AzTrials
AzTrials

Beta-ThalassemiaPhase 3NCT03207009

A Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of the LentiGlobin® BB305 Drug Product in Participants With Transfusion-Dependent β-Thalassemia

A Phase 3 study testing LentiGlobin BB305 Drug Product in people with Beta-Thalassemia, run by Genetix Biotherapeutics Inc. at 9 sites in 6 countries.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This is a single-arm, multi-site, single-dose, Phase 3 study in approximately 18 participants less than or equal to (<=) 50 years of age with transfusion-dependent β-thalassemia (TDT), who have a β0/β0, β0/IVS-I-110, or IVS-I-110/IVS-I-110 genotype. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 0 to 50 years
Conditions the study is for
Beta-Thalassemia
What is being tested?
LentiGlobin BB305 Drug Product
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
19 participants
Where
9 sitesin 6 countries
Study dates
8 Jun 2017to 15 Nov 2022
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 0 to 50 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Participants less than or equal to (<=) 50 years of age at the time of consent or assent (as applicable), and able to provide written consent (adults, or legal guardians, as applicable) or assent (adolescents or children). Provided that the data monitoring committee (DMC) has approved enrolling participants younger than 5 years of age, participants younger than 5 years of age may be enrolled if they weigh a minimum of 6 kilograms (kg) and are reasonably anticipated to be able to provide at least the minimum number of cells required to initiate the manufacturing process.
  • Diagnosis of TDT with a history of at least 100 milliliter per kilogram per year (mL/kg/year) of pRBCs in the 2 years preceding enrollment (all participants), or be managed under standard thalassemia guidelines with >= 8 transfusions of pRBCs per year in the 2 years preceding enrollment (participants >=12 years).
  • Clinically stable and eligible to undergo HSCT.
  • Treated and followed for at least the past 2 years in a specialized center that maintained detailed medical records, including transfusion history.

Who cannot join

  • Presence of a mutation characterized as other then β0 (e.g., β+, βE, βC) on at least one β-globin gene (HBB) allele.
  • Positive for presence of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 or 2 (HIV-1 and HIV-2), hepatitis B virus (HBV), or hepatitis C (HCV).
  • A white blood cell (WBC) count less than (<) 3×10^9/liter (L), and/or platelet count <100×10^9/L not related to hypersplenism.
  • Uncorrected bleeding disorder.
  • Any prior or current malignancy.
  • Prior HSCT.
Show all 15Show fewer
  • Advanced liver disease.
  • A cardiac T2* <10 ms by MRI.
  • Any other evidence of severe iron overload that, in the investigator's opinion, warrants exclusion.
  • Participation in another clinical study with an investigational drug within 30 days of Screening.
  • Any other condition that would render the participant ineligible for HSCT, as determined by the attending transplant physician or investigator.
  • Prior receipt of gene therapy.
  • Pregnancy or breastfeeding in a postpartum female or absence of adequate contraception for fertile participant.
  • A known and available human leukocyte antigen (HLA) matched family donor.
  • Any contraindications to the use of granulocyte colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) and plerixafor during the mobilization of hematopoietic stem cells and any contraindications to the use of busulfan and any other medicinal products required during the myeloablative conditioning, including hypersensitivity to the active substances or to any of the excipients.

Trial locations and contacts

9 sites in 6 countries.

9 sites in 6 countries

United States3 sites
  • Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago

    Chicago, Illinois, 60611

  • UCSF Benioff Children's Hospital Oakland

    Oakland, California, 94609

  • Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104

Other trials in United States

Germany2 sites
  • Hannover Medical School

    Hanover, 30625

  • University of Heidelberg

    Heidelberg, 69120

Other trials in Germany

France1 site
  • Hopital d'enfants de la Timone

    Marseille, 13385

Other trials in France

Greece1 site
  • General Hospital of Thessaloniki 'G.Papanikolaou'

