Falls (Accidents) in Old AgeFaCT2NCT03190460
Evaluating Technology-Based Fall Prevention Interventions
A study testing Cognitive Training and Technology-based Education in people with Falls (Accidents) in Old Age, run by University of Washington at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
Approximately one in three older adults fall annually and it is the primary cause of traumatic injury in older adults. While exercise and balance programs have been shown to be effective in reducing fall risk, maintaining behavior change is known to be difficult. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 65 to 89 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Falls (Accidents) in Old Age
- What is being tested?
- Cognitive Training and Technology-based Education
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 60 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 15 Feb 2017to 28 Feb 2019
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 65 to 89 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Older adult
Who may be able to join
- 65-89 years old
- speak and read English
- live within 30 miles of the University of Washington
- a score of 4 or higher on the Memory Impairment Screen (MIS-T)
- regular access to a computer with internet capability (whether at home, friend/family, community center, public library, or other)
- a positive response to any of the following three fall related questions: i) Have you had two or more falls in the prior 12 months? ii) Are you responding to the advertisement because of a recent fall? iii) Do you have difficulty with walking or balance?
- <53 seconds on 90 second balance test or gait speed <1m/sec.
Who cannot join
- current participation in formal cognitive training program
- currently bedridden or wheelchair dependent
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Influence of Cognitive Training on Fall Prevention in At Risk Older Adults
Approximately one in three older adults fall annually and it is the primary cause of traumatic injury in older adults. While exercise and balance programs have been shown to be effective in reducing fall risk, maintaining behavior change is known to be difficult. Thus additional interventions need to be validated to add to our current armamentarium to reduce falls in older adults. Cognitive training (CT) involves exercises that target specific cognitive tasks, such as memory or processing speed. It has been speculated that routinely performing such tasks may increase functional ability. Recent work has pointed to an increased risk of falls in community-dwelling older adults who have alterations in specific cognitive tasks. Thus the purpose of the proposed study is to demonstrate the feasibility and to explore the effectiveness of a 16 week CT intervention to reduce risk and incidence of fall and improve outcomes up to 1 month post-intervention in a group of community dwelling older adults at risk for fall.
- Conditions
- Falls (Accidents) in Old Age
- Being tested
- Cognitive Training, Technology-based Education
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Cognitive TrainingOther
Web-based cognitive training intervention targeting specific cognitive tasks. Subjects complete 3 training sessions per week with at least 24 hours in between sessions.
Technology-based EducationOther
Subjects complete 16 web-based educational modules on healthy aging content. Following each module, subjects complete a learning reflection.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention | Experimental | Not described Receives: Other: Cognitive Training |
| Education | Other | Not described Receives: Other: Technology-based Education |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Falls
Falls and Injurious Falls as per Fall Calendar
Measured: 16 weeks
Secondary outcomes (4)
Disability
Gill Disability Scale
Measured: 8 weeks, 16 weeks, 20 weeks.
Cognitive Assessment
CANTAB Battery (Simple response time, one touch stockings of Cambridge, Stop Signal Task, Spatial Working Memory, Verbal Recognition Memory, Rapid Visual Information Processing)
Measured: 8 weeks, 16 weeks, 20 weeks
Gait Assessment
Assessment of Gait Parameters using APDM sensor system
Measured: 8 weeks, 16 weeks, 20 weeks
Balance Assessment
Assessment of Balance using APDM sensor system
Measured: 8 weeks, 16 weeks, 20 weeks
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted16 Jun 2017
- Study start15 Feb 2017
- Primary completion31 Jan 2019
- Study completion28 Feb 2019
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Falls (Accidents) in Old AgeStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of WashingtonThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 60 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Washington
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Institute of Nursing Research (NINR)
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Hilaire Thompson, University of Washington
- Investigators
- Hilaire Thompson, Principal investigator, University of Washington
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03190460
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 50219
- Other IDs
- R21NR015541
- Acronym
- FaCT2
- Status last verified
- May 2022
- First submitted
- 13 Jun 2017
- Last updated
- 7 Jun 2022
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Thompson HJ, McGough E, Demiris G. Falls and Cognitive Training 2 (FaCT2) study protocol: a randomised controlled trial exploring cognitive training to reduce risk of falls in at-risk older adults. Inj Prev. 2020 Aug;26(4):370-377. doi: 10.1136/injuryprev-2019-043332. Epub 2019 Aug 26.
PubMed 31451566Drahota A, Udell JE, Mackenzie H, Pugh MT. Psychological and educational interventions for preventing falls in older people living in the community. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Oct 3;10(10):CD013480. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013480.pub2.
