AzTrials
AzTrials

Herpetic NeuralgiaPhase 3NCT03186443

Pregabalin Treatment and Prevention Post-herpetic Neuralgia

A Phase 3 study testing Pregabalin and Gabapentin in people with Herpetic Neuralgia, run by Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University at 1 site in China.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Pregabalin is effective on herpetic neuralgia, but whether can prevention post-herpetic neuralgia still need to confirm. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 50 to 85 years
Conditions the study is for
Herpetic Neuralgia
What is being tested?
Pregabalin and Gabapentin
Type of treatment
Pill or oral medicine
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
342 participants
Where
1 siteChina
Study dates
1 Oct 2017to 1 Oct 2017
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 50 to 85 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Pain occurs within 90 days of rash onset
  • Numerical rating scale (NRS) greater than 50 mm

Who cannot join

  • Patient with nervous system disorders which impair completing the pain diaries
  • Patient with history of illicit drug or alcohol abuse within the last 2 years

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Li Wan, Ph.D.,M.D. contact

18122256632

wanli5000cn@163.com

China1 site
  • National drug clinical trial fundation

    Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510260

    Chu-Yan Lin, M.D.

    Li Wan, Ph.D.,M.D.

Other trials in China

About this study

Official title: Prevention Effect of Pregabalin on Postherpetic Neuralgia: A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Controlled Trial

Pregabalin is effective on herpetic neuralgia, but whether can prevention post-herpetic neuralgia still need to confirm.

Read the detailed description

Pregabalin has been recommended as the first-line drug for post-herpetic neuralgia (PHN) therapy currently due to its efficacy and safety. However,there was no valuable report at present on the clinical efficacy of pregabalin for acute and subacute herpetic neuralgia (SHN), expect for a smaller study which included 29 outpatients who had acute zoster pain for a period of 7-1 4 days. And it is not clear whether early application of pregabalin can reduce the incidence of PHN.

Therefore, this study was rational designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of pregabalin in the treatment of herpetic neuralgia,and follow-up to the 8 months, evaluation whether impacting the accidence of PHN.

It is the first time in the international that treating acute herpetic neuralgia (AHN) and SHN with pregabalin as a large sample size clinical trial. The results of this study will be great significance for guiding the clinical medication.

Being tested
Pregabalin, Gabapentin
Keywords
herpetic neuralgia, post-herpetic neuralgia, pregabalin
Medical subject headings
Neuralgia, Postherpetic

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • PregabalinDrug

    Also called pregabalin tablet

    Pregabalin was taken 300mg,q 12h for 6 month.

  • GabapentinDrug

    Also called gabapentin tablet

    Gabapentin was taken 0.4, tid for 6 month.

Study groups in NCT03186443
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
pregabalinActive comparatorexperiment group: pregabalin 300mg,q12h for 6 months
Receives: Drug: Pregabalin
gabapentinExperimentalcompared to pregabalin effect on herpetic neuralgia
Receives: Drug: Gabapentin

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. the changes of numerical rating scale (NRS)

    Pain intensity was rated on an 1 1-point numerical rating scale

    Measured: from the date of start to 8 month

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Brief Pain Inventory (BPI)

    quality of life was rated on Brief Pain Inventory

    Measured: baseline and 8th month

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted14 Jun 2017
  2. Study start1 Oct 2017 (estimated)
  3. Primary completion1 Oct 2017 (estimated)
  4. Study completion1 Oct 2017 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
control group is to oral gabapentin 0.4 tid; experiment group is to oral pregabalin 300mg q 12h
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
342 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03186443
Sponsor's protocol ID
TT-01
Status last verified
Jun 2017
First submitted
7 Jun 2017
Last updated
14 Jun 2017
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing Pregabalin and Gabapentin in people with Herpetic Neuralgia, run by Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University at 1 site in China.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 14 Jun 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Li Wan, Ph.D.,M.D. (18122256632, wanli5000cn@163.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

the changes of numerical rating scale (NRS) (time frame: from the date of start to 8 month). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 14 Jun 2017.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in