    Thessaloniki

Other trials in Greece

Italy1 site
  • IRCCS Ospedale Pediatrico Babino Gesu

    Rome

Other trials in Italy

United Kingdom1 site
  • University College London Hospital

    London

Other trials in United Kingdom

About this study

Official title: A Phase 3 Single Arm Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Gene Therapy in Subjects With Transfusion-dependent β-Thalassemia by Transplantation of Autologous CD34+ Stem Cells Transduced Ex Vivo With a Lentiviral βA-T87Q-Globin Vector in Subjects ≤50 Years of Age

This is a single-arm, multi-site, single-dose, Phase 3 study in approximately 18 participants less than or equal to (<=) 50 years of age with transfusion-dependent β-thalassemia (TDT), who have a β0/β0, β0/IVS-I-110, or IVS-I-110/IVS-I-110 genotype. The study will evaluate the efficacy and safety of autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) using LentiGlobin BB305 Drug Product.

Being tested
LentiGlobin BB305 Drug Product
Medical subject headings
beta-Thalassemia

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • LentiGlobin BB305 Drug ProductGenetic

    Also called betibeglogene autotemcel

    LentiGlobin BB305 Drug Product is administered by IV infusion following myeloablative conditioning with busulfan.

Study groups in NCT03207009
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
LentiGlobin BB305 Drug ProductExperimentalLentiGlobin BB305 Drug Product (autologous CD34+ cell-enriched population that contains cells transduced with LentiGlobin BB305 lentiviral vector encoding human βA-T87Q-globin)
Receives: Genetic: LentiGlobin BB305 Drug Product

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Percentage of Participants Who Have Achieved Transfusion Independence (TI)

    TI was defined as a weighted average hemoglobin (Hb) >= 9 grams per deciliter (g/dL) without any packed red blood cell (pRBC) transfusions for a continuous period of >= 12 months at any time during the study after drug product infusion.

    Measured: From 12 to 24 months post-transplant

Secondary outcomes (25)
  1. Percentage of Participants Who Have Achieved Transfusion Independence (TI) at Month 24

    TI was defined as a weighted average hemoglobin (Hb) >= 9 grams per deciliter (g/dL) without any packed red blood cell (pRBC) transfusions for a continuous period of >= 12 months at any time during the study after drug product infusion.

    Measured: At Month 24 post-transplant

  2. Duration of Transfusion Independence (TI)

    Duration of TI was calculated as the time from the start of TI (i.e. first Hb >=9 with no transfusions in the preceding 60 days) up to the last available Hb at which the TI criteria are still met using Kaplan-Meier methodology.

    Measured: From start of TI up to Month 24 (actual maximum time frame of up to approximately 25 months due to visit window)

  3. Time From Drug Product Infusion to Achievement of Transfusion Independence (TI)

    Time from drug product infusion to achievement of TI was calculated as the time from drug product infusion to the first hemoglobin at which a participant can be declared as TI (that is to 'start of TI + >= 12 months', dependent on Hb lab schedule).

    Measured: From drug product infusion to start of TI (up to Month 24 [actual maximum time frame of up to approximately 25 months due to visit window])

  4. Weighted Average Hemoglobin (Hb) During Transfusion Independence (TI)

    Weighted average Hb was defined as the weighted average of Hb values without any pRBC transfusions in the proceeding 60 days for a given subject. Ratio of the time between two Hb values and the time between the first and the last Hb values was used as the weight for calculation.

    Measured: Timeframe varied by subject. For a given subject, the endpoint was calculated from 60 days after the last pRBC transfusion (so transfused blood did not confound the weighted average calculation) through the Month 24 Visit for that subject.

  5. Percentage of Participants Who Meet the Definition of Transfusion Reduction (TR)

    TR was defined as demonstration of a 60 percent (%) reduction in the annualized volume of pRBC transfusion requirements (in milliliter per kilogram [mL/kg]) in the post-treatment time period from 12 Months post-drug product infusion through Month 24 compared to the annualized mL/kg pRBC transfusion requirement during the 24 months prior to study enrollment.

