HealthyAMPEDNCT03193580
Accelerating Motor Learning in Pediatrics
A study testing Anodal Conventional tDCS and Anodal High Definition tDCS in people with Healthy and Pediatrics, run by University of Calgary at 2 sites in Canada.
Trial summary
Non-invasive brain stimulation can both study and potentially treat neurological disorders. Transcranial direct-current stimulation (tDCS) is an emerging safe and tolerability form of stimulation and has been used increasingly over the last decade. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 12 to 18 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Healthy, Pediatrics
- What is being tested?
- Anodal Conventional tDCS and Anodal High Definition tDCS
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 24 participants
- Where
- 2 sitesCanada
- Study dates
- 1 Jul 2017to 30 Aug 2018
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 12 to 18 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Child, Adult
Who may be able to join
- Age 12-18 years
- Right-handed
- Normal development
- No neuropsychiatric disorders, neuropsychotropic medications, or chronic medical conditions
- Informed consent/assent
Who cannot join
- Implanted electrical devices, including (but not limited to) cardiac pacemakers.
- Metallic implants or irremovable metal objects
- Pregnant females or females who may be pregnant.
- Braces or upper teeth wires.
Trial locations and contacts
2 sites in 1 country.
Canada2 sites
Alberta Children's Hospital
Calgary, Alberta, T3B 6A8
Alberta Childrens Hospital
Calgary, Alberta, T3B 6A8
About this study
Non-invasive brain stimulation can both study and potentially treat neurological disorders. Transcranial direct-current stimulation (tDCS) is an emerging safe and tolerability form of stimulation and has been used increasingly over the last decade.
The purpose of this research is to see if two different types of tDCS can improve motor function in healthy children. tDCS has been shown to safely enhance hand motor function in healthy adults, and those that have suffered stroke and other conditions. Recently the investigators demonstrated that tDCS may enhance hand motor function in healthy children, however, how it does so is unknown. In addition to assessing changes in motor function when tDCS is given during motor skill training, the investigators will perform various tests before and after stimulation to understand the changes that happen in the brain accompanying motor skill learning and brain stimulation.
The investigators hypothesize that there will be an accelerated acquisition of motor skill, when training is paired with conventional anodal tDCS, HD-tDCS, or sham tDCS.
Read the detailed description
Background \& rationale: Plasticity may be enhanced in the developing brain but mechanisms are poorly understood. Brain stimulation technologies such as transcranial direct-current stimulation (tDCS) modulate motor cortex excitability and plasticity. Studies by our group and others suggest that neuromodulation trials with tDCS are both safe and feasible in children. Recently the investigators demonstrated that conventional tDCS can enhance motor learning in healthy children. Additionally, recent advances in high-definition tDCS (HD-tDCS) have presented an opportunity to focally stimulate regions of the brain. HD-tDCS has not been investigated to date in children.
Establishing an ability of tDCS to enhance motor learning has therapeutic implications for children with motor disabilities. Perinatal stroke is the leading cause of hemiparetic cerebral palsy and most survivors suffer lifelong physical disability. Emerging models from our lab and others have defined central therapeutic targets whereby brain stimulation may enhance motor learning and function. Understand the effects of tDCS on motor learning, and it's underlying changes within the brain, is essential to advancing such interventions.
Research question \& objectives: Here the investigators propose to characterize the effects of tDCS on motor learning in healthy children. The primary objective of this study is to determine changes in acquisition of motor skill, when training is paired with conventional anodal tDCS, HD-tDCS, or sham tDCS. Multiple secondary objectives will describe biochemical and sensorimotor changes in the brain that take place during motor learning paired with tDCS. Secondary objectives will also assess the safety of HD- tDCS in healthy children.
Ethics: This study has been approved by the University of Calgary Research Ethics Board.
Design: Randomized, double blind, sham-controlled trial to evaluate the ability of tDCS and HD-tDCS to enhance motor learning.
