AzTrials
AzTrials

Metastatic or Locally-advanced Digestive CancerDPD DIGNCT03205735

The Enzymatic Activity of Lymphocyte Dihydropyrimidine Dehydrogenase DPD in the Blood as a Predictive and Prognostic Factor in Patients With Digestive Cancer in the First or Second Metastatic Line

An observational study of Metastatic or Locally-advanced Digestive Cancer, run by Centre Antoine Lacassagne at 1 site in France.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

An observational study of a prospective, analytical, monocentric cohort which does not modify the patient care because the phenotyping of the dihydropyrimidine déshydrogénase DPD (lymphocyte activity) is already carried out in routine hospital. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
What is being tested?
lymphocyte DPD dosage
How many people
200 participants
Where
1 siteFrance
Study dates
29 Jun 2017to 29 Dec 2021
How long will I take part?
24 Months
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Metastatic or locally-advanced digestive cancer

Who may be able to join

  • Be > or = to 18 of age on day of signing informed consent
  • ECOG 0 to 2,
  • Patient with digestive cancer, all histologic type,
  • Patient who will receive a metastatic or locally-advanced first or second line treatment by 5-FU or capecitabine,
  • Patient with measurable lesions based on RECIST 1.1 criteria,
  • Be willing and able to provide written informed consent/assent for the trial,
  • Health care insurance available

Who cannot join

  • Be < to 18 of age on day of signing informed consent,
  • Patient without measurable lesion based on RECIST 1.1 criteria,
  • ECOG > 2,
  • Patients refusing to participate in the study or unable to give an oral consent,
  • Contraindication of 5-FU or capecitabine treatment,
  • People particularly vulnerable as defined in Articles L.1121-5 to -8 of the French Healthcare Code, including: person deprived of freedom by an administrative or judicial decision, adult being the object of a legal protection measure or outside state to express their consent, pregnant or breastfeeding women.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

France1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Centre Antoine Lacassagne

    Nice, 06000

    Eric FRANCOIS, Md, +33492031663, eric.francois@nice.unicancer.fr

    Eric FRANCOIS, md

    Recruiting

Other trials in France

About this study

An observational study of a prospective, analytical, monocentric cohort which does not modify the patient care because the phenotyping of the dihydropyrimidine déshydrogénase DPD (lymphocyte activity) is already carried out in routine hospital. The analysis will be based on clinical, radiological and biological criteria.

Read the detailed description

Used for nearly sixty years, 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) is the oldest drug prescribed in the treatment of digestive cancers and, still today, the most prescribed drug in digestive cancer. 5-FU belongs to the class of anti-metabolites. There is an oral precursor of 5-FU which is currently available and used in digestive cancer: Xeloda® (capecitabine).

The problem is that fluoropyrimidines are 80% metabolised to 5-fluoro-5,6-dihydrouracil (5-FUH2) by a key enzyme: dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD). There is inter-individual variability in the activity of this enzyme, partly related to genetic factors [1]. An abundant literature has already shown that a decrease in the activity of this enzyme results in an increase in the half-life of 5-FU. Thus, patients with a deficit in DPD activity have a risk of overexposure to chemotherapy in this class, and consequently an increased risk of acute, early and severe toxicity.

Since the 1990th years, many authors have shown that there is considerable inter-individual variability in the plasma concentration of 5 FU after bolus [5] or continuous infusion [6]. These variations in plasma concentrations of 5FU are probably related to a 5-FU catabolism variability related to the activity of DPD.

It has also been shown that there is a correlation between 5FU plasma level, tumor response and toxicity [7, 8]. A Phase III study showed that there was a significant impact on the response rate (33.7% VS 18.3%) p = 0.004 if doses of 5-FU were adjusted to plasma levels of 5-FU versus body surface [9]. Median survival was 16 months in the control arm versus 22 months in the experimental arm (P = 0.08), with severe grade 3-4 toxicities statistically increased in the control arm (p = 0.03). An adaptation of doses of 5-FU to the body surface, as it is done today, is in conclusion insufficient to obtain reproducible plasma concentrations due to an interindividual variability of the metabolism, linked to the activity of the DPD .

These data suggest that DPD activity, by modulating plasma concentration, may be a predictive factor of fluoropyrimidine response and also a prognostic factor. To our knowledge, there are no studies that have demonstrated a direct link between DPD activity, tumor response, and survival impact. Recently, Chamorey and al. [10] showed that the high level of DPD enzyme activity (> 0.30 nmol / min / mg protein) was significantly correlated with lower overall survival and progression-free survival. This was a retrospective analysis of 130 patients treated with fluoropyrimidines regardless of the tumor primitive (digestive, breast, ENT).

These results, presented in spite of their significance, are the result of a retrospective study that is subject, as a minimum, to selection bias. It therefore seemed important to make a prospective study, centered on digestive cancers. The prospective nature will limit selection bias and restriction to digestive cancers in which fluoropyrimidines have a main function and limit confunding biases. The selection of the first and second lines of palliative chemotherapy will increase the population studied and thus the power of the statistical analysis.

If the initial results were confirmed, this will allow DPD to be approached from a new angle and will encourage multicenter controlled prospective studies with the Antoine-Lacassagne center as the national promotor.

In our study, we decided to evaluate DPD activity using an enzymatic radio technique that directly evaluates the activity of the enzyme in blood lymphocytes, which is the original technique and the oldest.

Being tested
lymphocyte DPD dosage
Medical subject headings
Neoplasm Metastasis

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • lymphocyte DPD dosageDiagnostic test

    lymphocyte DPD dosage in peripheral blood

Study groups in NCT03205735
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
normal DPD result grouppatients group with a normal DPD result
Receives: Diagnostic Test: lymphocyte DPD dosage
elevated DPD result grouppatients group with an elevated DPD result
Receives: Diagnostic Test: lymphocyte DPD dosage

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. progression free survival

    progression free survival calculated between diagnosis date and progression date or death date

    Measured: june 2019

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. overall survival

    overall survival calculated between diagnosis date and lastest news date or death

    Measured: june 2019

  2. treatment response

    treatment response defined according to RECIST 1.1 criteria

    Measured: june 2019

  3. toxicities evaluation

    toxicities evaluated according to NCI-CTCAE version 4.0

    Measured: june 2019

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted2 Jul 2017
  2. Study start29 Jun 2017
  3. Primary completion29 Sep 2021 (estimated)
  4. Study completion29 Dec 2021 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
200 participants (estimated)
Target duration
24 Months
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03205735
Sponsor's protocol ID
2017/25
Acronym
DPD DIG
Status last verified
Jul 2021
First submitted
29 Jun 2017
Last updated
2 Jul 2021
Results posted
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Metastatic or Locally-advanced Digestive Cancer, run by Centre Antoine Lacassagne at 1 site in France.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 2 Jul 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Eric FRANCOIS, Dr (+33 4 92031163, eric.francois@nice.unicancer.fr), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

progression free survival (time frame: june 2019). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 2 Jul 2021.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in