    Measured: From 12 to 24 months post-transplant

  6. Percentage of Participants Who Had a Reduction of At Least 50%, 60%, 75%, 90% or 100% in the Annualized pRBCs Transfusion Volume

    Percentage of participants with a reduction in the annualized mL/kg pRBCs transfused from 12 months post-drug product infusion through Month 24 (approximately a 12-month period) of at least 50%, 60%, 75%, 90% or 100% compared to the annualized mL/kg pRBC transfusion requirement during the 24 months prior to enrollment.

    Measured: 12 months post-drug product infusion through Month 24

  7. Annualized Number of pRBC Transfusions

    Annualized number of pRBC transfusions from 12 months post-drug product infusion through Month 24 was reported.

    Measured: From 12 months post-drug product infusion through Month 24

  8. Annualized Volume of pRBC Transfusions

    Annualized volume of pRBC transfusions from 12 months post-drug product infusion through Month 24 compared to the annualized volume of transfusions during the 24 months prior to enrollment.

    Measured: From 12 to 24 months post-transplant

  9. Time From Drug Product Infusion to Last pRBC Transfusion

    Time from drug product infusion to last pRBC transfusion was reported.

    Measured: From start of drug product infusion up to Month 24

  10. Time From Last pRBC Transfusion to 24 Months

    Time From Last pRBC Transfusion to the Month 24 was reported.

    Measured: From last pRBC Transfusion up to Month 24 (actual maximum time frame of up to approximately 27 months due to visit window)

  11. Weighted Average Nadir Hemoglobin (Hb)

    The weighted average nadir Hb was defined as the most recent Hb prior to each pRBC transfusion, on the day of transfusion or within 3 days and, if there was a period of more than 60 days without transfusion, all Hb records between Day 61 and last follow-up or next transfusion (inclusive) was included. The weighted average nadir Hb during the period of 12 months post-drug product infusion to Month 24 was compared to the weighted average nadir Hb during the 24 months prior to enrollment.

    Measured: 12 months post-drug product infusion through Month 24

  12. Unsupported Total Hb Levels at Month 6, 9, 12, 18 and 24

    Unsupported total Hb level was defined as the total Hb measurement level without any acute or chronic pRBC transfusions within 60 days prior to the measurement date.

    Measured: At Month 6, 9, 12, 18 and 24

  13. Number of Participants With Unsupported Total Hb Levels (>=10 g/dL, >=11 g/dL, >=12 g/dL, >=13 g/dL, and >=14 g/dL) at Months 6, 9, 12, 18 and 24

    Number of participants with unsupported total Hb levels (>=10 g/dL, >=11 g/dL, >=12 g/dL, >=13 g/dL, and >=14 g/dL) meeting the thresholds were reported at Months 6, 9, 12, 18 and 24. Participants were evaluable if they had an unsupported total Hb measurement at the specific timepoint, where unsupported total Hb level is defined as the total Hb measurement level without any acute or chronic pRBC transfusions within 60 days prior to the measurement date.

    Measured: At Months 6, 9, 12, 18 and 24

  14. Percentage of Participants Who Have Not Received Chelation Therapy for At Least 6 Months Following Drug Product Infusion

    Percentage of participants who have not received chelation therapy for at least 6 months following drug product infusion were reported.

    Measured: From 6 to 24 months

  15. Time From Last Iron Chelation Use to Last Follow-up

    Time from last iron chelation use to last follow-up to 24 months was reported.

    Measured: From last Iron Chelation up to Month 24 (actual maximum time frame of up to approximately 29 months due to visit window)

  16. Number of Participants Who Used Therapeutic Phlebotomy Post Drug Product Infusion

    Therapeutic phlebotomy could be used in lieu of chelation in participants who had Hb consistently >= 11 g/dL and who were no longer receiving regular transfusions, at the discretion of the investigator. Number of participants who used therapeutic phlebotomy post Drug Product infusion for up to Month 24 were reported.

