AzTrials
AzTrials

Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus-Type 2 Diabetes MellitusPhase 3GEMELLI1NCT03211858

Comparison of SAR341402 to NovoLog/NovoRapid in Adult Patients With Diabetes Mellitus Also Using Insulin Glargine

A Phase 3 study testing Insulin aspart, NovoLog/NovoRapid and Insulin glargine (HOE901) in people with Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus-Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, run by Sanofi at 82 sites in 7 countries.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Primary Objective: To demonstrate non-inferiority of SAR341402 versus NovoLog/NovoRapid in glycated hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) change from baseline to Week 26 in participants with type 1 or type 2 diabetes mellitus (T1DM or T2DM) also using Lantus®. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
What is being tested?
Insulin aspart, NovoLog/NovoRapid and Insulin glargine (HOE901)
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
597 participants
Where
82 sitesin 7 countries
Study dates
2 Aug 2017to 12 Jan 2019
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Participants with T1DM or T2DM (T2DM US only) diagnosed for at least 12 months, who have been treated with a multiple daily injection regimen with
  • NovoLog/NovoRapid or insulin lispro (100 U/mL) in the last 6 months prior to screening visit AND
  • insulin glargine (100 U/mL) in the last 6 months prior to screening visit OR insulin detemir (Levemir®) in the last 12 months prior to screening visit.

Who cannot join

  • At screening visit, age under legal age of adulthood.
  • HbA1c <7.0% or greater than (>) 10% at screening.
  • Less than 1 year on continuous insulin treatment.
  • Use of insulin pump in the last 3 months before screening visit.
  • Participants with incomplete baseline 7-point SMPG profile, defined as participants who do not have 7-point profiles with at least 5 points on at least 2 days in the week before randomization Visit 3.
  • Participants with T1DM: Use of glucose lowering agents other than insulin including use of non-insulin injectable peptides in the last 3 months prior to screening.
Show all 21Show fewer
  • Participants with T2DM:
  • Use of glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists in the last 3 months before screening visit.
  • Use of oral antidiabetic drugs (OADs) not on stable dose in the last 3 months before screening visit (sulfonylureas was discontinued at baseline).
  • At screening visit, body mass index (BMI) greater than or equal to (>=) 35 kilogram per meter square (kg/m^2) in participants with T1DM and >=40 kg/m^2 in participants with T2DM.
  • Use of insulin other than:
  • insulin glargine 100 U/mL and NovoLog/NovoRapid or insulin lispro 100 U/mL as part of a multiple injection regimen in the last 6 months before screening visit, OR
  • insulin detemir 100 U/mL in the 12 months before screening visit and NovoLog/NovoRapid or insulin lispro 100 U/mL in the last 6 months before screening visit as part of a multiple injection regimen.
  • Status post pancreatectomy.
  • Status post pancreas and/or islet cell transplantation.
  • Hospitalization for recurrent diabetic ketoacidosis in the last 3 months before screening visit.
  • History of severe hypoglycemia requiring Emergency Room admission or hospitalization in the last 3 months before screening visit.
  • Unstable proliferative diabetic retinopathy or any other rapidly progressive diabetic retinopathy or macular edema likely to require treatment (eg, laser, surgical treatment or injectable drugs) during the study period.
  • Pregnant or breastfeeding women.
  • Women of childbearing potential not protected by highly effective method(s) of birth control.
  • The above information is not intended to contain all considerations relevant to a participant's potential participation in a clinical trial.

Trial locations and contacts

82 sites in 7 countries.