Methods: Children will be recruited through the Healthy Infants and Children Clinical Research Program.
The training task will consists of performing the Purdue Pegboard Test (PPTL) with their left hand. This simple motor learning task is a well-validated task for complex, functionally relevant motor learning. The PPTL has demonstrated good sensitivity to change in both healthy and disease motor learning studies in adults and school-aged children. The PPTL will be performed over five consecutive days to monitor motor learning.
Children will attend the Alberta Children's Hospital Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation Laboratory. Subjects will be randomized to one of three stimulation groups (sham tDCS, conventional anodal tDCS, HD-tDCS). Baseline measures will be performed, including: magnetic resonance neuroimaging (anatomical imaging, functional neuroimaging and magnetic resonance spectroscopy), transcranial magnetic stimulation neurophysiology (motor mapping of the left and right motor cortex), sensorimotor functional changes assessed using the Kinesiological Instrument for Normal and Altered Reaching Movements (KINARM; arm positioning matching, kinesthesia, visually guided reaching, and object hit task), motor function changes (PPT, Jebsen-Taylor Test, Serial Reaction Time Task), and sensory discrimination measures (amplitude discrimination, temporal order judgment, temporal order judgment task, duration discrimination task, duration discrimination with confound, and single site adaptation task.
Following baseline measures, subjects will be seating in a comfortable chair with the PPTL test in front of them on a table. Participant randomized to sham or conventional anodal tDCS will be fitted with two 25cm2 electrodes (anode over the right primary motor cortex, cathode over the contralateral supraorbital area) or an EEG cap containing four small circular electrode (HD-tDCS, 1 anode centered over the right primary motor cortex, 4 cathodes surround the anode in a ring-like fashion). Three pre-intervention trials of the PPTL will be performed. All subjects will then have the tDCS ramped up to 1milliamp over 45 seconds. After 120 seconds the current will either be ramped down to 0milliamp (sham tDCS) or continue for a total of 20 minutes. The PPTL will be performed 5, 10, and 15 minutes following stimulation commencement, and after stimulation has ended (3 repetitions per time point). A tDCS safety and tolerability questionnaire will then be completed.
The same tDCS-treatment, PPTL training and safety and tolerability questionnaires will be performed over the next three consecutive days. On study day 5 participants will again repeat PPTL training paired with tDCS-treatment. Following tDCS and PPTL training, magnetic resonance neuroimaging, transcranial magnetic stimulation neurophysiology, sensorimotor functional changes, motor function changes, and sensory discrimination measures will be repeated to assess changes induced by motor learning and tDCS.
Participants will return six weeks following training, where magnetic resonance neuroimaging, transcranial magnetic stimulation neurophysiology, sensorimotor functional changes, motor function changes, and sensory discrimination measures will be repeated to assess long-term changes.
Data analysis: All outcome variables will be compared across the three intervention groups (sham tDCS, conventional tDCS, HD- tDCS) using a two-way repeated measures ANOVA with appropriate post-hoc analysis. The repeated measures ANOVA will distinguish the influence of intervention (stimulation type) and time (baseline, post-training, 1 month post- training). Pearson's correlations will be performed between the primary outcome measure and secondary outcome measures. Secondary statistical analysis will be performed as warranted.
- Conditions
- Healthy, Pediatrics
- Being tested
- Anodal Conventional tDCS, Anodal High Definition tDCS, Sham tDCS
- Keywords
- Anodal Stimulation Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation, High-Definition Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation, tDCS, Non-invasive brain stimulation, Pediatrics
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Anodal Conventional tDCSDevice
Also called Direct-current stimulator (Soterix)
tDCS will be applied for 20 minutes at 1milliamp while participants are performing a fine motor task. The current will be set at 1milliamp, stimulation will be ramped up over 30 seconds and ramped down over 30 seconds.
