Brain MetastasesNCT03189381
Pilot Phase 2 Study Whole Brain Radiation Therapy With Simultaneous Integrated Boost for Patients With Brain Metastases
A study testing Cohort A and Cohort B in people with Brain Metastases, run by Indiana University at 3 sites in United States.
Trial summary
This trial is a pilot, Phase 2, sequential two-cohort study designed to test two de-escalated whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT) dose levels and assess their ability to maintain acceptable in-brain distant control. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Brain Metastases
- What is being tested?
- Cohort A and Cohort B
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 20 participants
- Where
- 3 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- 21 Sep 2017to 30 Sep 2022
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Age ≥ 18 at time of consent.
- Ability to provide written informed consent and HIPAA authorization.
- Pathological diagnosis of any solid tumor histology (from any site in the body).
- Pathological or clinical (i.e., by imaging) diagnosis of brain metastatic tumor lesions.
- Total volume of lesions ≤ 30 cm3.
- Maximum volume of largest lesion ≤ 5 cm3.
- This volume limit would be equivalent to a largest diameter of about 2.1 cm, assuming a perfect sphere.
- Not a candidate for or eligible for but refused Gamma Knife radiosurgery.
Who cannot join
- Previous radiation to the brain, including WBRT or brain radiosurgery.
- Life expectancy < 6 months (as estimated per current ds-GPA).
- For histologies not included in the ds-GPA publications or otherwise noted online at brainmetgpa.com, the PI will use either published or validated data, or the PI's best clinical judgment to determine the patient's expected survival.
- Inability to comply with treatment per investigator discretion.
- Inability to complete neurocognitive assessments per investigator discretion.
- Of note, tumor lesion number is not an inclusion or exclusion criteria as we are using volume-based criteria instead.
Trial locations and contacts
3 sites in 1 country.
United States3 sites
Indiana University Health Hospital
Indianapolis, Indiana, 46202
Indiana University Health Melvin and Bren Simon Cancer Center
Indianapolis, Indiana, 46202
Methodist Hospital
Indianapolis, Indiana, 46202
About this study
Official title: A Pilot Phase 2 Study Evaluating Dose De-escalation in Whole Brain Radiation Therapy With Simultaneous Integrated Boost for Patients With Brain Metastases
This trial is a pilot, Phase 2, sequential two-cohort study designed to test two de-escalated whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT) dose levels and assess their ability to maintain acceptable in-brain distant control. The WBRT dose would decrease as the study moves forward, both in terms of absolute value and equivalent dose in 2 Gray fractions (EQD2) (as determined by the linear quadratic radiobiological model). The absolute value of the simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) dose will change with each dose level because the number of fractions delivered will depend on the WBRT dose. As such, the SIB dose will be manipulated such that the EQD2 will remain essentially equivalent despite the difference in the number of fractions delivered. This design will ensure that the only variable is the change in WBRT dose.
The concept is that WBRT with SIB would be expected to maximize both local and in-brain distant control as has already been shown in studies exploring WBRT with SRS boost. However, by itself WBRT with SIB does not address the concern over neurocognitive outcomes. Therefore, investigators hypothesize that there is a lower WBRT dose threshold that will maintain acceptable in-brain distant control, particularly in the setting of a SIB to gross lesions to maintain treated lesion control. In addition, lower overall brain dose (including lower hippocampal dose without specific hippocampal avoidance) may potentially improve neurocognitive function. Investigators are also interested in evaluating treated lesion control, overall survival, neurocognitive sequelae of therapy, quality of life, performance status, and adverse effects of therapy. Biomarker identification for potential correlative circulating tumor DNA and microRNA is an exploratory endpoint to generate data for future prospective evaluation.
Read the detailed description
Primary Objective Evaluate two de-escalated whole brain radiation dose levels (in the setting of simultaneous integrated boost to gross lesions) with respect to in-brain distant control for brain metastases, defined as an in-brain failure rate outside of the planning target volume at 6 months of < 20%.
Secondary Objectives
- Evaluate treated lesion control at 6 months for brain metastases in the setting of a predetermined total biologically effective SIB dose as determined by radiographic progression within the planning target volume with fusion and overlay of follow-up MRIs.
- Evaluate overall survival at 6 months for brain metastases in the setting of WBRT with SIB.
- Evaluate changes in neurocognitive function after WBRT with SIB in the following domains: verbal learning and memory as assessed by the Hopkins Verbal Learning Test - Revised (HVLT-R).
