Pregnancy RelatedNCT03188250
Chama Cha MamaToto: a Pilot Study of Peer Support Groups in Kenya
A study testing Chama cha Mamtoto in people with Pregnancy Related and Group, Peer, run by Moi University.
Trial summary
Preventing maternal and newborn deaths remain high on the global agenda. To address this, the Academic Model Providing Access to Healthcare (AMPATH), in partnership with the Government of Kenya, launched Chama cha MamaToto, a community-led peer-support model that groups women together in pregnancy and infancy. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 15 to 70 years, women onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Pregnancy Related, Group, Peer
- What is being tested?
- Chama cha Mamtoto
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 515 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- Sep 2012to Jun 2016
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 15 to 70 years
- Women only
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Pregnant women in communities where chamas were taking place
- Any woman attending chama
Who cannot join
- -
About this study
Official title: Increasing Pregnancy Health Services Uptake Through Integrated Peer Support Groups in Kenya: A Prospective Cohort Study
Preventing maternal and newborn deaths remain high on the global agenda. To address this, the Academic Model Providing Access to Healthcare (AMPATH), in partnership with the Government of Kenya, launched Chama cha MamaToto, a community-led peer-support model that groups women together in pregnancy and infancy. Central to the chama approach is the integration of health, social and financial literacy education with a savings/loans program.
Read the detailed description
To evaluate the feasibility of chamas, we analysed group attendance rates, GISE participation, membership retention, and continuation of the groups beyond the one year. To evaluate the effect of chamas, the investigators compared data from a prospective cohort of women in chamas with a group of controls who did not belong to a chama, matched for age, parity, and location of prenatal care. To evaluate the acceptability of chamas, FGDs were carried out with chama and non-chama participants, health providers and community health workers.
- Conditions
- Pregnancy Related, Group, Peer
- Being tested
- Chama cha Mamtoto
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Chama cha MamtotoBehavioural
Chama cha Mamatoto is a community-based model of peer support group in pregnancy and infancy that combines health education, relationship building and a savings and loans program, led by community health workers
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Chama cha MamaToto | Experimental | Pregnant women in communities where chama cha mamatoto is taking place will be invited to join and participate in bi-weekly group meetings for a year Receives: Behavioral: Chama cha Mamtoto |
| Referent | No intervention | Pregnant women attending at least one prenatal visit in communities where chama cha mamatoto was implemented three months later served as the comparison |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Facility delivery
Proportion of women giving birth in a health facility based on questionnaire
Measured: 22 months
Secondary outcomes (3)
4 ANC visits
attendance at 4 or more ANC visits in pregnancy based on questionnaire
Measured: 22 months
CHV homevisit
CHW homevisit within 48 hours of birth based on questionnaire
Measured: 22 months
Exclusive breastfeeding
Initiation of solids to the infant after 6 months based on questionnaire
Measured: 22 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted15 Jun 2017
- Study startSep 2012
- Primary completionJun 2014
- Study completionJun 2016
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Pregnancy RelatedStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Health services research
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 515 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Moi University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Grand Challenges Canada, University of Toronto
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Astrid Christoffersen-Deb, Moi University
- Investigators
- Astrid Christoffersen-Deb, MDCM, Principal investigator, Moi University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03188250
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- UMoi3
- Status last verified
- Jun 2017
- First submitted
- 31 May 2017
- Last updated
- 15 Jun 2017
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Maldonado LY, Songok JJ, Snelgrove JW, Ochieng CB, Chelagat S, Ikemeri JE, Okwanyi MA, Cole DC, Ruhl LJ, Christoffersen-Deb A. Promoting positive maternal, newborn, and child health behaviors through a group-based health education and microfinance program: a prospective matched cohort study in western Kenya. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020 May 12;20(1):288. doi: 10.1186/s12884-020-02978-w.
PubMed 32398156
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 15 Jun 2017. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Increasing Pregnancy Health Services Uptake Through Integrated Peer Support Groups in Kenya: A Prospective Cohort Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03188250
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- UMoi3
- Conditions
- Pregnancy Related, Group, Peer
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 515 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Moi UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Grand Challenges Canada, University of Toronto
- Study start
- Sep 2012 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Jun 2014 (actual)
- Study completion
- Jun 2016 (actual)
- First posted
- 15 Jun 2017 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Preventing maternal and newborn deaths remain high on the global agenda. To address this, the Academic Model Providing Access to Healthcare (AMPATH), in partnership with the Government of Kenya, launched Chama cha MamaToto, a community-led peer-support model that groups women together in pregnancy and infancy. Central to the chama approach is the integration of health, social and financial literacy education with a savings/loans program.
Detailed description
To evaluate the feasibility of chamas, we analysed group attendance rates, GISE participation, membership retention, and continuation of the groups beyond the one year. To evaluate the effect of chamas, the investigators compared data from a prospective cohort of women in chamas with a group of controls who did not belong to a chama, matched for age, parity, and location of prenatal care. To evaluate the acceptability of chamas, FGDs were carried out with chama and non-chama participants, health providers and community health workers.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Health services research
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Chama cha MamaToto | Experimental | Behavioral: Chama cha MamtotoPregnant women in communities where chama cha mamatoto is taking place will be invited to join and participate in bi-weekly group meetings for a year |
| Referent | No intervention | –Pregnant women attending at least one prenatal visit in communities where chama cha mamatoto was implemented three months later served as the comparison |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 15 to 70 years
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Pregnant women in communities where chamas were taking place
- Any woman attending chama
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- -
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Chama cha MamtotoChama cha Mamatoto is a community-based model of peer support group in pregnancy and infancy that combines health education, relationship building and a savings and loans program, led by community health workers | Behavioural | Chama cha MamaToto |
Primary outcome
Facility delivery
Time frame: 22 months
Proportion of women giving birth in a health facility based on questionnaire
3 secondary outcomes
4 ANC visits
Time frame: 22 months
CHV homevisit
Time frame: 22 months
Exclusive breastfeeding
Time frame: 22 months
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 15 Jun 2017.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 32398156Maldonado LY, Songok JJ, Snelgrove JW, Ochieng CB, Chelagat S, Ikemeri JE, Okwanyi MA, Cole DC, Ruhl LJ, Christoffersen-Deb A. Promoting positive maternal, newborn, and child health behaviors through a group-based health education and microfinance program: a prospective matched cohort study in western Kenya. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020 May 12;20(1):288. doi: 10.1186/s12884-020-02978-w.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Pregnancy Related
RecruitingPhase 2
Psilocybin-Assisted Psychotherapy in Cancer Patients With Adjustment Disorder
Adjustment Disorder, Adjustment Disorder With Anxious Mood
Active, not recruiting
Effective Caregiving for Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome: Testing an Instructional Mobile Technology Platform for High-Risk Pregnant Women
Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome, Opioid-use Disorder
RecruitingObservational study
Observational Safety Study in Women With Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorder (NMOSD) Exposed to UPLIZNA® During Pregnancy
Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorder, Pregnancy Related
RecruitingObservational study
Gender Related Coping and Survivorship for Genitourinary Cancers
Bladder Cancer
RecruitingObservational study
Immune System Related Kidney Disease
Kidney Disease, Nephrotic Syndrome
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Astrid Christoffersen-Deb, MDCM principal investigator
Moi University
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Chama cha Mamtoto in people with Pregnancy Related and Group, Peer, run by Moi University.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 15 Jun 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Facility delivery (time frame: 22 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03188250, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 15 Jun 2017.