Anodal High Definition tDCSDevice
Also called Direct-current stimulator (Soterix)
HD-tDCS will be applied for 20 minutes at 1milliamp while participants are performing a fine motor task. The current will be set at 1milliamp, stimulation will be ramped up over 30 seconds and ramped down over 30 seconds.
Sham tDCSDevice
Also called Direct-current stimulator (Soterix)
tDCS will be applied for 1 minutes at 1milliamp while participants are performing a fine motor task. The current will be set at 1milliamp, stimulation will be ramped up over 30 seconds and ramped down over 30 seconds.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Anodal Conventional tDCS | Experimental | The intervention will be anodal conventional tDCS. Anodal tDCS: 30 second ramp up to 1milliamp, 20 minute current hold at 1milliamp, 30 second ramp down to 0 milliamp. Anode positioned over the right primary motor cortex, and the cathode over the contralateral supraorbital area. Receives: Device: Anodal Conventional tDCS |
| Anodal High Definition tDCS | Experimental | The intervention will be anodal high definition-tDCS. Anodal HD-tDCS: 30 second ramp up to 1milliamp, 20 minute current hold at 1milliamp, 30 second ramp down to 0milliamp. Anode entered over the right primary motor cortex, and four cathodes placed in a ring formation surrounding the anode. Receives: Device: Anodal High Definition tDCS |
| Sham tDCS | Sham comparator | Sham subjects will undergo exactly the same anodal conventional tDCS protocol as outlined above. This includes the initial stimulation sequence of ramp up of 30 seconds, generating the initial transient scalp sensations identical to the treatment group. The stimulator will be programmed by the technologist after 120 seconds of stimulation to automatically ramp down to 0milliamp over 30 seconds. Receives: Device: Sham tDCS |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change in Left Hand Purdue Pegboard Test Score
A "baseline" trial will be performed. Each day they will do 15 repetitions for 5 consecutive days. On the fifth day, they will do a post training trial consisting of 3 repetitions.
Measured: Baseline and immediately post-training on day 5
Secondary outcomes (8)
Percent change in metabolic markers
Metabolic markers including GABA and glutamate will be assessed using Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy (MRS). An MRS will be performed at baseline, on day 5 post-training, and at the 6 week follow-up.
Measured: Baseline, post-training on day 5, and 6 weeks following training
Raw change in functional motor activations
Measures of functional motor activity will be assessed using Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI). Finger-tapping task will be performed in the MRI scanner. An MRI will be performed at baseline, on day 5 post-training, and at the 6 week follow-up.
Measured: Baseline, post-training on day 5, and 6 weeks following training
Raw change in robotic sensorimotor measures
The Kinesiological Instrument for Normal and Altered Reaching Movements (KINARM). The raw change in measures of proprioception, kinesthesia, visually-guided reaching, and object hit tasks will be measured. On the fifth day, the participants will do a post-training trial.
Measured: Baseline, post-training on day 5, and 6 weeks following training
Raw change in vibro-tactile sensory measures
The raw change of the Brain Gauge vibro-tactile sensory assessment score will be measured. On the fifth day, the participants will do a post-training trial.
Measured: Baseline, post-training on day 5, and 6 weeks following training
Raw change in size of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) motor maps
The raw change in TMS-measured motor evoked potential amplitude (Microvolts,uV) and neurophysiological changes in motor evoked potential size (Microvolts,uV). On the fifth day, the participants will do a post-training trial. Six weeks following the end of training, the participants will perform the task.
Measured: Baseline, post-training on day 5, and 6 weeks following training
Raw change in motor function tasks - Serial Reaction Time test
Raw change in score on the Serial Reaction Time test. A "baseline" trial will be performed. On the fifth day, the participants will do a post-training trial. All tasks are measured in milliseconds. Six weeks following the end of training, the participants will perform the task.
