Chronic Kidney Disease Requiring Chronic DialysisNCT03190629
The Effect of On-line Hemodiafiltratrion on Nutritional Status and Body Composition
A study testing High-flux hemodialysis and On line-hemodiafiltration in people with Chronic Kidney Disease Requiring Chronic Dialysis, run by Pablo Molina.
Trial summary
Compared to conventional hemodialysis (HD), on-line hemodiafiltration (OL-HDF) achieves a more efficient removal of uremic toxins and reduces inflammation, which could favourably affect nutritional status. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Chronic Kidney Disease Requiring Chronic Dialysis
- What is being tested?
- High-flux hemodialysis and On line-hemodiafiltration
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 33 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- 1 Apr 2012to 31 Mar 2013
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- being over 18 yr old; receiving stable high-flux hemodialysis treatment for at least 3 mo (Kt/Vurea ≥1.2 and hemodialysis performed 3.0 to 6.0 h, three times weekly), and agreed to give informed consent.
Who cannot join
- malabsorption syndrome; active malignant disease or other critical illnesses; or treated with steroids or antiandrogens.
About this study
Official title: The Effect of On-line Hemodiafiltratrion on Nutritional Status and Body Composition: A Prospective, Controlled, Pilot Study
Compared to conventional hemodialysis (HD), on-line hemodiafiltration (OL-HDF) achieves a more efficient removal of uremic toxins and reduces inflammation, which could favourably affect nutritional status. The aim of this study was to evaluate the 1-year effect of OL-HDF on nutritional status and body composition in prevalent HD patients.
Read the detailed description
Postdilution on-line hemodiafiltration (OL-HDF) is considered the most efficient renal replacement treatment modality. Compared with conventional hemodialysis (HD), OL-HDF enables a better removal of middle molecular weight uremic toxins by combining convective and diffusive clearance. Although higher convection volume exchange has been associated with an increased survival advantage for dialysis patients, the mechanisms by which OL-HDF may improve outcomes remain unknown.
On the basis of improved toxin removal, a potential benefit of OL-HDF on nutritional status has been postulated. However, evidence on the effect of OL-HDF on nutritional status is scarce and at times conflicting. Some observational and interventional studies have suggested that OL-HDF is associated with improved nutritional parameters; others have found no effect; and one study even reported negative effects of OL-HDF on nutritional status. The majority of these observations come from cohort studies, non-controlled interventions and/or secondary analysis of controlled trials. Further, there are currently no data examining the plausible effect of postdilution OL-HDF on body composition. To clarify this important knowledge gap, this prospective, controlled, study evaluated the effects of high volume postdilution OL-HDF on nutritional status and body composition in prevalent HD patients.
- Being tested
- High-flux hemodialysis, On line-hemodiafiltration
- Keywords
- body composition, bioimpedance, hemodialysis, hemodiafiltration, nutritional status, protein energy wasting
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
High-flux hemodialysisDevice
Hemodialysis treatment thrice weekly with the high-flux FX-100 dialyzer (Fresenius Medical Care, Bad Homburg, Germany; membrane: Helixone®; surface: 2.2 m2; UF coefficient: 73 ml/h mm Hg; ß2-microglobulin-sieving coefficient: 0.8; albumin-sieving coefficient: 0.001), including a minimum target dialysis dose (Kt/Vurea) ≥1.2 and a session length of 3.0 to 6.0 h. Hemodialysis treatments were performed with the 5008 hemodialysis system (Fresenius Medical Care).
On line-hemodiafiltrationDevice
Post-dilution on line-hemodiafiltration treatment thrice weekly with the high-flux FX-100 dialyzer (Fresenius Medical Care, Bad Homburg, Germany; membrane: Helixone®; surface: 2.2 m2; UF coefficient: 73 ml/h mm Hg; ß2-microglobulin-sieving coefficient: 0.8; albumin-sieving coefficient: 0.001), including a minimum target dialysis dose (Kt/Vurea) ≥1.2 and a session length of 3.0 to 6.0 h. Post-dilution on line-hemodiafiltration treatments were performed with the 5008 hemodialysis system (Fresenius Medical Care), with automatic adjustment of the substitution fluid flow rate for maximising substitution volume while simultaneously avoiding haemoconcentration and filter clotting.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| High-flux hemodialysis | Active comparator | 3 times per week Receives: Device: High-flux hemodialysis |
| On line-hemodiafiltration | Experimental | 3 times per week Receives: Device: On line-hemodiafiltration |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Lean tissue mass in kilograms
Change from baseline to end of study in lean tissue mass in kilograms, measured quarterly throughout the 12-month intervention. Lean tissue mass was assessed by multi-frequency bioimpedance spectroscopy (Fresenius Medical Care) by experienced research staff blinded to all clinical and biochemical data of the patients. In order to control for potential variability and the effect of overhydration, all bioimpedance analyses were performed before a mid-week dialysis session.
