SchizophreniaPhase 3NCT03198078
Trial to Evaluate the Short-term Safety & Efficacy of Brexpiprazole Monotherapy in the Treatment of Adolescents With Schizophrenia
A Phase 3 study testing Brexpiprazole (OPC-34712) and Aripiprazole in people with Schizophrenia, run by Otsuka Pharmaceutical Development & Commercialization, Inc. at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
To determine the safety \& efficacy of brexpiprazole monotherapy in the treatment of adolescents with schizophrenia. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 13 to 17 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Schizophrenia
- What is being tested?
- Brexpiprazole (OPC-34712) and Aripiprazole
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 316 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 30 Jun 2017to 3 Apr 2023
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 13 to 17 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child
Who may be able to join
- Male \& female subjects aged 13-17 years, inclusive at time of consent and at baseline visit, with a primary diagnosis of schizophrenia as defined by DSM-5 criteria and confirmed by K-SADS-PL and a history of the illness for at least 6 months prior to screening.
- PANSS score >= 80, inclusive, at screening and baseline
Who cannot join
- Subjects with a DSM-5 diagnosis other than schizophrenia that has been the primary focus of treatment within 3 months of screening.
- Subjects with a clinical presentation or history that is consistent with delirium, dementia, amnesia or other cognitive disorders
- Subjects who have been hospitalized > 21 days for a current exacerbation of schizophrenia at the time of baseline.
- Any neurological disorder other than Tourette's Syndrome
- Subjects at significant risk of committing violent acts, serious self-harm or suicide based on history
- Subjects with epilepsy, a history of seizures, severe head trauma or stroke
- Subjects who test positive for drugs of abuse at screening
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
For additional information regarding sites, contact 844-687-8522
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 73116
About this study
Official title: A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo- and Active-controlled Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy of Brexpiprazole Monotherapy for the Treatment in Adolescents (13-17 Years Old) With Schizophrenia
To determine the safety \& efficacy of brexpiprazole monotherapy in the treatment of adolescents with schizophrenia.
Read the detailed description
This is a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo- and active-controlled trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of brexpiprazole monotherapy compared to placebo in adolescent subjects (ages 13-17) with a DSM-5 diagnosis of schizophrenia.
- Conditions
- Schizophrenia
- Being tested
- Brexpiprazole (OPC-34712), Aripiprazole, Placebo
- Keywords
- Brexpiprazole, Schizophrenia, Adolescent
- Medical subject headings
- Schizophrenia
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Brexpiprazole (OPC-34712)Drug
Once-daily, tablets
AripiprazoleDrug
Once-daily, tablets
PlaceboDrug
Once-daily, tablets
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Brexpiprazole | Experimental | Participants were administered with brexpiprazole oral tablets, daily, dose titrated up to 0.5 mg by Day 4, 1 mg by Day 7, 2 mg by Day 14, then between 2-4 mg after Day 21 up to Week 6 with a 1 mg increase or decrease, based on the Investigator's decision. Receives: Drug: Brexpiprazole (OPC-34712) |
| Aripiprazole | Active comparator | Participants were administered with aripiprazole oral tablets, daily, dose titrated up to 2 mg by Day 4, 5 mg by Day 7, 10 mg by Day 14, then 10, 15 or 20 mg after Day 21 up to Week 6 with a 5 mg increase or decrease, based on the Investigator's decision. Receives: Drug: Aripiprazole |
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Participants were administered with brexpiprazole or aripiprazole matching placebo oral tablets, daily up to Week 6. Receives: Drug: Placebo |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change From Baseline to Week 6 in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) Total Score
The PANSS consisted of three subscales: a total of 30 symptom constructs. For each symptom construct, severity was rated on a 7-point scale, with a score of 1 (absence of symptoms) to 7 (extremely severe symptoms). The PANSS total score was the sum of the rating scores for 7 positive scale items, 7 negative scale items, and 16 general psychopathology scale items from the PANSS panel. The PANSS total score ranges from 30 (best possible outcome) to 210 (worst possible outcome). Higher scores indicate worsening of symptoms. Least squares (LS) mean was determined by Mixed-effect model repeated measures (MMRM) method with fixed effect of treatment, (pooled) clinical center visit, treatment visit interaction, baseline value and baseline visit interaction as a covariate, and with an unstructured covariance.
