AzTrials
AzTrials

Endometrial HyperplasiaPhase 2NCT03176992

Surgicel® & Endometrial Ablation in the Management of Perimenpausal Heavy Menstrual Bleeding

A Phase 2 study testing SURGICEL® in people with Endometrial Hyperplasia, run by Cairo University at 1 site in Egypt.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Two hundred \& forty patients aged from 40 to 50 years - complaining of heavy menstrual bleeding that is unresponsive to hormonal lines of treatment \& requesting conservative surgical approach- were randomized into 3 groups; group A (Surgicel group) in which 80 patients underwent formal curettage followed by… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 40 to 50 years, women onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Endometrial Hyperplasia
What is being tested?
SURGICEL®
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
240 participants
Where
1 siteEgypt
Study dates
Jun 2015to Feb 2018
Phase
Phase 2
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 40 to 50 years
  • Women only
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Heavy menstrual bleeding (i.e. pictorial blood loss assessment chart score >150) that unresponsive to hormonal lines of treatment \& requesting conservative surgical approach.
  • Uterine length <12 cm.
  • FSH level > 40 IU/L
  • Normal Pap smear
  • Benign endometrial pathology

Who cannot join

  • Active form of PID
  • Uterine scars \& uterine malformation.
  • Uterine organic lesions (e.g., fibroids, polyps \& Adenomyosis)
  • Previous history of endometrial ablation.
  • Patients seeking fertility preservation.
  • Patients suffering coagulopathies or receiving anticoagulant treatments

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

MOUTAZ ELSHERBINI, MD contact

(+20)01001588300

mizosherbini@yahoo.com

FADEL SHALTOUT, MD contact

Egypt1 site, 1 recruiting
  • kasr elaini hospital (Cairo university)

    Cairo, 115431

    MOUTAZ ELSHERBINI, MD, (+2)01001588300, mizosherbini@yahoo.com

    MOUTAZ ELSHERBINI, md

    Recruiting

Other trials in Egypt

About this study

Official title: Surgicel® Versus Endometrial Ablation in the Management of Perimenpausal Heavy Menstrual Bleeding (HMB): Randomised Controlled Trial

Two hundred \& forty patients aged from 40 to 50 years - complaining of heavy menstrual bleeding that is unresponsive to hormonal lines of treatment \& requesting conservative surgical approach- were randomized into 3 groups; group A (Surgicel group) in which 80 patients underwent formal curettage followed by insertion of 4 pieces of Surgicel inside the uterine cavity, group B (Thermal balloon ablation group) in which 80 patients underwent thermal balloon ablation using bipolar radiofrequency electrical energy (Novasure), group C (Endometrial resection group) in which 80 patients underwent transcervical Hysteroscopic endometrial resection.All patients were followed up over duration of 18 months following the procedure (at 3,6,12 \& 18 months). Primary outcome included amenorrhea rates

Read the detailed description

Two hundred \& forty patients aged from 40 to 50 years complaining of heavy menstrual bleeding (i.e. pictorial blood loss assessment chart score >150) that is unresponsive to hormonal lines of treatment \& requesting conservative surgical approach. Participants were randomized into 3 groups; group A (Surgicel group) in which 80 patients underwent formal curettage followed by insertion of 4 pieces of Surgicel inside the uterine cavity, group B (Thermal balloon ablation group) in which 80 patients underwent thermal balloon ablation using bipolar radiofrequency electrical energy (Novasure), group C (Endometrial resection group) in which 80 patients underwent transcervical Hysteroscopic endometrial resection. Randomization was done using computer generated random numbers.

Inclusion criteria included uterine length <12 cm, FSH level > 40 IU/L, normal Pap smear \& benign endometrial pathology. Exclusion criteria included active form of PID, uterine scars, uterine malformation, uterine organic lesions (e.g., fibroids, polyps \& Adenomyosis) \& previous history of endometrial ablation. In addition, patients seeking fertility preservation, suffering coagulopathies or receiving anticoagulant treatments were excluded.

