CIN2EXCIN2NCT03177863
Expectancy as Alternative to Treatment for Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia Grade 2 Among Women 25 - 30 Years of Age
A study testing Expectancy in people with CIN2 and Therapy, run by Sahlgrenska University Hospital at 5 sites in Sweden.
Trial summary
In the Swedish organised cervical screening program precursors of cervical cancer are detected and treated. Most precursor lesions detected by screening heal spontaneously. Those who progress do it slowly. There are three levels from light; CIN1, moderate; CIN2 to severe; CIN3. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 25 to 30 years, women only
- What is being tested?
- Expectancy
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 125 participants
- Where
- 5 sitesSweden
- Study dates
- 12 Jun 2017to 24 Jun 2021
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 25 to 30 years
- Women only
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- CIN 2
- Written consent
Who cannot join
- CIN (any grade) not resolved
- Former treatment of CIN
- Immunomodulating medication
- Pregnancy (at start of study)
Trial locations and contacts
5 sites in 1 country.
5 sites in 1 country
Sweden5 sites
Södra Älvsborgs Sjukhus
Borås
Kungshöjds gynekologmottagning
Gothenburg, 43350
Frölunda specialistsjukhus
Gothenburg
Skaraborgs sjukhus, kvinnokliniken
Skövde
Norra Älvsborgs sjukhus, kvinnokliniken
Trollhättan
About this study
Official title: Expectancy as Alternative to Treatment for Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia Grade 2 Among Women 25 - 30 Years of Age. A Multicenter Clinical Study
In the Swedish organised cervical screening program precursors of cervical cancer are detected and treated. Most precursor lesions detected by screening heal spontaneously. Those who progress do it slowly. There are three levels from light; CIN1, moderate; CIN2 to severe; CIN3. Women with CIN3 are always treated, regardless of age, according to current clinical guidelines. Women with CIN2 who are below the age of 25 years are offered active expectance for up to two years because there is good evidence that they will spontaneously heal their lesions (regression) in 40-70% of the cases during that time.
Method of treatment is today an excisional procedure of the cervix most often by Large loop excision of the transformation zone (LLETZ/LEEP) Treatment increases the risk of premature birth in a future pregnancy. In 2015 about 1800 excisional procedures of the transformation zone of the cervix were performed in the Västra Götalands regionen (VGR) om Sweden. The average age of first-time mothers in Sweden is rising and in 2014 it was 29 years. Postponed childbearing raises the question whether it is possible to refrain from surgery even for the group of women over 25 years old, with proven CIN2. Existing studies suggest that cure of CIN2 in the age group of and above 25 takes place in the same extent as under 25 years of age.There is lack of evidence concerning clinical follow-up.
In a prospective multicenter clinical cohort study (observational study) with careful monitoring, the investigators will examine what proportion of CIN2 changes regress spontaneously within two years in women, 25-30 years old, and if human papillomavirus (HPV) type 16 may can be a marker for poor regression in this group. Instead of LLETZ, active expectance is offered to women this age with CIN2 in five gynecological clinics in VGR. The study protocol includes gynecologist visits every 6 months for two years, including cytology, colposcopy and directed biopsies of the cervix. Power calculation shows 160 women needs to be included, which is expected to occur within one year from the start.
Read the detailed description
Available in Swedish
- Being tested
- Expectancy
- Keywords
- neoplasm, uterine cervix
- Medical subject headings
- Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
ExpectancyProcedure or surgery
Clinical monitoring. See arm description
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Study cohort | Experimental | Healthy women 25 - 30 years of age with CIN2 who consent to inclusion and with no former history of CIN (any grade). The "intervention" is expectancy with clinical visits every 6 months. Women will leave study cohort if found with total regression (no CIN) or CIN3 Receives: Procedure: Expectancy |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Proportion of regress
Proportion of women with CIN2 at inclusion who will regress to CIN1 or no evidence of disease
Measured: 24 months from date of visit when CIN2 was diagnosed
Secondary outcomes (1)
Proportion of regress for women with HPV16
Proportion of women with CIN2 and HPV 16 at inclusion who will regress to CIN1 or no evidence of disease
Measured: Proportion of women with CIN2 at inclusion who will regress to CIN1 or no evidence of disease
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted6 Jun 2017
- Study start12 Jun 2017
- Primary completion24 Jun 2021
- Study completion24 Jun 2021
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (8)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for CIN2Studies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Sahlgrenska University HospitalThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 125 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Sahlgrenska University Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Björn Strander, Sahlgrenska University Hospital
- Investigators
- Strander, Principal investigator, Sahlgrenska Academy, Gothenburg University, Sweden
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03177863
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- EX CIN 2 001
- Acronym
- EXCIN2
- Status last verified
- Oct 2022
- First submitted
- 2 Jun 2017
- Last updated
- 26 Oct 2022
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Massad LS, Einstein MH, Huh WK, Katki HA, Kinney WK, Schiffman M, Solomon D, Wentzensen N, Lawson HW; 2012 ASCCP Consensus Guidelines Conference. 2012 updated consensus guidelines for the management of abnormal cervical cancer screening tests and cancer precursors. Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Apr;121(4):829-846. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3182883a34.