    Measured: From drug product infusion through Month 24

  17. Annualized Phlebotomy Therapy Usage Following Drug Product Infusion

    Annualized phlebotomy therapy usage (number of procedures per year, calculated from DP infusion through last follow-up) were reported.

    Measured: From drug product infusion through Month 24

  18. Change From Baseline in Liver Iron Content by Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)

    Change From Baseline in Liver Iron Content by MRI at Months 12 and 24 were reported. Baseline is defined as value closest to but prior to conditioning.

    Measured: Baseline, Month 12 and 24

  19. Change From Baseline in Cardiac T2* on MRI

    Change From Baseline in Cardiac T2* on MRI from Baseline, Month 12 and 24 was reported.

    Measured: Baseline, Months 12 and 24

  20. Change From Baseline in Serum Ferritin

    Serum ferritin was commonly used for an indirect estimation of body iron stores. Although sensitive, it is not specific for iron overload as it can be elevated in a variety of infectious and inflammatory states, and in the presence of cytolysis. Change from baseline in serum ferritin at Months 12 and 24 was reported.

    Measured: Baseline, Month 12 and 24

  21. Change From Baseline in Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL) Total Scores at Months 12 and 24

    PedsQL GCS designed to measure health-related quality of life in pediatric and adolescents (2-18 years). It encompassed 4 dimensions of functioning (physical [8 items], emotional [5 items], social [5 items], school [3 items]). Age groups: Toddler (2-4 years), Young pediatric (5-7 years), Pediatric (8-12 years), Teens (13-18 years). The questionnaire was also completed by parent/caregiver to assess parents' perceptions of their children's quality of life. The Toddler group consisted of 21 items, using a 5-point Likert scale (0 to 4); all other groups consisted of 23 items, with a 3-point Likert scale (0, 2, 4) for young pediatric, a 5-point Likert scale for pediatric and teens groups. All reported scores were transformed on a scale from 0 to 100 for each domain where 0=100, 1=75, 2=50, 3=25, and 4=0. Higher scores correspond with higher quality of life.

    Measured: Baseline, Month 12 and 24

  22. Change From Baseline in EuroQol Quality of Life 5-Dimension Youth Scale (EQ-5D-Y) VAS Health Status at Months 12 and 24

    EQ-5D is a validated, standardized, generic instrument that was most widely used preference based health related quality of life questionnaire in cost effectiveness and health technologies assessment. EQ-5D-Y was a version of instrument specifically developed and validated for use by youths aged 12 through 17 years. The EQ-5D-Y visual analog scale (VAS) consisted of a 20-cm vertical VAS, with anchors of 0 (worst imaginable health state) and 100 (best imaginable health state). Respondents were asked to rate their own health state today by drawing a line from a box containing these words to the point on the scale that they felt most accurately reflected their current health state. The VAS was reported (raw data) on a scale of 0-100 where 0= death and 100= perfect health. Higher scores corresponded with higher quality of life.

    Measured: Baseline, Months 12 and 24

  23. Change From Baseline in EuroQol Quality of Life 5-Dimension Adult Scale (EQ-5D-3L) VAS Heath Status Score at Months 12 and 24

    EQ-5D is a validated, standardized, generic instrument that was most widely used preference based health related quality of life (HRQoL) questionnaire in cost effectiveness and health technologies assessment. Participants age >=18 at time of informed consent were eligible to complete the EQ-5D-3L visual analog scale (VAS) which consisted of a 20-cm vertical VAS, with anchors of 0 (worst imaginable health state) and 100 (best imaginable health state). Respondents were asked to rate their own health state today by drawing a line from a box containing these words to the point on the scale that they felt most accurately reflected their current health state. The VAS was reported (raw data) on a scale of 0-100 where 0= death and 100= perfect health. Negative change in score indicated decrease in quality of life (as measured by EQ5D VAS) from baseline.

