Metastatic or Locally-advanced Digestive CancerDPD DIGNCT03205735
The Enzymatic Activity of Lymphocyte Dihydropyrimidine Dehydrogenase DPD in the Blood as a Predictive and Prognostic Factor in Patients With Digestive Cancer in the First or Second Metastatic Line
An observational study of Metastatic or Locally-advanced Digestive Cancer, run by Centre Antoine Lacassagne at 1 site in France.
Trial summary
An observational study of a prospective, analytical, monocentric cohort which does not modify the patient care because the phenotyping of the dihydropyrimidine déshydrogénase DPD (lymphocyte activity) is already carried out in routine hospital. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Metastatic or Locally-advanced Digestive Cancer
- What is being tested?
- lymphocyte DPD dosage
- How many people
- 200 participants
- Where
- 1 siteFrance
- Study dates
- 29 Jun 2017to 29 Dec 2021
- How long will I take part?
- 24 Months
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Metastatic or locally-advanced digestive cancer
Who may be able to join
- Be > or = to 18 of age on day of signing informed consent
- ECOG 0 to 2,
- Patient with digestive cancer, all histologic type,
- Patient who will receive a metastatic or locally-advanced first or second line treatment by 5-FU or capecitabine,
- Patient with measurable lesions based on RECIST 1.1 criteria,
- Be willing and able to provide written informed consent/assent for the trial,
- Health care insurance available
Who cannot join
- Be < to 18 of age on day of signing informed consent,
- Patient without measurable lesion based on RECIST 1.1 criteria,
- ECOG > 2,
- Patients refusing to participate in the study or unable to give an oral consent,
- Contraindication of 5-FU or capecitabine treatment,
- People particularly vulnerable as defined in Articles L.1121-5 to -8 of the French Healthcare Code, including: person deprived of freedom by an administrative or judicial decision, adult being the object of a legal protection measure or outside state to express their consent, pregnant or breastfeeding women.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
France1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Centre Antoine Lacassagne
Nice, 06000
Eric FRANCOIS, Md, +33492031663, eric.francois@nice.unicancer.fr
Eric FRANCOIS, md
About this study
An observational study of a prospective, analytical, monocentric cohort which does not modify the patient care because the phenotyping of the dihydropyrimidine déshydrogénase DPD (lymphocyte activity) is already carried out in routine hospital. The analysis will be based on clinical, radiological and biological criteria.
Read the detailed description
Used for nearly sixty years, 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) is the oldest drug prescribed in the treatment of digestive cancers and, still today, the most prescribed drug in digestive cancer. 5-FU belongs to the class of anti-metabolites. There is an oral precursor of 5-FU which is currently available and used in digestive cancer: Xeloda® (capecitabine).
The problem is that fluoropyrimidines are 80% metabolised to 5-fluoro-5,6-dihydrouracil (5-FUH2) by a key enzyme: dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD). There is inter-individual variability in the activity of this enzyme, partly related to genetic factors [1]. An abundant literature has already shown that a decrease in the activity of this enzyme results in an increase in the half-life of 5-FU. Thus, patients with a deficit in DPD activity have a risk of overexposure to chemotherapy in this class, and consequently an increased risk of acute, early and severe toxicity.
Since the 1990th years, many authors have shown that there is considerable inter-individual variability in the plasma concentration of 5 FU after bolus [5] or continuous infusion [6]. These variations in plasma concentrations of 5FU are probably related to a 5-FU catabolism variability related to the activity of DPD.
It has also been shown that there is a correlation between 5FU plasma level, tumor response and toxicity [7, 8]. A Phase III study showed that there was a significant impact on the response rate (33.7% VS 18.3%) p = 0.004 if doses of 5-FU were adjusted to plasma levels of 5-FU versus body surface [9]. Median survival was 16 months in the control arm versus 22 months in the experimental arm (P = 0.08), with severe grade 3-4 toxicities statistically increased in the control arm (p = 0.03). An adaptation of doses of 5-FU to the body surface, as it is done today, is in conclusion insufficient to obtain reproducible plasma concentrations due to an interindividual variability of the metabolism, linked to the activity of the DPD .
These data suggest that DPD activity, by modulating plasma concentration, may be a predictive factor of fluoropyrimidine response and also a prognostic factor. To our knowledge, there are no studies that have demonstrated a direct link between DPD activity, tumor response, and survival impact. Recently, Chamorey and al. [10] showed that the high level of DPD enzyme activity (> 0.30 nmol / min / mg protein) was significantly correlated with lower overall survival and progression-free survival. This was a retrospective analysis of 130 patients treated with fluoropyrimidines regardless of the tumor primitive (digestive, breast, ENT).