Measured: Baseline to Week 6
Secondary outcomes (21)
Change From Baseline to Week 6 in PANSS Positive and Negative Sub-Scales Scores
PANSS has 7 positive symptom constructs: delusions, conceptual disorganization, hallucinatory behavior, excitement, grandiosity, suspiciousness/persecution, hostility; and 7 negative symptom constructs: blunted affect, emotional withdrawal, poor rapport, passive/apathetic social withdrawal, difficulty in abstract thinking, lack of spontaneity and flow of conversation, stereotyped thinking. Each item's severity was rated on 7-point scale, with score of 1 (absence of symptoms) to 7 (extremely severe symptoms). PANSS positive \& negative subscale scores were the sum of rating scores for 7 positive \& 7 negative items respectively. Both scores range from 7 (best possible outcome) to 49 (worst possible outcome). Higher scores denote worsening of symptoms. LS mean was determined by MMRM method with fixed effect of treatment, (pooled) clinical center visit, treatment visit interaction, baseline value, and baseline visit interaction as a covariate, and with an unstructured covariance.
Measured: Baseline to Week 6
Percentage of Participants Achieving Response
Response was defined as at least 30% improvement from baseline in PANSS Total Score or CGI score of 1 or 2. The PANSS total score was the sum of the rating scores for 7 positive scale items, 7 negative scale items, and 16 general psychopathology scale items from the PANSS panel, and ranges from 30 (best possible outcome) to 210 (worst possible outcome). The CGI scale is an investigator-rated evaluation that assesses the severity of a participant's illness on a 7-point scale, ranging from 1 (normal, not at all ill) to 7 (among the most extremely ill participants). Percentage of participants achieving response was determined by Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) method.
Measured: Up to 6 weeks
Percentage of Participants Achieving Remission
Remission was defined as a score of ≤ 3 on each of the following specific PANSS items: delusions (positive scale item [P] 1), unusual thought content (general scale item [G] 9), hallucinatory behavior (P3), conceptual disorganization (P2), mannerisms/posturing (G5), blunted affect (negative scale item [N] 1), passive/apathetic social withdrawal (N4), and lack of spontaneity and conversation flow (N6). Each item's severity was rated on 7-point scale, with score of 1 (absence of symptoms) to 7 (extremely severe symptoms). Percentage of participants achieving remission was determined by LOCF method.
Measured: Up to 6 weeks
Change From Baseline to Week 6 in Children's Global Assessment Scale (CGAS) Total Score
The CGAS is a 100-point rating scale measuring psychological, social, and school functioning for children aged 6-17 years and provides a global measure of the severity of disturbance. The scale is separated into 10-point sections that are headed with a description of the level of functioning and followed by examples matching the interval. The score ranges from 0-100, 1 to 10 indicates the need for constant supervision and 91 to 100 indicates superior functioning in all areas. Higher scores indicate better functioning. LS mean was determined by MMRM method with fixed effect of treatment, (pooled) clinical center visit, treatment visit interaction, baseline value, and baseline visit interaction as a covariate, and with an unstructured covariance.
Measured: Baseline to Week 6
Change From Baseline to Week 6 in Clinical Global Impression Severity (CGI-S) Scale Score
The CGI-S scale is an investigator-rated evaluation that assesses the severity of a participant's illness on a 7-point scale, ranging from 1 to 7. The investigator answered the question: "Considering your total clinical experience with this particular population, how mentally ill is the participant at this time?". Response choices were: 0 = not assessed; 1 = normal, not at all ill; 2 = borderline ill; 3 = mildly ill; 4 = moderately ill; 5 = markedly ill; 6 = severely ill; and 7 = among the most extremely ill participants. Higher scores indicate worse condition. LS mean was determined by the MMRM method with fixed effect of treatment, (pooled) clinical center visit, treatment visit interaction, baseline value, and baseline visit interaction as a covariate, and with an unstructured covariance.
