Acute Urinary RetentionNCT03194737
Prostatic Urethral Lift in Subject With Acute Urinary Retention
A study testing UroLift System Procedure in people with Acute Urinary Retention and Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia, run by NeoTract, Inc. at 6 sites in United Kingdom.
Trial summary
Assess feasibility and safety of the Prostatic Urethra Lift (PUL) procedure in patients with acute urinary retention secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 50 years and older, men only
- Conditions the study is for
- Acute Urinary Retention, Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia
- What is being tested?
- UroLift System Procedure
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 101 participants
- Where
- 6 sitesUnited Kingdom
- Study dates
- 24 Mar 2018to 3 Mar 2020
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 50 years and older
- Men only
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Male gender
- Diagnosis of symptomatic BPH
- Age ≥ 50 years
- Prostate volume ≤ 100 cc per ultrasound (US)
- Acute urinary retention with at least one failed trial without catheter (TWOC) while on alpha blocker
Who cannot join
- An obstructive or protruding median lobe of the prostate
- Previous BPH surgical procedure
- Previous pelvic surgery
- Urethral conditions that prevents insertion and delivery of device system into bladder
- Retention volume of >1500 mL
- Has not had prostate cancer excluded
Show all 24Show fewer
- History of prostate or bladder cancer
- Biopsy of the prostate within the 6 weeks prior to Index Procedure
- History of neurogenic or atonic bladder
- Acute or chronic renal failure
- Known coagulopathies or subject on anticoagulants within 3 days of index procedure (excluding up to 100mg ASA)
- Known bladder stones within the prior 3 months or treatment within 12 months
- Prostatitis requiring treatment (antibiotics) within the last year
- Other co-morbidities that could impact the study results
- severe cardiac arrhythmias uncontrolled by medications or pacemaker
- congestive heart failure New York Heart Association (NYHA) III or IV
- history of uncontrolled diabetes mellitus
- significant respiratory disease in which hospitalisation may be required
- known immunosuppression (i.e. AIDS, post-transplant, undergoing chemotherapy)
- Life expectancy estimated to be less than 5 years
- Desire to maintain fertility post procedure
- Unable or unwilling to complete all required questionnaires and follow up assessments
- Unable or unwilling to sign informed consent form
- Currently enroled in any other clinical research trial that has not completed the primary endpoint
Trial locations and contacts
6 sites in 1 country.
6 sites in 1 country
United Kingdom6 sites
Addenbrooke's Hospital
Cambridge
Frimley Park Hospital
Frimley, Surrey, GU16 7UJ
Freeman Hospital
High Heaton, Newcastle Upon Tyne, NE7 7DN
St. James's University Hospital
Leeds
Central Middlesex Hospital
London
Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital
Norwich
About this study
Assess feasibility and safety of the Prostatic Urethra Lift (PUL) procedure in patients with acute urinary retention secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH).
Read the detailed description
The study is a multi-centre, prospective evaluation of PUL and retrospective review of invasive surgery as potential comparator. The study is intended to be conducted at up to 5 different centres in the United Kingdom to enrol up to 50 subjects. Subject follow-up visits are at post-procedure, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months and 12 months.
- Being tested
- UroLift System Procedure
- Keywords
- Benign prostatic hyperplasia, BPH, Urinary retention, prostate, hypertrophy
- Medical subject headings
- Prostatic Hyperplasia, Urinary Retention, Hypertrophy
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
UroLift System ProcedureDevice
Also called Prostatic UroLift (PUL)
Minimally invasive procedure in patients with acute urinary retention secondary to BPH.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| UroLift System procedure | Experimental | All eligible,enroled subjects will undergo a UroLift procedure. Receives: Device: UroLift System Procedure |
| Retrospective Arm | No intervention | Chart review will be performed on all invasive BPH surgeries (TURP, Holmium Laser Enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP), etc) performed by the site from June 1, 2015 to December 31, 2015 |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Successful Trial Without Catheter Peri-procedurally
Success is defined as a spontaneous voided volume of ≥100 mL associated with a post void residual volume by ultrasound <300 mL 3 days (± 1 day) after the index procedure catheter placement without the need for re-catheterisation.
Measured: 3 days (± 1 day) from index procedure
Secondary outcomes (1)
Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events Related to Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH) Intervention
Number of patients who experienced adjudicated Serious Adverse Events related to Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) Intervention Procedure or Device
Measured: Through 3 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted21 Jun 2017
- Study start24 Mar 2018
- Primary completion21 Jan 2019
- Study completion3 Mar 2020
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for Acute Urinary RetentionStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 101 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- NeoTract, Inc.
