AzTrials
AzTrials

Brain MetastasesNCT03189381

Pilot Phase 2 Study Whole Brain Radiation Therapy With Simultaneous Integrated Boost for Patients With Brain Metastases

A study testing Cohort A and Cohort B in people with Brain Metastases, run by Indiana University at 3 sites in United States.

Terminated

Stopped early. The study ended before it was planned to and will not resume.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This trial is a pilot, Phase 2, sequential two-cohort study designed to test two de-escalated whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT) dose levels and assess their ability to maintain acceptable in-brain distant control. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Brain Metastases
What is being tested?
Cohort A and Cohort B
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
20 participants
Where
3 sitesUnited States
Study dates
21 Sep 2017to 30 Sep 2022
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Age ≥ 18 at time of consent.
  • Ability to provide written informed consent and HIPAA authorization.
  • Pathological diagnosis of any solid tumor histology (from any site in the body).
  • Pathological or clinical (i.e., by imaging) diagnosis of brain metastatic tumor lesions.
  • Total volume of lesions ≤ 30 cm3.
  • Maximum volume of largest lesion ≤ 5 cm3.
  • This volume limit would be equivalent to a largest diameter of about 2.1 cm, assuming a perfect sphere.
  • Not a candidate for or eligible for but refused Gamma Knife radiosurgery.

Who cannot join

  • Previous radiation to the brain, including WBRT or brain radiosurgery.
  • Life expectancy < 6 months (as estimated per current ds-GPA).
  • For histologies not included in the ds-GPA publications or otherwise noted online at brainmetgpa.com, the PI will use either published or validated data, or the PI's best clinical judgment to determine the patient's expected survival.
  • Inability to comply with treatment per investigator discretion.
  • Inability to complete neurocognitive assessments per investigator discretion.
  • Of note, tumor lesion number is not an inclusion or exclusion criteria as we are using volume-based criteria instead.

Trial locations and contacts

3 sites in 1 country.

United States3 sites
  • Indiana University Health Hospital

    Indianapolis, Indiana, 46202

  • Indiana University Health Melvin and Bren Simon Cancer Center

    Indianapolis, Indiana, 46202

  • Methodist Hospital

    Indianapolis, Indiana, 46202

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: A Pilot Phase 2 Study Evaluating Dose De-escalation in Whole Brain Radiation Therapy With Simultaneous Integrated Boost for Patients With Brain Metastases

This trial is a pilot, Phase 2, sequential two-cohort study designed to test two de-escalated whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT) dose levels and assess their ability to maintain acceptable in-brain distant control. The WBRT dose would decrease as the study moves forward, both in terms of absolute value and equivalent dose in 2 Gray fractions (EQD2) (as determined by the linear quadratic radiobiological model). The absolute value of the simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) dose will change with each dose level because the number of fractions delivered will depend on the WBRT dose. As such, the SIB dose will be manipulated such that the EQD2 will remain essentially equivalent despite the difference in the number of fractions delivered. This design will ensure that the only variable is the change in WBRT dose.

The concept is that WBRT with SIB would be expected to maximize both local and in-brain distant control as has already been shown in studies exploring WBRT with SRS boost. However, by itself WBRT with SIB does not address the concern over neurocognitive outcomes. Therefore, investigators hypothesize that there is a lower WBRT dose threshold that will maintain acceptable in-brain distant control, particularly in the setting of a SIB to gross lesions to maintain treated lesion control. In addition, lower overall brain dose (including lower hippocampal dose without specific hippocampal avoidance) may potentially improve neurocognitive function. Investigators are also interested in evaluating treated lesion control, overall survival, neurocognitive sequelae of therapy, quality of life, performance status, and adverse effects of therapy. Biomarker identification for potential correlative circulating tumor DNA and microRNA is an exploratory endpoint to generate data for future prospective evaluation.

Read the detailed description

Primary Objective Evaluate two de-escalated whole brain radiation dose levels (in the setting of simultaneous integrated boost to gross lesions) with respect to in-brain distant control for brain metastases, defined as an in-brain failure rate outside of the planning target volume at 6 months of < 20%.

Secondary Objectives

  1. Evaluate treated lesion control at 6 months for brain metastases in the setting of a predetermined total biologically effective SIB dose as determined by radiographic progression within the planning target volume with fusion and overlay of follow-up MRIs.
  2. Evaluate overall survival at 6 months for brain metastases in the setting of WBRT with SIB.
  3. Evaluate changes in neurocognitive function after WBRT with SIB in the following domains: verbal learning and memory as assessed by the Hopkins Verbal Learning Test - Revised (HVLT-R).
  4. Evaluate changes in health-related quality of life as assessed by the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy with Brain Subscale (FACT-Br) after WBRT-SIB for brain metastases.
  5. Evaluate changes in performance status as assessed by the Karnofsky Performance Status tool after WBRT-SIB for brain metastases.
  6. Evaluate adverse events after WBRT-SIB for brain metastases according to current CTCAE criteria.
Being tested
Cohort A, Cohort B
Keywords
Whole Brain Radiation, Simultaneous Integrated Boost
Medical subject headings
Brain Neoplasms

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Cohort ARadiation

    Cohort A - WBRT dose = 25 Gy, SIB dose = 42 Gy, # of daily fractions = 10, SIB dose in EQD2 = 49.7 Gy

  • Cohort BRadiation

    Cohort B - WBRT dose = 20 Gy, SIB dose = 40 Gy, # of daily fractions = 8, SIB dose in EQD2 = 50.0 Gy

Study groups in NCT03189381
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Cohort AExperimentalStandard PCI dose
Receives: Radiation: Cohort A
Cohort BExperimentalLow PCI dose
Receives: Radiation: Cohort B

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. In-Brain Distant Failure Rate

    An actuarial 6-month rate of new parenchymal lesions seen outside the planning target volume of any lesion that received SIB on any post-treatment MRI (in all 3 planes). This is the binomial proportion of patients who experienced in-brain distant failure by 6 months and the associated 95% confidence interval.

