AzTrials
AzTrials

Necrotising EnterocolitisNCT03188380

Imaging Modalities in Diagnosing Necrotizing Enterocolitis in Preterm Infants.

An observational study of Necrotising Enterocolitis, run by Princess Anna Mazowiecka Hospital, Warsaw, Poland at 1 site in Poland.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Background Necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) is one of the most serious conditions in newborns, affecting up to 10% of very low birth weight infants (VLBW). In the most premature population mortality rates can rise as high as 60%. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 22 to 32 weeks
Conditions the study is for
Necrotising Enterocolitis
What is being tested?
Plain abdominal radiography and Abdominal ultrasound
How many people
200 participants
Where
1 sitePoland
Study dates
1 Jan 2021to 31 Dec 2022
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 22 to 32 weeks
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child

Study population: In this single-gate study we plan to include all consecutive preterm infants (born at <32 weeks of gestation) with suspected necrotizing enterocolitis based on the presence of at least three of the above mentioned clinical symptoms 4-7:

Who may be able to join

  • Abdominal distension
  • Visible bowels loops
  • Feeding intolerance (defined as emesis ≥ 2 consecutive feeds, or gastric residuals of >50% per feed in ≥ 2 consecutive feeds, bilious residuals, bilious emesis)
  • Temperature instability (defined as ≥ 2 consecutive measurements)
  • Frank bloody stools
  • Cardiovascular instability (hypotension; defined as MAP < 30mmHg, tachycardia >160/' or bradycardia < 80/')
Show all 15Show fewer
  • Recurrent apnea
  • Increase of abdominal girth > 2cm (allowing inter-observer variability of 1 cm) within 12 h
  • Abdominal wall erythemia
  • And/or at least 2 of the below laboratory findings5:
  • Thrombocytopenia < 50 x103/uL
  • Leukopenia <6 x106/uL
  • CRP > 10 mg/L
  • PCT > 1 ng/ml
  • Coagulopathy

Who cannot join

  • • < 22 weeks of gestational age or > 32 weeks (estimated by ultrasound)
  • Congenital abnormalities
  • No parental consent

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Joanna Seliga-Siwecka, MD PhD contact

+48225966155

seliga.joanna@gmail.com

Poland1 site
  • Department of Neonatology and Neonatal Intensive Care Warsaw Medical University

    Warsaw, 00-315

    Joanna Seliga-Siwecka, MD PhD, +48225966155, joanna.seliga@wum.edu.pl

    Joanna Seliga-Siwecka

Other trials in Poland

About this study

Official title: The Use of Different Imaging Modalities in Diagnosing Necrotizing Enterocolitis in Preterm Infants.

Background Necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) is one of the most serious conditions in newborns, affecting up to 10% of very low birth weight infants (VLBW). In the most premature population mortality rates can rise as high as 60%.

Typical findings on abdominal radiography (AR) include pnuematosis intestinalis (PI), portal vein gas (PVG) and pneumoperitoneum, but are sometimes not present even in severe cases. Abdominal ultrasound (AUS) can depict PI, PVG and pnuemoperitoneum (in some cases a head of AR), but it also provides other crucial information such as bowel wall viability (thickness or thinning) and free abdominal fluid. These additional findings are helpful in expediting diagnosis and management of NEC.

Read more

Methods and analysis The hypothesis being tested is that preforming an AUR in patients with clinical symptoms of NEC but inconclusive/normal AR will enhance detection rates, and expedite treatment in infants born at <32 weeks.

Discussion The use of AUS together with AR as an add-on test may increase the accuracy of diagnosing NEC, and precipitate treatment. Swift implementation of antibiotics and bowel rest is extremely important. To our best knowledge, our study will be the first to focus only on VLBW, who are most prone to NEC. It will also be the first multi-centre study evaluating the use of AUS as an add-on test, enabling us to recruit a significantly higher number of patients compared to published studies.

Being tested
Plain abdominal radiography, Abdominal ultrasound
Keywords
nec, abdominal ultrasound, abdominal radiograph, preterm
Medical subject headings
Enterocolitis, Necrotizing, Premature Birth

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Plain abdominal radiographyDiagnostic test

    After meeting enrolment criteria each patient will have an AR performed. One image will be obtained with a vertical beam and a horizontal beam, with the patient supine.

  • Abdominal ultrasoundDiagnostic test

    If the AR is inconclusive or no abnormalities typical for NEC are recorded, an AUS will be ordered.

Study groups in NCT03188380
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Plain abdominal radiograph (AR)After meeting enrolment criteria each patient will have an AR performed. One image will be obtained with a vertical beam and a horizontal beam, with the patient supine.
Receives: Diagnostic Test: Plain abdominal radiography; Diagnostic Test: Abdominal ultrasound
Abdominal ultrasound (AUS)If plain abdominal radiography is inconclusive or no abnormalities typical for NEC are recorded, an AUS will be ordered.
Receives: Diagnostic Test: Plain abdominal radiography; Diagnostic Test: Abdominal ultrasound

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Intervention time

    The time required to initiate conservative and/or surgical treatment after diagnosing NEC with AR versus AR and AUS

    Measured: until 40 weeks of post-conceptional age

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Sensitivity and specificity

    Sensitivity and specificity of a diagnostic strategy involving a combination of AR (reference test) followed by AUS (index test) as compared to AR (reference test) in diagnosing NEC.

    Measured: until 40 weeks of post-conceptual age

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted15 Jun 2017
  2. Study start1 Jan 2021 (estimated)
  3. Primary completion31 Dec 2022 (estimated)
  4. Study completion31 Dec 2022 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
200 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03188380
Sponsor's protocol ID
KAROWA USG VERSION 1.0
Status last verified
May 2020
First submitted
11 May 2017
Last updated
14 May 2020
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Undecided: All de-identified data collected during the trial will be available. The study protocol will also be available. These documents will be accessible to anyone who provides a methodologically sound proposal immediately following publication with no end date.

Publications

  • Seliga-Siwecka J, Rutkowski J, Margas W, Puskarz-Gasowska J, Bokiniec R. Sensitivity and specificity of different imaging modalities in diagnosing necrotising enterocolitis in a Polish population of preterm infants: a diagnostic test accuracy study protocol. BMJ Open. 2020 Jul 20;10(7):e033519. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033519.

    PubMed 32690727

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Necrotising Enterocolitis, run by Princess Anna Mazowiecka Hospital, Warsaw, Poland at 1 site in Poland.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 15 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 14 May 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Poland. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Joanna Seliga-Siwecka, MD PhD (+48225966155, seliga.joanna@gmail.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Intervention time (time frame: until 40 weeks of post-conceptional age). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03188380, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 14 May 2020.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in