StrokesERFNCT03207490
Robotics for Rehabilitation of Hand and Fingers After Stroke
A study testing AMADEO in people with Stroke, run by IRCCS San Camillo, Venezia, Italy at 2 sites in 2 countries.
Trial summary
The major issue for a person who has suffered a stroke is the severe impairment affecting the hand and the high risk to have a poor recovery associated. Innovative approaches are needed in the next future, translating recent advances from neuro-engineering, into feasible devices for rehabilitation care. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Stroke
- What is being tested?
- AMADEO
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 40 participants
- Where
- 2 sitesin 2 countries
- Study dates
- Jul 2014to Dec 2017
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients suffering from first stroke, ischemic and/or hemorrhagic
- Score between 1 and 3 at the upper-limb sub-item of the Italian version of the National Institute of Health Stroke Scale, IT-NIHSS (Pezzella et al. 2009)
- Score lower than 100 out of a total of 126 at the Functional Independence Measure (FIM) scale.
- Less than 45 cubes carried in one minute whit the affected hand at the Box and Bocks Test.
Who cannot join
- Non-stabilized fractures
- Diagnosis of depression
- Traumatic brain Injury
- Untreated or drug resistant seizures.
- Severe ideomotor apraxia
- Severe neglect
- Patients participating in other rehabilitation treatments for the upper-limb (e.g. virtual reality treatment, motor imagery).
Trial locations and contacts
2 sites in 2 countries.
2 sites in 2 countries
About this study
Official title: sEMG Based-Rehabilitation of Hand and Fingers After Stroke
The major issue for a person who has suffered a stroke is the severe impairment affecting the hand and the high risk to have a poor recovery associated. Innovative approaches are needed in the next future, translating recent advances from neuro-engineering, into feasible devices for rehabilitation care. The FP7-EU project MYOSENS aims to translate known motor control logic from sEMG prosthetic control, to rehabilitation robotics. The target is to promote the closing of sensory-motor loop on the basis of intention to move, as detected from residual sEMG (i.e. Extensor Digitorum Communis, Flexor Digitorum Profundus).
Read the detailed description
The objectives of this pilot study are:
- to assess whether a clinical and kinematic effect might be induced providing a closed-loop control by sEMG signal for robot (i.e. Amadeo ®) assisted therapy of hand function
- to determine safety and feasibility of including robotic therapy into daily rehabilitation programs after stroke.
A total of 20 patients has been recruited, all of them received on daily basis 1 hour of robot therapy in adjunction to 1 hour of standard therapy. Overall the hour of robotic therapy include both subject preparation (15 minutes to place surface electrodes on the forearm and set the right position of sitting and upper limb) and delivery of exercises. The treatment protocol includes passive and active training of flexion and extension movements of the fingers. The passive part lasts 5 minutes, while the active one provides 25 total minutes divided into 5 exercises. The robot therapy lasts 15 consecutive sessions, 5 times a week, for 3 weeks.
- Conditions
- Stroke
- Being tested
- AMADEO
- Keywords
- Hand, Rehabilitation, sEMG
- Medical subject headings
- Stroke
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
AMADEODevice
Also called Robot-assisted therapy for the hand
Robot therapy: 1-Degrees-Of-Freedom (1DOFs) robot training for flexion and extention movements of the hand.
Standard rehabilitation therapy includes speech, physical, occupational therapies and group activities
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Robot group | Experimental | Receive 1 hour of AMADEO (robot-assisted therapy) for the hand and 1 hour of daily standard rehabilitation therapy Receives: Device: AMADEO |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change at Box and Block Test (BBT)
Hand dexterity is measured by means of the BBT. The patient has to carry as much cubes as possible, one by one, from a container to another one in one minute. The test is performed with both hands.
Measured: Before treatment, then 3 weeks after
Secondary outcomes (5)
Change at Functional Independence Measure scale (FIM)
FIM is an 18-item scale that assesses the degree of autonomy in carrying out activities of daily living (total score = 126 points).
Measured: Before treatment, then 3 weeks after
Change at Reaching Performance Scale (RPS)
RPS assesses the ability of subjects to reach an object (a cone). The cone is placed at both 4-cm (close) and 30-cm (far) distance from the subject. The subject is asked to reach and grab the cone if possible. The observer evaluates the quality of reaching instead of the grip strength (Total score = 36 points).
Measured: Before treatment, then 3 weeks after
Change at Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS)
Spasticity is measured using the MAS of five muscles: Pectoralis major, biceps, wrist flexors, flexor digitorum superficialis, flexor digitorum profundus (Total score = 20 points).
