Endometrial HyperplasiaPhase 2NCT03176992
Surgicel® & Endometrial Ablation in the Management of Perimenpausal Heavy Menstrual Bleeding
A Phase 2 study testing SURGICEL® in people with Endometrial Hyperplasia, run by Cairo University at 1 site in Egypt.
Trial summary
Two hundred \& forty patients aged from 40 to 50 years - complaining of heavy menstrual bleeding that is unresponsive to hormonal lines of treatment \& requesting conservative surgical approach- were randomized into 3 groups; group A (Surgicel group) in which 80 patients underwent formal curettage followed by… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 40 to 50 years, women onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Endometrial Hyperplasia
- What is being tested?
- SURGICEL®
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 240 participants
- Where
- 1 siteEgypt
- Study dates
- Jun 2015to Feb 2018
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 40 to 50 years
- Women only
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- Heavy menstrual bleeding (i.e. pictorial blood loss assessment chart score >150) that unresponsive to hormonal lines of treatment \& requesting conservative surgical approach.
- Uterine length <12 cm.
- FSH level > 40 IU/L
- Normal Pap smear
- Benign endometrial pathology
Who cannot join
- Active form of PID
- Uterine scars \& uterine malformation.
- Uterine organic lesions (e.g., fibroids, polyps \& Adenomyosis)
- Previous history of endometrial ablation.
- Patients seeking fertility preservation.
- Patients suffering coagulopathies or receiving anticoagulant treatments
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
FADEL SHALTOUT, MD contact
Egypt1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
kasr elaini hospital (Cairo university)
Cairo, 115431
MOUTAZ ELSHERBINI, MD, (+2)01001588300, mizosherbini@yahoo.com
MOUTAZ ELSHERBINI, md
About this study
Official title: Surgicel® Versus Endometrial Ablation in the Management of Perimenpausal Heavy Menstrual Bleeding (HMB): Randomised Controlled Trial
Two hundred \& forty patients aged from 40 to 50 years - complaining of heavy menstrual bleeding that is unresponsive to hormonal lines of treatment \& requesting conservative surgical approach- were randomized into 3 groups; group A (Surgicel group) in which 80 patients underwent formal curettage followed by insertion of 4 pieces of Surgicel inside the uterine cavity, group B (Thermal balloon ablation group) in which 80 patients underwent thermal balloon ablation using bipolar radiofrequency electrical energy (Novasure), group C (Endometrial resection group) in which 80 patients underwent transcervical Hysteroscopic endometrial resection.All patients were followed up over duration of 18 months following the procedure (at 3,6,12 \& 18 months). Primary outcome included amenorrhea rates
Read the detailed description
Two hundred \& forty patients aged from 40 to 50 years complaining of heavy menstrual bleeding (i.e. pictorial blood loss assessment chart score >150) that is unresponsive to hormonal lines of treatment \& requesting conservative surgical approach. Participants were randomized into 3 groups; group A (Surgicel group) in which 80 patients underwent formal curettage followed by insertion of 4 pieces of Surgicel inside the uterine cavity, group B (Thermal balloon ablation group) in which 80 patients underwent thermal balloon ablation using bipolar radiofrequency electrical energy (Novasure), group C (Endometrial resection group) in which 80 patients underwent transcervical Hysteroscopic endometrial resection. Randomization was done using computer generated random numbers.
Inclusion criteria included uterine length <12 cm, FSH level > 40 IU/L, normal Pap smear \& benign endometrial pathology. Exclusion criteria included active form of PID, uterine scars, uterine malformation, uterine organic lesions (e.g., fibroids, polyps \& Adenomyosis) \& previous history of endometrial ablation. In addition, patients seeking fertility preservation, suffering coagulopathies or receiving anticoagulant treatments were excluded.
For all patients, full history was taken followed by complete physical examination (with emphasis on speculum examination to exclude cervical or vaginal wall lesions) \& laboratory investigations (FSH, coagulation profile \& routine preoperative investigations). History of Pap smear schedule was obtained and a Pap smear was scheduled if it was due. Transvaginal ultrasound (TVUS) was done using a 7.5 MHz vaginal probe of the General Electric Voluson E8 ultrasound unit (GE Healthcare Austria GmbH, Seoul, Korea) to assess uterine size and to exclude organic lesions of the uterus or ovaries. All participants were subjected to an endometrial biopsy (either before the procedure or intraoperatively followed by a frozen section). Patients, who were found to have atypical endometrial hyperplasia or endometrial malignancy, were excluded from the study.
In the Surgicel group (group A), each SURGICEL® (oxidized regenerated cellulose - Ethicon US, LLC.) knitted fabric (5 x 10 cm) was divided into four equal pieces. A formal cervical dilatation \& curettage was done followed by packing the uterine cavity with the four SURGICEL® strips to ensure that the SURGICEL® is in contact with the basal endometrium all over the cavity.