    Measured: 6 Months

Secondary outcomes (8)
  1. Treated Lesion Local Control

    An actuarial 6-month rate of any new, recurrent, or progressing (as defined by Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology Brain Metastases (RANO-BM) criteria) tumor within the planning target volume on any post-treatment MRI. This details the estimated 6-month survival and associated 95% confidence interval from the Kaplan Meier method. The time from treatment start to local failure was calculated. Patients who did not experience local failure were censored at the date last know alive or at the date of death if they expired.

    Measured: 6 Months

  2. Overall Survival for Evaluable Patients

    An actuarial 6-month rate of patients still alive regardless of disease status. This details the estimated 6-month survival and associated 95% confidence interval from the Kaplan Meier method. For patients who expired, the time from treatment start to death was calculated. Patients who did not expire were censored at the date last know alive.

    Measured: 6 Months

  3. Change in Neurocognitive Function From Baseline to 6 Months

    The change in scores from the neurocognitive test were calculated by subtracting the baseline score from the 6-month score. Positive values indicate an increase from baseline and negative values indicate a decrease.

    The neurological test scores were assessed with the Hopkins Verbal Learning Test - Revised (HVLT). In the HVLT, 12 nouns are read and the participant is asked to recall in 3 rounds. Total words recalled are summed for the Total Recall score ranging from 0-36 (higher score represents better recall). The delayed recall score is tested 20-25 mins after the initial recall and ranges from 0-12 (higher scores are better). Retention (%) is the percentage of words recalled and ranges from 0-100 (higher values represent better recall). The recognition discrimination score is tested by a series of yes/no responses from the participant identifying 12 words from a list of 24 and subtracts the number of true positives minus the true negatives (higher values are better).

    Measured: 6 Months

  4. Change in Health-Related Quality of Life (QoL) From Baseline to 6 Months

    The change in scores of health-related quality of life test from baseline to 6 months calculated by subtracting the baseline score from the 6-month score. Positive values indicate an increase in score from baseline to 6 months while negative values indicate a decrease.

    The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy with Brain Subscale (FACT-Br) asks questions on a scale from 0 to 4 with 0 being "not at all" and 4 being "very much". Responses were reversed, if applicable, and compiled to calculate physical well-being (range: 0-28), social/family well-being (range: 0-28), emotional well-being (range: 0-24), functional well-being (range: 0-28), bone marrow transplant (BMT) (range: 0-40), and brain cancer (range: 0-92) subscale scores. These subscale scores were then summed to obtain the trail outcome index (range: 0-148), bone marrow transplant (FACT-BMT) (range: 0-96), general (FACT-G) (range: 0-108), and FACT-Br (range: 0-200) total scores. The higher the score, the better the QoL.

    Measured: 6 Months

  5. Change in Performance Status

    Total change in performance status score was calculated by substracting the baseline score from the follow-up score. Positive values indicate an increase in score from baseline while negative values indicate a decrease in score from baseline. Functional status evaluated using the Karnofsky Performance Score (KPS) Index. The KPS score is evaluated on a scale from 0 to 100 where 0 is death and 100 is "normal no complaints; no evidence of disease".

    Measured: 12 Months

  6. Incidence of Early and Late Treatment-Related Adverse Effects

    This is the percentage of eligible patients who experienced the respective treatment-related AE while on study. Adverse effects (AEs) were defined per CTCAE and considered treatment-related if the AE start date occurred on or after the first date of treatment and it was possibly, probably, or definitely related to treatment. AEs were recorded from the start of treatment until the patient was off-study.

    Measured: Up To 39 Months

  7. Overall Survival for Eligible Patients

    An actuarial 6-month rate of patients still alive regardless of disease status. This details the estimated 6-month survival and associated 95% confidence interval from the Kaplan Meier method. For patients who expired, the time from treatment start to death was calculated. Patients who did not expire were censored at the date last know alive.

    Measured: 6 Months

  8. Change in Neurocognitive Function Retention Percentage Raw Score From Baseline to 6 Months

    The change in scores from the neurocognitive test were calculated by subtracting the baseline score from the 6-month score. Positive values indicate an increase from baseline and negative values indicate a decrease.

    The neurological test scores were assessed with the Hopkins Verbal Learning Test - Revised (HVLT). In the HVLT, 12 nouns are read and the participant is asked to recall in 3 rounds. Total words recalled are summed for the Total Recall score ranging from 0-36 (higher score represents better recall). The delayed recall score is tested 20-25 mins after the initial recall and ranges from 0-12 (higher scores are better). Retention (%) is the percentage of words recalled and ranges from 0-100 (higher values represent better recall). The recognition discrimination score is tested by a series of yes/no responses from the participant identifying 12 words from a list of 24 and subtracts the number of true positives minus the true negatives (higher values are better).

    Measured: 6 Months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted16 Jun 2017
  2. Study start21 Sep 2017
  3. Primary completion30 Sep 2022
  4. Study completion30 Sep 2022

Why it stopped: Early termination leading to no patients enrolled in cohort B.

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Non-randomised
Intervention model
Sequential
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
20 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03189381
Sponsor's protocol ID
IUSCC-0605
Status last verified
Jun 2024
First submitted
14 Jun 2017
Last updated
28 Jun 2024
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Cohort A and Cohort B in people with Brain Metastases, run by Indiana University at 3 sites in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 8 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 28 Jun 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 3 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 28 Jun 2024). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

In-Brain Distant Failure Rate (time frame: 6 Months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 28 Jun 2024.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in