Measured: Baseline to Week 6
Mean Clinical Global Impression Improvement (CGI-I) Scale Score at Week 6
The efficacy of brexpiprazole in the treatment was rated for each participant using the CGI-I. The investigator rated the participant's total improvement whether or not it was entirely due to drug treatment on a 7-point scale, ranging from 0 to 7. Response choices were: 0 = not assessed, 1 = very much improved, 2 = much improved, 3 = minimally improved, 4 = no change, 5 = minimally worse, 6 = much worse, and 7 = very much worse. Higher scores indicate worse condition. Mean CGI-I scale score was determined by LOCF method.
Measured: Week 6
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Trial Discontinuation Due to AEs
An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered with a medicinal product that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment.
Measured: From the first dose of study drug up to 21 days after the last dose of study drug (up to approximately 9 weeks)
Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs), Serious TEAEs, and TEAEs Graded by Severity
An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered with a medicinal product that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment. An SAE was any AE that results in the appearance of (or worsening of any pre-existing) undesirable signs, symptoms, or medical conditions which is fatal, life-threatening, result in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, constitutes a congenital anomaly/birth defect, and requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization. TEAE is any AE after the start of treatment or if the event was continuous from baseline, medicinal product related, or resulted in death, discontinuation, interruption or reduction of medicinal product. TEAEs were graded on a 3-point scale: 1 (Mild: Discomfort noticed, but no disruption to daily activity), 2 (Moderate: Discomfort sufficient to reduce or affect normal daily activity), and 3 (Severe: Inability to work or perform normal daily activity).
Measured: From the first dose of study drug up to 21 days after the last dose of study drug (up to approximately 9 weeks)
Mean Change From Baseline in Weight
Change in weight was reported, in kilograms (kg).
Measured: Baseline up to last visit (approximately 6 weeks)
Mean Change From Baseline in Height
Change in height was reported in centimeters (cm).
Measured: Baseline up to last visit (approximately 6 weeks)
Mean Change From Baseline in Body Mass Index (BMI)
Change in BMI was reported in kilograms per square meter (kg/m^2).
Measured: Baseline up to last visit (approximately 6 weeks)
Mean Change From Baseline in Waist Circumference
Change in waist circumference was reported in 'cm'.
Measured: Baseline up to last visit (approximately 6 weeks)
Number of Participants With At Least One Occurrence of Suicidal Behavior or Suicidal Ideation as Recorded on Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS)
C-SSRS is a scale used to report at least one occurrence of any suicidal behavior or suicidal ideation. Suicidal behavior was defined as reporting any of the following items: actual attempt, interrupted attempt, aborted attempt, and preparatory acts or behavior. The suicidal ideation total score is the sum of intensity scores of 5 items (frequency, duration, controllability, deterrents, and reasons for ideation). The score of each intensity item ranges from 0 (none) to 5 (worst) and the total score ranges from 0 to 25. Lower scores indicate improvement.
Measured: From the first dose of study drug up to last dose of study drug (up to approximately 6 weeks)
Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Test Values
Potentially clinically relevant laboratory values assessed included - serum chemistry [including blinded prolactin], hematology, and urinalysis as defined in SAP.
Measured: From the first dose of study drug up to last dose of study drug (up to approximately 6 weeks)
Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Abnormalities in Vital Signs
Vital sign measurements included body weight, systolic blood pressure (SBP), and diastolic blood pressure (DBP). Blood pressure measurements were made in the supine, sitting, and standing positions after the participant had been in each position for at least 3 minutes as defined in SAP.
Measured: From the first dose of study drug up to last dose of study drug (up to approximately 6 weeks)
Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Electrocardiogram (ECG) Parameters
Twelve-lead ECG recordings were obtained after the participant was supine and at rest for at least 5 minutes as defined in SAP.
Measured: From the first dose of study drug up to last dose of study drug (up to approximately 6 weeks)
Change From Baseline in Simpson Angus Scale (SAS) Total Score
The SAS consists of a list of 10 symptoms of Parkinsonism (gait, arm dropping, shoulder shaking, elbow rigidity, wrist rigidity, head rotation, glabella tap, tremor, salivation, and akathisia). Severity of each item was rated on a 5-point scale, with a score of 0 (absence of symptoms) to 4 (severe condition). The SAS total score is the sum of the scores of all 10 items, ranging from 0 to 40 where lower scores indicate less severe condition. LS mean was determined by Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) model with treatment and study center as main effects and baseline value as covariate.