82 sites in 7 countries

United States42 sites
  • Investigational Site Number 8400038

    Arlington Heights, Illinois, 60005

  • Investigational Site Number 8400007

    Atlanta, Georgia, 30318

  • Investigational Site Number 8400037

    Aurora, Colorado, 80045

  • Investigational Site Number 8400044

    Austin, Texas, 78731

  • Investigational Site Number 8400029

    Bend, Oregon, 97701

  • Investigational Site Number 8400039

    Bridgeport, West Virginia, 26330

  • Investigational Site Number 8400033

    Chattanooga, Tennessee, 37404

  • Investigational Site Number 8400022

    Columbus, Georgia, 31904

  • Investigational Site Number 8400012

    Concord, California, 94520

  • Investigational Site Number 8400009

    Dallas, Texas, 75230

  • Investigational Site Number 8400035

    Dallas, Texas, 75230

  • Investigational Site Number 8400021

    Dallas, Texas, 75246

  • Investigational Site Number 8400005

    Des Moines, Iowa, 50314

  • Investigational Site Number 8400018

    Englewood, Colorado, 80113

  • Investigational Site Number 8400002

    Escondido, California, 92025

  • Investigational Site Number 8400023

    Fargo, North Dakota, 58104

  • Investigational Site Number 8400019

    Flint, Michigan, 48532-3447

  • Investigational Site Number 8400030

    Fresno, California, 93720

  • Investigational Site Number 8400004

    Greenbrae, California, 94904

  • Investigational Site Number 8400024

    Henderson, Nevada, 89052

  • Investigational Site Number 8400017

    Houston, Texas, 77043

  • Investigational Site Number 8400001

    Houston, Texas, 77079

  • Investigational Site Number 8400020

    Houston, Texas, 77089

  • Investigational Site Number 8400014

    La Jolla, California, 92037

  • Investigational Site Number 8400040

    Little Rock, Arkansas, 72211

  • Investigational Site Number 8400043

    Los Angeles, California, 90057

  • Investigational Site Number 8400016

    Mesquite, Texas, 75149

  • Investigational Site Number 8400041

    Metairie, Louisiana, 70006

  • Investigational Site Number 8400025

    Morehead City, North Carolina, 28557

  • Investigational Site Number 8400031

    New Port Richey, Florida, 34652

  • Investigational Site Number 8400028

    New York, New York, 10001

  • Investigational Site Number 8400027

    Ocoee, Florida, 34761

  • Investigational Site Number 8400003

    Omaha, Nebraska, 68131

  • Investigational Site Number 8400036

    Pomona, California, 91766

  • Investigational Site Number 8400008

    Renton, Washington, 98057

  • Investigational Site Number 8400015

    Rockville, Maryland, 20852-4267

  • Investigational Site Number 8400032

    Roswell, Georgia, 30076

  • Investigational Site Number 8400034

    Salt Lake City, Utah, 84102

  • Investigational Site Number 8400011

    Santa Barbara, California, 93105

  • Investigational Site Number 8400013

    Ventura, California, 93003

  • Investigational Site Number 8400042

    Waltham, Massachusetts, 02453

  • Investigational Site Number 8400010

    Wilmington, North Carolina, 28401

Other trials in United States

Hungary10 sites
  • Investigational Site Number 3480012

    Balatonfüred, 8230

  • Investigational Site Number 3480011

    Budapest, 1036

  • Investigational Site Number 3480008

    Budapest, 1042

  • Investigational Site Number 3480001

    Budapest, 1062

  • Investigational Site Number 3480005

    Budapest, 1062

  • Investigational Site Number 3480004

    Budapest, 1139

  • Investigational Site Number 3480007

    Debrecen, 4031

  • Investigational Site Number 3480003

    Nagykanizsa, 8800

  • Investigational Site Number 3480010

    Nyíregyháza, 4400

  • Investigational Site Number 3480009

    Szentendre, 2000

Other trials in Hungary

Japan10 sites
  • Investigational Site Number 3920009

    Fukuyama-Shi

  • Investigational Site Number 3920008

    Higashiosaka-Shi

  • Investigational Site Number 3920007

    Kashiwara-Shi

  • Investigational Site Number 3920001

    Koriyama-Shi

  • Investigational Site Number 3920005

    Kumamoto

  • Investigational Site Number 3920003

    Mito

  • Investigational Site Number 3920010

