Nasolabial FoldNCT03174132
Pain and Safety of Restylane Perlane With and Without Lidocaine for Correction of Moderate and Severe Nasolabial Folds
A study testing Restylane Perlane Lidocaine and Restylane Perlane in people with Nasolabial Fold, run by Galderma R&D at 3 sites in Taiwan.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the pain and safety in associated with injection of Restylane Perlane Lidocaine compared to Restylane Perlane using VAS scale Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 20 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Nasolabial Fold
- What is being tested?
- Restylane Perlane Lidocaine and Restylane Perlane
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion, Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 70 participants
- Where
- 3 sitesTaiwan
- Study dates
- 21 Sep 2017to 16 Jan 2018
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 20 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Signed and dated informed consent to participate in the study.
- Men or women aged 20 years or older of Chinese origin.
- Subjects willing to abstain from any other facial plastic surgical or cosmetic procedures below the level of the lower orbital rim for the duration of the study.
- Intent to undergo correction of both nasolabial folds (NLF) with a wrinkle severity in Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale (WSRS) of either grade 3 on both NLFs or grade 4 on both NLFs.
Who cannot join
- Previous tissue augmentation therapy or contouring with any permanent (non-biodegradable) or semi-permanent filler, autologous fat, lifting threads or permanent implant below the level of the lower orbital rim.
- Previous use of any hyaluronic acid based or collagen based biodegradable facial tissue augmentation therapy below the level of the lower orbital rim within 12 months before treatment.
- Previous tissue revitalization treatment with laser or light, mesotherapy, radiofrequency, ultrasound, cryotherapy, chemical peeling or dermabrasion in the midface within 6 months before treatment.
- Scars or deformities, active skin disease, inflammation or related conditions near or in the area to be treated.
- Other condition preventing the subject from entering the study in the Investigator's opinion
Trial locations and contacts
3 sites in 1 country.
Taiwan3 sites
Kaohsiung Medical University
Kaohsiung City
Chang Gung Memorial Hospital
Taipei
Taipei Medical University Hospital
Taipei
About this study
Official title: A Randomised, Multi-center, Subject and Evaluator-blinded Study Comparing the Pain and the Safety Profile Associate With Correction of Moderate to Severe Nasolabial Folds Using Restylane Perlane Lidocaine Compared to Restylane Perlane
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the pain and safety in associated with injection of Restylane Perlane Lidocaine compared to Restylane Perlane using VAS scale
- Conditions
- Nasolabial Fold
- Being tested
- Restylane Perlane Lidocaine, Restylane Perlane
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Restylane Perlane LidocaineDevice
Intradermal injection
Restylane PerlaneDevice
Intradermal injection
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Restylane Perlane Lidocaine | Experimental | Restylane Perlane Lidocaine will be injected into one side of the nasolabial fold at day 1 Receives: Device: Restylane Perlane Lidocaine |
| Restylane Perlane | Active comparator | Restylane Perlane will be injected into the opposite side of the nasolabial fold on day 1 Receives: Device: Restylane Perlane |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Treatment Differences in Pain (Restylane Perlane Side - Restylane Perlane Lidocaine Side) as Measured by a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)
Subjects that reported at least 10 mm less VAS pain associated with injections of Perlane-Lido compared to Perlane at the time of injection.
VAS=Visual Analogue Scale. The VAS is a subjective scale to measure pain intensity. The participant is instructed to put a vertical mark, approximating the pain experienced during the procedure, on a 100 mm (millimeter) horizontal line labelled "no pain" at the left end and "the worst pain you can imagine" at the right end. The distance in mm from the left end (no pain) to the participant's VAS mark is measured with a standard ruler.
Measured: At the time of injection
Secondary outcomes (1)
Treatment Differences in Pain (Restylane Perlane Side - Restylane Perlane Lidocaine Side) as Measured by a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)
Subjects that reported at least 10 mm less VAS pain associated with injections of Perlane-Lido compared to Perlane at 15, 30, 45 and 60 minutes after injection.
VAS=Visual Analogue Scale. The VAS is a subjective scale to measure pain intensity. The participant is instructed to put a vertical mark, approximating the pain experienced during the procedure, on a 100 mm (millimeter) horizontal line labelled "no pain" at the left end and "the worst pain you can imagine" at the right end. The distance in mm from the left end (no pain) to the participant's VAS mark is measured with a standard ruler.