Measured: Baseline up to last visit (approximately 6 weeks)
Change From Baseline in Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS) Total Score
The AIMS assessment consists of 12 items rating the involuntary movements: Facial and oral movements (4 items), extremity movements (2 items), and trunk movements (1 item) were observed unobtrusively while the participant is at rest and the investigator also made global judgments on the participant's dyskinesias (2 items), and dental status (2 items). Severity of each item was rated on a 5-point scale, with a score of 0 (absence of symptoms) to 4 (severe condition). Total Score is the sum of the scores of all 12 items, ranging from 0 to 48, higher scores indicate severe condition. LS mean was determined by ANCOVA model with treatment and study center as main effects and baseline value as covariate.
Measured: Baseline up to last visit (approximately 6 weeks)
Change From Baseline in Barnes Akathisia Rating Scale (BARS) Score
The BARS consists of 4 items related to akathisia: objective observation of akathisia by the investigator, subjective feelings of restlessness by the participant, subjective distress due to akathisia, and global clinical assessment of akathisia. The first 3 items were rated on a 4-point scale, with a score of 0 (absence of symptoms) to 3 (severe condition) and the global clinical assessment was rated on a 6-point scale, with a score of 0 (absence of symptoms) to 5 (severe akathisia). Total score is the sum of the scores of all 4 items, ranging from 0 to 14, higher scores indicate severe condition. LS mean was determined by ANCOVA model with treatment and study center as main effects and baseline value as covariate.
Measured: Baseline up to last visit (approximately 6 weeks)
Number of Participants With Severe Psychotropic Side Effects as Assessed by Udvalg for Kliniske Undersogelser (UKU) Rating Scale
The UKU rating scale is a semi-structured interview used to assess the side effects of participants being treated with antipsychotic drugs. The scale is divided into 6 sub-scales: Psychic, neurological, autonomic, other, global assessment by subject, and global assessment by doctor. The scale has a total of 48 items, each item is rated on a 4-point scale (0=not present; 1=mild; 2=moderate; 3=severe), and the total score ranges from 0 to 144. Higher ratings indicate greater impairment. The severe side effects are reported in this outcome measure.
Measured: From the first dose of study drug up to last dose of study drug (up to approximately 6 weeks)
Number of Participants With Cognitive Adverse Effects Assessed by New York Assessment for Adverse Cognitive Effects of Neuropsychiatric Treatment (NY-AACENT)
The NY-AACENT is used to detect changes in cognitive function subsequent to pharmacological or similar treatments for neurological or psychiatric problems, specifically designed to be used in pediatric population (ages 12 to 17), but could have been utilized with other age groups, as appropriate. Number of participants with at least one occurrence of the corresponding signs/symptoms are reported in this outcome measure.
Measured: From the first dose of study drug up to last dose of study drug (up to approximately 6 weeks)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted23 Jun 2017
- Study start30 Jun 2017
- Primary completion3 Apr 2023
- Study completion3 Apr 2023
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for SchizophreniaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Otsuka Pharmaceutical Development & Commercialization, Inc.The sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Subjects randomized 1:1:1 to 1 of 3 double-blind treatment arms to evaluate safety \& efficacy
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 316 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- H. Lundbeck A/S
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Caroline Ward, PhD., Study director, Otsuka Pharmaceutical Development & Commercialization, Inc.
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03198078
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 331-10-234
- Other IDs
- 2017-001447-12, 2017
- Status last verified
- Nov 2023
- First submitted
- 20 Jun 2017
- Last updated
- 20 Dec 2023
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Publications
Ward C, Pejovic Milovancevic M, Kohegyi E, Hefting N, Aurang C, Chen D, Larsen KG, Hobart M, Correll CU. Efficacy and safety of brexpiprazole in adolescents with schizophrenia: a multicountry, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial with an active reference. Lancet Psychiatry. 2025 May;12(5):345-354. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(25)00043-4. Epub 2025 Apr 7.