PubMed 23635684Kyrgiou M, Mitra A, Arbyn M, Stasinou SM, Martin-Hirsch P, Bennett P, Paraskevaidis E. Fertility and early pregnancy outcomes after treatment for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ. 2014 Oct 28;349:g6192. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g6192.
PubMed 25352501Wilkinson TM, Sykes PH, Simcock B, Petrich S. Recurrence of high-grade cervical abnormalities following conservative management of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Jun;212(6):769.e1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.01.010. Epub 2015 Jan 9.
PubMed 25582099Ostor AG. Natural history of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: a critical review. Int J Gynecol Pathol. 1993 Apr;12(2):186-92.
PubMed 8463044Discacciati MG, de Souza CA, d'Otavianno MG, Angelo-Andrade LA, Westin MC, Rabelo-Santos SH, Zeferino LC. Outcome of expectant management of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 in women followed for 12 months. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2011 Apr;155(2):204-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2010.12.002. Epub 2010 Dec 28.
PubMed 21193261Guedes AC, Zeferino LC, Syrjanen KJ, Brenna SM. Short-term outcome of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2: considerations for management strategies and reproducibility of diagnosis. Anticancer Res. 2010 Jun;30(6):2319-23.
PubMed 20651386Ho GY, Einstein MH, Romney SL, Kadish AS, Abadi M, Mikhail M, Basu J, Thysen B, Reimers L, Palan PR, Trim S, Soroudi N, Burk RD; Albert Einstein Cervix Dysplasia Clinical Consortium. Risk factors for persistent cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grades 1 and 2: managed by watchful waiting. J Low Genit Tract Dis. 2011 Oct;15(4):268-75. doi: 10.1097/LGT.0b013e3182216fef.
PubMed 21811178Castle PE, Schiffman M, Wheeler CM, Solomon D. Evidence for frequent regression of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia-grade 2. Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Jan;113(1):18-25. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31818f5008.
PubMed 19104355
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 26 Oct 2022. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Expectancy as Alternative to Treatment for Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia Grade 2 Among Women 25 - 30 Years of Age. A Multicenter Clinical Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03177863
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- EXCIN2 / EX CIN 2 001
- Keywords
- neoplasm, uterine cervix
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 125 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Sahlgrenska University HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 12 Jun 2017 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 24 Jun 2021 (actual)
- Study completion
- 24 Jun 2021 (actual)
- First posted
- 6 Jun 2017 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
In the Swedish organised cervical screening program precursors of cervical cancer are detected and treated. Most precursor lesions detected by screening heal spontaneously. Those who progress do it slowly. There are three levels from light; CIN1, moderate; CIN2 to severe; CIN3. Women with CIN3 are always treated, regardless of age, according to current clinical guidelines. Women with CIN2 who are below the age of 25 years are offered active expectance for up to two years because there is good evidence that they will spontaneously heal their lesions (regression) in 40-70% of the cases during that time.
Method of treatment is today an excisional procedure of the cervix most often by Large loop excision of the transformation zone (LLETZ/LEEP) Treatment increases the risk of premature birth in a future pregnancy. In 2015 about 1800 excisional procedures of the transformation zone of the cervix were performed in the Västra Götalands regionen (VGR) om Sweden. The average age of first-time mothers in Sweden is rising and in 2014 it was 29 years. Postponed childbearing raises the question whether it is possible to refrain from surgery even for the group of women over 25 years old, with proven CIN2. Existing studies suggest that cure of CIN2 in the age group of and above 25 takes place in the same extent as under 25 years of age.There is lack of evidence concerning clinical follow-up.
In a prospective multicenter clinical cohort study (observational study) with careful monitoring, the investigators will examine what proportion of CIN2 changes regress spontaneously within two years in women, 25-30 years old, and if human papillomavirus (HPV) type 16 may can be a marker for poor regression in this group. Instead of LLETZ, active expectance is offered to women this age with CIN2 in five gynecological clinics in VGR. The study protocol includes gynecologist visits every 6 months for two years, including cytology, colposcopy and directed biopsies of the cervix. Power calculation shows 160 women needs to be included, which is expected to occur within one year from the start.