These results, presented in spite of their significance, are the result of a retrospective study that is subject, as a minimum, to selection bias. It therefore seemed important to make a prospective study, centered on digestive cancers. The prospective nature will limit selection bias and restriction to digestive cancers in which fluoropyrimidines have a main function and limit confunding biases. The selection of the first and second lines of palliative chemotherapy will increase the population studied and thus the power of the statistical analysis.
If the initial results were confirmed, this will allow DPD to be approached from a new angle and will encourage multicenter controlled prospective studies with the Antoine-Lacassagne center as the national promotor.
In our study, we decided to evaluate DPD activity using an enzymatic radio technique that directly evaluates the activity of the enzyme in blood lymphocytes, which is the original technique and the oldest.
- Being tested
- lymphocyte DPD dosage
- Medical subject headings
- Neoplasm Metastasis
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
lymphocyte DPD dosageDiagnostic test
lymphocyte DPD dosage in peripheral blood
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| normal DPD result group | patients group with a normal DPD result Receives: Diagnostic Test: lymphocyte DPD dosage | |
| elevated DPD result group | patients group with an elevated DPD result Receives: Diagnostic Test: lymphocyte DPD dosage |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
progression free survival
progression free survival calculated between diagnosis date and progression date or death date
Measured: june 2019
Secondary outcomes (3)
overall survival
overall survival calculated between diagnosis date and lastest news date or death
Measured: june 2019
treatment response
treatment response defined according to RECIST 1.1 criteria
Measured: june 2019
toxicities evaluation
toxicities evaluated according to NCI-CTCAE version 4.0
Measured: june 2019
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted2 Jul 2017
- Study start29 Jun 2017
- Primary completion29 Sep 2021 (estimated)
- Study completion29 Dec 2021 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Metastatic or Locally-advanced Digestive CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 200 participants (estimated)
- Target duration
- 24 Months
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Centre Antoine Lacassagne
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03205735
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2017/25
- Acronym
- DPD DIG
- Status last verified
- Jul 2021
- First submitted
- 29 Jun 2017
- Last updated
- 2 Jul 2021
- Results posted
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 2 Jul 2021. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- The Enzymatic Activity of Lymphocyte Dihydropyrimidine Dehydrogenase DPD in the Blood as a Predictive and Prognostic Factor in Patients With Digestive Cancer in the First or Second Metastatic Line
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03205735
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- DPD DIG / 2017/25
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 200 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Centre Antoine LacassagneUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 29 Jun 2017 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 29 Sep 2021 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 29 Dec 2021 (estimated)
- First posted
- 2 Jul 2017 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
An observational study of a prospective, analytical, monocentric cohort which does not modify the patient care because the phenotyping of the dihydropyrimidine déshydrogénase DPD (lymphocyte activity) is already carried out in routine hospital. The analysis will be based on clinical, radiological and biological criteria.
Detailed description
Used for nearly sixty years, 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) is the oldest drug prescribed in the treatment of digestive cancers and, still today, the most prescribed drug in digestive cancer. 5-FU belongs to the class of anti-metabolites. There is an oral precursor of 5-FU which is currently available and used in digestive cancer: Xeloda® (capecitabine).
The problem is that fluoropyrimidines are 80% metabolised to 5-fluoro-5,6-dihydrouracil (5-FUH2) by a key enzyme: dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD). There is inter-individual variability in the activity of this enzyme, partly related to genetic factors [1]. An abundant literature has already shown that a decrease in the activity of this enzyme results in an increase in the half-life of 5-FU. Thus, patients with a deficit in DPD activity have a risk of overexposure to chemotherapy in this class, and consequently an increased risk of acute, early and severe toxicity.
Since the 1990th years, many authors have shown that there is considerable inter-individual variability in the plasma concentration of 5 FU after bolus [5] or continuous infusion [6]. These variations in plasma concentrations of 5FU are probably related to a 5-FU catabolism variability related to the activity of DPD.
It has also been shown that there is a correlation between 5FU plasma level, tumor response and toxicity [7, 8]. A Phase III study showed that there was a significant impact on the response rate (33.7% VS 18.3%) p = 0.004 if doses of 5-FU were adjusted to plasma levels of 5-FU versus body surface [9]. Median survival was 16 months in the control arm versus 22 months in the experimental arm (P = 0.08), with severe grade 3-4 toxicities statistically increased in the control arm (p = 0.03). An adaptation of doses of 5-FU to the body surface, as it is done today, is in conclusion insufficient to obtain reproducible plasma concentrations due to an interindividual variability of the metabolism, linked to the activity of the DPD .