Measured: Before treatment, then 3 weeks after
Change at Nine Hole Pegboard Test (NHPT)
NHPT measures the dexterity of the hand. Patient should insert 9 pins in the board. There are 9 pins. The number of pins inserted in 50 sec are registered or if the patient inserted 9 pins, then the time is registered.
Measured: Before treatment, then 3 weeks after
Change at Fugl-Meyer Assessment Scale: Upper Extremity Motor Function (F-M UE)
Motor function of the upper limb is measured by means of the Fugl-Meyer Scale. There are 3 values: 0 (severe impairment), 1 (moderate impairiment), 2 (preserved function)
Measured: Before treatment, then 3 weeks after
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted2 Jul 2017
- Study startJul 2014
- Primary completionDec 2017
- Study completionDec 2017
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (4)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for StrokeStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Model description
- Intervention is provided by a robotic device for hand motion, controlled by closed loop surface electromyography (sEMG)
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 40 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- IRCCS San Camillo, Venezia, Italy
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Andrea Turolla, IRCCS San Camillo, Venezia, Italy
- Investigators
- Andrea Turolla, PhD, Principal investigator, IRCCS San Camillo, Venezia, Italy
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03207490
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- Prot. 2014.14
- Acronym
- sERF
- Status last verified
- May 2018
- First submitted
- 12 Jan 2016
- Last updated
- 14 May 2018
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Hwang CH, Seong JW, Son DS. Individual finger synchronized robot-assisted hand rehabilitation in subacute to chronic stroke: a prospective randomized clinical trial of efficacy. Clin Rehabil. 2012 Aug;26(8):696-704. doi: 10.1177/0269215511431473. Epub 2012 Jan 19.
PubMed 22261813Sale P, Lombardi V, Franceschini M. Hand robotics rehabilitation: feasibility and preliminary results of a robotic treatment in patients with hemiparesis. Stroke Res Treat. 2012;2012:820931. doi: 10.1155/2012/820931. Epub 2012 Dec 26.
PubMed 23320252Stein J, Bishop L, Gillen G, Helbok R. Robot-assisted exercise for hand weakness after stroke: a pilot study. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2011 Nov;90(11):887-94. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0b013e3182328623.
PubMed 21952215Takahashi CD, Der-Yeghiaian L, Le V, Motiwala RR, Cramer SC. Robot-based hand motor therapy after stroke. Brain. 2008 Feb;131(Pt 2):425-37. doi: 10.1093/brain/awm311. Epub 2007 Dec 20.
PubMed 18156154
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 14 May 2018. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- sEMG Based-Rehabilitation of Hand and Fingers After Stroke
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03207490
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- sERF / Prot. 2014.14
- Conditions
- Stroke
- Keywords
- Hand, Rehabilitation, sEMG
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 40 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- IRCCS San Camillo, Venezia, ItalyUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Jul 2014
- Primary completion
- Dec 2017 (actual)
- Study completion
- Dec 2017 (actual)
- First posted
- 2 Jul 2017 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The major issue for a person who has suffered a stroke is the severe impairment affecting the hand and the high risk to have a poor recovery associated. Innovative approaches are needed in the next future, translating recent advances from neuro-engineering, into feasible devices for rehabilitation care. The FP7-EU project MYOSENS aims to translate known motor control logic from sEMG prosthetic control, to rehabilitation robotics. The target is to promote the closing of sensory-motor loop on the basis of intention to move, as detected from residual sEMG (i.e. Extensor Digitorum Communis, Flexor Digitorum Profundus).
Detailed description
The objectives of this pilot study are:
- to assess whether a clinical and kinematic effect might be induced providing a closed-loop control by sEMG signal for robot (i.e. Amadeo ®) assisted therapy of hand function
- to determine safety and feasibility of including robotic therapy into daily rehabilitation programs after stroke.