- Evaluate changes in health-related quality of life as assessed by the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy with Brain Subscale (FACT-Br) after WBRT-SIB for brain metastases.
- Evaluate changes in performance status as assessed by the Karnofsky Performance Status tool after WBRT-SIB for brain metastases.
- Evaluate adverse events after WBRT-SIB for brain metastases according to current CTCAE criteria.
- Conditions
- Brain Metastases
- Being tested
- Cohort A, Cohort B
- Keywords
- Whole Brain Radiation, Simultaneous Integrated Boost
- Medical subject headings
- Brain Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Cohort ARadiation
Cohort A - WBRT dose = 25 Gy, SIB dose = 42 Gy, # of daily fractions = 10, SIB dose in EQD2 = 49.7 Gy
Cohort BRadiation
Cohort B - WBRT dose = 20 Gy, SIB dose = 40 Gy, # of daily fractions = 8, SIB dose in EQD2 = 50.0 Gy
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Cohort A | Experimental | Standard PCI dose Receives: Radiation: Cohort A |
| Cohort B | Experimental | Low PCI dose Receives: Radiation: Cohort B |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
In-Brain Distant Failure Rate
An actuarial 6-month rate of new parenchymal lesions seen outside the planning target volume of any lesion that received SIB on any post-treatment MRI (in all 3 planes). This is the binomial proportion of patients who experienced in-brain distant failure by 6 months and the associated 95% confidence interval.
Measured: 6 Months
Secondary outcomes (8)
Treated Lesion Local Control
An actuarial 6-month rate of any new, recurrent, or progressing (as defined by Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology Brain Metastases (RANO-BM) criteria) tumor within the planning target volume on any post-treatment MRI. This details the estimated 6-month survival and associated 95% confidence interval from the Kaplan Meier method. The time from treatment start to local failure was calculated. Patients who did not experience local failure were censored at the date last know alive or at the date of death if they expired.
Measured: 6 Months
Overall Survival for Evaluable Patients
An actuarial 6-month rate of patients still alive regardless of disease status. This details the estimated 6-month survival and associated 95% confidence interval from the Kaplan Meier method. For patients who expired, the time from treatment start to death was calculated. Patients who did not expire were censored at the date last know alive.
Measured: 6 Months
Change in Neurocognitive Function From Baseline to 6 Months
The change in scores from the neurocognitive test were calculated by subtracting the baseline score from the 6-month score. Positive values indicate an increase from baseline and negative values indicate a decrease.
The neurological test scores were assessed with the Hopkins Verbal Learning Test - Revised (HVLT). In the HVLT, 12 nouns are read and the participant is asked to recall in 3 rounds. Total words recalled are summed for the Total Recall score ranging from 0-36 (higher score represents better recall). The delayed recall score is tested 20-25 mins after the initial recall and ranges from 0-12 (higher scores are better). Retention (%) is the percentage of words recalled and ranges from 0-100 (higher values represent better recall). The recognition discrimination score is tested by a series of yes/no responses from the participant identifying 12 words from a list of 24 and subtracts the number of true positives minus the true negatives (higher values are better).
Measured: 6 Months
Change in Health-Related Quality of Life (QoL) From Baseline to 6 Months
The change in scores of health-related quality of life test from baseline to 6 months calculated by subtracting the baseline score from the 6-month score. Positive values indicate an increase in score from baseline to 6 months while negative values indicate a decrease.
The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy with Brain Subscale (FACT-Br) asks questions on a scale from 0 to 4 with 0 being "not at all" and 4 being "very much". Responses were reversed, if applicable, and compiled to calculate physical well-being (range: 0-28), social/family well-being (range: 0-28), emotional well-being (range: 0-24), functional well-being (range: 0-28), bone marrow transplant (BMT) (range: 0-40), and brain cancer (range: 0-92) subscale scores. These subscale scores were then summed to obtain the trail outcome index (range: 0-148), bone marrow transplant (FACT-BMT) (range: 0-96), general (FACT-G) (range: 0-108), and FACT-Br (range: 0-200) total scores. The higher the score, the better the QoL.
Measured: 6 Months
Change in Performance Status
Total change in performance status score was calculated by substracting the baseline score from the follow-up score. Positive values indicate an increase in score from baseline while negative values indicate a decrease in score from baseline. Functional status evaluated using the Karnofsky Performance Score (KPS) Index. The KPS score is evaluated on a scale from 0 to 100 where 0 is death and 100 is "normal no complaints; no evidence of disease".