Measured: Baseline, 4, 8, and 12 months.
Intracellular water in liters
Change from baseline to end of study in intracellular water in liters, measured quarterly throughout the 12-month intervention. Intracellular water was assessed by multi-frequency bioimpedance spectroscopy (Fresenius Medical Care) by experienced research staff blinded to all clinical and biochemical data of the patients. In order to control for potential variability and the effect of overhydration, all bioimpedance analyses were performed before a mid-week dialysis session.
Measured: Baseline, 4, 8, and 12 months.
Body cell mass in kilograms
Change from baseline to end of study in body cell mass in kilograms, measured quarterly throughout the 12-month intervention. Body cell mass was assessed by multi-frequency bioimpedance spectroscopy (Fresenius Medical Care) by experienced research staff blinded to all clinical and biochemical data of the patients. In order to control for potential variability and the effect of overhydration, all bioimpedance analyses were performed before a mid-week dialysis session.
Measured: Baseline, 4, 8, and 12 months.
Secondary outcomes (1)
Serum prealbumin levels in milligrams per deciliter
Change from baseline to end of study in serum prealbumin concentration in milligrams per decilitre, measured quarterly throughout the 12-month intervention. Pre-dialytic blood samples were collected after insertion of the access needle, and the post-dialytic sample was drawn from the arterial needle after slowing the blood punt to 50 ml/min. Prealbumin was determined by nephelometry with the IMMAGE800 Immunochemistry System (Beckman Coulter, Galway, Ireland).
Measured: Baseline, 4, 8, and 12 months.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted19 Jun 2017
- Study start1 Apr 2012
- Primary completion31 Mar 2013
- Study completion31 Mar 2013
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (5)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Chronic Kidney Disease Requiring Chronic DialysisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 33 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Pablo Molina
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor-investigator, Pablo Molina, Fundación para el Fomento de la Investigación Sanitaria y Biomédica de la Comunitat Valenciana
- Investigators
- Pablo Molina, MD, PhD, Principal investigator, Department of Nephrology, Hospital Universitari Dr Peset, Department of Medicine, Universitat de València, Spain
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03190629
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- OL-HDF-63/16
- Status last verified
- Jun 2017
- First submitted
- 13 Jun 2017
- Last updated
- 19 Jun 2017
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Gatti E, Ronco C. Seeking an optimal renal replacement therapy for the chronic kidney disease epidemic: the case for on-line hemodiafiltration. Contrib Nephrol. 2011;175:170-185. doi: 10.1159/000333636. Epub 2011 Dec 15.
PubMed 22188699Canaud B, Bowry SK. Emerging clinical evidence on online hemodiafiltration: does volume of ultrafiltration matter? Blood Purif. 2013;35(1-3):55-62. doi: 10.1159/000345175. Epub 2013 Jan 22.
PubMed 23343547Fischbach M, Terzic J, Menouer S, Dheu C, Seuge L, Zalosczic A. Daily on line haemodiafiltration promotes catch-up growth in children on chronic dialysis. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2010 Mar;25(3):867-73. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfp565. Epub 2009 Nov 4.
PubMed 19889872Maduell F, Navarro V, Rius A, Torregrosa E, Sanchez JJ, Saborit ML, Ferrero JA. [Improvement of nutritional status in patients with short daily on-line hemodiafiltration]. Nefrologia. 2004;24(1):60-6. Spanish.
PubMed 15083959Molina P, Vizcaino B, Molina MD, Beltran S, Gonzalez-Moya M, Mora A, Castro-Alonso C, Kanter J, Avila AI, Gorriz JL, Estan N, Pallardo LM, Fouque D, Carrero JJ. The effect of high-volume online haemodiafiltration on nutritional status and body composition: the ProtEin Stores prEservaTion (PESET) study. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2018 Jul 1;33(7):1223-1235. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfx342.
