Common WartPhase 4NCT03183765
Intralesional Measles, Mumps, Rubella (MMR) Vaccine Versus Cryotherapy in Treatment of Multiple Common and Planter Warts
A Phase 4 study testing Measles-Mumps-Rubella Vaccine and cryotherapy in people with Common Wart and Plantar Wart, run by Assiut University at 1 site in Egypt.
Trial summary
Warts are benign epidermal tumors caused by human papilloma virus, which are epitheliotropic non-enveloped double stranded DNA viruses. Transmission of warts occurs from direct person-to-person contact or indirectly by fomites . Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 16 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Common Wart, Plantar Wart
- What is being tested?
- Measles-Mumps-Rubella Vaccine and cryotherapy
- Type of treatment
- Vaccines, Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 48 participants
- Where
- 1 siteEgypt
- Study dates
- 1 Aug 2017to 1 May 2018
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 16 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients should have multiple common or plantar warts.
- No concurrent systemic or topical treatment of warts
Who cannot join
- patients under 16 years old.
- Patients with fever or signs of any inflammation or infection.
- Patients with other types of warts.
- Patients with single warts.
- Pregnancy.
- Lactation.
Show all 9Show fewer
- Immunosuppression.
- Patients who received any other treatments for their warts in the month before starting study.
- Past history of asthma, allergic skin disorders, meningitis or convulsions.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Intralesional Measles, Mumps, Rubella (MMR) Vaccine Versus Cryotherapy in Treatment of Multiple Common and Planter Warts : a Randomized Controlled Trial
Warts are benign epidermal tumors caused by human papilloma virus, which are epitheliotropic non-enveloped double stranded DNA viruses. Transmission of warts occurs from direct person-to-person contact or indirectly by fomites . Warts appear in various forms including verruca vulgaris, plane, plantar, filiform, digitate and periungual.
Read the detailed description
Treatment of warts is difficult for patients and physicians . Currently Available treatment options include cryosurgery, laser, electrosurgery, bleomycin, and topical keratolytic applications; many of them are painful, ineffective, costly and prone for recurrences.
Cryotherapy, which uses liquid nitrogen to freeze tissues and destroy warts, is one of the most common and effective treatments. freezing causes local irritation, leading the host to mount an immune reaction against the virus.
Immunotherapy appears to enhance virus recognition by immune system; allowing clearance of treated wart, distant warts , and helps to prevent infection .Recently, intralesional immunotherapy using different antigens such as mumps, Candida, and tuberculin has been proved effective in the treatment of warts.
The exact mechanism of action of intralesional immunotherapy is still obscure. Intralesional antigen injection probably induces strong non specific inflammatory response against the human papilloma virus-infected cells.
It has been suggested that intralesional measles mumps rubella vaccine results in regression of warts via induction of immune system.
- Conditions
- Common Wart, Plantar Wart
- Being tested
- Measles-Mumps-Rubella Vaccine, cryotherapy
- Medical subject headings
- Warts
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Measles-Mumps-Rubella VaccineDrug
Also called MMR
MMR vaccine will be injected 0.5 ml into the largest wart at 2-week intervals until complete clearance was achieved or for a maximum of 3 treatments.
Response to treatment will be evaluated 1 month after the last session by decrease in the size of warts, decrease in the number of warts and photographic comparison. The clinical response was graded into complete (complete cure), partial (if there was a decrease in the size and\or a decrease in the total number of warts), and no response (no change in size and number of warts).
cryotherapyProcedure or surgery
patients received cryotherapy with liquid nitrogen once every 2 weeks until complete clearance or for a maximum of 3 sessions.Response to treatment will be evaluated 1 month after the last session by decrease in the size of warts, decrease in the number of warts and photographic comparison.
The clinical response was graded into complete (complete cure), partial (if there was a decrease in the size and\or a decrease in the total number of warts), and no response (no change in size and number of warts).
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| MMR vaccine | Experimental | Measles-Mumps-Rubella Vaccine will be injected 0.5 ml into the largest wart at 2-week intervals until complete clearance was achieved or for a maximum of 3 treatments Receives: Drug: Measles-Mumps-Rubella Vaccine |
| Cryotherapy | Active comparator | patients received cryotherapy with liquid nitrogen once every 2 weeks until complete clearance or for a maximum of 3 sessions Receives: Procedure: cryotherapy |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Cure rate
Assess cure rate of MMR vaccine and cryotherapy in treatment of common and planter warts (complete disappearance of lesions) one month after last session, compare efficacy of both measures.
Measured: 60 days
Secondary outcomes (2)
Detection of partial response to both measures
if there was a decrease in the size or a decrease in the total number of warts
Measured: 60 days
Side effects
Detection of post procedure side effects such as flu like symptoms, pain , hypopigmentation.