Measured: 15, 30, 45, and 60 minutes after injection
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted2 Jun 2017
- Study start21 Sep 2017
- Primary completion16 Jan 2018
- Study completion16 Jan 2018
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for Nasolabial FoldStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Galderma R&DThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 70 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Galderma R&D
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Q-Med AB, Study director, Galderma R&D
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03174132
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 43TW1628
- Status last verified
- Aug 2019
- First submitted
- 29 May 2017
- Last updated
- 26 Aug 2022
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 26 Aug 2022. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Randomised, Multi-center, Subject and Evaluator-blinded Study Comparing the Pain and the Safety Profile Associate With Correction of Moderate to Severe Nasolabial Folds Using Restylane Perlane Lidocaine Compared to Restylane Perlane
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03174132
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 43TW1628
- Conditions
- Nasolabial Fold
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 70 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Galderma R&DIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 21 Sep 2017 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 16 Jan 2018 (actual)
- Study completion
- 16 Jan 2018 (actual)
- First posted
- 2 Jun 2017 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 20 Sep 2019
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the pain and safety in associated with injection of Restylane Perlane Lidocaine compared to Restylane Perlane using VAS scale
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Restylane Perlane Lidocaine | Experimental | Device: Restylane Perlane LidocaineRestylane Perlane Lidocaine will be injected into one side of the nasolabial fold at day 1 |
| Restylane Perlane | Active comparator | Device: Restylane PerlaneRestylane Perlane will be injected into the opposite side of the nasolabial fold on day 1 |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 20 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Signed and dated informed consent to participate in the study.
- Men or women aged 20 years or older of Chinese origin.
- Subjects willing to abstain from any other facial plastic surgical or cosmetic procedures below the level of the lower orbital rim for the duration of the study.
- Intent to undergo correction of both nasolabial folds (NLF) with a wrinkle severity in Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale (WSRS) of either grade 3 on both NLFs or grade 4 on both NLFs.
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Previous tissue augmentation therapy or contouring with any permanent (non-biodegradable) or semi-permanent filler, autologous fat, lifting threads or permanent implant below the level of the lower orbital rim.
- Previous use of any hyaluronic acid based or collagen based biodegradable facial tissue augmentation therapy below the level of the lower orbital rim within 12 months before treatment.
- Previous tissue revitalization treatment with laser or light, mesotherapy, radiofrequency, ultrasound, cryotherapy, chemical peeling or dermabrasion in the midface within 6 months before treatment.
- Scars or deformities, active skin disease, inflammation or related conditions near or in the area to be treated.
- Other condition preventing the subject from entering the study in the Investigator's opinion
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Restylane Perlane LidocaineIntradermal injection | Device | Restylane Perlane Lidocaine |
| Restylane PerlaneIntradermal injection | Device | Restylane Perlane |
Primary outcome
Treatment Differences in Pain (Restylane Perlane Side - Restylane Perlane Lidocaine Side) as Measured by a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)
Time frame: At the time of injection
Subjects that reported at least 10 mm less VAS pain associated with injections of Perlane-Lido compared to Perlane at the time of injection. VAS=Visual Analogue Scale. The VAS is a subjective scale to measure pain intensity. The participant is instructed to put a vertical mark, approximating the pain experienced during the procedure, on a 100 mm (millimeter) horizontal line labelled "no pain" at the left end and "the worst pain you can imagine" at the right end. The distance in mm from the left end (no pain) to the participant's VAS mark is measured with a standard ruler.
1 secondary outcome
Treatment Differences in Pain (Restylane Perlane Side - Restylane Perlane Lidocaine Side) as Measured by a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)
Time frame: 15, 30, 45, and 60 minutes after injection
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 26 Aug 2022.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Nasolabial Fold
Recruiting
A Study to Confirm Safety and Effectiveness of RADIESSE® Injectable Implant for the Correction of Moderate to Severe Nasolabial Folds
Nasolabial Folds
Not yet recruiting
Dermal Evaluation of Facetem™ S in Nasolabial Folds Esthetics Improvement: DEFINE Study
Nasolabial Folds
Active, not recruiting
Post Market Clinical Follow up Evaluating the Performance and Safety of Juläine(TM) on Nasolabial Fold Wrinkles
Nasolabial Fold
RecruitingPhase 3
Study to Assess Adverse Events and How Effective NOA LIFT is Compared to JUVÉDERM VOLIFT With Lidocaine for the Correction of Nasolabial Folds in Adults
Nasolabial Folds
Recruiting
THE EVALUATION OF THE SAFETY AND PERFORMANCE OF AN INJECTABLE HYALURONIC ACID FILLER
Lips Enhancement Nasolabial Fold Correction Midface Volume Deficit
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Q-Med AB study director
Galderma R&D
3 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Restylane Perlane Lidocaine and Restylane Perlane in people with Nasolabial Fold, run by Galderma R&D at 3 sites in Taiwan.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 26 Aug 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 3 sites in Taiwan. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 20 Sep 2019). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Treatment Differences in Pain (Restylane Perlane Side - Restylane Perlane Lidocaine Side) as Measured by a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) (time frame: At the time of injection). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 26 Aug 2022.