PubMed 29370428
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 19 Jun 2017. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- The Effect of On-line Hemodiafiltratrion on Nutritional Status and Body Composition: A Prospective, Controlled, Pilot Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03190629
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- OL-HDF-63/16
- Keywords
- body composition, bioimpedance, hemodialysis, hemodiafiltration, nutritional status, protein energy wasting
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 33 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Pablo MolinaUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Apr 2012 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Mar 2013 (actual)
- Study completion
- 31 Mar 2013 (actual)
- First posted
- 19 Jun 2017 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Compared to conventional hemodialysis (HD), on-line hemodiafiltration (OL-HDF) achieves a more efficient removal of uremic toxins and reduces inflammation, which could favourably affect nutritional status. The aim of this study was to evaluate the 1-year effect of OL-HDF on nutritional status and body composition in prevalent HD patients.
Detailed description
Postdilution on-line hemodiafiltration (OL-HDF) is considered the most efficient renal replacement treatment modality. Compared with conventional hemodialysis (HD), OL-HDF enables a better removal of middle molecular weight uremic toxins by combining convective and diffusive clearance. Although higher convection volume exchange has been associated with an increased survival advantage for dialysis patients, the mechanisms by which OL-HDF may improve outcomes remain unknown.
On the basis of improved toxin removal, a potential benefit of OL-HDF on nutritional status has been postulated. However, evidence on the effect of OL-HDF on nutritional status is scarce and at times conflicting. Some observational and interventional studies have suggested that OL-HDF is associated with improved nutritional parameters; others have found no effect; and one study even reported negative effects of OL-HDF on nutritional status. The majority of these observations come from cohort studies, non-controlled interventions and/or secondary analysis of controlled trials. Further, there are currently no data examining the plausible effect of postdilution OL-HDF on body composition. To clarify this important knowledge gap, this prospective, controlled, study evaluated the effects of high volume postdilution OL-HDF on nutritional status and body composition in prevalent HD patients.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| High-flux hemodialysis | Active comparator | Device: High-flux hemodialysis3 times per week |
| On line-hemodiafiltration | Experimental | Device: On line-hemodiafiltration3 times per week |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- being over 18 yr old; receiving stable high-flux hemodialysis treatment for at least 3 mo (Kt/Vurea ≥1.2 and hemodialysis performed 3.0 to 6.0 h, three times weekly), and agreed to give informed consent.
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- malabsorption syndrome; active malignant disease or other critical illnesses; or treated with steroids or antiandrogens.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| High-flux hemodialysisHemodialysis treatment thrice weekly with the high-flux FX-100 dialyzer (Fresenius Medical Care, Bad Homburg, Germany; membrane: Helixone®; surface: 2.2 m2; UF coefficient: 73 ml/h mm Hg; ß2-microglobulin-sieving coefficient: 0.8; albumin-sieving coefficient: 0.001), including a minimum target dialysis dose (Kt/Vurea) ≥1.2 and a session length of 3.0 to 6.0 h. Hemodialysis treatments were performed with the 5008 hemodialysis system (Fresenius Medical Care). | Device | High-flux hemodialysis |
| On line-hemodiafiltrationPost-dilution on line-hemodiafiltration treatment thrice weekly with the high-flux FX-100 dialyzer (Fresenius Medical Care, Bad Homburg, Germany; membrane: Helixone®; surface: 2.2 m2; UF coefficient: 73 ml/h mm Hg; ß2-microglobulin-sieving coefficient: 0.8; albumin-sieving coefficient: 0.001), including a minimum target dialysis dose (Kt/Vurea) ≥1.2 and a session length of 3.0 to 6.0 h. Post-dilution on line-hemodiafiltration treatments were performed with the 5008 hemodialysis system (Fresenius Medical Care), with automatic adjustment of the substitution fluid flow rate for maximising substitution volume while simultaneously avoiding haemoconcentration and filter clotting. | Device | On line-hemodiafiltration |
Primary outcome
Lean tissue mass in kilograms
Time frame: Baseline, 4, 8, and 12 months.
Change from baseline to end of study in lean tissue mass in kilograms, measured quarterly throughout the 12-month intervention. Lean tissue mass was assessed by multi-frequency bioimpedance spectroscopy (Fresenius Medical Care) by experienced research staff blinded to all clinical and biochemical data of the patients. In order to control for potential variability and the effect of overhydration, all bioimpedance analyses were performed before a mid-week dialysis session.
