AzTrials
AzTrials

AsthmaNCT03188120

Specific Use-Result of Spiriva Respimat® in Asthmatics

An observational study of Asthma, run by Boehringer Ingelheim at 1 site in Japan.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The study objective is to investigate the safety and effectiveness of Spiriva Respimat in patients with mild to moderate persistent asthma under real-world use Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 15 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Asthma
What is being tested?
Spiriva Respimat
How many people
193 participants
Where
1 siteJapan
Study dates
4 Jul 2017to 8 Nov 2018
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 15 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Study population: Patients diagnosed with mild to moderate persistent bronchial asthma

Who may be able to join

  • Patients diagnosed with mild to moderate persistent bronchial asthma
  • Patient aged ≥ 15 years
  • Patients who are naive to Spiriva Respimat and receive Spiriva Respimat for the first time for treatment of bronchial asthma on top of at least ICS treatment.

Who cannot join

  • Patients who have a contraindication to Spiriva Respimat defined in the package insert for Spiriva Respimat
  • Patients who have been enrolled in this study before.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Japan1 site
  • Nippon Boehringer Ingelheim Co., Ltd

    Tokyo, 1416017

Other trials in Japan

About this study

Official title: Specific Use-Result Surveillance of Spiriva Respimat in Asthmatics (Patients With Mild and Moderate Persistent Asthma)

The study objective is to investigate the safety and effectiveness of Spiriva Respimat in patients with mild to moderate persistent asthma under real-world use

Read the detailed description

The study is Post-Marketing Surveillance on the Long-Term Use of Spiriva Respimat in Japanese patients with mild to moderate persistent asthma. The patient population who receive Spiriva Respimat and the safety profile is not expected to change. This study can investigate the safety and effectiveness of Spiriva Respimat in patients with mild to moderate persistent asthma under real-world use

Conditions
Asthma
Being tested
Spiriva Respimat
Medical subject headings
Asthma

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Spiriva RespimatDrug

    Also called FORVENT, SPIRIVA, SRIVASSO

    Drug

Study groups in NCT03188120
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Spiriva Respimat groupNot described
Receives: Drug: Spiriva Respimat

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Number of Participants With Suspected Adverse Drug Reactions (ADRs)

    Number of participants with suspected adverse drug reactions (ADRs) is presented.

    An Adverse Event (AE) was considered to be ADR if either the physician who reported the AE or the sponsor assessed its causal relationship as related.

    Measured: From first drug administration until 30 days after last drug administration; up to 337 days

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. The Change From Baseline in Asthma Control Status at Week 12 Using Asthma Prevention and Management Guideline

    The change from baseline in asthma control status at week 12 using Asthma prevention and management guideline is presented.

    Well controlled is a better outcome compared to Insufficiently controlled and Poorly controlled outcomes.

    Abbreviations used:

    Baseline (BL), Week 12 (W12), Well-controlled (WC), Insufficiently controlled (IC), Poorly controlled (PC), Unknown (UNK), Missing (MIS); If a patient was well-controlled at baseline and maintained the state until Week 12, the effectiveness was assessed as "no change". If a patient insufficiently controlled or poorly controlled at baseline became well-controlled at Week 12, or if a patient was poorly controlled at baseline and became insufficiently controlled at Week 12, Spiriva Respimat was assessed as "effective" (or the patient assessed as a responder). If the disease condition did not improve in a patient at Week 12 from baseline, Spiriva Respimat was assessed as "ineffective" (or the patient assessed as a non-responder).

    Measured: baseline and 12 weeks

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted15 Jun 2017
  2. Study start4 Jul 2017
  3. Primary completion22 Sep 2018
  4. Study completion8 Nov 2018

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
193 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03188120
Sponsor's protocol ID
0205-0536
Status last verified
Nov 2019
First submitted
13 Jun 2017
Last updated
27 Nov 2019
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Asthma, run by Boehringer Ingelheim at 1 site in Japan.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 27 Nov 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Japan. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 27 Nov 2019). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Number of Participants With Suspected Adverse Drug Reactions (ADRs) (time frame: From first drug administration until 30 days after last drug administration; up to 337 days). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 27 Nov 2019.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in