Measured: Baseline, post-training on day 5, and 6 weeks following training
Raw change in motor function tasks - Jebsen-Taylor test
Raw change in score on the Jebsen-Taylor test. A "baseline" trial will be performed. All measures are measured in seconds. On the fifth day, the participants will do a post-training trial. Six weeks following the end of training, the participants will perform the task.
Measured: Baseline, post-training on day 5, and 6 weeks following training
Raw change in motor function tasks - Purdue Pegboard test
Raw change in score on the Purdue Pegboard Test for the left, right, and both hands. A "baseline" trial will be performed. The average number of pegs places will be measured. On the fifth day, they will do a post training trial consisting of 3 repetitions for the left, right, and both hands trials. Six weeks following the end of training, the participants will perform 3 repetitions for the left, right and both hands trials.
Measured: Baseline, post-training on day 5, and 6 weeks following training
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted21 Jun 2017
- Study start1 Jul 2017
- Primary completion1 Jul 2018
- Study completion30 Aug 2018
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (5)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for HealthyStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Participants will be assigned to one of three groups (sham, tDCS, HD-tDCS) throughout the duration of the study.
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 24 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Calgary
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Adam Kirton, University of Calgary
- Investigators
- Adam Kirton, MD, MSc, Principal investigator, University of Calgary
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03193580
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- REB16-2474
- Acronym
- AMPED
- Status last verified
- Apr 2019
- First submitted
- 5 May 2017
- Last updated
- 22 Apr 2019
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Kirton A, Ciechanski P, Zewdie E, Andersen J, Nettel-Aguirre A, Carlson H, Carsolio L, Herrero M, Quigley J, Mineyko A, Hodge J, Hill M. Transcranial direct current stimulation for children with perinatal stroke and hemiparesis. Neurology. 2017 Jan 17;88(3):259-267. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000003518. Epub 2016 Dec 7.
PubMed 27927938Ciechanski P, Kirton A. Transcranial Direct-Current Stimulation Can Enhance Motor Learning in Children. Cereb Cortex. 2017 May 1;27(5):2758-2767. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhw114.
PubMed 27166171Kuczynski AM, Semrau JA, Kirton A, Dukelow SP. Kinesthetic deficits after perinatal stroke: robotic measurement in hemiparetic children. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2017 Feb 15;14(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s12984-017-0221-6.
PubMed 28202036Kuczynski AM, Dukelow SP, Semrau JA, Kirton A. Robotic Quantification of Position Sense in Children With Perinatal Stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2016 Sep;30(8):762-72. doi: 10.1177/1545968315624781. Epub 2016 Jan 7.
PubMed 26747126Cole L, Giuffre A, Ciechanski P, Carlson HL, Zewdie E, Kuo HC, Kirton A. Effects of High-Definition and Conventional Transcranial Direct-Current Stimulation on Motor Learning in Children. Front Neurosci. 2018 Oct 31;12:787. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2018.00787. eCollection 2018.
PubMed 30429768
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 22 Apr 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Accelerating Motor Learning in Pediatrics
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03193580
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- AMPED / REB16-2474
- Conditions
- Healthy, Pediatrics
- Keywords
- Anodal Stimulation Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation, High-Definition Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation, tDCS, Non-invasive brain stimulation, Pediatrics
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 24 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of CalgaryUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Jul 2017 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Jul 2018 (actual)
- Study completion
- 30 Aug 2018 (actual)
- First posted
- 21 Jun 2017 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Non-invasive brain stimulation can both study and potentially treat neurological disorders. Transcranial direct-current stimulation (tDCS) is an emerging safe and tolerability form of stimulation and has been used increasingly over the last decade.
The purpose of this research is to see if two different types of tDCS can improve motor function in healthy children. tDCS has been shown to safely enhance hand motor function in healthy adults, and those that have suffered stroke and other conditions. Recently the investigators demonstrated that tDCS may enhance hand motor function in healthy children, however, how it does so is unknown. In addition to assessing changes in motor function when tDCS is given during motor skill training, the investigators will perform various tests before and after stimulation to understand the changes that happen in the brain accompanying motor skill learning and brain stimulation.