These data suggest that DPD activity, by modulating plasma concentration, may be a predictive factor of fluoropyrimidine response and also a prognostic factor. To our knowledge, there are no studies that have demonstrated a direct link between DPD activity, tumor response, and survival impact. Recently, Chamorey and al. [10] showed that the high level of DPD enzyme activity (> 0.30 nmol / min / mg protein) was significantly correlated with lower overall survival and progression-free survival. This was a retrospective analysis of 130 patients treated with fluoropyrimidines regardless of the tumor primitive (digestive, breast, ENT).
These results, presented in spite of their significance, are the result of a retrospective study that is subject, as a minimum, to selection bias. It therefore seemed important to make a prospective study, centered on digestive cancers. The prospective nature will limit selection bias and restriction to digestive cancers in which fluoropyrimidines have a main function and limit confunding biases. The selection of the first and second lines of palliative chemotherapy will increase the population studied and thus the power of the statistical analysis.
If the initial results were confirmed, this will allow DPD to be approached from a new angle and will encourage multicenter controlled prospective studies with the Antoine-Lacassagne center as the national promotor.
In our study, we decided to evaluate DPD activity using an enzymatic radio technique that directly evaluates the activity of the enzyme in blood lymphocytes, which is the original technique and the oldest.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Target follow-up
- 24 Months
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| normal DPD result group | – | Diagnostic Test: lymphocyte DPD dosagepatients group with a normal DPD result |
| elevated DPD result group | – | Diagnostic Test: lymphocyte DPD dosagepatients group with an elevated DPD result |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Metastatic or locally-advanced digestive cancer
Key inclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Be > or = to 18 of age on day of signing informed consent
- ECOG 0 to 2,
- Patient with digestive cancer, all histologic type,
- Patient who will receive a metastatic or locally-advanced first or second line treatment by 5-FU or capecitabine,
- Patient with measurable lesions based on RECIST 1.1 criteria,
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Be < to 18 of age on day of signing informed consent,
- Patient without measurable lesion based on RECIST 1.1 criteria,
- ECOG > 2,
- Patients refusing to participate in the study or unable to give an oral consent,
- Contraindication of 5-FU or capecitabine treatment,
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| lymphocyte DPD dosagelymphocyte DPD dosage in peripheral blood | Diagnostic test | elevated DPD result group, normal DPD result group |
Primary outcome
progression free survival
Time frame: june 2019
progression free survival calculated between diagnosis date and progression date or death date
3 secondary outcomes
overall survival
Time frame: june 2019
treatment response
Time frame: june 2019
toxicities evaluation
Time frame: june 2019
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 2 Jul 2021.
Related trials for Metastatic or Locally-advanced Digestive Cancer
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Study of INBRX-106 and INBRX-106 in Combination With Pembrolizumab (Keytruda®) in Subjects With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Solid Tumors (Hexavalent OX40 Agonist)
Solid Tumor, Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Recruiting
CREO - Microwave Ablation Feasibility Study
Pancreatic Cancer, Liver Cancer (Locally Advanced or Metastatic)
RecruitingPhase 1/2
VMD-928 Monotherapy and in Combination With Pembrolizumab to Treat TrkA Overexpression Driven Solid Tumors or Lymphoma
Head and Neck Carcinoma, Adenoid Cystic Carcinoma
RecruitingPhase 3
A Clinical Study of Calderasib (MK-1084) With Targeted Therapy and Chemotherapy in People With Colorectal Cancer (MK-1084-012/KANDLELIT-012)
Colon Adenocarcinoma, Rectal Adenocarcinoma
Active, not recruitingPhase 1
A Study to Evaluate the Safety, Pharmacokinetics, and Activity of Enzelkitug as a Single Agent and in Combination With Checkpoint Inhibitor in Participants With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Solid Tumors
Locally Advanced or Metastatic Solid Tumors, NSCLC
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Metastatic or Locally-advanced Digestive Cancer, run by Centre Antoine Lacassagne at 1 site in France.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 2 Jul 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Eric FRANCOIS, Dr (+33 4 92031163, eric.francois@nice.unicancer.fr), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
progression free survival (time frame: june 2019). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 2 Jul 2021.