    Osaka

  • Investigational Site Number 3920002

    Sagamihara-Shi

  • Investigational Site Number 3920004

    Shinjuku-Ku

  • Investigational Site Number 3920006

    Ushiku-Shi

Other trials in Japan

Poland7 sites
  • Investigational Site Number 6160004

    Bialystok, 15-435

  • Investigational Site Number 6160003

    Krakow, 31-501

  • Investigational Site Number 6160005

    Krakow, 31-548

  • Investigational Site Number 6160007

    Lublin, 20-538

  • Investigational Site Number 6160006

    Nowy Sącz, 33-300

  • Investigational Site Number 6160001

    Poznan, 60-834

  • Investigational Site Number 6160002

    Warsaw, 02-507

Other trials in Poland

Germany5 sites
  • Investigational Site Number 2760001

    Berlin, 10115

  • Investigational Site Number 2760006

    Essen, 45136

  • Investigational Site Number 2760004

    Heidelberg, 69115

  • Investigational Site Number 2760005

    Oldenburg in Holstein, 23758

  • Investigational Site Number 2760002

    Pirna, 01796

Other trials in Germany

Finland4 sites
  • Investigational Site Number 2460006

    Jyväskylä, 40100

  • Investigational Site Number 2460002

    Kuopio, 70100

  • Investigational Site Number 2460004

    Pori, 28500

  • Investigational Site Number 2460003

    Seinäjoki, 60100

Other trials in Finland

Russia4 sites
  • Investigational Site Number 6430001

    Saint Petersburg, 194358

  • Investigational Site Number 6430002

    Samara, 443041

  • Investigational Site Number 6430003

    Saratov, 410030

  • Investigational Site Number 6430004

    Tomsk, 634050

Other trials in Russia

About this study

Official title: Six-month, Randomized, Open-label, Parallel-group Comparison of SAR341402 to NovoLog®/NovoRapid® in Adult Patients With Diabetes Mellitus Also Using Insulin Glargine, With a 6-month Safety Extension Period

Primary Objective:

To demonstrate non-inferiority of SAR341402 versus NovoLog/NovoRapid in glycated hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) change from baseline to Week 26 in participants with type 1 or type 2 diabetes mellitus (T1DM or T2DM) also using Lantus®.

Read more

Secondary Objectives:

  • To assess the immunogenicity of SAR341402 and NovoLog/NovoRapid in terms of positive/negative status and anti-insulin antibody (AIA) titers during the course of the study.
  • To assess the relationship of AIAs with efficacy and safety.
  • To assess the efficacy of SAR341402 and NovoLog/NovoRapid in terms of proportion of participants reaching HbA1c lesser than (<) 7.0% and change in HbA1c, fasting plasma glucose (FPG), and self-measured plasma glucose (SMPG) profiles from baseline to Week 26 and Week 52 (only Week 52 for HbA1c).
  • To assess safety of SAR341402 and NovoLog/NovoRapid.
Read the detailed description

The study consisted of a 2-week screening period, a 26-week treatment period, a 26-week comparative safety extension period, and a 1-day follow-up period. The maximum study duration was 54 weeks per participant and a 1 day safety follow-up.

Being tested
Insulin aspart, NovoLog/NovoRapid, Insulin glargine (HOE901)

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Insulin aspartDrug

    SAR341402 100 units per milliliters (U/mL) (dose range of 1 unit to 80 units) self-administered by SC injection, immediately (within 5-10 minutes) before meal intake. Dose adjusted to achieve a 2-hour postprandial plasma glucose (PPG <10 millimoles/liter [mmol/L] [<180 milligram/deciliter {mg/dL}]) while avoiding hypoglycemia.

  • NovoLog/NovoRapidDrug

    Also called Insulin aspart

    NovoLog/NovoRapid 100 U/mL (dose range of 1 unit to 60 units) self-administered by SC injection, immediately (within 5-10 minutes) before meal intake. Dose adjusted to achieve a 2-hour postprandial plasma glucose (PPG <10 mmol/L [<180 mg/dL]) while avoiding hypoglycemia.

  • Insulin glargine (HOE901)Drug

    Also called Lantus

    Insulin glargine 100 U/mL injected QD subcutaneously consistent with the local label. Doses adjusted to achieve glycemic target for fasting, preprandial plasma glucose between 4.4 to 7.2 mmol/L (80 to 130 mg/dL) without hypoglycemia.

