Parkinson DiseaseNCT03180515
Neural and Kinematic Features of Freezing of Gait for Adaptive Neurostimulation
A study testing Activa PC+S Neurostimulator in people with Parkinson Disease, run by Stanford University at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
Continuous deep brain stimulation (cDBS) is an established therapy for the major motor signs in Parkinson's disease, however some patients find that it does not adequately treat their freezing of gait (FOG). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 80 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Parkinson Disease
- What is being tested?
- Activa PC+S Neurostimulator
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 12 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 15 May 2017to 31 Oct 2018
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 80 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- A diagnosis of idiopathic Parkinson's disease, with bilateral symptoms at Hoehn and Yahr Stage greater than or equal to II.
- Documented improvement in motor signs on versus off dopaminergic medication, with a change in the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale motor (UPDRS III) score of >= 30% off to on medication.
- The presence of complications of medication such as wearing off signs,fluctuating responses and/or dyskinesias, and/or medication refractory tremor,and/or impairment in the quality of life on or off medication due to these factors.
- Subjects should be on stable doses of medications, which should remain unchanged until the DBS system is activated. After the DBS system is optimized(during which time the overall medication dose may be reduced to avoid discomfort and complications such as dyskinesias) the medication dose should remain unchanged, if possible, for the duration of the study.
- Treatment with carbidopa/levodopa, and with a dopamine agonist at the maximal tolerated doses as determined by a movement disorders neurologist.
- Ability and willingness to return for study visits, at the initial programming and after three, six and twelve months of DBS.
- Age > 18
- Has a history of and/or displays freezing of gait
Who cannot join
- Subjects with significant cognitive impairment and/or dementia as determined bya standardized neuropsychological battery.
- Subjects with clinically active depression, defined according to the Diagnostic and Statistical manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition (DSM-IV) criteria and as scored on a validated depression assessment scale.
- Subjects with very advanced Parkinson's disease, Hoehn and Yahr stage 5 on medication (non-ambulatory).
- Age > 80.
- Subjects with an implanted electronic device such as a neurostimulator, cardiac pacemaker/defibrillator or medication pump.
- Subjects, who are pregnant, are capable of becoming pregnant, or who are breast feeding.
Show all 15Show fewer
- Patients with cortical atrophy out of proportion to age or focal brain lesions that could indicate a non-idiopathic movement disorder as determined by MRI
- Subjects having a major comorbidity increasing the risk of surgery (prior stroke,severe hypertension, severe diabetes, or need for chronic anti-coagulation other than aspirin).
- Subjects having any prior intracranial surgery.
- Subjects with a history of seizures.
- Subjects, who are immunocompromised.
- Subjects with an active infection.
- Subjects, who require diathermy, electroconvulsive therapy (ECT), or transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to treat a chronic condition.
- Subjects, who have an inability to comply with study follow-up visits or study protocol.
- Subjects, who are unable to understand or sign the informed consent.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
Stanford Movement Disorders
Palo Alto, California, 94304
About this study
Continuous deep brain stimulation (cDBS) is an established therapy for the major motor signs in Parkinson's disease, however some patients find that it does not adequately treat their freezing of gait (FOG). Currently, cDBS is limited to "open-loop" stimulation,without real-time adjustment to the patient's state of activity, fluctuations and types of motor symptoms, medication dosages, or neural markers of the disease. The purpose of this study is to determine if an adaptive DBS system,responding to patient specific, clinically relevant neural or kinematic feedback related to FOG, is more effective than continuous DBS on the motor Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS III) and gait measures of PD.
- Conditions
- Parkinson Disease
- Being tested
- Activa PC+S Neurostimulator
- Medical subject headings
- Parkinson Disease
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Activa PC+S NeurostimulatorDevice
Also called adaptive deep brain stimulation (aDBS), continuous deep brain stimulation (cDBS)
Activa PC+S Neurostimulator is approved for both aDBS and cDBS paradigms.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Activa PC+S Neurostimulator | Experimental | All patients will complete motor testing on both continuous DBS and adaptive DBS during a study visit. The UPDRS rater and the patient will be blind to which type of stimulation they are on. Receives: Device: Activa PC+S Neurostimulator |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Incidence of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events [Safety and Tolerability] Related to aDBS
Safety, tolerability and feasibility of aDBS
Measured: 30 min - 2 hours
Secondary outcomes (9)
Aim 1: Alpha Power
Subthalamic nucleus (STN) local field potentials (LFP) recordings demonstrate oscillatory neuronal activity in both the alpha (8-12 Hz) and beta (13-30 Hz) bands in the resting state in PD. Spectrograms were generated using a short-time Fourier transform, with a 1 second Hanning window and a 0.5 second overlap, creating a frequency resolution of 1 Hz. Power spectral densities were calculated using the Welch method with the same window and overlap parameters. Power was summed in the beta and alpha bands. This power can be representative of the magnitude of oscillatory activity in this frequency band occurring in this brain region.
