjorring OL, Perner A, Wetterslev J, Lange T, Keus F, Laake JH, Okkonen M, Siegemund M, Morgan M, Thormar KM, Rasmussen BS; HOT-ICU Investigators. Handling Oxygenation Targets in the Intensive Care Unit (HOT-ICU)-Protocol for a randomised clinical trial comparing a lower vs a higher oxygenation target in adults with acute hypoxaemic respiratory failure. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2019 Aug;63(7):956-965. doi: 10.1111/aas.13356. Epub 2019 Mar 18.
- Background: PubMed 29708586Barbateskovic M, Schjorring OL, Jakobsen JC, Meyhoff CS, Rasmussen BS, Perner A, Wetterslev J. Oxygen supplementation for critically ill patients-A protocol for a systematic review. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2018 Aug;62(7):1020-1030. doi: 10.1111/aas.13127. Epub 2018 Apr 30.
- Background: PubMed 31773728Barbateskovic M, Schjorring OL, Russo Krauss S, Jakobsen JC, Meyhoff CS, Dahl RM, Rasmussen BS, Perner A, Wetterslev J. Higher versus lower fraction of inspired oxygen or targets of arterial oxygenation for adults admitted to the intensive care unit. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Nov 27;2019(11):CD012631. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012631.pub2.
- Background: PubMed 30527413Rasmussen BS, Perner A, Wetterslev J, Meyhoff CS, Schjorring OL. Oxygenation targets in acutely ill patients: still a matter of debate. Lancet. 2018 Dec 8;392(10163):2436-2437. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32201-3. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 32068884Schjorring OL, Klitgaard TL, Perner A, Wetterslev J, Lange T, Keus F, Laake JH, Morgan M, Backlund M, Siegemund M, Thormar KM, Rasmussen BS. The handling oxygenation targets in the intensive care unit (HOT-ICU) trial: Detailed statistical analysis plan. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2020 Jul;64(6):847-856. doi: 10.1111/aas.13569. Epub 2020 Mar 4.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 40920961Crescioli E, Klitgaard TL, Riis JO, Weinreich UM, Jensen JS, Vestergaard SR, Bunzel AG, Eriksen ASB, Gudbjerg SH, Poulsen LM, Brochner AC, Mortensen CB, Haberlandt T, Meyer CN, Braagaard L, Mortensen J, Lange T, Perner A, Schjorring OL, Rasmussen BS. Oxygenation Targets and Long-Term Cognitive and Pulmonary Functions in Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure: A Clinical Trial. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2026 Mar 1;212(3):464-473. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202412-2499OC.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 38990335Nielsen FM, Klitgaard TL, Bruun NH, Moller MH, Schjorring OL, Rasmussen BS. Lower or higher oxygenation targets in the intensive care unit: an individual patient data meta-analysis. Intensive Care Med. 2024 Aug;50(8):1275-1286. doi: 10.1007/s00134-024-07523-3. Epub 2024 Jul 11.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 38711834Nielsen MB, Klitgaard TL, Weinreich UM, Nielsen FM, Perner A, Schjorring OL, Rasmussen BS. Effects of a lower versus a higher oxygenation target in intensive care unit patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and acute hypoxaemic respiratory failure: a subgroup analysis of a randomised clinical trial. BJA Open. 2024 Apr 29;10:100281. doi: 10.1016/j.bjao.2024.100281. eCollection 2024 Jun.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 37588787Klitgaard TL, Schjorring OL, Severinsen MT, Perner A, Rasmussen BS. Lower versus higher oxygenation targets in ICU patients with haematological malignancy - insights from the HOT-ICU trial. BJA Open. 2022 Sep 23;4:100090. doi: 10.1016/j.bjao.2022.100090. eCollection 2022 Dec.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 37196799Crescioli E, Lass Klitgaard T, Perner A, Lilleholt Schjorring O, Steen Rasmussen B. Lower versus higher oxygenation targets in hypoxaemic ICU patients after cardiac arrest. Resuscitation. 2023 Jul;188:109838. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2023.109838. Epub 2023 May 16.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 35441849Crescioli E, Klitgaard TL, Poulsen LM, Brand BA, Siegemund M, Grofte T, Keus F, Pedersen UG, Backlund M, Karttunen J, Morgan M, Ciubotariu A, Bunzel AG, Vestergaard SR, Jensen NM, Jensen TS, Kjaer MN, Jensen AKG, Lange T, Wetterslev J, Perner A, Schjorring OL, Rasmussen BS. Long-term mortality and health-related quality of life of lower versus higher oxygenation targets in ICU patients with severe hypoxaemia. Intensive Care Med. 2022 Jun;48(6):714-722. doi: 10.1007/s00134-022-06695-0. Epub 2022 Apr 20.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 34674834Klitgaard TL, Schjorring OL, Lange T, Moller MH, Perner A, Rasmussen BS, Granholm A. Lower versus higher oxygenation targets in critically ill patients with severe hypoxaemia: secondary Bayesian analysis to explore heterogeneous treatment effects in the Handling Oxygenation Targets in the Intensive Care Unit (HOT-ICU) trial. Br J Anaesth. 2022 Jan;128(1):55-64. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2021.09.010. Epub 2021 Oct 19.
- Link to the HOT-ICU websiteLink provided by the sponsor.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. All original records (incl. consent forms, eCRFs, and relevant correspondences) will be archived at trial sites for 15 years. The clean electronic trial database file will be delivered to the EudraCT Database and Zenodo (https://zenodo.org/about) and maintained for 15 years and anonymised if requested by the authorities.
Related trials for Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure
Recruiting
Automated Oxygen Titration With the EMILY.AI Device in a Respiratory Intermediate Care Unit
Chronic Respiratory Failure, Acute Respiratory Failure
Recruiting
Spontaneous vs Controlled Mechanical Ventilation in Acute Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure
Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS), Acute Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure
RecruitingPhase 2
Interleukin-6 Guided Treatment With Dexamethasone or Tocilizumab in Patients Hospitalized With Acute Respiratory Symptoms - a Feasibility Study
Acute Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure
Recruiting
Physiological Effects of Continuous Negative External Pressure for Acute Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure
Acute Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure
Active, not recruiting
Optimizing Care in Critically Ill at UCHealth by Liberalizing the Target O2 in Mechanically-ventilated ICU Patients
Respiratory Failure, Acute Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Bodil Steen Rasmussen, MD, PhD principal investigator
Aalborg University Hospital
Anders Perner, MD, PhD study chair
Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet
37 sites in 7 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing Oxygen in people with Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure and Oxygen Toxicity, run by Aalborg University Hospital at 37 sites in 7 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 15 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 26 Oct 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 37 sites in Denmark, United Kingdom, Finland, Netherlands, Switzerland and 2 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
90-days mortality (time frame: 90 days). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03174002, which also lists 15 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 26 Oct 2021; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 30 Oct 2026.