PubMed 40209740
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 20 Dec 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo- and Active-controlled Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy of Brexpiprazole Monotherapy for the Treatment in Adolescents (13-17 Years Old) With Schizophrenia
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03198078
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 331-10-234
- Conditions
- Schizophrenia
- Keywords
- Brexpiprazole, Schizophrenia, Adolescent
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 316 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Otsuka Pharmaceutical Development & Commercialization, Inc.Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- H. Lundbeck A/S
- Study start
- 30 Jun 2017 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 3 Apr 2023 (actual)
- Study completion
- 3 Apr 2023 (actual)
- First posted
- 23 Jun 2017 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 20 Dec 2023
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
To determine the safety \& efficacy of brexpiprazole monotherapy in the treatment of adolescents with schizophrenia.
Detailed description
This is a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo- and active-controlled trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of brexpiprazole monotherapy compared to placebo in adolescent subjects (ages 13-17) with a DSM-5 diagnosis of schizophrenia.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 3
- Model description
- Subjects randomized 1:1:1 to 1 of 3 double-blind treatment arms to evaluate safety \& efficacy
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Brexpiprazole | Experimental | Drug: Brexpiprazole (OPC-34712)Participants were administered with brexpiprazole oral tablets, daily, dose titrated up to 0.5 mg by Day 4, 1 mg by Day 7, 2 mg by Day 14, then between 2-4 mg after Day 21 up to Week 6 with a 1 mg increase or decrease, based on the Investigator's decision. |
| Aripiprazole | Active comparator | Drug: AripiprazoleParticipants were administered with aripiprazole oral tablets, daily, dose titrated up to 2 mg by Day 4, 5 mg by Day 7, 10 mg by Day 14, then 10, 15 or 20 mg after Day 21 up to Week 6 with a 5 mg increase or decrease, based on the Investigator's decision. |
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Drug: PlaceboParticipants were administered with brexpiprazole or aripiprazole matching placebo oral tablets, daily up to Week 6. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 13 to 17 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Male \& female subjects aged 13-17 years, inclusive at time of consent and at baseline visit, with a primary diagnosis of schizophrenia as defined by DSM-5 criteria and confirmed by K-SADS-PL and a history of the illness for at least 6 months prior to screening.
- PANSS score >= 80, inclusive, at screening and baseline
Key exclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Subjects with a DSM-5 diagnosis other than schizophrenia that has been the primary focus of treatment within 3 months of screening.
- Subjects with a clinical presentation or history that is consistent with delirium, dementia, amnesia or other cognitive disorders
- Subjects who have been hospitalized > 21 days for a current exacerbation of schizophrenia at the time of baseline.
- Any neurological disorder other than Tourette's Syndrome
- Subjects at significant risk of committing violent acts, serious self-harm or suicide based on history
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Brexpiprazole (OPC-34712)Once-daily, tablets | Drug | Brexpiprazole |
| AripiprazoleOnce-daily, tablets | Drug | Aripiprazole |
| PlaceboOnce-daily, tablets | Drug | Placebo |
Primary outcome
Change From Baseline to Week 6 in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) Total Score
Time frame: Baseline to Week 6
The PANSS consisted of three subscales: a total of 30 symptom constructs. For each symptom construct, severity was rated on a 7-point scale, with a score of 1 (absence of symptoms) to 7 (extremely severe symptoms). The PANSS total score was the sum of the rating scores for 7 positive scale items, 7 negative scale items, and 16 general psychopathology scale items from the PANSS panel. The PANSS total score ranges from 30 (best possible outcome) to 210 (worst possible outcome). Higher scores indicate worsening of symptoms. Least squares (LS) mean was determined by Mixed-effect model repeated measures (MMRM) method with fixed effect of treatment, (pooled) clinical center visit, treatment visit interaction, baseline value and baseline visit interaction as a covariate, and with an unstructured covariance.
