AzTrials
AzTrials

Legionella Pneumophila PneumoniaNCT03200275

Impact of Legionella Urine Antigen Testing (LUAT) on the Local Epidemiology and Diagnosis of Legionella Pneumonia

An observational study of Legionella Pneumophila Pneumonia, run by Ministry of Health, Malaysia at 1 site in Malaysia.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

There has never been a paper published or research done to determine the rate of Legionella species as a cause of community or nosocomial acquired pneumonia requiring hospitalization in Malaysia. Anecdotally, Legionnaires' disease is thought to be uncommon in Malaysia. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Legionella Pneumophila Pneumonia
What is being tested?
Immunocatch™ Legionella Urine Antigen Test
How many people
505 participants
Where
1 siteMalaysia
Study dates
12 Sep 2017to 15 May 2019
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: A total of 503 patients who are consecutively hospitalised with pneumonia in Hospital Taiping from date of commencement of study.

Who may be able to join

  • More than 18 years of age,
  • Hospitalized consecutively for pneumonia irrespective of it being community or hospital acquired.
  • Acute symptoms of less than 2 weeks and radiological features which are compatible to pneumonia.
  • -

Who cannot join

  • Under 18 years of age
  • Suspected/confirmed case of active tuberculosis
  • Patients who refused to give consent -

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Malaysia1 site
  • Hospital Taiping

    Taiping, Perak, 34000

Other trials in Malaysia

About this study

Official title: The Impact of Legionella Urine Antigen Testing (LUAT) on the Local Epidemiology and Diagnosis of Legionella Pneumonia - A Hospital Based Study in Malaysia

There has never been a paper published or research done to determine the rate of Legionella species as a cause of community or nosocomial acquired pneumonia requiring hospitalization in Malaysia. Anecdotally, Legionnaires' disease is thought to be uncommon in Malaysia. This is one of the first prospective hospital-based studies to comprehensively evaluate the epidemiological and demographical factors of patients hospitalized with Legionella infection in Malaysia.

Read the detailed description

Legionellosis is an environment-related, acute gram negative bacterial respiratory infection and is caused primarily by the species Legionella pneumophila, an atypical pulmonary pathogen, in the likes of mycoplasma and chlamydia species. Potentially all Legionella spp. may cause human disease, however, the majority (92%) of clinical cases are caused by L. pneumophila and the predominant serogroup is serogroup 1.

Globally, 1-5% of community acquired pneumonia patients is caused by Legionella spp. and is a challenge to public health authorities. The incidence of Legionella Pneumonia in the US has exceeded expectations and is increasing, with at least 13,000 cases occurring annually. In Singapore, Legionella spp. is responsible for 2-7% of cases of hospitalized community-acquired pneumonia.

Legionella pneumophila is being increasingly recognized as a common pathogen causing both community-acquired and nosocomial pneumonia that is responsible for significant morbidity and mortality. It is also one of the most common aetiology discovered when pneumonia is sufficiently severe to require admission to an intensive care unit. It's likely to cause a severe form of pneumonia with high likelihood of adverse medical outcomes which includes rapid deterioration, respiratory failure and the need for intensive care unit (ICU) admission.

It will be impossible to distinguish patients with Legionnaires' disease from patients with other types of pneumonia clinically. The key to diagnosis is to perform microbiologic testing when a patient is stratified into a high-risk category. Rapid diagnosis of these pneumonias is desired as delayed diagnosis and institution of appropriate antibiotics is associated with poor outcomes.

In routine clinical practice, legionellosis is rarely proven by culture whereas detection of urinary antigen is now common. In US and Europe, case detection rates were revolutionized with the usage of urine antigen test at 97% and 79% respectively. Urine antigen testing has a reported sensitivity that ranges between 76% and 86% for cases of Legionella pneumonia serogroup 1 and a specificity that approaches 100%.

In this region, urine antigen test is rarely done due to lack of clinical awareness, a perception that Legionella infection is uncommon and due to the lack of availability of this test regionally. The introduction of the immunochromatographic (ICT) membrane assay to detect antigenuria has revolutionized the usage of UAT to diagnose Legionella infections. The ICT assay is similar to a home pregnancy test and is commercially available. The test is simple to perform and does not require special laboratory equipment, and results can be obtained within 15 minutes. The investigators wish to utilize this innovation to test patients whom are hospitalized with pneumonia and determine the incidence of Legionella infection in the local setting.