PubMed 39360568
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 7 Jun 2022. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Influence of Cognitive Training on Fall Prevention in At Risk Older Adults
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03190460
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- FaCT2 / 50219
- Conditions
- Falls (Accidents) in Old Age
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 60 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of WashingtonUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Institute of Nursing Research (NINR)
- Study start
- 15 Feb 2017 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Jan 2019 (actual)
- Study completion
- 28 Feb 2019 (actual)
- First posted
- 16 Jun 2017 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 20 Jan 2021
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Approximately one in three older adults fall annually and it is the primary cause of traumatic injury in older adults. While exercise and balance programs have been shown to be effective in reducing fall risk, maintaining behavior change is known to be difficult. Thus additional interventions need to be validated to add to our current armamentarium to reduce falls in older adults. Cognitive training (CT) involves exercises that target specific cognitive tasks, such as memory or processing speed. It has been speculated that routinely performing such tasks may increase functional ability. Recent work has pointed to an increased risk of falls in community-dwelling older adults who have alterations in specific cognitive tasks. Thus the purpose of the proposed study is to demonstrate the feasibility and to explore the effectiveness of a 16 week CT intervention to reduce risk and incidence of fall and improve outcomes up to 1 month post-intervention in a group of community dwelling older adults at risk for fall.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind (participant, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention | Experimental | Other: Cognitive Training |
| Education | Other | Other: Technology-based Education |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 65 to 89 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (7 listed)
- 65-89 years old
- speak and read English
- live within 30 miles of the University of Washington
- a score of 4 or higher on the Memory Impairment Screen (MIS-T)
- regular access to a computer with internet capability (whether at home, friend/family, community center, public library, or other)
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- current participation in formal cognitive training program
- currently bedridden or wheelchair dependent
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Cognitive TrainingWeb-based cognitive training intervention targeting specific cognitive tasks. Subjects complete 3 training sessions per week with at least 24 hours in between sessions. | Other | Intervention |
| Technology-based EducationSubjects complete 16 web-based educational modules on healthy aging content. Following each module, subjects complete a learning reflection. | Other | Education |
Primary outcome
Falls
Time frame: 16 weeks
Falls and Injurious Falls as per Fall Calendar
4 secondary outcomes
Disability
Time frame: 8 weeks, 16 weeks, 20 weeks.
Cognitive Assessment
Time frame: 8 weeks, 16 weeks, 20 weeks
Gait Assessment
Time frame: 8 weeks, 16 weeks, 20 weeks
Balance Assessment
Time frame: 8 weeks, 16 weeks, 20 weeks
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 7 Jun 2022.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Background: PubMed 31451566Thompson HJ, McGough E, Demiris G. Falls and Cognitive Training 2 (FaCT2) study protocol: a randomised controlled trial exploring cognitive training to reduce risk of falls in at-risk older adults. Inj Prev. 2020 Aug;26(4):370-377. doi: 10.1136/injuryprev-2019-043332. Epub 2019 Aug 26.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 39360568Drahota A, Udell JE, Mackenzie H, Pugh MT. Psychological and educational interventions for preventing falls in older people living in the community. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Oct 3;10(10):CD013480. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013480.pub2.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Falls (Accidents) in Old Age
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Turkish Adaptation of the Multidimensional Falls Efficacy Scale in Older Adults
Balance Control in Elderly, Falls (Accidents) in Old Age
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Evaluation of the Relationship Between Fall Risk, Muscle Strength, and Anticholinergic Burden in Geriatric Patients Presenting to the Emergency Department
Falls (Accidents) in Old Age, Falls
RecruitingObservational study
Vestibular Balance-Cognition Dual-Task Digital System: Development of a Smart Rehabilitation Platform for the Elderly and Prediction of Balance Function Risks
Vestibular Dysfunction, Dizziness
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Effect of Testosterone on Elderly Frail Men With Testosterone Deficiency
Frail Elderly Patients, Hypogonadal Males
RecruitingObservational study
Association Between Intake of Psychotropic Medications and Risk of Falls in Older Adults
Falls (Accidents) in Old Age, Psychotropic Drugs
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Hilaire Thompson principal investigator
University of Washington
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Cognitive Training and Technology-based Education in people with Falls (Accidents) in Old Age, run by University of Washington at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 7 Jun 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 20 Jan 2021). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Falls (time frame: 16 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03190460, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 7 Jun 2022; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 27 Oct 2026.