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Neil Barber, Principal investigator, Frimley Park HospitalOliver Kayes, Principal investigator, St James's University HosptialMark Rochester, Principal investigator, Clinical Research and Trials Unit (Norfolk & Norwich University Hospital, UK)Toby Page, Principal investigator, Freeman Health SystemRajesh Kavia, Principal investigator, Central Middlesex HospitalNikesh Thiruchelvam, Principal investigator, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03194737
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CP00004
- Status last verified
- May 2021
- First submitted
- 19 Jun 2017
- Last updated
- 16 Jul 2021
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 16 Jul 2021. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Prostatic Urethral Lift in Subject With Acute Urinary Retention
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03194737
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CP00004
- Keywords
- Benign prostatic hyperplasia, BPH, Urinary retention, prostate, hypertrophy
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 101 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- NeoTract, Inc.Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 24 Mar 2018 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 21 Jan 2019 (actual)
- Study completion
- 3 Mar 2020 (actual)
- First posted
- 21 Jun 2017 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 16 Jul 2021
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Assess feasibility and safety of the Prostatic Urethra Lift (PUL) procedure in patients with acute urinary retention secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH).
Detailed description
The study is a multi-centre, prospective evaluation of PUL and retrospective review of invasive surgery as potential comparator. The study is intended to be conducted at up to 5 different centres in the United Kingdom to enrol up to 50 subjects. Subject follow-up visits are at post-procedure, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months and 12 months.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| UroLift System procedure | Experimental | Device: UroLift System ProcedureAll eligible,enroled subjects will undergo a UroLift procedure. |
| Retrospective Arm | No intervention | –Chart review will be performed on all invasive BPH surgeries (TURP, Holmium Laser Enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP), etc) performed by the site from June 1, 2015 to December 31, 2015 |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 50 years and older
- Sex
- Male only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Male gender
- Diagnosis of symptomatic BPH
- Age ≥ 50 years
- Prostate volume ≤ 100 cc per ultrasound (US)
- Acute urinary retention with at least one failed trial without catheter (TWOC) while on alpha blocker
Key exclusion criteria (24 listed)
- An obstructive or protruding median lobe of the prostate
- Previous BPH surgical procedure
- Previous pelvic surgery
- Urethral conditions that prevents insertion and delivery of device system into bladder
- Retention volume of >1500 mL
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| UroLift System ProcedureAlso: Prostatic UroLift (PUL)Minimally invasive procedure in patients with acute urinary retention secondary to BPH. | Device | UroLift System procedure |
Primary outcome
Successful Trial Without Catheter Peri-procedurally
Time frame: 3 days (± 1 day) from index procedure
Success is defined as a spontaneous voided volume of ≥100 mL associated with a post void residual volume by ultrasound <300 mL 3 days (± 1 day) after the index procedure catheter placement without the need for re-catheterisation.
1 secondary outcome
Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events Related to Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH) Intervention
Time frame: Through 3 months
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 16 Jul 2021.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Acute Urinary Retention
RecruitingObservational study
Effect of Catheter Duration on Prostate Laser Enucleation Surgery Outcomes in Patients With Urinary Retention
Urinary Retention, Benign Prostate Obstruction (BPO)
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Study of Teverelix DP on Prostate Volume, Urinary Function and Clinical Outcomes Following Acute Urinary Retention
Acute Urinary Retention, Benign Prostate Hypertrophy(BPH)
RecruitingPhase 4
Tamsulosin With or Without Tadalafil for Trial Without Catheter After Acute Urinary Retention Due to Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia
Acute Urinary Retention, Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia
RecruitingPhase 4
Tamsulosin Dose Escalation or Silodosin Switch Before Trial Without Catheter in BPH-Related Acute Urinary Retention
Acute Urinary Retention, Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia
Active, not recruiting
How the Method of Bladder Emptying After Epidural Placement in Labor Affects Postpartum Voiding
Urinary Retention, Urinary Tract Infection (Diagnosis)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Neil Barber principal investigator
Frimley Park Hospital
Oliver Kayes principal investigator
St James's University Hosptial
Mark Rochester principal investigator
Clinical Research and Trials Unit (Norfolk & Norwich University Hospital, UK)
6 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing UroLift System Procedure in people with Acute Urinary Retention and Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia, run by NeoTract, Inc. at 6 sites in United Kingdom.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 24 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 16 Jul 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 6 sites in United Kingdom. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 16 Jul 2021). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Successful Trial Without Catheter Peri-procedurally (time frame: 3 days (± 1 day) from index procedure). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 16 Jul 2021.