Study groups in NCT03211858
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
SAR341402ExperimentalSAR341402 subcutaneous (SC), before meals intake on top of once daily (QD) Insulin Glargine, up to Week 52.
Receives: Drug: Insulin aspart; Drug: Insulin glargine (HOE901)
NovoLog/NovoRapidActive comparatorNovoLog/NovoRapid SC, before meals intake on top of QD Insulin Glargine, up to Week 52.
Receives: Drug: NovoLog/NovoRapid; Drug: Insulin glargine (HOE901)

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change in Glycated Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) From Baseline to Week 26

    All values up to Week 26 were taken into account in the analysis, regardless of adherence to treatment. Change in HbA1c was calculated by subtracting baseline value from Week 26 value. Missing changes at Week 26 were imputed using a retrieved dropout multiple imputation method (separately for participants who prematurely discontinued or completed treatment). Adjusted least square (LS) means and standard errors (SE) were obtained using an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model on data obtained from the multiple imputations (results were combined using Rubin's formulae).

    Measured: Baseline, Week 26

Secondary outcomes (11)
  1. Change in HbA1c From Baseline to Week 52

    All values up to Week 52 were taken into account in the analysis, regardless of adherence to treatment. Change in HbA1c was calculated by subtracting baseline value from Week 52 value. Missing changes at Week 52 were imputed using a retrieved dropout multiple imputation method (separately for participants who prematurely discontinued or completed treatment). Adjusted LS means and SE were obtained using ANCOVA model on data obtained from the multiple imputations (results were combined using Rubin's formulae).

    Measured: Baseline, Week 52

  2. Percentage of Participants With HbA1c <7% at Week 26 and Week 52

    Participants who had no available assessment at Week 26 and Week 52 were considered as non-responders.

    Measured: Week 26 and Week 52

  3. Change in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) From Baseline to Week 26 and Week 52

    All values up to Week 26 and Week 52 were taken into account in the analysis, regardless of adherence to treatment. Change in FPG at Week 26 and 52 was calculated by subtracting baseline value from Week 26 and Week 52 values, respectively. Missing changes at Week 26 and Week 52 were imputed using a retrieved dropout multiple imputation method (separately for participants who prematurely discontinued or completed treatment). Adjusted LS means and SE were obtained using ANCOVA analysis on data obtained from the multiple imputations (results were combined using Rubin's formulae).

    Measured: Baseline, Week 26, and Week 52

  4. Change in the Mean 24-hour Plasma Glucose Concentration From Baseline to Week 26 and Week 52

    Mean 24-hour plasma glucose concentration was calculated based on 7-point self-measured plasma glucose (SMPG) profiles with plasma glucose measurements before and 2-hours after each main meal and at bedtime. Mean 24-hour plasma glucose concentration was calculated for each profile and then averaged across profiles performed in the week before a visit. All calculated values up to Week 26 and Week 52 were taken into account in the analysis, regardless of adherence to treatment. Change in mean 24-hour plasma glucose concentration at Weeks 26 and 52 was calculated by subtracting baseline value from Week 26 and Week 52 values, respectively. Missing changes at Week 26 and Week 52 were imputed using a return-to-baseline multiple imputation method (values imputed as participant baseline plus an error). Adjusted LS means and SE were obtained using ANCOVA analysis on data obtained from the multiple imputations (results were combined using Rubin's formulae).

    Measured: Baseline, Week 26, and Week 52

  5. Change in Postprandial Plasma Glucose (PPG) Excursion From Baseline to Week 26 and Week 52

    Plasma glucose excursions were calculated at breakfast, lunch and dinner for each 7-point SMPG profile, as 2-hour PPG minus plasma glucose value obtained 30 minutes prior to start of the meal. Values of plasma glucose excursions at each visit were then calculated as the average across profiles performed in the week before the visit. All calculated values up to Week 26 and Week 52 were taken into account in the analysis, regardless of adherence to treatment. Change in PPG excursions at Weeks 26 and 52 was calculated by subtracting baseline value from Week 26 and Week 52 values, respectively. Missing changes at Week 26 and Week 52 were imputed using a return-to-baseline multiple imputation method (values imputed as participant baseline plus an error). Adjusted LS means and SE were obtained using ANCOVA analysis on data obtained from the multiple imputations (results were combined using Rubin's formulae).