Measured: 12 Months
Incidence of Early and Late Treatment-Related Adverse Effects
This is the percentage of eligible patients who experienced the respective treatment-related AE while on study. Adverse effects (AEs) were defined per CTCAE and considered treatment-related if the AE start date occurred on or after the first date of treatment and it was possibly, probably, or definitely related to treatment. AEs were recorded from the start of treatment until the patient was off-study.
Measured: Up To 39 Months
Overall Survival for Eligible Patients
An actuarial 6-month rate of patients still alive regardless of disease status. This details the estimated 6-month survival and associated 95% confidence interval from the Kaplan Meier method. For patients who expired, the time from treatment start to death was calculated. Patients who did not expire were censored at the date last know alive.
Measured: 6 Months
Change in Neurocognitive Function Retention Percentage Raw Score From Baseline to 6 Months
The change in scores from the neurocognitive test were calculated by subtracting the baseline score from the 6-month score. Positive values indicate an increase from baseline and negative values indicate a decrease.
The neurological test scores were assessed with the Hopkins Verbal Learning Test - Revised (HVLT). In the HVLT, 12 nouns are read and the participant is asked to recall in 3 rounds. Total words recalled are summed for the Total Recall score ranging from 0-36 (higher score represents better recall). The delayed recall score is tested 20-25 mins after the initial recall and ranges from 0-12 (higher scores are better). Retention (%) is the percentage of words recalled and ranges from 0-100 (higher values represent better recall). The recognition discrimination score is tested by a series of yes/no responses from the participant identifying 12 words from a list of 24 and subtracts the number of true positives minus the true negatives (higher values are better).
Measured: 6 Months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted16 Jun 2017
- Study start21 Sep 2017
- Primary completion30 Sep 2022
- Study completion30 Sep 2022
Why it stopped: Early termination leading to no patients enrolled in cohort B.
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for Brain MetastasesStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Sequential
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 20 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Indiana University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Kevin Shiue, MD, Indiana University
- Investigators
- Kevin R. Shiue, MD, Principal investigator, Indiana University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03189381
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- IUSCC-0605
- Status last verified
- Jun 2024
- First submitted
- 14 Jun 2017
- Last updated
- 28 Jun 2024
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 28 Jun 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Pilot Phase 2 Study Evaluating Dose De-escalation in Whole Brain Radiation Therapy With Simultaneous Integrated Boost for Patients With Brain Metastases
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03189381
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- IUSCC-0605
- Conditions
- Brain Metastases
- Keywords
- Whole Brain Radiation, Simultaneous Integrated Boost
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- TerminatedReason stopped: Early termination leading to no patients enrolled in cohort B.
- Enrolment
- 20 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Indiana UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 21 Sep 2017 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Sep 2022 (actual)
- Study completion
- 30 Sep 2022 (actual)
- First posted
- 16 Jun 2017 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 28 Jun 2024
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This trial is a pilot, Phase 2, sequential two-cohort study designed to test two de-escalated whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT) dose levels and assess their ability to maintain acceptable in-brain distant control. The WBRT dose would decrease as the study moves forward, both in terms of absolute value and equivalent dose in 2 Gray fractions (EQD2) (as determined by the linear quadratic radiobiological model). The absolute value of the simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) dose will change with each dose level because the number of fractions delivered will depend on the WBRT dose. As such, the SIB dose will be manipulated such that the EQD2 will remain essentially equivalent despite the difference in the number of fractions delivered. This design will ensure that the only variable is the change in WBRT dose.
The concept is that WBRT with SIB would be expected to maximize both local and in-brain distant control as has already been shown in studies exploring WBRT with SRS boost. However, by itself WBRT with SIB does not address the concern over neurocognitive outcomes. Therefore, investigators hypothesize that there is a lower WBRT dose threshold that will maintain acceptable in-brain distant control, particularly in the setting of a SIB to gross lesions to maintain treated lesion control. In addition, lower overall brain dose (including lower hippocampal dose without specific hippocampal avoidance) may potentially improve neurocognitive function. Investigators are also interested in evaluating treated lesion control, overall survival, neurocognitive sequelae of therapy, quality of life, performance status, and adverse effects of therapy. Biomarker identification for potential correlative circulating tumor DNA and microRNA is an exploratory endpoint to generate data for future prospective evaluation.
Detailed description
Primary Objective Evaluate two de-escalated whole brain radiation dose levels (in the setting of simultaneous integrated boost to gross lesions) with respect to in-brain distant control for brain metastases, defined as an in-brain failure rate outside of the planning target volume at 6 months of < 20%.
