To Compare the Effects of Mycophenolate Mofetil With Cyclophosphamide in Neplaese Lupus Nephritis PatientsPhase 2NCT03200002
Cyclophosphamide Versus Mycophenolate Mofetil in Lupus Nephritis
A Phase 2 study testing Cyclophosphamide and Mycophenolate Mofetil in people with To Compare the Effects of Mycophenolate Mofetil With Cyclophosphamide in Neplaese Lupus Nephritis Patients, run by Chitwan Medical College.
Trial summary
This was a prospective open label randomized control trial, which was conducted for a period of one and half year from January 2014 to June 2015. Out of 52 patients screened, 49 patients meeting the international society of nephrology/ renal pathology society (ISN/RPS) criteria were enrolled in the study comprising of… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 13 to 68 years
- Conditions the study is for
- To Compare the Effects of Mycophenolate Mofetil With Cyclophosphamide in Neplaese Lupus Nephritis Patients
- What is being tested?
- Cyclophosphamide and Mycophenolate Mofetil
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine, Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 49 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- 1 Jan 2014to 30 Jun 2015
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 13 to 68 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Newly diagnosed LN with ISN/RPS histopathology classes III to V
Who cannot join
- Patients with biopsy had proven ISN / RPS classes I, II and VI LN
- Patients with previous history of treatment and relapse of lupus nephritis
- Patients who were receiving continuous dialysis for more than two weeks prior to randomization.
- Patients of less than 12 years of age
- Patients who had concurrent infection or illness at the time of enrollment
- Patients who were taking concurrent medications which are supposed to have interactions with MMF or CYC
- Female patients who were pregnant and breastfeeding.
- Patients who did not give consent for participation
About this study
Official title: Effect of Cyclophosphamide Versus Mycophenolate Mofetil in Induction Therapy of Lupus Nephritis in Nepalese Population
This was a prospective open label randomized control trial, which was conducted for a period of one and half year from January 2014 to June 2015. Out of 52 patients screened, 49 patients meeting the international society of nephrology/ renal pathology society (ISN/RPS) criteria were enrolled in the study comprising of 25 and 24 patients in the cyclophosphamide (CYC) and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) groups respectively. Forty two patients (21 in each group) could complete the study till the end of 6 months and were included in final analysis. Baseline clinical evaluation and investigations were done and recorded. CYC was given intravenously as a monthly pulse in the dose of 0.5 to 1 gram per m2 body surface area. MMF was administered in the tablet form with the starting dose of 500 mg twice daily, which was increased to 750 mg twice daily after a month. Patients were assessed and monitored monthly and the details were recorded. Efficacy of treatment was measured as primary end point for those who achieved partial remission (reduction of 24 hour urinary protein to < 3.5gms/day if baseline proteinuria >3.5 gms/day or decrease by 50% if baseline proteinuria <3.5 gms/day) and secondary end point for those who achieved complete remission (normalization of serum creatinine and < 500 mg of 24 hour urinary protein). Adverse events experienced by the patients were also recorded during monthly visit.
Read the detailed description
Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is an autoimmune disease associated with multiple organ involvement, among which kidney involvement, also known as lupus nephritis (LN), is quite common in SLE. LN is associated with a more than four-fold increase in mortality in patients with SLE. The management of SLE and LN comprises timely and coordinated management consisting of initial or induction phase of aggressive immunosuppression to bring the active disease under control followed by maintenance phase. The initial phase usually lasting for six months consists of treatment with steroid and cyclophosphamide or mycophenolate mofetil. So far there is no study published regarding the efficacy and adverse events of such treatments in Nepal. So, this study aimed to evaluate and compare the effectiveness and safety profile of mycophenolate mofetil and intravenous pulse cyclophosphamide in induction therapy of LN in Nepalese population.
A total of 52 patients with international society of Nephrology/ renal pathology society (ISN/RPS) class III to V lupus nephritis were screened, 3 of which did not meet entry criteria and 49 patients were enrolled in the study comprising of 25 and 24 patients in the MMF and CYC group respectively. Twenty one patients in each groups could complete the study till the end of 6 months and were included for analysis.
Patients in the CYC group received intravenous cyclophosphamide (CYC) in the dose of 0.5 to 1 gram per m2 of body surface area. The medicine, which is available in the strength of 1 gram in powder form, was first dissolved in 20 ml of normal saline. Only15 ml of this preparation was mixed in 100 ml of normal saline and was infused over a period of one hour. CYC was not given to those patients who had total leukocyte counts (TLC) less than 2500/mm3. Those patients were re-evaluated after one week and intravenous pulse CYC was reinstituted if the total leucocyte count (TLC) exceeds 2500/mm3. Pulse CYC was administered every month for a total of six infusions.Patients were monitored monthly and the details were recorded. During follow ups, any adverse events in between were noted and detailed physical evaluation was done and all baseline investigations (except USG abdomen, chest X-ray, serum anti nuclear antibody (ANA) and anti double strain deoxy-ribonuccleic acid (anti dsDNA), complement factor 3 (C3) and complement facotr 4 (C4) level) was repeated. Fasting lipid profile was repeated at the end of third and sixth month of treatment.