Being tested
Immunocatch™ Legionella Urine Antigen Test
Keywords
Legionella urine antigen test

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Immunocatch™ Legionella Urine Antigen TestDiagnostic test

    A total number of 503 urine specimens from study participants will be tested with LUAT - Immunocatch™. This test utilises the immunochromatographic (ICT) membrane assay to detect antigenuria which has revolutionized the usage of UAT to diagnose Legionella infections. The results can be obtained within minutes and the test does not require any sophisticated laboratory support. A comparison of the ICT with the Enzyme Immuno Assay (EIA) test showed comparable performance characteristics.

Study groups in NCT03200275
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
HOSPITALISED PNEUMONIA PATIENTSAll patients of more than 18 years of age, hospitalized consecutively for pneumonia irrespective of it being community or hospital acquired. All the patients included in this study will need to have acute symptoms of less than 2 weeks and radiological features which are compatible to pneumonia. They will undergo testing for Legionella pneumophila serogroup 1 urine antigen using a qualitative rapid assay following manufacturer's instructions at baseline. The diagnosis of Legionella pneumonia is made if the Immunocatch™ Legionella Urine Antigen Test is positive.
Receives: Diagnostic Test: Immunocatch™ Legionella Urine Antigen Test

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Legionella Pneumonia

    The diagnosis of Legionella pneumonia is made if the Legionella Urine Antigen Test is positive. The LUAT test kit utilized in this study will not be compared to the gold standard test for Legionellosis which would be the culture on specialised media/buffered-charcoal yeast extract (BCYE) plates, as this test is not available nationwide

    Measured: 15 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted27 Jun 2017
  2. Study start12 Sep 2017
  3. Primary completion15 May 2019
  4. Study completion15 May 2019

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Case only
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrolment
505 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03200275
Sponsor's protocol ID
NMRR-17-50-34002
Status last verified
Jul 2019
First submitted
24 Jun 2017
Last updated
30 Jul 2019
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Touray S, Newstein MC, Lui JK, Harris M, Knox K. Legionella pneumophila cases in a community hospital: A 12-month retrospective review. SAGE Open Med. 2014 Oct 10;2:2050312114554673. doi: 10.1177/2050312114554673. eCollection 2014.

    PubMed 26770744
  • Diederen BM, Kluytmans JA, Vandenbroucke-Grauls CM, Peeters MF. Utility of real-time PCR for diagnosis of Legionnaires' disease in routine clinical practice. J Clin Microbiol. 2008 Feb;46(2):671-7. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01196-07. Epub 2007 Dec 19.

    PubMed 18094136
  • Farnham A, Alleyne L, Cimini D, Balter S. Legionnaires' disease incidence and risk factors, New York, New York, USA, 2002-2011. Emerg Infect Dis. 2014 Nov;20(11):1795-1802. doi: 10.3201/eid2011.131872.

    PubMed 25513657
  • Helbig JH, Uldum SA, Bernander S, Luck PC, Wewalka G, Abraham B, Gaia V, Harrison TG. Clinical utility of urinary antigen detection for diagnosis of community-acquired, travel-associated, and nosocomial legionnaires' disease. J Clin Microbiol. 2003 Feb;41(2):838-40. doi: 10.1128/JCM.41.2.838-840.2003.

    PubMed 12574296
  • Fiumefreddo R, Zaborsky R, Haeuptle J, Christ-Crain M, Trampuz A, Steffen I, Frei R, Muller B, Schuetz P. Clinical predictors for Legionella in patients presenting with community-acquired pneumonia to the emergency department. BMC Pulm Med. 2009 Jan 19;9:4. doi: 10.1186/1471-2466-9-4.

    PubMed 19152698
  • Levcovich A, Lazarovitch T, Moran-Gilad J, Peretz C, Yakunin E, Valinsky L, Weinberger M. Complex clinical and microbiological effects on Legionnaires' disease outcone; A retrospective cohort study. BMC Infect Dis. 2016 Feb 10;16:75. doi: 10.1186/s12879-016-1374-9.

    PubMed 26864322
  • Hollenbeck B, Dupont I, Mermel LA. How often is a work-up for Legionella pursued in patients with pneumonia? a retrospective study. BMC Infect Dis. 2011 Sep 7;11:237. doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-11-237.

    PubMed 21899763

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Legionella Pneumophila Pneumonia, run by Ministry of Health, Malaysia at 1 site in Malaysia.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 30 Jul 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Malaysia. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Legionella Pneumonia (time frame: 15 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03200275, which also lists 7 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 30 Jul 2019.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in