    Measured: Baseline, Months 12 and 24

  24. Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Bone Marrow Transplant (FACT-BMT) Questionnaire Total Score

    FACT-BMT is assessed bone marrow transplant related quality of life in adults. Total score was sum of sub-scale scores for 5 domains: Physical Well-Being, Social/Family Well-Being, Emotional Well-Being, Functional Well-Being, and Bone Marrow Transplantation Subscale. Each item scored on a 5-point Likert scale based on participant agreement with each statement: 0 for "not at all," 1 for "a little bit," 2 for "somewhat," 3 for "quite a bit," and 4 for "very much. Reported scores were transformed as follows: After taking into account reverse scores for questions constructed in negative form, subscale score for each domain was calculated by multiplying sum of item scores by number of items in subscale, then dividing by number of items answered. Total score was sum of subscale total added together and ranges from 0-148. Higher scores corresponded with higher quality of life.

    Measured: Baseline, Months 12 and 24

  25. Change From Baseline in Short Form-36 Health Survey (SF-36), Version 2, Acute (Physical and Mental Component Summary Scores) at Months 12 and 24

    SF-36 was designed to measure health-related quality of life in adults. The instrument consisted of 36 items that were aggregated into 8 multi-item scales (physical functioning [1=yes, limited a lot, to 3=no, not limited at all], role-physical [1=all of time, to 5=none of time], bodily pain [1=very severe, to 6=none], general health [1=poor, to 5=excellent], vitality [1=none of time, to 5=all of time], social functioning [1=all of time, to 5=none of time], role emotional [1=all of time, to 5=none of time] and mental health [1=all of time, to 5=none of the time]). The 8 scales were summarized as Physical Component Summary (PCS) score (physical functioning, role-physical, bodily pain, general health scales) and Mental Component Summary (MCS) score (vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, mental health scales). Reported summary scores were transformed on a scale from 0-100 (higher scores corresponded with higher quality of life), with change from baseline results being presented.

    Measured: Baseline, Months 12 and 24

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted2 Jul 2017
  2. Study start8 Jun 2017
  3. Primary completion15 Nov 2022
  4. Study completion15 Nov 2022

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
19 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03207009
Sponsor's protocol ID
HGB-212
Status last verified
Mar 2024
First submitted
29 Jun 2017
Last updated
7 Mar 2024
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: Bluebird bio is committed to transparency. Appropriately de-identified patient-level datasets and supporting documents may be shared (if contractually or otherwise legally permitted) following completion of this study, submission of all applicable regulatory submissions and consistent with criteria established by bluebird bio and/or industry best practices to protect confidential information and maintain the privacy of study participants. For enquiries, please contact us at datasharing@bluebirdbio.com.

Publications

  • Kwiatkowski JL, Walters MC, Hongeng S, Yannaki E, Kulozik AE, Kunz JB, Sauer MG, Thrasher AJ, Thuret I, Lal A, Tao G, Ali S, Thakar HL, Elliot H, Lodaya A, Lee J, Colvin RA, Locatelli F, Thompson AA. Betibeglogene autotemcel gene therapy in patients with transfusion-dependent, severe genotype beta-thalassaemia (HGB-212): a non-randomised, multicentre, single-arm, open-label, single-dose, phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2024 Nov 30;404(10468):2175-2186. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(24)01884-1. Epub 2024 Nov 8.

    PubMed 39527960

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing LentiGlobin BB305 Drug Product in people with Beta-Thalassemia, run by Genetix Biotherapeutics Inc. at 9 sites in 6 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 15 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 7 Mar 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 9 sites in United States, Germany, France, Greece, Italy and 1 more country. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 29 Dec 2023). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Percentage of Participants Who Have Achieved Transfusion Independence (TI) (time frame: From 12 to 24 months post-transplant). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03207009, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 7 Mar 2024.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in