Detailed description
Available in Swedish
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Study cohort | Experimental | Procedure: ExpectancyHealthy women 25 - 30 years of age with CIN2 who consent to inclusion and with no former history of CIN (any grade). The "intervention" is expectancy with clinical visits every 6 months. Women will leave study cohort if found with total regression (no CIN) or CIN3 |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 25 to 30 years
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- CIN 2
- Written consent
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- CIN (any grade) not resolved
- Former treatment of CIN
- Immunomodulating medication
- Pregnancy (at start of study)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| ExpectancyClinical monitoring. See arm description | Procedure or surgery | Study cohort |
Primary outcome
Proportion of regress
Time frame: 24 months from date of visit when CIN2 was diagnosed
Proportion of women with CIN2 at inclusion who will regress to CIN1 or no evidence of disease
1 secondary outcome
Proportion of regress for women with HPV16
Time frame: Proportion of women with CIN2 at inclusion who will regress to CIN1 or no evidence of disease
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 26 Oct 2022.
- Background: PubMed 23635684Massad LS, Einstein MH, Huh WK, Katki HA, Kinney WK, Schiffman M, Solomon D, Wentzensen N, Lawson HW; 2012 ASCCP Consensus Guidelines Conference. 2012 updated consensus guidelines for the management of abnormal cervical cancer screening tests and cancer precursors. Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Apr;121(4):829-846. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3182883a34.
- Background: PubMed 25352501Kyrgiou M, Mitra A, Arbyn M, Stasinou SM, Martin-Hirsch P, Bennett P, Paraskevaidis E. Fertility and early pregnancy outcomes after treatment for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ. 2014 Oct 28;349:g6192. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g6192.
- Results publication: PubMed 25582099Wilkinson TM, Sykes PH, Simcock B, Petrich S. Recurrence of high-grade cervical abnormalities following conservative management of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Jun;212(6):769.e1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.01.010. Epub 2015 Jan 9.
- Results publication: PubMed 8463044Ostor AG. Natural history of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: a critical review. Int J Gynecol Pathol. 1993 Apr;12(2):186-92.
- Results publication: PubMed 21193261Discacciati MG, de Souza CA, d'Otavianno MG, Angelo-Andrade LA, Westin MC, Rabelo-Santos SH, Zeferino LC. Outcome of expectant management of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 in women followed for 12 months. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2011 Apr;155(2):204-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2010.12.002. Epub 2010 Dec 28.
- Results publication: PubMed 20651386Guedes AC, Zeferino LC, Syrjanen KJ, Brenna SM. Short-term outcome of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2: considerations for management strategies and reproducibility of diagnosis. Anticancer Res. 2010 Jun;30(6):2319-23.
- Results publication: PubMed 21811178Ho GY, Einstein MH, Romney SL, Kadish AS, Abadi M, Mikhail M, Basu J, Thysen B, Reimers L, Palan PR, Trim S, Soroudi N, Burk RD; Albert Einstein Cervix Dysplasia Clinical Consortium. Risk factors for persistent cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grades 1 and 2: managed by watchful waiting. J Low Genit Tract Dis. 2011 Oct;15(4):268-75. doi: 10.1097/LGT.0b013e3182216fef.
- Results publication: PubMed 19104355Castle PE, Schiffman M, Wheeler CM, Solomon D. Evidence for frequent regression of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia-grade 2. Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Jan;113(1):18-25. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31818f5008.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for CIN2
Not yet recruitingObservational study
RWS of PDT for CIN 2
Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia Grade 2 (CIN2)
Recruiting
Multicenter Prospective Non-randomized Controlled Study of Ella Photodynamic Therapy for Cervical HSIL/CIN2
HSIL, High Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion, CIN 2
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Pembrolizumab for the Treatment of Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia
Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia, Cervical Squamous Cell Carcinoma In Situ
Recruiting
Evaluation of Low-thermal Argon Plasma Devitalization for the Treatment of CIN 2 Versus Standard of Active Surveillance
Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia Grade 2 (CIN2), Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia Grade 2
Recruiting
Urine HPV Testing for Cervical Cancer Screening Among Women Living With HIV in South Africa
Cervical Cancer, CIN2
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Strander principal investigator
Sahlgrenska Academy, Gothenburg University, Sweden
5 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Expectancy in people with CIN2 and Therapy, run by Sahlgrenska University Hospital at 5 sites in Sweden.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 26 Oct 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 5 sites in Sweden. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Proportion of regress (time frame: 24 months from date of visit when CIN2 was diagnosed). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03177863, which also lists 8 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 26 Oct 2022.