For all patients, full history was taken followed by complete physical examination (with emphasis on speculum examination to exclude cervical or vaginal wall lesions) \& laboratory investigations (FSH, coagulation profile \& routine preoperative investigations). History of Pap smear schedule was obtained and a Pap smear was scheduled if it was due. Transvaginal ultrasound (TVUS) was done using a 7.5 MHz vaginal probe of the General Electric Voluson E8 ultrasound unit (GE Healthcare Austria GmbH, Seoul, Korea) to assess uterine size and to exclude organic lesions of the uterus or ovaries. All participants were subjected to an endometrial biopsy (either before the procedure or intraoperatively followed by a frozen section). Patients, who were found to have atypical endometrial hyperplasia or endometrial malignancy, were excluded from the study.

In the Surgicel group (group A), each SURGICEL® (oxidized regenerated cellulose - Ethicon US, LLC.) knitted fabric (5 x 10 cm) was divided into four equal pieces. A formal cervical dilatation \& curettage was done followed by packing the uterine cavity with the four SURGICEL® strips to ensure that the SURGICEL® is in contact with the basal endometrium all over the cavity.

In group B, Thermal balloon ablation was done using bipolar radiofrequency electrical energy (Novasure). The cervix was grasped with a tenaculum then dilated to 6 mm. The disposable device was inserted in the uterine cavity until the distal end of the sheath touches the fundus then withdrawn backwards approximately 0.5 cm. The cervical collar was slided forward until it forms a seal against the external cervical os. The ablation cycle starts automatically, upon successful completion of the cavity integrity assessment (CIA), \& ends automatically as well. In group C, Transcervical hysteroscopic endometrial resection was done. Bipolar resectoscope is used \& endometrium is resected in successive passes under direct hysteroscopic vision. Each pass of the U-shaped loop electrode removes a layer of tissue of approximately 3-5 mm.

All patients were followed up over duration of 18 months following the procedure (at 3,6,12 \& 18 months). Primary outcome included amenorrhea rates \& secondary outcomes included complication (intra- or post-operative), PBAC score (pictorial blood loss assessment chart score), dysmenorrhea rates, patient satisfaction \& the need for re-intervention (hysterectomy).

Being tested
SURGICEL®
Keywords
ablation, surgicel
Medical subject headings
Endometrial Hyperplasia

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • SURGICEL®Drug

    insertion of 4 pieces of Surgicel inside the uterine cavity after formal curettage

Study groups in NCT03176992
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Surgicel groupActive comparator80 patients underwent formal curettage followed by insertion of 4 pieces of Surgicel inside the uterine cavity
Receives: Drug: SURGICEL®
Thermal balloon ablation groupNo intervention80 patients underwent thermal balloon ablation using bipolar radiofrequency electrical energy (Novasure)
Endometrial resection groupNo intervention80 patients underwent transcervical Hysteroscopic endometrial resection

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. amenorrhea rates

    absence of menstruation

    Measured: 18 months

Secondary outcomes (4)
  1. PBAC score (pictorial blood loss assessment chart score)

    chart consists of a series of diagrams representing lightly, moderately and heavily soiled towels and tampons.The participants complete the chart each menstrual period after clear instructions and explanation of how it should be used

    Measured: 18 months

  2. dysmenorrhea rates

    occurrence of painful menstruation

    Measured: 18 months

  3. patient satisfaction

    simple questions about decreasing duration \& amount of menstrual blood \& better quality of life

    Measured: 18 months

  4. the need for re-intervention

    hysterectomy

    Measured: 18 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted6 Jun 2017
  2. Study startJun 2015
  3. Primary completionDec 2017 (estimated)
  4. Study completionFeb 2018 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Enrolment
240 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03176992
Sponsor's protocol ID
250597
Status last verified
Jun 2017
First submitted
2 Jun 2017
Last updated
6 Jun 2017
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 2 study testing SURGICEL® in people with Endometrial Hyperplasia, run by Cairo University at 1 site in Egypt.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 6 Jun 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Egypt. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact MOUTAZ ELSHERBINI, MD ((+20)01001588300, mizosherbini@yahoo.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

amenorrhea rates (time frame: 18 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 6 Jun 2017.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in