Intracellular water in liters
Time frame: Baseline, 4, 8, and 12 months.
Change from baseline to end of study in intracellular water in liters, measured quarterly throughout the 12-month intervention. Intracellular water was assessed by multi-frequency bioimpedance spectroscopy (Fresenius Medical Care) by experienced research staff blinded to all clinical and biochemical data of the patients. In order to control for potential variability and the effect of overhydration, all bioimpedance analyses were performed before a mid-week dialysis session.
Body cell mass in kilograms
Time frame: Baseline, 4, 8, and 12 months.
Change from baseline to end of study in body cell mass in kilograms, measured quarterly throughout the 12-month intervention. Body cell mass was assessed by multi-frequency bioimpedance spectroscopy (Fresenius Medical Care) by experienced research staff blinded to all clinical and biochemical data of the patients. In order to control for potential variability and the effect of overhydration, all bioimpedance analyses were performed before a mid-week dialysis session.
1 secondary outcome
Serum prealbumin levels in milligrams per deciliter
Time frame: Baseline, 4, 8, and 12 months.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 19 Jun 2017.
- Background: PubMed 22188699Gatti E, Ronco C. Seeking an optimal renal replacement therapy for the chronic kidney disease epidemic: the case for on-line hemodiafiltration. Contrib Nephrol. 2011;175:170-185. doi: 10.1159/000333636. Epub 2011 Dec 15.
- Background: PubMed 23343547Canaud B, Bowry SK. Emerging clinical evidence on online hemodiafiltration: does volume of ultrafiltration matter? Blood Purif. 2013;35(1-3):55-62. doi: 10.1159/000345175. Epub 2013 Jan 22.
- Background: PubMed 19889872Fischbach M, Terzic J, Menouer S, Dheu C, Seuge L, Zalosczic A. Daily on line haemodiafiltration promotes catch-up growth in children on chronic dialysis. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2010 Mar;25(3):867-73. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfp565. Epub 2009 Nov 4.
- Background: PubMed 15083959Maduell F, Navarro V, Rius A, Torregrosa E, Sanchez JJ, Saborit ML, Ferrero JA. [Improvement of nutritional status in patients with short daily on-line hemodiafiltration]. Nefrologia. 2004;24(1):60-6. Spanish.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 29370428Molina P, Vizcaino B, Molina MD, Beltran S, Gonzalez-Moya M, Mora A, Castro-Alonso C, Kanter J, Avila AI, Gorriz JL, Estan N, Pallardo LM, Fouque D, Carrero JJ. The effect of high-volume online haemodiafiltration on nutritional status and body composition: the ProtEin Stores prEservaTion (PESET) study. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2018 Jul 1;33(7):1223-1235. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfx342.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Chronic Kidney Disease Requiring Chronic Dialysis
Recruiting
DIALysis With EXpanded Solute Removal
Chronic Kidney Disease Requiring Hemodialysis, End-Stage Kidney Disease (ESKD)
RecruitingPhase 2
A Study to Evaluate Safety, Tolerability and Efficacy of AP306 at Fixed Doses in Dialysis Participants With Hyperphosphatemia
Hyperphosphatemia, Chronic Kidney Disease Requiring Chronic Dialysis
Recruiting
Technology Assisted Collaborative Care Intervention to Improve Patient-centered Outcomes in Dialysis Patients
Chronic Kidney Disease Requiring Hemodialysis
Recruiting
Incremental Hemodialysis for Veterans in the First Year of Dialysis (IncHVets)
Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) Stage 5, Kidney Dysfunction Requiring Dialysis (KDRD)
Recruiting
Post-market Surveillance Study of the BD® WavelinQ™ EndoAVF System
Kidney Disease, End-Stage, End-stage Renal Disease
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Pablo Molina, MD, PhD principal investigator
Department of Nephrology, Hospital Universitari Dr Peset, Department of Medicine, Universitat de València, Spain
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing High-flux hemodialysis and On line-hemodiafiltration in people with Chronic Kidney Disease Requiring Chronic Dialysis, run by Pablo Molina.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 19 Jun 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Lean tissue mass in kilograms (time frame: Baseline, 4, 8, and 12 months.). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03190629, which also lists 5 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 19 Jun 2017.