Measured: 60 days
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted12 Jun 2017
- Study start1 Aug 2017
- Primary completion1 Mar 2018
- Study completion1 May 2018
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (7)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Common WartStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Assiut UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 48 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Assiut University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, GAbdelsamea, Assiut University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03183765
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- MMRVCRYO
- Status last verified
- Jun 2020
- First submitted
- 9 Jun 2017
- Last updated
- 16 Jun 2020
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Shaheen MA, Salem SA, Fouad DA, El-Fatah AA. Intralesional tuberculin (PPD) versus measles, mumps, rubella (MMR) vaccine in treatment of multiple warts: a comparative clinical and immunological study. Dermatol Ther. 2015 Jul-Aug;28(4):194-200. doi: 10.1111/dth.12230. Epub 2015 Apr 6.
PubMed 25847793Tomson N, Sterling J, Ahmed I, Hague J, Berth-Jones J. Human papillomavirus typing of warts and response to cryotherapy. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2011 Sep;25(9):1108-11. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-3083.2010.03906.x. Epub 2010 Nov 25.
PubMed 21812829Nofal A, Nofal E, Yosef A, Nofal H. Treatment of recalcitrant warts with intralesional measles, mumps, and rubella vaccine: a promising approach. Int J Dermatol. 2015 Jun;54(6):667-71. doi: 10.1111/ijd.12480. Epub 2014 Jul 29.
PubMed 25070525Johnson SM, Roberson PK, Horn TD. Intralesional injection of mumps or Candida skin test antigens: a novel immunotherapy for warts. Arch Dermatol. 2001 Apr;137(4):451-5.
PubMed 11295925Sapp M, Bienkowska-Haba M. Viral entry mechanisms: human papillomavirus and a long journey from extracellular matrix to the nucleus. FEBS J. 2009 Dec;276(24):7206-16. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-4658.2009.07400.x.
PubMed 19878308Castellsague X, Cohet C, Puig-Tintore LM, Acebes LO, Salinas J, San Martin M, Breitscheidel L, Remy V. Epidemiology and cost of treatment of genital warts in Spain. Eur J Public Health. 2009 Jan;19(1):106-10. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckn127. Epub 2008 Dec 26.
PubMed 19112075Choi MH, Seo SH, Kim IH, Son SW. Comparative study on the sustained efficacy of diphencyprone immunotherapy versus cryotherapy in viral warts. Pediatr Dermatol. 2008 May-Jun;25(3):398-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1470.2008.00696.x.
PubMed 18577059
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 16 Jun 2020. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Intralesional Measles, Mumps, Rubella (MMR) Vaccine Versus Cryotherapy in Treatment of Multiple Common and Planter Warts : a Randomized Controlled Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03183765
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- MMRVCRYO
- Conditions
- Common Wart, Plantar Wart
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 48 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Assiut UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Aug 2017 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Mar 2018 (actual)
- Study completion
- 1 May 2018 (actual)
- First posted
- 12 Jun 2017 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Warts are benign epidermal tumors caused by human papilloma virus, which are epitheliotropic non-enveloped double stranded DNA viruses. Transmission of warts occurs from direct person-to-person contact or indirectly by fomites . Warts appear in various forms including verruca vulgaris, plane, plantar, filiform, digitate and periungual.
Detailed description
Treatment of warts is difficult for patients and physicians . Currently Available treatment options include cryosurgery, laser, electrosurgery, bleomycin, and topical keratolytic applications; many of them are painful, ineffective, costly and prone for recurrences.
Cryotherapy, which uses liquid nitrogen to freeze tissues and destroy warts, is one of the most common and effective treatments. freezing causes local irritation, leading the host to mount an immune reaction against the virus.
Immunotherapy appears to enhance virus recognition by immune system; allowing clearance of treated wart, distant warts , and helps to prevent infection .Recently, intralesional immunotherapy using different antigens such as mumps, Candida, and tuberculin has been proved effective in the treatment of warts.
The exact mechanism of action of intralesional immunotherapy is still obscure. Intralesional antigen injection probably induces strong non specific inflammatory response against the human papilloma virus-infected cells.
It has been suggested that intralesional measles mumps rubella vaccine results in regression of warts via induction of immune system.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| MMR vaccine | Experimental | Drug: Measles-Mumps-Rubella VaccineMeasles-Mumps-Rubella Vaccine will be injected 0.5 ml into the largest wart at 2-week intervals until complete clearance was achieved or for a maximum of 3 treatments |
| Cryotherapy | Active comparator | Procedure: cryotherapypatients received cryotherapy with liquid nitrogen once every 2 weeks until complete clearance or for a maximum of 3 sessions |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 16 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Patients should have multiple common or plantar warts.
- No concurrent systemic or topical treatment of warts
Key exclusion criteria (9 listed)
- patients under 16 years old.
