AzTrials
AzTrials

Parkinson DiseasePTDBSNCT03181282

Physical Therapy and Deep Brain Stimulation in Parkinson Disease

A study testing Physical Therapy in people with Parkinson Disease, run by Washington University School of Medicine at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

While deep brain stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus (STN-DBS) is commonly used to reduce tremor, muscle stiffness, and bradykinesia in people with Parkinson disease (PD), preliminary studies suggest balance may worsen and falls may increase after STN-DBS. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 30 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Parkinson Disease
What is being tested?
Physical Therapy
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
31 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
3 Aug 2017to 2 Aug 2019
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 30 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Diagnosis of idiopathic Parkinson disease
  • Hoehn \& Yahr stages II-IV
  • At least 1 year post-STN-DBS
  • Able to provide informed consent

Who cannot join

  • Diagnosis of atypical parkinsonism
  • Hoehn \& Yahr stages I or V
  • Evidence of dementia (MMSE < 24/30)
  • Inability to walk 10 meters with or without assistive device

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine - Program in Physical Therapy

    St Louis, Missouri, 63108

Other trials in United States

About this study

While deep brain stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus (STN-DBS) is commonly used to reduce tremor, muscle stiffness, and bradykinesia in people with Parkinson disease (PD), preliminary studies suggest balance may worsen and falls may increase after STN-DBS. Walking speed, known to be reduced in PD, typically improves after surgery; however, other important gait qualities may not improve. Given the potential for worsening balance and gait and increasing falls after surgery, it is imperative that researchers explore interventions that complement the positive effects of STN-DBS and delay worsening of balance and gait.

Physical therapy (PT) is reported to be effective in improving balance and walking in people with PD. However, there have been no studies to investigate how individuals with STN-DBS respond to PT. As such, it is unclear if exercise in the post-DBS population is safe, feasible, and effective. The purpose of this study is to examine the safety, feasibility, and efficacy of PT in people with PD with STN-DBS.

The investigators hypothesize that PT will be safe and feasible for people with PD with STN-DBS. Further, the investigators hypothesize that those assigned to PT group will demonstrate improvements in balance and gait while those assigned to the control group will demonstrate no change or a decline in balance and gait.

Read the detailed description

Deficits in balance and gait may lead to falls, fall-related complications, and physical inactivity in people with PD. These negative effects are thought to lead to a 'malignant' form of PD in which there is reduced quality of life and increased risk for mortality. While people who have had STN-DBS often experience reductions in tremor, rigidity, and bradykinesia, surgical management of PD may not be effective in ameliorating impairments in balance and gait. In fact, investigators have reported that DBS may worsen balance, which may accelerate an individual's decline toward 'malignant' PD. To this end, recent studies indicate physical activity levels did not increase after STN-DBS. This finding should not go unnoticed as physical activity may have a disease modifying effect, slowing the progression of motor disability. As of 2011, approximately 70,000 people with PD have undergone DBS, with the annual number of DBS procedures for PD totaling between 8,000-10,000. In addition, investigators are now studying the effects of STN-DBS in people with early PD. The procedure appears to be safe and effective in this population, which will increase the number of surgical candidates. With the number of people with PD expected to double to more than 8 million by 2030, the number of those receiving DBS is expected to substantially increase.

Given the expected rise in STN-DBS procedures and potential for worsening of postural instability and gait deficits, there is a clear need for interventions that prevent these negative complications of STN-DBS.

Physical therapy, delivered using various treatment approaches (e.g. treadmill training, balance training), is effective in reducing postural instability and improving spatiotemporal gait characteristics among individuals with PD who do not have DBS. To our knowledge, there are no studies to date that assessed the impact of PT for those with PD who have DBS. In fact, the current standard of care following STN-DBS does not include PT. Current care post-DBS includes pharmacologic management and monitoring of DBS settings, which are optimized based on Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale motor subsection (UPDRS III) scores. Despite the introduction of substantial changes to neural activity in areas of the brain governing movement with DBS, formal movement training or assessment of functional mobility and safety are not provided after surgery. As such, patients may not experience significant improvements in postural stability and gait following surgery, and may be at increased risk for falls, fall-related complications, and development of a sedentary lifestyle. Physical therapy is a personalized intervention that can be used to address specific movement impairments that remain even when patients are on optimal regimens of medication and DBS. There is an urgent need to determine if PT is effective in improving postural stability and gait performance over time following STN-DBS. If the intervention is safe and feasible, future studies could evaluate the efficacy of PT for gait and balance deficits in this population before and/or immediately post-surgery, increasing the potential impact of this research.

In this pilot randomized controlled trial, participants will be randomly assigned to either the physical therapy group or control group. Those in the physical therapy group will attend 1-hour sessions of PT twice weekly with a treatment plan designed to improve balance and gait. Those in the control group will not be prescribed an exercise intervention.