In group B, Thermal balloon ablation was done using bipolar radiofrequency electrical energy (Novasure). The cervix was grasped with a tenaculum then dilated to 6 mm. The disposable device was inserted in the uterine cavity until the distal end of the sheath touches the fundus then withdrawn backwards approximately 0.5 cm. The cervical collar was slided forward until it forms a seal against the external cervical os. The ablation cycle starts automatically, upon successful completion of the cavity integrity assessment (CIA), \& ends automatically as well. In group C, Transcervical hysteroscopic endometrial resection was done. Bipolar resectoscope is used \& endometrium is resected in successive passes under direct hysteroscopic vision. Each pass of the U-shaped loop electrode removes a layer of tissue of approximately 3-5 mm.
All patients were followed up over duration of 18 months following the procedure (at 3,6,12 \& 18 months). Primary outcome included amenorrhea rates \& secondary outcomes included complication (intra- or post-operative), PBAC score (pictorial blood loss assessment chart score), dysmenorrhea rates, patient satisfaction \& the need for re-intervention (hysterectomy).
- Conditions
- Endometrial Hyperplasia
- Being tested
- SURGICEL®
- Keywords
- ablation, surgicel
- Medical subject headings
- Endometrial Hyperplasia
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
SURGICEL®Drug
insertion of 4 pieces of Surgicel inside the uterine cavity after formal curettage
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Surgicel group | Active comparator | 80 patients underwent formal curettage followed by insertion of 4 pieces of Surgicel inside the uterine cavity Receives: Drug: SURGICEL® |
| Thermal balloon ablation group | No intervention | 80 patients underwent thermal balloon ablation using bipolar radiofrequency electrical energy (Novasure) |
| Endometrial resection group | No intervention | 80 patients underwent transcervical Hysteroscopic endometrial resection |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
amenorrhea rates
absence of menstruation
Measured: 18 months
Secondary outcomes (4)
PBAC score (pictorial blood loss assessment chart score)
chart consists of a series of diagrams representing lightly, moderately and heavily soiled towels and tampons.The participants complete the chart each menstrual period after clear instructions and explanation of how it should be used
Measured: 18 months
dysmenorrhea rates
occurrence of painful menstruation
Measured: 18 months
patient satisfaction
simple questions about decreasing duration \& amount of menstrual blood \& better quality of life
Measured: 18 months
the need for re-intervention
hysterectomy
Measured: 18 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted6 Jun 2017
- Study startJun 2015
- Primary completionDec 2017 (estimated)
- Study completionFeb 2018 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Endometrial HyperplasiaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Cairo UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Enrolment
- 240 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Cairo University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Moutaz Sherbini, Cairo University
- Investigators
- MOUTAZ ELSHERBINI, MD, Principal investigator, Assistant professor of obstetrics and gynecology
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03176992
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 250597
- Status last verified
- Jun 2017
- First submitted
- 2 Jun 2017
- Last updated
- 6 Jun 2017
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 6 Jun 2017. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Surgicel® Versus Endometrial Ablation in the Management of Perimenpausal Heavy Menstrual Bleeding (HMB): Randomised Controlled Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03176992
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 250597
- Conditions
- Endometrial Hyperplasia
- Keywords
- ablation, surgicel
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 240 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Cairo UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Jun 2015 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Dec 2017 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Feb 2018 (estimated)
- First posted
- 6 Jun 2017 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Two hundred \& forty patients aged from 40 to 50 years - complaining of heavy menstrual bleeding that is unresponsive to hormonal lines of treatment \& requesting conservative surgical approach- were randomized into 3 groups; group A (Surgicel group) in which 80 patients underwent formal curettage followed by insertion of 4 pieces of Surgicel inside the uterine cavity, group B (Thermal balloon ablation group) in which 80 patients underwent thermal balloon ablation using bipolar radiofrequency electrical energy (Novasure), group C (Endometrial resection group) in which 80 patients underwent transcervical Hysteroscopic endometrial resection.All patients were followed up over duration of 18 months following the procedure (at 3,6,12 \& 18 months). Primary outcome included amenorrhea rates
Detailed description
Two hundred \& forty patients aged from 40 to 50 years complaining of heavy menstrual bleeding (i.e. pictorial blood loss assessment chart score >150) that is unresponsive to hormonal lines of treatment \& requesting conservative surgical approach. Participants were randomized into 3 groups; group A (Surgicel group) in which 80 patients underwent formal curettage followed by insertion of 4 pieces of Surgicel inside the uterine cavity, group B (Thermal balloon ablation group) in which 80 patients underwent thermal balloon ablation using bipolar radiofrequency electrical energy (Novasure), group C (Endometrial resection group) in which 80 patients underwent transcervical Hysteroscopic endometrial resection. Randomization was done using computer generated random numbers.
Inclusion criteria included uterine length <12 cm, FSH level > 40 IU/L, normal Pap smear \& benign endometrial pathology. Exclusion criteria included active form of PID, uterine scars, uterine malformation, uterine organic lesions (e.g., fibroids, polyps \& Adenomyosis) \& previous history of endometrial ablation. In addition, patients seeking fertility preservation, suffering coagulopathies or receiving anticoagulant treatments were excluded.