Secondary Objectives
- Evaluate treated lesion control at 6 months for brain metastases in the setting of a predetermined total biologically effective SIB dose as determined by radiographic progression within the planning target volume with fusion and overlay of follow-up MRIs.
- Evaluate overall survival at 6 months for brain metastases in the setting of WBRT with SIB.
- Evaluate changes in neurocognitive function after WBRT with SIB in the following domains: verbal learning and memory as assessed by the Hopkins Verbal Learning Test - Revised (HVLT-R).
- Evaluate changes in health-related quality of life as assessed by the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy with Brain Subscale (FACT-Br) after WBRT-SIB for brain metastases.
- Evaluate changes in performance status as assessed by the Karnofsky Performance Status tool after WBRT-SIB for brain metastases.
- Evaluate adverse events after WBRT-SIB for brain metastases according to current CTCAE criteria.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Sequential
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Cohort A | Experimental | Radiation: Cohort AStandard PCI dose |
| Cohort B | Experimental | Radiation: Cohort BLow PCI dose |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Age ≥ 18 at time of consent.
- Ability to provide written informed consent and HIPAA authorization.
- Pathological diagnosis of any solid tumor histology (from any site in the body).
- Pathological or clinical (i.e., by imaging) diagnosis of brain metastatic tumor lesions.
- Total volume of lesions ≤ 30 cm3.
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Previous radiation to the brain, including WBRT or brain radiosurgery.
- Life expectancy < 6 months (as estimated per current ds-GPA).
- For histologies not included in the ds-GPA publications or otherwise noted online at brainmetgpa.com, the PI will use either published or validated data, or the PI's best clinical judgment to determine the patient's expected survival.
- Inability to comply with treatment per investigator discretion.
- Inability to complete neurocognitive assessments per investigator discretion.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Cohort ACohort A - WBRT dose = 25 Gy, SIB dose = 42 Gy, # of daily fractions = 10, SIB dose in EQD2 = 49.7 Gy | Radiation | Cohort A |
| Cohort BCohort B - WBRT dose = 20 Gy, SIB dose = 40 Gy, # of daily fractions = 8, SIB dose in EQD2 = 50.0 Gy | Radiation | Cohort B |
Primary outcome
In-Brain Distant Failure Rate
Time frame: 6 Months
An actuarial 6-month rate of new parenchymal lesions seen outside the planning target volume of any lesion that received SIB on any post-treatment MRI (in all 3 planes). This is the binomial proportion of patients who experienced in-brain distant failure by 6 months and the associated 95% confidence interval.
8 secondary outcomes
Treated Lesion Local Control
Time frame: 6 Months
Overall Survival for Evaluable Patients
Time frame: 6 Months
Change in Neurocognitive Function From Baseline to 6 Months
Time frame: 6 Months
Change in Health-Related Quality of Life (QoL) From Baseline to 6 Months
Time frame: 6 Months
Change in Performance Status
Time frame: 12 Months
Incidence of Early and Late Treatment-Related Adverse Effects
Time frame: Up To 39 Months
Overall Survival for Eligible Patients
Time frame: 6 Months
Change in Neurocognitive Function Retention Percentage Raw Score From Baseline to 6 Months
Time frame: 6 Months
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 28 Jun 2024.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Brain Metastases
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Enhancement of Neurocognitive Functions by Hippocampal Sparing Radiotherapy
Radiation of Neurocranial Region
Not yet recruiting
Dural Puncture Epidural With 27G vs 26G Needles Versus Standard Epidural for Elective Cesarean Delivery
Cesarean Section, Anesthesia, Obstetrical
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
The METAMAX Study: MT027 Allogeneic CAR-T for Brain Metastases From Advanced Solid Tumors
Brain Metastases From Solid Tumors
RecruitingObservational study
Collection of CSF Samples From Participants With Metastatic Triple Negative Breast Cancer (TNBC) and HER2+ Breast Cancer With no Prior History Nor Active Radiographically Detectable Brain Metastases
Breast Cancer, Breast Carcinoma
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Phase I/II Study of Intrathecal/Ommaya T-DXd in HER2-Expressing Breast Cancer With Leptomeningeal/Brain Metastases
Breast Cancer
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Kevin R. Shiue, MD principal investigator
Indiana University
3 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Cohort A and Cohort B in people with Brain Metastases, run by Indiana University at 3 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 8 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 28 Jun 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 3 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 28 Jun 2024). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
In-Brain Distant Failure Rate (time frame: 6 Months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 28 Jun 2024.