Adult Patients Undergoing ERCPNCT03196479
Comparison Between Efficacy of Ketamine and Propofol Mixture With 1:6 Ratio and 1:4 Ratio for Endoscopic Retrograde Procedure Sedation
A study testing ketamine and propofol mixture with 1:6 ratio and ketamine and propofol mixture with 1:4 ratio in people with Adult Patients Undergoing ERCP, run by Universitas Indonesia at 1 site in Indonesia.
Trial summary
This study aimed to compare the efficacy of ketamine and propofol mixture with 1:6 ratio and 1:4 ratio for endoscopic retrograde procedure Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Adult Patients Undergoing ERCP
- What is being tested?
- ketamine and propofol mixture with 1:6 ratio and ketamine and propofol mixture with 1:4 ratio
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 58 participants
- Where
- 1 siteIndonesia
- Study dates
- 1 Mar 2017to 31 Aug 2017
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients who were going to undergo ERCP unders sedation. Patient with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status of I-III, and body mass index of 18-30 kg/m2.
Who cannot join
- Subjects with history of allergy with drugs used in this trial, subjects with cardiovascular disease, hypertension, respiratory disorder, pregnancy, unstable hemodynamic, psychiatric drugs consumption, possibility of difficult airway, and kidney disorder
- Drop out Criteria:
- drug allergy during procedure, hypotension (>20%) not resolved using ephedrine, desaturation (oxygen saturation <90%) not resolved using positive pressure ventilation, and endoscopic complication occur
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Indonesia1 site
Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital
Central Jakarta, DKI Jakarta, 10430
About this study
This study aimed to compare the efficacy of ketamine and propofol mixture with 1:6 ratio and 1:4 ratio for endoscopic retrograde procedure
Read the detailed description
Approval from Ethical Committee of Faculty of Medicine Universitas Indonesia was acquired prior conducting the study. Subjects were given informed consent before enrolling the study. Intravenous (IV) cannula (20 G) , non-invasive blood pressure monitor, and pulse-oxymetry had been set on the subjects in endoscopic room. Vital signs were recorded. Subjects were then randomized into two groups (Ketamine:propofol ratio of 1:6 [K16] and ketamine:propofol ratio of 1:4 [K14]). K16 group's drug mixture was ketamine:propofol with ratio of 1:6, filled in 50 cc syringe, which consisted of 1 ml of ketamine (50 mg/ml), 30 ml of 1% propofol (10 mg/ml), and 19 ml of normal saline so that every ml of mixture consisted of 1 mg of ketamine and 6 mg of propofol. K14 group's drug mixture was ketamine:propofol with ratio of 1:4, filled in 50 cc syringe, which consisted of 1 ml of ketamine (50 mg/ml), 20 ml of 1% propofol (10 mg/ml), and 29 ml of normal saline so that every ml of mixture consisted of 1 mg of ketamine and 4 mg of propofol. Patient then was given initial bolus dose of 1 mg/kg body weight (BW) (based on propofol dose) and continued with maintenance dose of propofol (50 mcg/kg BW/minute, based on propofol dose). Maintenance dose could be increased by 10 mcg/kg BW/ minute if the subject still gave response to surgical stimulation or decreased by 10 mcg/kg BW/minute if hypotension occured. Onset of the drug, vital signs every 5 minutes, hypotension and desaturation events were recorded. If there were signs of pain such as tachycardia or hypertension, an additional dose of 25 mcg of fentanyl intravenous was given and recorded. After the endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) finished, drugs were stopped and the total doses of propofol, drug administration speed, total dose of fentanyl used, and recovery time were recorded. Subjects were moved to the recovery room and observed for side effects event. Subjects were moved to the ward after aldrete score of 9-10.
