AzTrials
AzTrials

To Compare the Effects of Mycophenolate Mofetil With Cyclophosphamide in Neplaese Lupus Nephritis PatientsPhase 2NCT03200002

Cyclophosphamide Versus Mycophenolate Mofetil in Lupus Nephritis

A Phase 2 study testing Cyclophosphamide and Mycophenolate Mofetil in people with To Compare the Effects of Mycophenolate Mofetil With Cyclophosphamide in Neplaese Lupus Nephritis Patients, run by Chitwan Medical College.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This was a prospective open label randomized control trial, which was conducted for a period of one and half year from January 2014 to June 2015. Out of 52 patients screened, 49 patients meeting the international society of nephrology/ renal pathology society (ISN/RPS) criteria were enrolled in the study comprising of… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 13 to 68 years
What is being tested?
Cyclophosphamide and Mycophenolate Mofetil
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
49 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
1 Jan 2014to 30 Jun 2015
Phase
Phase 2
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 13 to 68 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Newly diagnosed LN with ISN/RPS histopathology classes III to V

Who cannot join

  • Patients with biopsy had proven ISN / RPS classes I, II and VI LN
  • Patients with previous history of treatment and relapse of lupus nephritis
  • Patients who were receiving continuous dialysis for more than two weeks prior to randomization.
  • Patients of less than 12 years of age
  • Patients who had concurrent infection or illness at the time of enrollment
  • Patients who were taking concurrent medications which are supposed to have interactions with MMF or CYC
  • Female patients who were pregnant and breastfeeding.
  • Patients who did not give consent for participation

About this study

Official title: Effect of Cyclophosphamide Versus Mycophenolate Mofetil in Induction Therapy of Lupus Nephritis in Nepalese Population

This was a prospective open label randomized control trial, which was conducted for a period of one and half year from January 2014 to June 2015. Out of 52 patients screened, 49 patients meeting the international society of nephrology/ renal pathology society (ISN/RPS) criteria were enrolled in the study comprising of 25 and 24 patients in the cyclophosphamide (CYC) and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) groups respectively. Forty two patients (21 in each group) could complete the study till the end of 6 months and were included in final analysis. Baseline clinical evaluation and investigations were done and recorded. CYC was given intravenously as a monthly pulse in the dose of 0.5 to 1 gram per m2 body surface area. MMF was administered in the tablet form with the starting dose of 500 mg twice daily, which was increased to 750 mg twice daily after a month. Patients were assessed and monitored monthly and the details were recorded. Efficacy of treatment was measured as primary end point for those who achieved partial remission (reduction of 24 hour urinary protein to < 3.5gms/day if baseline proteinuria >3.5 gms/day or decrease by 50% if baseline proteinuria <3.5 gms/day) and secondary end point for those who achieved complete remission (normalization of serum creatinine and < 500 mg of 24 hour urinary protein). Adverse events experienced by the patients were also recorded during monthly visit.

Read the detailed description

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is an autoimmune disease associated with multiple organ involvement, among which kidney involvement, also known as lupus nephritis (LN), is quite common in SLE. LN is associated with a more than four-fold increase in mortality in patients with SLE. The management of SLE and LN comprises timely and coordinated management consisting of initial or induction phase of aggressive immunosuppression to bring the active disease under control followed by maintenance phase. The initial phase usually lasting for six months consists of treatment with steroid and cyclophosphamide or mycophenolate mofetil. So far there is no study published regarding the efficacy and adverse events of such treatments in Nepal. So, this study aimed to evaluate and compare the effectiveness and safety profile of mycophenolate mofetil and intravenous pulse cyclophosphamide in induction therapy of LN in Nepalese population.

A total of 52 patients with international society of Nephrology/ renal pathology society (ISN/RPS) class III to V lupus nephritis were screened, 3 of which did not meet entry criteria and 49 patients were enrolled in the study comprising of 25 and 24 patients in the MMF and CYC group respectively. Twenty one patients in each groups could complete the study till the end of 6 months and were included for analysis.

Patients in the CYC group received intravenous cyclophosphamide (CYC) in the dose of 0.5 to 1 gram per m2 of body surface area. The medicine, which is available in the strength of 1 gram in powder form, was first dissolved in 20 ml of normal saline. Only15 ml of this preparation was mixed in 100 ml of normal saline and was infused over a period of one hour. CYC was not given to those patients who had total leukocyte counts (TLC) less than 2500/mm3. Those patients were re-evaluated after one week and intravenous pulse CYC was reinstituted if the total leucocyte count (TLC) exceeds 2500/mm3. Pulse CYC was administered every month for a total of six infusions.Patients were monitored monthly and the details were recorded. During follow ups, any adverse events in between were noted and detailed physical evaluation was done and all baseline investigations (except USG abdomen, chest X-ray, serum anti nuclear antibody (ANA) and anti double strain deoxy-ribonuccleic acid (anti dsDNA), complement factor 3 (C3) and complement facotr 4 (C4) level) was repeated. Fasting lipid profile was repeated at the end of third and sixth month of treatment.