The investigators hypothesize that there will be an accelerated acquisition of motor skill, when training is paired with conventional anodal tDCS, HD-tDCS, or sham tDCS.
Detailed description
Background \& rationale: Plasticity may be enhanced in the developing brain but mechanisms are poorly understood. Brain stimulation technologies such as transcranial direct-current stimulation (tDCS) modulate motor cortex excitability and plasticity. Studies by our group and others suggest that neuromodulation trials with tDCS are both safe and feasible in children. Recently the investigators demonstrated that conventional tDCS can enhance motor learning in healthy children. Additionally, recent advances in high-definition tDCS (HD-tDCS) have presented an opportunity to focally stimulate regions of the brain. HD-tDCS has not been investigated to date in children.
Establishing an ability of tDCS to enhance motor learning has therapeutic implications for children with motor disabilities. Perinatal stroke is the leading cause of hemiparetic cerebral palsy and most survivors suffer lifelong physical disability. Emerging models from our lab and others have defined central therapeutic targets whereby brain stimulation may enhance motor learning and function. Understand the effects of tDCS on motor learning, and it's underlying changes within the brain, is essential to advancing such interventions.
Research question \& objectives: Here the investigators propose to characterize the effects of tDCS on motor learning in healthy children. The primary objective of this study is to determine changes in acquisition of motor skill, when training is paired with conventional anodal tDCS, HD-tDCS, or sham tDCS. Multiple secondary objectives will describe biochemical and sensorimotor changes in the brain that take place during motor learning paired with tDCS. Secondary objectives will also assess the safety of HD- tDCS in healthy children.
Ethics: This study has been approved by the University of Calgary Research Ethics Board.
Design: Randomized, double blind, sham-controlled trial to evaluate the ability of tDCS and HD-tDCS to enhance motor learning.
Methods: Children will be recruited through the Healthy Infants and Children Clinical Research Program.
The training task will consists of performing the Purdue Pegboard Test (PPTL) with their left hand. This simple motor learning task is a well-validated task for complex, functionally relevant motor learning. The PPTL has demonstrated good sensitivity to change in both healthy and disease motor learning studies in adults and school-aged children. The PPTL will be performed over five consecutive days to monitor motor learning.
Children will attend the Alberta Children's Hospital Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation Laboratory. Subjects will be randomized to one of three stimulation groups (sham tDCS, conventional anodal tDCS, HD-tDCS). Baseline measures will be performed, including: magnetic resonance neuroimaging (anatomical imaging, functional neuroimaging and magnetic resonance spectroscopy), transcranial magnetic stimulation neurophysiology (motor mapping of the left and right motor cortex), sensorimotor functional changes assessed using the Kinesiological Instrument for Normal and Altered Reaching Movements (KINARM; arm positioning matching, kinesthesia, visually guided reaching, and object hit task), motor function changes (PPT, Jebsen-Taylor Test, Serial Reaction Time Task), and sensory discrimination measures (amplitude discrimination, temporal order judgment, temporal order judgment task, duration discrimination task, duration discrimination with confound, and single site adaptation task.
Following baseline measures, subjects will be seating in a comfortable chair with the PPTL test in front of them on a table. Participant randomized to sham or conventional anodal tDCS will be fitted with two 25cm2 electrodes (anode over the right primary motor cortex, cathode over the contralateral supraorbital area) or an EEG cap containing four small circular electrode (HD-tDCS, 1 anode centered over the right primary motor cortex, 4 cathodes surround the anode in a ring-like fashion). Three pre-intervention trials of the PPTL will be performed. All subjects will then have the tDCS ramped up to 1milliamp over 45 seconds. After 120 seconds the current will either be ramped down to 0milliamp (sham tDCS) or continue for a total of 20 minutes. The PPTL will be performed 5, 10, and 15 minutes following stimulation commencement, and after stimulation has ended (3 repetitions per time point). A tDCS safety and tolerability questionnaire will then be completed.