- Conditions
- Adult Patients Undergoing ERCP
- Being tested
- ketamine and propofol mixture with 1:6 ratio, ketamine and propofol mixture with 1:4 ratio
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
ketamine and propofol mixture with 1:6 ratioDrug
K16: K16 group was received ketamine:propofol with ratio of 1:6, filled in 50 cc syringe, which consisted of 1 ml of ketamine (50 mg/ml), 30 ml of 1% propofol (10 mg/ml), and 19 ml of normal saline so that every ml of mixture consisted of 1 mg of ketamine and 6 mg of propofol
ketamine and propofol mixture with 1:4 ratioDrug
K14 group was received ketamine:propofol with ratio of 1:4, filled in 50 cc syringe, which consisted of 1 ml of ketamine (50 mg/ml), 20 ml of 1% propofol (10 mg/ml), and 29 ml of normal saline so that every ml of mixture consisted of 1 mg of ketamine and 4 mg of propofol
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| ketamine:propofol ratio of 1:6 | Active comparator | K16 group was received ketamine:propofol with ratio of 1:6, filled in 50 cc syringe, which consisted of 1 ml of ketamine (50 mg/ml), 30 ml of 1% propofol (10 mg/ml), and 19 ml of normal saline so that every ml of mixture consisted of 1 mg of ketamine and 6 mg of propofol Receives: Drug: ketamine and propofol mixture with 1:6 ratio |
| ketamine:propofol ratio of 1:4 | Active comparator | K14 group was received ketamine:propofol with ratio of 1:4, filled in 50 cc syringe, which consisted of 1 ml of ketamine (50 mg/ml), 20 ml of 1% propofol (10 mg/ml), and 29 ml of normal saline so that every ml of mixture consisted of 1 mg of ketamine and 4 mg of propofol Receives: Drug: ketamine and propofol mixture with 1:4 ratio |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Recovery Time
Recovery time after procedure has ended
Measured: Day 1
Propofol requirement
Total dose of propofol used during ERCP
Measured: Day 1
Fentanyl requirement
Total dose of fentanyl used during ERCP
Measured: Day 1
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted22 Jun 2017
- Study start1 Mar 2017
- Primary completion30 Jun 2017
- Study completion31 Aug 2017
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (9)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Adult Patients Undergoing ERCPStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Universitas IndonesiaThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 58 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Universitas Indonesia
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Rudyanto Sedono, Universitas Indonesia
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03196479
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- IndonesiaUAnes017
- Status last verified
- Sep 2017
- First submitted
- 20 Jun 2017
- Last updated
- 6 Sep 2017
- Results posted
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
ASGE Standards of Practice Committee; Early DS, Ben-Menachem T, Decker GA, Evans JA, Fanelli RD, Fisher DA, Fukami N, Hwang JH, Jain R, Jue TL, Khan KM, Malpas PM, Maple JT, Sharaf RS, Dominitz JA, Cash BD. Appropriate use of GI endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2012 Jun;75(6):1127-31. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2012.01.011. No abstract available.
PubMed 22624807Triantafillidis JK, Merikas E, Nikolakis D, Papalois AE. Sedation in gastrointestinal endoscopy: current issues. World J Gastroenterol. 2013 Jan 28;19(4):463-81. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i4.463.
PubMed 23382625Nwokediuko SC, Obienu O. Sedation practices for routine diagnostic upper gastrointestinal endoscopy in Nigeria. World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2012 Jun 16;4(6):260-5. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v4.i6.260.
PubMed 22720128Andolfatto G, Willman E. A prospective case series of pediatric procedural sedation and analgesia in the emergency department using single-syringe ketamine-propofol combination (ketofol). Acad Emerg Med. 2010 Feb;17(2):194-201. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2009.00646.x.
PubMed 20370749Goudra BG, Singh PM. Propofol alternatives in gastrointestinal endoscopy anesthesia. Saudi J Anaesth. 2014 Oct;8(4):540-5. doi: 10.4103/1658-354X.140893.
PubMed 25422614Sharieff GQ, Trocinski DR, Kanegaye JT, Fisher B, Harley JR. Ketamine-propofol combination sedation for fracture reduction in the pediatric emergency department. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2007 Dec;23(12):881-4. doi: 10.1097/pec.0b013e31815c9df6.
PubMed 18091596Kogan A, Efrat R, Katz J, Vidne BA. Propofol-ketamine mixture for anesthesia in pediatric patients undergoing cardiac catheterization. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2003 Dec;17(6):691-3. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2003.09.008.
PubMed 14689406Botero CA, Smith CE, Holbrook C, Chavez AM, Snow NJ, Hagen JF, Pinchak AC. Total intravenous anesthesia with a propofol-ketamine combination during coronary artery surgery. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2000 Aug;14(4):409-15. doi: 10.1053/jcan.2000.7933.