Each participant will undergo the same battery of balance and gait tests. Although STN-DBS settings are typically stable at 12 months post-surgery, participants will be allowed to follow up with their neurologists as needed for programming and medication adjustments. All changes in programming settings and medication dosages will be noted. A rater, blinded to group assignment, will collect all outcomes at each time point. Participants will be tested in the following conditions: 1) OFF stimulation and OFF medication and 2) ON stimulation and ON medication. Testing participants OFF stimulation/OFF medication will allow us to determine if the addition of PT after STN-DBS affects balance and gait independent of other treatments. OFF medication is defined as greater than or equal to 12 hours since the last intake of anti-PD medication. For OFF stimulation/OFF medication testing, participants will arrive to the laboratory OFF medication but with stimulators on. The stimulators will be turned OFF upon arrival at the laboratory and testing will commence 45 minutes after the stimulators are turned OFF. Stimulators will be turned back on upon completion of this testing session. The investigators anticipate the total time for this laboratory visit to be 2 hours. Testing ON stimulation/ON medication will provide insight into how participants perform on an everyday basis. ON medication is defined as 1-1.5 hours after medication intake. For ON stimulation/ON medication assessments, participants will arrive to the laboratory 1-1.5 hours after taking their normal anti-PD medication dose with stimulators on and stimulators will remain on throughout the session. Assessments will occur at baseline and at 8 (i.e. post-test) and 12 weeks (i.e. follow up). Assessments will take place on two separate days and the order of testing condition (OFF medication/OFF stimulation vs. ON medication/ON stimulation) will be randomized. The Movement Disorders Society-Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale III (MDS-UPDRS III) will be administered in each condition.

Being tested
Physical Therapy
Keywords
Deep brain stimulation, Balance, Gait, Physical Therapy, Parkinson disease
Medical subject headings
Parkinson Disease

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Physical TherapyBehavioural

    Also called Physical Rehabilitation

    Postural stability exercises will follow a framework targeting quiet stance, anticipatory and reactive postural adjustments, and dynamic postural control. Gait exercises will include treadmill walking and practice with dual-task gait. A home exercise program (HEP), to be completed twice weekly, will be provided on each participant's initial visit with the physical therapist following STN-DBS surgery. The HEP will include the following exercises: trunk rotation, standing hip flexion, standing hip abduction, standing plantarflexion, and standing squat.

Study groups in NCT03181282
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Physical TherapyExperimentalParticipants assigned to Physical Therapy (PT) will attend a 1-hour visit with a physical therapist twice weekly for 8 weeks. The PT intervention, which will mirror traditional PT for those with PD, will include exercises designed to improve balance and gait.
Receives: Behavioral: Physical Therapy
ControlNo interventionParticipants in the control group will receive the current standard of care following STN-DBS. As such, STN-DBS settings and anti-PD medications will be optimized according to the determination of their neurologist in the same fashion as they will be in the experimental group. Those in the control group will not receive prescribed exercise from a physical therapist.

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events [Safety & Tolerability]

    Number of participants with falls, orthopedic injuries, or other adverse events that are related to treatment.

    Measured: 8 weeks

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. Treatment-Related Adherence [Feasibility]

    Feasibility of the treatment as measured by the number of PT sessions attended.

    Measured: 8 weeks

  2. Balance

    Change in Balance Evaluation Systems Test score. The scale is scored from 0-100% with higher scores indicating better balance. Here, the higher the change score, the greater the improvement in balance.

    A change score of 0.04 would correspond to a 4% improvement in the BESTest score. A change score of -0.02 would correspond to a 2% decline in BESTest score.

    Measured: 8 weeks

  3. Gait

    Change in gait velocity (cm/sec). Higher gait speeds are associated with better mobility. The greater the value for the change in gait speed, the greater the improvement in gait speed. Negative values would indicate a decline in gait speed.

    Measured: 8 weeks

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted8 Jun 2017
  2. Study start3 Aug 2017
  3. Primary completion2 Aug 2019
  4. Study completion2 Aug 2019

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
31 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03181282
Sponsor's protocol ID
201609148
Other IDs
K12HD055931
Acronym
PTDBS
Status last verified
Feb 2023
First submitted
5 Jun 2017
Last updated
22 Mar 2023
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Tueth LE, Rawson KS, Van Dillen LR, Earhart GM, Perlmutter JS, Duncan RP. Physical Therapy and Deep Brain Stimulation in Parkinson Disease: Safety, Feasibility, and Preliminary Efficacy. J Neurol Phys Ther. 2025 Oct 1;49(4):214-221. doi: 10.1097/NPT.0000000000000519. Epub 2025 Sep 16.

    PubMed 40343851
  • Duncan RP, Van Dillen LR, Garbutt JM, Earhart GM, Perlmutter JS. Physical therapy and deep brain stimulation in Parkinson's Disease: protocol for a pilot randomized controlled trial. Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2018 Feb 21;4:54. doi: 10.1186/s40814-018-0243-2. eCollection 2018.

    PubMed 29484198

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Physical Therapy in people with Parkinson Disease, run by Washington University School of Medicine at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 22 Mar 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 22 Mar 2023). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events [Safety & Tolerability] (time frame: 8 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03181282, which also lists 2 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 22 Mar 2023.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in