Measured: 30 minutes
Aim 1: Beta Power
Subthalamic nucleus (STN) local field potentials (LFP) recordings demonstrate oscillatory neuronal activity in both the alpha (8-12 Hz) and beta (13-30 Hz) bands in the resting state in PD. Spectrograms were generated using a short-time Fourier transform, with a 1 second Hanning window and a 0.5 second overlap, creating a frequency resolution of 1 Hz. Power spectral densities were calculated using the Welch method with the same window and overlap parameters. Power was summed in the beta and alpha bands. This power can be representative of the magnitude of oscillatory activity in this frequency band occurring in this brain region.
Measured: 30 minutes
Aim 1: Alpha Sample Entropy
The predictability of the local field potentials (band-pass filtered between 8-12 Hz for alpha) was analyzed using Sample Entropy (SampEn), a nonlinear measure suitable for physiological time series. SampEn may be a more consistent measure and more suitable to shorter time series data than approximate entropy, partially due to the elimination of counting self matches. SampEn is calculated as the negative logarithm of the estimated conditional probability that if consecutive subseries of length m are similar according to some preset tolerance r, the consecutive subseries of length m+1 will be similar too. Here the length of the vector pairs, m, denotes the embedding dimension.
Measured: 30 minutes
Aim 1: Beta Sample Entropy
The predictability of the local field potentials (band-pass filtered between 15-30 Hz for beta) was analyzed using Sample Entropy (SampEn), a nonlinear measure suitable for physiological time series. SampEn may be a more consistent measure and more suitable to shorter time series data than approximate entropy, partially due to the elimination of counting self matches. SampEn is calculated as the negative logarithm of the estimated conditional probability that if consecutive subseries of length m are similar according to some preset tolerance r, the consecutive subseries of length m+1 will be similar too. Here the length of the vector pairs, m, denotes the embedding dimension.
Measured: 30 minutes
Aim 2: Asymmetry
Asymmetry during both forward walking and stepping in place was calculated using periods of walking or stepping when the subject was not freezing. According to previous studies, asymmetry is defined as: 100*(absolute value of the natural log of the shorter average swing time over the longer average swing time) or mathematically: 100*| ln (SSWT/LSWT) |
where SSWT = shorter mean swing time LSWT = longer mean swing time
Measured: 30 minutes
Aim 2: Arrhythmicity
Arrhythmicity during both forward walking and stepping in place was calculated using periods of walking or stepping when the subject was not freezing. According to previous studies, arrhythmicity is defined as the mean stride time coefficient of variation of both legs, and a greater stride time CV implies less rhythmic gait or stepping. Higher arrhythmicity corresponds to more arrhythmic, or more impaired, gait.
Measured: 30 minutes
Aim 2: Stride Time
Kinematic Features associated with Freezing of Gait
Measured: 30 minutes
Aim 2: Percent Time Freezing
Freezing of gait episodes during stepping in place were identified using a validated computerized algorithm, and during forward walking by a blinded rater. The percent time freezing was calculated by dividing the time spent freezing by the total time to complete the task then multiplying by 100 to get a percent. If no freezing was observed, then the percent time freezing reported was 0.0%.
Measured: 30 minutes
Percent Time Freezing
Freezing of gait episodes during stepping in place were identified using a validated computerized algorithm. The percent time freezing was calculated by dividing the time spent freezing by the total time to complete the task then multiplying by 100 to get a percent. If no freezing was observed, then the percent time freezing reported was 0.0%. The percent time spent freezing was compared while the participant was doing the stepping in place task on continuous deep brain stimulation (cDBS) and while the participant was doing the stepping in place task on adaptive deep brain stimulation (aDBS).