PubMed 10972606Coulter FL, Hannam JA, Anderson BJ. Ketofol simulations for dosing in pediatric anesthesia. Paediatr Anaesth. 2014 Aug;24(8):806-12. doi: 10.1111/pan.12386. Epub 2014 Mar 26.
PubMed 24666723
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 6 Sep 2017. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Comparison Between Efficacy of Ketamine and Propofol Mixture With 1:6 Ratio and 1:4 Ratio for Endoscopic Retrograde Procedure Sedation
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03196479
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- IndonesiaUAnes017
- Conditions
- Adult Patients Undergoing ERCP
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 58 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Universitas IndonesiaUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Mar 2017 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Jun 2017 (actual)
- Study completion
- 31 Aug 2017 (actual)
- First posted
- 22 Jun 2017 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study aimed to compare the efficacy of ketamine and propofol mixture with 1:6 ratio and 1:4 ratio for endoscopic retrograde procedure
Detailed description
Approval from Ethical Committee of Faculty of Medicine Universitas Indonesia was acquired prior conducting the study. Subjects were given informed consent before enrolling the study. Intravenous (IV) cannula (20 G) , non-invasive blood pressure monitor, and pulse-oxymetry had been set on the subjects in endoscopic room. Vital signs were recorded. Subjects were then randomized into two groups (Ketamine:propofol ratio of 1:6 [K16] and ketamine:propofol ratio of 1:4 [K14]). K16 group's drug mixture was ketamine:propofol with ratio of 1:6, filled in 50 cc syringe, which consisted of 1 ml of ketamine (50 mg/ml), 30 ml of 1% propofol (10 mg/ml), and 19 ml of normal saline so that every ml of mixture consisted of 1 mg of ketamine and 6 mg of propofol. K14 group's drug mixture was ketamine:propofol with ratio of 1:4, filled in 50 cc syringe, which consisted of 1 ml of ketamine (50 mg/ml), 20 ml of 1% propofol (10 mg/ml), and 29 ml of normal saline so that every ml of mixture consisted of 1 mg of ketamine and 4 mg of propofol. Patient then was given initial bolus dose of 1 mg/kg body weight (BW) (based on propofol dose) and continued with maintenance dose of propofol (50 mcg/kg BW/minute, based on propofol dose). Maintenance dose could be increased by 10 mcg/kg BW/ minute if the subject still gave response to surgical stimulation or decreased by 10 mcg/kg BW/minute if hypotension occured. Onset of the drug, vital signs every 5 minutes, hypotension and desaturation events were recorded. If there were signs of pain such as tachycardia or hypertension, an additional dose of 25 mcg of fentanyl intravenous was given and recorded. After the endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) finished, drugs were stopped and the total doses of propofol, drug administration speed, total dose of fentanyl used, and recovery time were recorded. Subjects were moved to the recovery room and observed for side effects event. Subjects were moved to the ward after aldrete score of 9-10.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| ketamine:propofol ratio of 1:6 | Active comparator | Drug: ketamine and propofol mixture with 1:6 ratioK16 group was received ketamine:propofol with ratio of 1:6, filled in 50 cc syringe, which consisted of 1 ml of ketamine (50 mg/ml), 30 ml of 1% propofol (10 mg/ml), and 19 ml of normal saline so that every ml of mixture consisted of 1 mg of ketamine and 6 mg of propofol |
| ketamine:propofol ratio of 1:4 | Active comparator | Drug: ketamine and propofol mixture with 1:4 ratioK14 group was received ketamine:propofol with ratio of 1:4, filled in 50 cc syringe, which consisted of 1 ml of ketamine (50 mg/ml), 20 ml of 1% propofol (10 mg/ml), and 29 ml of normal saline so that every ml of mixture consisted of 1 mg of ketamine and 4 mg of propofol |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 65 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Patients who were going to undergo ERCP unders sedation. Patient with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status of I-III, and body mass index of 18-30 kg/m2.