During the course of treatment, if a patient had interruption of medication for less than a 10 days' period due to any reason, s/he was considered as a regularly included subject. If the interruption extended beyond 10 days, the patient was withdrawn from the study.
Patients in the MMF group were administered tablet mycophenolate mofetil at a starting dose of 500 mg twice daily if the weight of the patient was less than 50 kilograms and 750 mg twice daily if the weight was more than 50 kilograms. After one month, the dose of MMF was increased to 750 mg twice daily. The clinical response was monitored in terms of reduction in serum creatinine and proteinuria. MMF dose was decreased or interrupted in patients experiencing an absolute neutrophil count <1300/mm3 at any study visit; MMF treatment was discontinued if a patient experienced an absolute neutrophil count <1000/mm3.
All patients, irrespective of randomized group, received concomitant corticosteroid therapy with oral prednisolone and hydroxychloroquine. Angiotensin receptor inhibitors (ACEi)/ angiotensin receptor blocker (ARBs) were given to all patients if the blood pressure remained above or equal to 120 mmHg of systolic blood pressure and 80 mmHg of diastolic blood pressure. If the blood pressure remained persistently high despite the use of ACEi/ARBs, other antihypertensives were added as required to achieve target blood pressure <130/80 mmHg. Oral prednisolone was given at an initial dose of 1 mg/kg with a maximum dose of 60 mg/day. The starting dose of prednisolone was continued for initial one month. Then, the dose of oral prednisolone was tapered at the rate of 10 mg/day every 2 weeks and was maintained at the baseline dose of 5 to 7.5 mg per day then after. Additional intravenous methylprednisolone was given at the beginning of treatment for patients who presented as rapidly progressive glomerulonephritis (RPGN) and who had activity index of more than 8 out of 24 on kidney biopsy irrespective of the randomized group (MMF or CYC) of the patient. The dose of methylprednisolone was 1 gram, which was given after mixing with 100 ml of normal saline and was infused intravenously over 1 hour for 3 days.
- Being tested
- Cyclophosphamide, Mycophenolate Mofetil
- Keywords
- Lupus Nephritis, cyclophosphamide, Mycophenolate mofetil
- Medical subject headings
- Lupus Nephritis
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
CyclophosphamideDrug
Cyclophosphamide injection was administered in the dose of 0.5 to 1 gram per m2 of body surface area. The medicine, which is available in the strength of 1 gram in powder form, was first dissolved in 20 ml of normal saline. Only15 ml of this preparation was mixed in 100 ml of normal saline and was infused over a period of one hour. CYC was not given to those patients who had total leukocyte counts (TLC) less than 2500/mm3. Those patients were re-evaluated after one week and intravenous pulse CYC was reinstituted if the TLC exceeds 2500/mm3. Pulse CYC was administered every month for a total of six infusions.
Participants in the MMF group were administered tablet mycophenolate mofetil at a starting dose of 500 mg twice daily if the weight of the patient was less than 50 kilograms and 750 mg twice daily if the weight was more than 50 kilograms. After one month, the dose of MMF was increased to 750 mg twice daily. The clinical response was monitored in terms of reduction in serum creatinine and proteinuria. MMF dose was decreased or interrupted in patients experiencing an absolute neutrophil count <1300/mm3 at any study visit; MMF treatment was discontinued if a patient experienced an absolute neutrophil count <1000/mm3.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Cyclophosphamide | Experimental | Participants in this arm received intravenous cyclophosphamide (CYC) in the dose of 0.5 to 1 gram per m2 of body surface area. Receives: Drug: Cyclophosphamide |
| mycophenolate mofetil | Experimental | Patients in this arm received mycophenolate mofetil in the tablet form. Receives: Drug: Mycophenolate Mofetil |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
partial remission
reduction of 24 hour urinary protein to < 3.5gms/day if baseline proteinuria >3.5 gms/day or decrease by 50% if baseline proteinuria <3.5 gms/day
Measured: 6 months
Secondary outcomes (1)
Complete remission
normalization of serum creatinine and < 500 mg of 24 hour urinary protein
Measured: 6 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted27 Jun 2017
- Study start1 Jan 2014
- Primary completion30 Jun 2015
- Study completion30 Jun 2015
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for To Compare the Effects of Mycophenolate Mofetil With Cyclophosphamide in Neplaese Lupus Nephritis PatientsStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 49 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Chitwan Medical College
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Arun Sedhain, Chitwan Medical College
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03200002
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- LN_CYC_MMF
- Status last verified
- Jun 2017
- First submitted
- 20 Jun 2017
- Last updated
- 28 Jun 2017
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Publications
Sedhain A, Hada R, Agrawal RK, Bhattarai GR, Baral A. Low dose mycophenolate mofetil versus cyclophosphamide in the induction therapy of lupus nephritis in Nepalese population: a randomized control trial. BMC Nephrol. 2018 Jul 11;19(1):175. doi: 10.1186/s12882-018-0973-7.