The same tDCS-treatment, PPTL training and safety and tolerability questionnaires will be performed over the next three consecutive days. On study day 5 participants will again repeat PPTL training paired with tDCS-treatment. Following tDCS and PPTL training, magnetic resonance neuroimaging, transcranial magnetic stimulation neurophysiology, sensorimotor functional changes, motor function changes, and sensory discrimination measures will be repeated to assess changes induced by motor learning and tDCS.
Participants will return six weeks following training, where magnetic resonance neuroimaging, transcranial magnetic stimulation neurophysiology, sensorimotor functional changes, motor function changes, and sensory discrimination measures will be repeated to assess long-term changes.
Data analysis: All outcome variables will be compared across the three intervention groups (sham tDCS, conventional tDCS, HD- tDCS) using a two-way repeated measures ANOVA with appropriate post-hoc analysis. The repeated measures ANOVA will distinguish the influence of intervention (stimulation type) and time (baseline, post-training, 1 month post- training). Pearson's correlations will be performed between the primary outcome measure and secondary outcome measures. Secondary statistical analysis will be performed as warranted.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 3
- Model description
- Participants will be assigned to one of three groups (sham, tDCS, HD-tDCS) throughout the duration of the study.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Anodal Conventional tDCS | Experimental | Device: Anodal Conventional tDCSThe intervention will be anodal conventional tDCS. Anodal tDCS: 30 second ramp up to 1milliamp, 20 minute current hold at 1milliamp, 30 second ramp down to 0 milliamp. Anode positioned over the right primary motor cortex, and the cathode over the contralateral supraorbital area. |
| Anodal High Definition tDCS | Experimental | Device: Anodal High Definition tDCSThe intervention will be anodal high definition-tDCS. Anodal HD-tDCS: 30 second ramp up to 1milliamp, 20 minute current hold at 1milliamp, 30 second ramp down to 0milliamp. Anode entered over the right primary motor cortex, and four cathodes placed in a ring formation surrounding the anode. |
| Sham tDCS | Sham comparator | Device: Sham tDCSSham subjects will undergo exactly the same anodal conventional tDCS protocol as outlined above. This includes the initial stimulation sequence of ramp up of 30 seconds, generating the initial transient scalp sensations identical to the treatment group. The stimulator will be programmed by the technologist after 120 seconds of stimulation to automatically ramp down to 0milliamp over 30 seconds. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 12 to 18 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Age 12-18 years
- Right-handed
- Normal development
- No neuropsychiatric disorders, neuropsychotropic medications, or chronic medical conditions
- Informed consent/assent
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Implanted electrical devices, including (but not limited to) cardiac pacemakers.
- Metallic implants or irremovable metal objects
- Pregnant females or females who may be pregnant.
- Braces or upper teeth wires.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Anodal Conventional tDCSAlso: Direct-current stimulator (Soterix)tDCS will be applied for 20 minutes at 1milliamp while participants are performing a fine motor task. The current will be set at 1milliamp, stimulation will be ramped up over 30 seconds and ramped down over 30 seconds. | Device | Anodal Conventional tDCS |
| Anodal High Definition tDCSAlso: Direct-current stimulator (Soterix)HD-tDCS will be applied for 20 minutes at 1milliamp while participants are performing a fine motor task. The current will be set at 1milliamp, stimulation will be ramped up over 30 seconds and ramped down over 30 seconds. | Device | Anodal High Definition tDCS |
| Sham tDCSAlso: Direct-current stimulator (Soterix)tDCS will be applied for 1 minutes at 1milliamp while participants are performing a fine motor task. The current will be set at 1milliamp, stimulation will be ramped up over 30 seconds and ramped down over 30 seconds. | Device | Sham tDCS |
Primary outcome
Change in Left Hand Purdue Pegboard Test Score
Time frame: Baseline and immediately post-training on day 5
A "baseline" trial will be performed. Each day they will do 15 repetitions for 5 consecutive days. On the fifth day, they will do a post training trial consisting of 3 repetitions.