Measured: 30 minutes
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted8 Jun 2017
- Study start15 May 2017
- Primary completion31 Oct 2018
- Study completion31 Oct 2018
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for Parkinson DiseaseStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Stanford UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Basic science
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 12 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Stanford University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Helen M. Bronte-Stewart, Stanford University
- Investigators
- Helen Bronte-Stewart, MS, MD, Principal investigator, Stanford University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03180515
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 1R21NS096398
- Status last verified
- Nov 2019
- First submitted
- 6 Jun 2017
- Last updated
- 21 Nov 2019
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 21 Nov 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Neural and Kinematic Features of Freezing of Gait for Adaptive Neurostimulation
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03180515
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 1R21NS096398
- Conditions
- Parkinson Disease
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 12 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Stanford UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 15 May 2017 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Oct 2018 (actual)
- Study completion
- 31 Oct 2018 (actual)
- First posted
- 8 Jun 2017 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 4 Nov 2019
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Continuous deep brain stimulation (cDBS) is an established therapy for the major motor signs in Parkinson's disease, however some patients find that it does not adequately treat their freezing of gait (FOG). Currently, cDBS is limited to "open-loop" stimulation,without real-time adjustment to the patient's state of activity, fluctuations and types of motor symptoms, medication dosages, or neural markers of the disease. The purpose of this study is to determine if an adaptive DBS system,responding to patient specific, clinically relevant neural or kinematic feedback related to FOG, is more effective than continuous DBS on the motor Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS III) and gait measures of PD.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Basic science
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Activa PC+S Neurostimulator | Experimental | Device: Activa PC+S NeurostimulatorAll patients will complete motor testing on both continuous DBS and adaptive DBS during a study visit. The UPDRS rater and the patient will be blind to which type of stimulation they are on. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 80 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (8 listed)
- A diagnosis of idiopathic Parkinson's disease, with bilateral symptoms at Hoehn and Yahr Stage greater than or equal to II.
- Documented improvement in motor signs on versus off dopaminergic medication, with a change in the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale motor (UPDRS III) score of >= 30% off to on medication.
- The presence of complications of medication such as wearing off signs,fluctuating responses and/or dyskinesias, and/or medication refractory tremor,and/or impairment in the quality of life on or off medication due to these factors.
- Subjects should be on stable doses of medications, which should remain unchanged until the DBS system is activated. After the DBS system is optimized(during which time the overall medication dose may be reduced to avoid discomfort and complications such as dyskinesias) the medication dose should remain unchanged, if possible, for the duration of the study.
- Treatment with carbidopa/levodopa, and with a dopamine agonist at the maximal tolerated doses as determined by a movement disorders neurologist.
Key exclusion criteria (15 listed)
- Subjects with significant cognitive impairment and/or dementia as determined bya standardized neuropsychological battery.
- Subjects with clinically active depression, defined according to the Diagnostic and Statistical manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition (DSM-IV) criteria and as scored on a validated depression assessment scale.
- Subjects with very advanced Parkinson's disease, Hoehn and Yahr stage 5 on medication (non-ambulatory).
- Age > 80.
- Subjects with an implanted electronic device such as a neurostimulator, cardiac pacemaker/defibrillator or medication pump.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Activa PC+S NeurostimulatorAlso: adaptive deep brain stimulation (aDBS), continuous deep brain stimulation (cDBS)Activa PC+S Neurostimulator is approved for both aDBS and cDBS paradigms. | Device | Activa PC+S Neurostimulator |
Primary outcome
Incidence of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events [Safety and Tolerability] Related to aDBS
Time frame: 30 min - 2 hours
Safety, tolerability and feasibility of aDBS
9 secondary outcomes
Aim 1: Alpha Power
Time frame: 30 minutes
Aim 1: Beta Power
Time frame: 30 minutes
Aim 1: Alpha Sample Entropy
Time frame: 30 minutes
Aim 1: Beta Sample Entropy
Time frame: 30 minutes
Aim 2: Asymmetry
Time frame: 30 minutes
Aim 2: Arrhythmicity
Time frame: 30 minutes
Aim 2: Stride Time
Time frame: 30 minutes
Aim 2: Percent Time Freezing
Time frame: 30 minutes
Percent Time Freezing
Time frame: 30 minutes
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 21 Nov 2019.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Parkinson Disease
Not yet recruitingPhase 1/2
STAR0602 With Nivolumab in Non Small Cell Lung Cancer and in Metastatic Castrate-Resistant Prostate Cancer, and STAR0602 Alone in Thymic Carcinoma
NSCLC, Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
Early Molecular Biomarkers for Differentiating Parkinsonian Syndromes
PARKINSON DISEASE (Disorder), Atypical Parkinsonism
RecruitingPhase 3
A Clinical Study of Sacituzumab Tirumotecan (MK-2870) in Combination With Pembrolizumab (MK-3475) as First-line Maintenance Treatment of Cervical Cancer (MK-2870-036/TroFuse-036/GOG-3123/ENGOT-cx22)
Cervical Cancer
Active, not recruitingPhase 1/2
Clinical Safety and Efficacy of Umbilical Cord Mesenchymal Stromal Cells-derived Exosomes in Patients With Parkinson's Disease
Parkinson Disease (PD)
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Adaptive DBS to Offset STN Dysregulation During Exercise in PD
Parkinson Disease
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Helen Bronte-Stewart, MS, MD principal investigator
Stanford University
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Activa PC+S Neurostimulator in people with Parkinson Disease, run by Stanford University at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 8 inclusion and 15 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 21 Nov 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 4 Nov 2019). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Incidence of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events [Safety and Tolerability] Related to aDBS (time frame: 30 min - 2 hours). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 21 Nov 2019.