- Patients with other types of warts.
- Patients with single warts.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Measles-Mumps-Rubella VaccineAlso: MMRMMR vaccine will be injected 0.5 ml into the largest wart at 2-week intervals until complete clearance was achieved or for a maximum of 3 treatments. Response to treatment will be evaluated 1 month after the last session by decrease in the size of warts, decrease in the number of warts and photographic comparison. The clinical response was graded into complete (complete cure), partial (if there was a decrease in the size and\or a decrease in the total number of warts), and no response (no change in size and number of warts). | Drug | MMR vaccine |
| cryotherapypatients received cryotherapy with liquid nitrogen once every 2 weeks until complete clearance or for a maximum of 3 sessions.Response to treatment will be evaluated 1 month after the last session by decrease in the size of warts, decrease in the number of warts and photographic comparison. The clinical response was graded into complete (complete cure), partial (if there was a decrease in the size and\or a decrease in the total number of warts), and no response (no change in size and number of warts). | Procedure or surgery | Cryotherapy |
Primary outcome
Cure rate
Time frame: 60 days
Assess cure rate of MMR vaccine and cryotherapy in treatment of common and planter warts (complete disappearance of lesions) one month after last session, compare efficacy of both measures.
2 secondary outcomes
Detection of partial response to both measures
Time frame: 60 days
Side effects
Time frame: 60 days
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 16 Jun 2020.
- Background: PubMed 25847793Shaheen MA, Salem SA, Fouad DA, El-Fatah AA. Intralesional tuberculin (PPD) versus measles, mumps, rubella (MMR) vaccine in treatment of multiple warts: a comparative clinical and immunological study. Dermatol Ther. 2015 Jul-Aug;28(4):194-200. doi: 10.1111/dth.12230. Epub 2015 Apr 6.
- Background: PubMed 21812829Tomson N, Sterling J, Ahmed I, Hague J, Berth-Jones J. Human papillomavirus typing of warts and response to cryotherapy. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2011 Sep;25(9):1108-11. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-3083.2010.03906.x. Epub 2010 Nov 25.
- Background: PubMed 25070525Nofal A, Nofal E, Yosef A, Nofal H. Treatment of recalcitrant warts with intralesional measles, mumps, and rubella vaccine: a promising approach. Int J Dermatol. 2015 Jun;54(6):667-71. doi: 10.1111/ijd.12480. Epub 2014 Jul 29.
- Background: PubMed 11295925Johnson SM, Roberson PK, Horn TD. Intralesional injection of mumps or Candida skin test antigens: a novel immunotherapy for warts. Arch Dermatol. 2001 Apr;137(4):451-5.
- Background: PubMed 19878308Sapp M, Bienkowska-Haba M. Viral entry mechanisms: human papillomavirus and a long journey from extracellular matrix to the nucleus. FEBS J. 2009 Dec;276(24):7206-16. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-4658.2009.07400.x.
- Background: PubMed 19112075Castellsague X, Cohet C, Puig-Tintore LM, Acebes LO, Salinas J, San Martin M, Breitscheidel L, Remy V. Epidemiology and cost of treatment of genital warts in Spain. Eur J Public Health. 2009 Jan;19(1):106-10. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckn127. Epub 2008 Dec 26.
- Background: PubMed 18577059Choi MH, Seo SH, Kim IH, Son SW. Comparative study on the sustained efficacy of diphencyprone immunotherapy versus cryotherapy in viral warts. Pediatr Dermatol. 2008 May-Jun;25(3):398-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1470.2008.00696.x.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Common Wart
Active, not recruitingPhase 3
Cantharidin Application in Patients With Common Warts (Verruca Vulgaris) (COVE-2)
Common Warts, Common Warts (Verruca Vulgaris)
RecruitingPhase 3
Long-Term Follow-up Study of Cantharidin (YCANTH [VP-102/TO-208]) in Patients With Common Warts (Verruca Vulgaris)
Common Warts (Verruca Vulgaris), Common Warts
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Safety and Systemic Exposure of YCANTH (VP-102) in Subjects With Common Warts (Verruca Vulgaris) (COVE-5)
Common Warts, Common Warts (Verruca Vulgaris)
Recruiting
Liquid Nitrogen Cryotherapy Versus CO₂ Laser for Palmoplantar Warts
Palmoplantar Warts
Not yet recruitingPhase 3
Hydrogen Peroxide 40% Versus Salicylic Acid 40% for Plantar Warts
Plantar Wart
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing Measles-Mumps-Rubella Vaccine and cryotherapy in people with Common Wart and Plantar Wart, run by Assiut University at 1 site in Egypt.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 16 Jun 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Egypt. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Cure rate (time frame: 60 days). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03183765, which also lists 7 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 16 Jun 2020.