For all patients, full history was taken followed by complete physical examination (with emphasis on speculum examination to exclude cervical or vaginal wall lesions) \& laboratory investigations (FSH, coagulation profile \& routine preoperative investigations). History of Pap smear schedule was obtained and a Pap smear was scheduled if it was due. Transvaginal ultrasound (TVUS) was done using a 7.5 MHz vaginal probe of the General Electric Voluson E8 ultrasound unit (GE Healthcare Austria GmbH, Seoul, Korea) to assess uterine size and to exclude organic lesions of the uterus or ovaries. All participants were subjected to an endometrial biopsy (either before the procedure or intraoperatively followed by a frozen section). Patients, who were found to have atypical endometrial hyperplasia or endometrial malignancy, were excluded from the study.
In the Surgicel group (group A), each SURGICEL® (oxidized regenerated cellulose - Ethicon US, LLC.) knitted fabric (5 x 10 cm) was divided into four equal pieces. A formal cervical dilatation \& curettage was done followed by packing the uterine cavity with the four SURGICEL® strips to ensure that the SURGICEL® is in contact with the basal endometrium all over the cavity.
In group B, Thermal balloon ablation was done using bipolar radiofrequency electrical energy (Novasure). The cervix was grasped with a tenaculum then dilated to 6 mm. The disposable device was inserted in the uterine cavity until the distal end of the sheath touches the fundus then withdrawn backwards approximately 0.5 cm. The cervical collar was slided forward until it forms a seal against the external cervical os. The ablation cycle starts automatically, upon successful completion of the cavity integrity assessment (CIA), \& ends automatically as well. In group C, Transcervical hysteroscopic endometrial resection was done. Bipolar resectoscope is used \& endometrium is resected in successive passes under direct hysteroscopic vision. Each pass of the U-shaped loop electrode removes a layer of tissue of approximately 3-5 mm.
All patients were followed up over duration of 18 months following the procedure (at 3,6,12 \& 18 months). Primary outcome included amenorrhea rates \& secondary outcomes included complication (intra- or post-operative), PBAC score (pictorial blood loss assessment chart score), dysmenorrhea rates, patient satisfaction \& the need for re-intervention (hysterectomy).
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Surgicel group | Active comparator | Drug: SURGICEL®80 patients underwent formal curettage followed by insertion of 4 pieces of Surgicel inside the uterine cavity |
| Thermal balloon ablation group | No intervention | –80 patients underwent thermal balloon ablation using bipolar radiofrequency electrical energy (Novasure) |
| Endometrial resection group | No intervention | –80 patients underwent transcervical Hysteroscopic endometrial resection |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 40 to 50 years
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Heavy menstrual bleeding (i.e. pictorial blood loss assessment chart score >150) that unresponsive to hormonal lines of treatment \& requesting conservative surgical approach.
- Uterine length <12 cm.
- FSH level > 40 IU/L
- Normal Pap smear
- Benign endometrial pathology
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Active form of PID
- Uterine scars \& uterine malformation.
- Uterine organic lesions (e.g., fibroids, polyps \& Adenomyosis)
- Previous history of endometrial ablation.
- Patients seeking fertility preservation.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| SURGICEL®insertion of 4 pieces of Surgicel inside the uterine cavity after formal curettage | Drug | Surgicel group |
Primary outcome
amenorrhea rates
Time frame: 18 months
absence of menstruation
4 secondary outcomes
PBAC score (pictorial blood loss assessment chart score)
Time frame: 18 months
dysmenorrhea rates
Time frame: 18 months
patient satisfaction
Time frame: 18 months
the need for re-intervention
Time frame: 18 months
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 6 Jun 2017.
Related trials for Endometrial Hyperplasia
RecruitingObservational study
Leveraging Methylated DNA Markers (MDMs) in the Detection of Endometrial Cancer, Ovarian Cancer, and Cervical Cancer
Endometrial Cancer, Cervical Cancer
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Levonorgestrel-Releasing Intrauterine System in Treating Patients With Complex Atypical Hyperplasia or Grade I Endometrial Cancer
Atypical Endometrial Hyperplasia, Stage I Uterine Corpus Cancer AJCC v7
RecruitingObservational study
Liquid Biopsy-Based Early Screening for Endometrial Cancer in Regional Chinese Populations
Endometrial Cancer, Atypical Endometrial Hyperplasia
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Canagliflozin Plus Progestin for Atypical Endometrial Hyperplasia and Early-Stage Endometrial Cancer
Endometrioid Endometrial Cancer, Atypical Endometrial Hyperplasia
RecruitingPhase 2
A Study to Estimate Early Clinical Efficacy Signals of GLP-1 Agonist Administration in Conjunction With Levonorgestrel Intrauterine Device in Obese Patients With Endometrioid Intraepithelial Neoplasia
Endometrioid Endometrial Adenocarcinoma
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
FADEL SHALTOUT, MD contact
MOUTAZ ELSHERBINI, MD principal investigator
Assistant professor of obstetrics and gynecology
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing SURGICEL® in people with Endometrial Hyperplasia, run by Cairo University at 1 site in Egypt.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 6 Jun 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Egypt. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact MOUTAZ ELSHERBINI, MD ((+20)01001588300, mizosherbini@yahoo.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
amenorrhea rates (time frame: 18 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 6 Jun 2017.