During the course of treatment, if a patient had interruption of medication for less than a 10 days' period due to any reason, s/he was considered as a regularly included subject. If the interruption extended beyond 10 days, the patient was withdrawn from the study.

Patients in the MMF group were administered tablet mycophenolate mofetil at a starting dose of 500 mg twice daily if the weight of the patient was less than 50 kilograms and 750 mg twice daily if the weight was more than 50 kilograms. After one month, the dose of MMF was increased to 750 mg twice daily. The clinical response was monitored in terms of reduction in serum creatinine and proteinuria. MMF dose was decreased or interrupted in patients experiencing an absolute neutrophil count <1300/mm3 at any study visit; MMF treatment was discontinued if a patient experienced an absolute neutrophil count <1000/mm3.

All patients, irrespective of randomized group, received concomitant corticosteroid therapy with oral prednisolone and hydroxychloroquine. Angiotensin receptor inhibitors (ACEi)/ angiotensin receptor blocker (ARBs) were given to all patients if the blood pressure remained above or equal to 120 mmHg of systolic blood pressure and 80 mmHg of diastolic blood pressure. If the blood pressure remained persistently high despite the use of ACEi/ARBs, other antihypertensives were added as required to achieve target blood pressure <130/80 mmHg. Oral prednisolone was given at an initial dose of 1 mg/kg with a maximum dose of 60 mg/day. The starting dose of prednisolone was continued for initial one month. Then, the dose of oral prednisolone was tapered at the rate of 10 mg/day every 2 weeks and was maintained at the baseline dose of 5 to 7.5 mg per day then after. Additional intravenous methylprednisolone was given at the beginning of treatment for patients who presented as rapidly progressive glomerulonephritis (RPGN) and who had activity index of more than 8 out of 24 on kidney biopsy irrespective of the randomized group (MMF or CYC) of the patient. The dose of methylprednisolone was 1 gram, which was given after mixing with 100 ml of normal saline and was infused intravenously over 1 hour for 3 days.

Keywords
Lupus Nephritis, cyclophosphamide, Mycophenolate mofetil
Medical subject headings
Lupus Nephritis

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • CyclophosphamideDrug

    Cyclophosphamide injection was administered in the dose of 0.5 to 1 gram per m2 of body surface area. The medicine, which is available in the strength of 1 gram in powder form, was first dissolved in 20 ml of normal saline. Only15 ml of this preparation was mixed in 100 ml of normal saline and was infused over a period of one hour. CYC was not given to those patients who had total leukocyte counts (TLC) less than 2500/mm3. Those patients were re-evaluated after one week and intravenous pulse CYC was reinstituted if the TLC exceeds 2500/mm3. Pulse CYC was administered every month for a total of six infusions.

  • Mycophenolate MofetilDrug

    Participants in the MMF group were administered tablet mycophenolate mofetil at a starting dose of 500 mg twice daily if the weight of the patient was less than 50 kilograms and 750 mg twice daily if the weight was more than 50 kilograms. After one month, the dose of MMF was increased to 750 mg twice daily. The clinical response was monitored in terms of reduction in serum creatinine and proteinuria. MMF dose was decreased or interrupted in patients experiencing an absolute neutrophil count <1300/mm3 at any study visit; MMF treatment was discontinued if a patient experienced an absolute neutrophil count <1000/mm3.

Study groups in NCT03200002
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
CyclophosphamideExperimentalParticipants in this arm received intravenous cyclophosphamide (CYC) in the dose of 0.5 to 1 gram per m2 of body surface area.
Receives: Drug: Cyclophosphamide
mycophenolate mofetilExperimentalPatients in this arm received mycophenolate mofetil in the tablet form.
Receives: Drug: Mycophenolate Mofetil

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. partial remission

    reduction of 24 hour urinary protein to < 3.5gms/day if baseline proteinuria >3.5 gms/day or decrease by 50% if baseline proteinuria <3.5 gms/day

    Measured: 6 months

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Complete remission

    normalization of serum creatinine and < 500 mg of 24 hour urinary protein

    Measured: 6 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted27 Jun 2017
  2. Study start1 Jan 2014
  3. Primary completion30 Jun 2015
  4. Study completion30 Jun 2015

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
49 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03200002
Sponsor's protocol ID
LN_CYC_MMF
Status last verified
Jun 2017
First submitted
20 Jun 2017
Last updated
28 Jun 2017
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Undecided

Publications

  • Sedhain A, Hada R, Agrawal RK, Bhattarai GR, Baral A. Low dose mycophenolate mofetil versus cyclophosphamide in the induction therapy of lupus nephritis in Nepalese population: a randomized control trial. BMC Nephrol. 2018 Jul 11;19(1):175. doi: 10.1186/s12882-018-0973-7.

    PubMed 29996800

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 2 study testing Cyclophosphamide and Mycophenolate Mofetil in people with To Compare the Effects of Mycophenolate Mofetil With Cyclophosphamide in Neplaese Lupus Nephritis Patients, run by Chitwan Medical College.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 28 Jun 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

partial remission (time frame: 6 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03200002, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 28 Jun 2017.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in