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Subjects with history of allergy with drugs used in this trial, subjects with cardiovascular disease, hypertension, respiratory disorder, pregnancy, unstable hemodynamic, psychiatric drugs consumption, possibility of difficult airway, and kidney disorder
- drug allergy during procedure, hypotension (>20%) not resolved using ephedrine, desaturation (oxygen saturation <90%) not resolved using positive pressure ventilation, and endoscopic complication occur
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| ketamine and propofol mixture with 1:6 ratioK16: K16 group was received ketamine:propofol with ratio of 1:6, filled in 50 cc syringe, which consisted of 1 ml of ketamine (50 mg/ml), 30 ml of 1% propofol (10 mg/ml), and 19 ml of normal saline so that every ml of mixture consisted of 1 mg of ketamine and 6 mg of propofol | Drug | ketamine:propofol ratio of 1:6 |
| ketamine and propofol mixture with 1:4 ratioK14 group was received ketamine:propofol with ratio of 1:4, filled in 50 cc syringe, which consisted of 1 ml of ketamine (50 mg/ml), 20 ml of 1% propofol (10 mg/ml), and 29 ml of normal saline so that every ml of mixture consisted of 1 mg of ketamine and 4 mg of propofol | Drug | ketamine:propofol ratio of 1:4 |
Primary outcome
Recovery Time
Time frame: Day 1
Recovery time after procedure has ended
Propofol requirement
Time frame: Day 1
Total dose of propofol used during ERCP
Fentanyl requirement
Time frame: Day 1
Total dose of fentanyl used during ERCP
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 6 Sep 2017.
- Background: PubMed 22624807ASGE Standards of Practice Committee; Early DS, Ben-Menachem T, Decker GA, Evans JA, Fanelli RD, Fisher DA, Fukami N, Hwang JH, Jain R, Jue TL, Khan KM, Malpas PM, Maple JT, Sharaf RS, Dominitz JA, Cash BD. Appropriate use of GI endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2012 Jun;75(6):1127-31. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2012.01.011. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 23382625Triantafillidis JK, Merikas E, Nikolakis D, Papalois AE. Sedation in gastrointestinal endoscopy: current issues. World J Gastroenterol. 2013 Jan 28;19(4):463-81. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i4.463.
- Background: PubMed 22720128Nwokediuko SC, Obienu O. Sedation practices for routine diagnostic upper gastrointestinal endoscopy in Nigeria. World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2012 Jun 16;4(6):260-5. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v4.i6.260.
- Background: PubMed 20370749Andolfatto G, Willman E. A prospective case series of pediatric procedural sedation and analgesia in the emergency department using single-syringe ketamine-propofol combination (ketofol). Acad Emerg Med. 2010 Feb;17(2):194-201. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2009.00646.x.
- Background: PubMed 25422614Goudra BG, Singh PM. Propofol alternatives in gastrointestinal endoscopy anesthesia. Saudi J Anaesth. 2014 Oct;8(4):540-5. doi: 10.4103/1658-354X.140893.
- Background: PubMed 18091596Sharieff GQ, Trocinski DR, Kanegaye JT, Fisher B, Harley JR. Ketamine-propofol combination sedation for fracture reduction in the pediatric emergency department. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2007 Dec;23(12):881-4. doi: 10.1097/pec.0b013e31815c9df6.
- Background: PubMed 14689406Kogan A, Efrat R, Katz J, Vidne BA. Propofol-ketamine mixture for anesthesia in pediatric patients undergoing cardiac catheterization. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2003 Dec;17(6):691-3. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2003.09.008.
- Background: PubMed 10972606Botero CA, Smith CE, Holbrook C, Chavez AM, Snow NJ, Hagen JF, Pinchak AC. Total intravenous anesthesia with a propofol-ketamine combination during coronary artery surgery. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2000 Aug;14(4):409-15. doi: 10.1053/jcan.2000.7933.
- Background: PubMed 24666723Coulter FL, Hannam JA, Anderson BJ. Ketofol simulations for dosing in pediatric anesthesia. Paediatr Anaesth. 2014 Aug;24(8):806-12. doi: 10.1111/pan.12386. Epub 2014 Mar 26.
- Glomsaker TB. Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in Norway. University of Bergen, 2013.Link provided by the sponsor.
- Donnelly RF, Willman E, Andolfatto G. Stability of Ketamine - Propofol Mixtures for Procedural Sedation and Analgesia in the Emergency Department. Can J Hosp Pharm 2008; 61: 426-430.Link provided by the sponsor.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing ketamine and propofol mixture with 1:6 ratio and ketamine and propofol mixture with 1:4 ratio in people with Adult Patients Undergoing ERCP, run by Universitas Indonesia at 1 site in Indonesia.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 6 Sep 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Indonesia. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Recovery Time (time frame: Day 1). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03196479, which also lists 9 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 6 Sep 2017.