8 secondary outcomes
Percent change in metabolic markers
Time frame: Baseline, post-training on day 5, and 6 weeks following training
Raw change in functional motor activations
Time frame: Baseline, post-training on day 5, and 6 weeks following training
Raw change in robotic sensorimotor measures
Time frame: Baseline, post-training on day 5, and 6 weeks following training
Raw change in vibro-tactile sensory measures
Time frame: Baseline, post-training on day 5, and 6 weeks following training
Raw change in size of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) motor maps
Time frame: Baseline, post-training on day 5, and 6 weeks following training
Raw change in motor function tasks - Serial Reaction Time test
Time frame: Baseline, post-training on day 5, and 6 weeks following training
Raw change in motor function tasks - Jebsen-Taylor test
Time frame: Baseline, post-training on day 5, and 6 weeks following training
Raw change in motor function tasks - Purdue Pegboard test
Time frame: Baseline, post-training on day 5, and 6 weeks following training
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 22 Apr 2019.
- Background: PubMed 27927938Kirton A, Ciechanski P, Zewdie E, Andersen J, Nettel-Aguirre A, Carlson H, Carsolio L, Herrero M, Quigley J, Mineyko A, Hodge J, Hill M. Transcranial direct current stimulation for children with perinatal stroke and hemiparesis. Neurology. 2017 Jan 17;88(3):259-267. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000003518. Epub 2016 Dec 7.
- Background: PubMed 27166171Ciechanski P, Kirton A. Transcranial Direct-Current Stimulation Can Enhance Motor Learning in Children. Cereb Cortex. 2017 May 1;27(5):2758-2767. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhw114.
- Background: PubMed 28202036Kuczynski AM, Semrau JA, Kirton A, Dukelow SP. Kinesthetic deficits after perinatal stroke: robotic measurement in hemiparetic children. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2017 Feb 15;14(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s12984-017-0221-6.
- Background: PubMed 26747126Kuczynski AM, Dukelow SP, Semrau JA, Kirton A. Robotic Quantification of Position Sense in Children With Perinatal Stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2016 Sep;30(8):762-72. doi: 10.1177/1545968315624781. Epub 2016 Jan 7.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 30429768Cole L, Giuffre A, Ciechanski P, Carlson HL, Zewdie E, Kuo HC, Kirton A. Effects of High-Definition and Conventional Transcranial Direct-Current Stimulation on Motor Learning in Children. Front Neurosci. 2018 Oct 31;12:787. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2018.00787. eCollection 2018.
- Program websiteLink provided by the sponsor.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Healthy
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Collection and Distribution of Blood Components From Healthy Donors for In Vitro Research Use
Blood Donors, Apheresis
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
Dynamic Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Human Subarachnoid Space Using Intrathecal Gadolinium Contrast
Healthy Volunteers
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
Connors Protocol for the Management and Use of Stored Human Specimens (Stored Human Specimens)
Healthy Volunteer Samples
RecruitingObservational study
Viral Infections in Healthy and Immunocompromised Hosts
Anogenital Herpes, COVID-19
RecruitingPhase 1
A Study in Healthy People to Compare How 2 Different Formulations of Vicadrostat / Empagliflozin Tablets Are Taken up in the Body
Healthy
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Adam Kirton, MD, MSc principal investigator
University of Calgary
2 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Anodal Conventional tDCS and Anodal High Definition tDCS in people with Healthy and Pediatrics, run by University of Calgary at 2 sites in Canada.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 22 Apr 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 2 sites in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change in Left Hand Purdue Pegboard Test Score (time frame: Baseline and immediately post-training on day 5). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03193580, which also lists 5 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 22 Apr 2019.