21 secondary outcomes
Change From Baseline to Week 6 in PANSS Positive and Negative Sub-Scales Scores
Time frame: Baseline to Week 6
Percentage of Participants Achieving Response
Time frame: Up to 6 weeks
Percentage of Participants Achieving Remission
Time frame: Up to 6 weeks
Change From Baseline to Week 6 in Children's Global Assessment Scale (CGAS) Total Score
Time frame: Baseline to Week 6
Change From Baseline to Week 6 in Clinical Global Impression Severity (CGI-S) Scale Score
Time frame: Baseline to Week 6
Mean Clinical Global Impression Improvement (CGI-I) Scale Score at Week 6
Time frame: Week 6
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Trial Discontinuation Due to AEs
Time frame: From the first dose of study drug up to 21 days after the last dose of study drug (up to approximately 9 weeks)
Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs), Serious TEAEs, and TEAEs Graded by Severity
Time frame: From the first dose of study drug up to 21 days after the last dose of study drug (up to approximately 9 weeks)
Mean Change From Baseline in Weight
Time frame: Baseline up to last visit (approximately 6 weeks)
Mean Change From Baseline in Height
Time frame: Baseline up to last visit (approximately 6 weeks)
Mean Change From Baseline in Body Mass Index (BMI)
Time frame: Baseline up to last visit (approximately 6 weeks)
Mean Change From Baseline in Waist Circumference
Time frame: Baseline up to last visit (approximately 6 weeks)
Number of Participants With At Least One Occurrence of Suicidal Behavior or Suicidal Ideation as Recorded on Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS)
Time frame: From the first dose of study drug up to last dose of study drug (up to approximately 6 weeks)
Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Test Values
Time frame: From the first dose of study drug up to last dose of study drug (up to approximately 6 weeks)
Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Abnormalities in Vital Signs
Time frame: From the first dose of study drug up to last dose of study drug (up to approximately 6 weeks)
Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Electrocardiogram (ECG) Parameters
Time frame: From the first dose of study drug up to last dose of study drug (up to approximately 6 weeks)
Change From Baseline in Simpson Angus Scale (SAS) Total Score
Time frame: Baseline up to last visit (approximately 6 weeks)
Change From Baseline in Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS) Total Score
Time frame: Baseline up to last visit (approximately 6 weeks)
Change From Baseline in Barnes Akathisia Rating Scale (BARS) Score
Time frame: Baseline up to last visit (approximately 6 weeks)
Number of Participants With Severe Psychotropic Side Effects as Assessed by Udvalg for Kliniske Undersogelser (UKU) Rating Scale
Time frame: From the first dose of study drug up to last dose of study drug (up to approximately 6 weeks)
Number of Participants With Cognitive Adverse Effects Assessed by New York Assessment for Adverse Cognitive Effects of Neuropsychiatric Treatment (NY-AACENT)
Time frame: From the first dose of study drug up to last dose of study drug (up to approximately 6 weeks)
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 20 Dec 2023.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 40209740Ward C, Pejovic Milovancevic M, Kohegyi E, Hefting N, Aurang C, Chen D, Larsen KG, Hobart M, Correll CU. Efficacy and safety of brexpiprazole in adolescents with schizophrenia: a multicountry, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial with an active reference. Lancet Psychiatry. 2025 May;12(5):345-354. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(25)00043-4. Epub 2025 Apr 7.
Related trials for Schizophrenia
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study to Evaluate the Long-term Safety and Tolerability of Xanomeline and Trospium Chloride for the Treatment of Psychiatric Disorders in Children and Adolescents
Schizophrenia, Autism-Related Irritability
Not yet recruiting
Deep Brain Stimulation for Treatment-Resistant Schizophrenia
Treatment Resistant Disorders
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Sleep Monitoring for Early Detection of Relapse in People With Schizophrenia or Bipolar Disorder Receiving Usual Treatment
Bipolar Disorder (BD), SCHIZOPHRENIA 1 (Disorder)
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
Pharmacokinetics and Relative Bioavailability of Intranasal vs Intramuscular Olanzapine in Healthy Adult Participants
Healthy Adult Participants
Active, not recruiting
Designing and Evaluating a Classroom-Based Mental Health Programme for Adolescents.
Mental Health Promotion
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Caroline Ward, PhD. study director
Otsuka Pharmaceutical Development & Commercialization, Inc.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Brexpiprazole (OPC-34712) and Aripiprazole in people with Schizophrenia, run by Otsuka Pharmaceutical Development & Commercialization, Inc. at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 20 Dec 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 20 Dec 2023). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change From Baseline to Week 6 in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) Total Score (time frame: Baseline to Week 6). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03198078, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 20 Dec 2023.