A total of 20 patients has been recruited, all of them received on daily basis 1 hour of robot therapy in adjunction to 1 hour of standard therapy. Overall the hour of robotic therapy include both subject preparation (15 minutes to place surface electrodes on the forearm and set the right position of sitting and upper limb) and delivery of exercises. The treatment protocol includes passive and active training of flexion and extension movements of the fingers. The passive part lasts 5 minutes, while the active one provides 25 total minutes divided into 5 exercises. The robot therapy lasts 15 consecutive sessions, 5 times a week, for 3 weeks.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
- Model description
- Intervention is provided by a robotic device for hand motion, controlled by closed loop surface electromyography (sEMG)
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Robot group | Experimental | Device: AMADEOReceive 1 hour of AMADEO (robot-assisted therapy) for the hand and 1 hour of daily standard rehabilitation therapy |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Patients suffering from first stroke, ischemic and/or hemorrhagic
- Score between 1 and 3 at the upper-limb sub-item of the Italian version of the National Institute of Health Stroke Scale, IT-NIHSS (Pezzella et al. 2009)
- Score lower than 100 out of a total of 126 at the Functional Independence Measure (FIM) scale.
- Less than 45 cubes carried in one minute whit the affected hand at the Box and Bocks Test.
Key exclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Non-stabilized fractures
- Diagnosis of depression
- Traumatic brain Injury
- Untreated or drug resistant seizures.
- Severe ideomotor apraxia
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| AMADEOAlso: Robot-assisted therapy for the handRobot therapy: 1-Degrees-Of-Freedom (1DOFs) robot training for flexion and extention movements of the hand. Standard rehabilitation therapy includes speech, physical, occupational therapies and group activities | Device | Robot group |
Primary outcome
Change at Box and Block Test (BBT)
Time frame: Before treatment, then 3 weeks after
Hand dexterity is measured by means of the BBT. The patient has to carry as much cubes as possible, one by one, from a container to another one in one minute. The test is performed with both hands.
5 secondary outcomes
Change at Functional Independence Measure scale (FIM)
Time frame: Before treatment, then 3 weeks after
Change at Reaching Performance Scale (RPS)
Time frame: Before treatment, then 3 weeks after
Change at Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS)
Time frame: Before treatment, then 3 weeks after
Change at Nine Hole Pegboard Test (NHPT)
Time frame: Before treatment, then 3 weeks after
Change at Fugl-Meyer Assessment Scale: Upper Extremity Motor Function (F-M UE)
Time frame: Before treatment, then 3 weeks after
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 14 May 2018.
- Background: PubMed 22261813Hwang CH, Seong JW, Son DS. Individual finger synchronized robot-assisted hand rehabilitation in subacute to chronic stroke: a prospective randomized clinical trial of efficacy. Clin Rehabil. 2012 Aug;26(8):696-704. doi: 10.1177/0269215511431473. Epub 2012 Jan 19.
- Background: PubMed 23320252Sale P, Lombardi V, Franceschini M. Hand robotics rehabilitation: feasibility and preliminary results of a robotic treatment in patients with hemiparesis. Stroke Res Treat. 2012;2012:820931. doi: 10.1155/2012/820931. Epub 2012 Dec 26.
- Background: PubMed 21952215Stein J, Bishop L, Gillen G, Helbok R. Robot-assisted exercise for hand weakness after stroke: a pilot study. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2011 Nov;90(11):887-94. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0b013e3182328623.
- Background: PubMed 18156154Takahashi CD, Der-Yeghiaian L, Le V, Motiwala RR, Cramer SC. Robot-based hand motor therapy after stroke. Brain. 2008 Feb;131(Pt 2):425-37. doi: 10.1093/brain/awm311. Epub 2007 Dec 20.
Related trials for Stroke
Not yet recruiting
Temporal Interference Stimulation for Upper-Limb Motor Recovery in Early Subacute Stroke
Acute Ischemic Stroke
RecruitingObservational study
ELATE Study: Evaluating Large-vessel Acute Thrombectomy in Extended Time Window
Acute Ichemic Stroke
Recruiting
Web-Based Tele-Rehabilitation Using Action Observation and Mirror Therapy for Subacute Stroke: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Stroke, Upper Extremity Paresis
Recruiting
Early Motor-Cognitive Integrative Training on Cognitive and Motor Performance in Patients With Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage
Subarachnoid Aneurysm Hemorrhage
Not yet recruiting
Selective Intra-Arterial Hypothermia After Endovascular Treatment for Acute Basilar Artery Occlusion
Acute Ischemic Stroke, Basilar Artery Occlusion
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Andrea Turolla, PhD principal investigator
IRCCS San Camillo, Venezia, Italy
2 sites in 2 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing AMADEO in people with Stroke, run by IRCCS San Camillo, Venezia, Italy at 2 sites in 2 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 14 May 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 2 sites in Austria, Italy. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change at Box and Block Test (BBT) (time frame: Before treatment, then 3 weeks after). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03207490, which also lists 4 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 14 May 2018.