PubMed 29996800
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 28 Jun 2017. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Effect of Cyclophosphamide Versus Mycophenolate Mofetil in Induction Therapy of Lupus Nephritis in Nepalese Population
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03200002
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- LN_CYC_MMF
- Keywords
- Lupus Nephritis, cyclophosphamide, Mycophenolate mofetil
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 49 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Chitwan Medical CollegeUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Jan 2014 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Jun 2015 (actual)
- Study completion
- 30 Jun 2015 (actual)
- First posted
- 27 Jun 2017 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This was a prospective open label randomized control trial, which was conducted for a period of one and half year from January 2014 to June 2015. Out of 52 patients screened, 49 patients meeting the international society of nephrology/ renal pathology society (ISN/RPS) criteria were enrolled in the study comprising of 25 and 24 patients in the cyclophosphamide (CYC) and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) groups respectively. Forty two patients (21 in each group) could complete the study till the end of 6 months and were included in final analysis. Baseline clinical evaluation and investigations were done and recorded. CYC was given intravenously as a monthly pulse in the dose of 0.5 to 1 gram per m2 body surface area. MMF was administered in the tablet form with the starting dose of 500 mg twice daily, which was increased to 750 mg twice daily after a month. Patients were assessed and monitored monthly and the details were recorded. Efficacy of treatment was measured as primary end point for those who achieved partial remission (reduction of 24 hour urinary protein to < 3.5gms/day if baseline proteinuria >3.5 gms/day or decrease by 50% if baseline proteinuria <3.5 gms/day) and secondary end point for those who achieved complete remission (normalization of serum creatinine and < 500 mg of 24 hour urinary protein). Adverse events experienced by the patients were also recorded during monthly visit.
Detailed description
Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is an autoimmune disease associated with multiple organ involvement, among which kidney involvement, also known as lupus nephritis (LN), is quite common in SLE. LN is associated with a more than four-fold increase in mortality in patients with SLE. The management of SLE and LN comprises timely and coordinated management consisting of initial or induction phase of aggressive immunosuppression to bring the active disease under control followed by maintenance phase. The initial phase usually lasting for six months consists of treatment with steroid and cyclophosphamide or mycophenolate mofetil. So far there is no study published regarding the efficacy and adverse events of such treatments in Nepal. So, this study aimed to evaluate and compare the effectiveness and safety profile of mycophenolate mofetil and intravenous pulse cyclophosphamide in induction therapy of LN in Nepalese population.
A total of 52 patients with international society of Nephrology/ renal pathology society (ISN/RPS) class III to V lupus nephritis were screened, 3 of which did not meet entry criteria and 49 patients were enrolled in the study comprising of 25 and 24 patients in the MMF and CYC group respectively. Twenty one patients in each groups could complete the study till the end of 6 months and were included for analysis.
Patients in the CYC group received intravenous cyclophosphamide (CYC) in the dose of 0.5 to 1 gram per m2 of body surface area. The medicine, which is available in the strength of 1 gram in powder form, was first dissolved in 20 ml of normal saline. Only15 ml of this preparation was mixed in 100 ml of normal saline and was infused over a period of one hour. CYC was not given to those patients who had total leukocyte counts (TLC) less than 2500/mm3. Those patients were re-evaluated after one week and intravenous pulse CYC was reinstituted if the total leucocyte count (TLC) exceeds 2500/mm3. Pulse CYC was administered every month for a total of six infusions.Patients were monitored monthly and the details were recorded. During follow ups, any adverse events in between were noted and detailed physical evaluation was done and all baseline investigations (except USG abdomen, chest X-ray, serum anti nuclear antibody (ANA) and anti double strain deoxy-ribonuccleic acid (anti dsDNA), complement factor 3 (C3) and complement facotr 4 (C4) level) was repeated. Fasting lipid profile was repeated at the end of third and sixth month of treatment.
During the course of treatment, if a patient had interruption of medication for less than a 10 days' period due to any reason, s/he was considered as a regularly included subject. If the interruption extended beyond 10 days, the patient was withdrawn from the study.
Patients in the MMF group were administered tablet mycophenolate mofetil at a starting dose of 500 mg twice daily if the weight of the patient was less than 50 kilograms and 750 mg twice daily if the weight was more than 50 kilograms. After one month, the dose of MMF was increased to 750 mg twice daily. The clinical response was monitored in terms of reduction in serum creatinine and proteinuria. MMF dose was decreased or interrupted in patients experiencing an absolute neutrophil count <1300/mm3 at any study visit; MMF treatment was discontinued if a patient experienced an absolute neutrophil count <1000/mm3.
All patients, irrespective of randomized group, received concomitant corticosteroid therapy with oral prednisolone and hydroxychloroquine. Angiotensin receptor inhibitors (ACEi)/ angiotensin receptor blocker (ARBs) were given to all patients if the blood pressure remained above or equal to 120 mmHg of systolic blood pressure and 80 mmHg of diastolic blood pressure. If the blood pressure remained persistently high despite the use of ACEi/ARBs, other antihypertensives were added as required to achieve target blood pressure <130/80 mmHg. Oral prednisolone was given at an initial dose of 1 mg/kg with a maximum dose of 60 mg/day. The starting dose of prednisolone was continued for initial one month. Then, the dose of oral prednisolone was tapered at the rate of 10 mg/day every 2 weeks and was maintained at the baseline dose of 5 to 7.5 mg per day then after. Additional intravenous methylprednisolone was given at the beginning of treatment for patients who presented as rapidly progressive glomerulonephritis (RPGN) and who had activity index of more than 8 out of 24 on kidney biopsy irrespective of the randomized group (MMF or CYC) of the patient. The dose of methylprednisolone was 1 gram, which was given after mixing with 100 ml of normal saline and was infused intravenously over 1 hour for 3 days.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Cyclophosphamide | Experimental | Drug: CyclophosphamideParticipants in this arm received intravenous cyclophosphamide (CYC) in the dose of 0.5 to 1 gram per m2 of body surface area. |
| mycophenolate mofetil | Experimental | Drug: Mycophenolate MofetilPatients in this arm received mycophenolate mofetil in the tablet form. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 13 to 68 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Newly diagnosed LN with ISN/RPS histopathology classes III to V
Key exclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Patients with biopsy had proven ISN / RPS classes I, II and VI LN
- Patients with previous history of treatment and relapse of lupus nephritis
- Patients who were receiving continuous dialysis for more than two weeks prior to randomization.
- Patients of less than 12 years of age
- Patients who had concurrent infection or illness at the time of enrollment
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| CyclophosphamideCyclophosphamide injection was administered in the dose of 0.5 to 1 gram per m2 of body surface area. The medicine, which is available in the strength of 1 gram in powder form, was first dissolved in 20 ml of normal saline. Only15 ml of this preparation was mixed in 100 ml of normal saline and was infused over a period of one hour. CYC was not given to those patients who had total leukocyte counts (TLC) less than 2500/mm3. Those patients were re-evaluated after one week and intravenous pulse CYC was reinstituted if the TLC exceeds 2500/mm3. Pulse CYC was administered every month for a total of six infusions. | Drug | Cyclophosphamide |
| Mycophenolate MofetilParticipants in the MMF group were administered tablet mycophenolate mofetil at a starting dose of 500 mg twice daily if the weight of the patient was less than 50 kilograms and 750 mg twice daily if the weight was more than 50 kilograms. After one month, the dose of MMF was increased to 750 mg twice daily. The clinical response was monitored in terms of reduction in serum creatinine and proteinuria. MMF dose was decreased or interrupted in patients experiencing an absolute neutrophil count <1300/mm3 at any study visit; MMF treatment was discontinued if a patient experienced an absolute neutrophil count <1000/mm3. | Drug | mycophenolate mofetil |
Primary outcome
partial remission
Time frame: 6 months
reduction of 24 hour urinary protein to < 3.5gms/day if baseline proteinuria >3.5 gms/day or decrease by 50% if baseline proteinuria <3.5 gms/day
1 secondary outcome
Complete remission
Time frame: 6 months
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 28 Jun 2017.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 29996800Sedhain A, Hada R, Agrawal RK, Bhattarai GR, Baral A. Low dose mycophenolate mofetil versus cyclophosphamide in the induction therapy of lupus nephritis in Nepalese population: a randomized control trial. BMC Nephrol. 2018 Jul 11;19(1):175. doi: 10.1186/s12882-018-0973-7.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing Cyclophosphamide and Mycophenolate Mofetil in people with To Compare the Effects of Mycophenolate Mofetil With Cyclophosphamide in Neplaese Lupus Nephritis Patients, run by Chitwan Medical College.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 28 Jun 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
partial remission (time frame: 6 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03200002, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 28 Jun 2017.