    Measured: Baseline, Week 26, and Week 52

  6. Change in 7-Point SMPG Profiles From Baseline to Week 26 and Week 52 Per Time Point

    7-point SMPG profiles were measured at the following 7 points at each visit (Baseline, Week 26, and Week 52): before breakfast, 2 hours after breakfast, before lunch, 2 hours after lunch, before dinner, 2 hours after dinner, and bedtime. For each time point, the value at each visit was calculated as the average of values obtained for the same time point across profiles performed in the week before the visit.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 26, and Week 52

  7. Number of Participants With at Least One Hypoglycemic Event

    Severe hypoglycemia was an event in which the participant required the assistance of another person to actively administer carbohydrate, glucagon, or other resuscitative actions, because the participant was not capable of helping self. Documented symptomatic hypoglycemia was an event during which typical symptoms of hypoglycemia were accompanied by a measured plasma glucose concentration of <=3.9 mmol/L (<=70 mg/dL) or plasma glucose level of <3.0 mmol/L (<54 mg/dL).

    Measured: From first injection of investigational medicinal product (IMP) up to Week 26 or up to 1 day after last injection of IMP, whichever comes earlier, for Week 26 analysis, and from first injection of IMP up to 1 day after last injection of IMP for Week 52

  8. Number of Hypoglycemia Events Per Participant-Year

    Number of hypoglycemia events (any, severe and documented [both thresholds]) per participant-year of exposure were reported. Severe hypoglycemia was an event in which the participant required the assistance of another person to actively administer carbohydrate, glucagon, or other resuscitative actions, because the participant was not capable of helping self. Documented symptomatic hypoglycemia was an event during which typical symptoms of hypoglycemia were accompanied by a measured plasma glucose concentration of <=3.9 mmol/L (<=70 mg/dL) or plasma glucose level of <3.0 mmol/L (<54 mg/dL).

    Measured: From first injection of investigational medicinal product (IMP) up to Week 26 or up to 1 day after last injection of IMP, whichever comes earlier, for Week 26 analysis, and from first injection of IMP up to 1 day after last injection of IMP for Week 52

  9. Percentage of Participants With Hypersensitivity Reactions and Injection Site Reactions

    Participants with at least one treatment-emergent adverse event linked to hypersensitivity reaction and injection site reaction regardless of relationship to IMP during the main 6-month and the 12-month on-treatment periods was assessed and reported.

    Measured: From first injection of IMP up to Week 26 or up to 1 day after last injection of IMP, whichever comes earlier, for Week 26 analysis, and from first injection of IMP up to 1 day after last injection of IMP for Week 52

  10. Percentage of Participants With at Least One Positive Anti-Insulin Aspart Antibodies (AIA) Sample

    Participants with at least one positive AIA sample at baseline or at any time during the on-treatment period (Prevalence).

    Measured: From first injection of IMP up to Week 26 or up to 1 day after last injection of IMP, whichever comes earlier, for Week 26 analysis, and from first injection of IMP up to 1 day after last injection of IMP for Week 52

  11. Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Induced, Treatment-Boosted and Treatment-Emergent Anti-insulin Aspart Antibodies (AIAs)

    AIA incidence were categorized as: treatment-induced, treatment-boosted AIAs, and treatment-emergent AIA. 1) Participants with treatment-induced AIAs were those who developed AIA following IMP administration (participants with at least one positive AIA sample at any time during on-treatment period, in those participants without pre-existing AIA or with missing baseline sample). 2) Participants with treatment-boosted AIAs were those with pre-existing AIAs that were boosted to a significant higher titer following IMP administration (participants with at least one AIA sample with at least a 4-fold increase in titers compared to baseline value at any time during on-treatment period). 3) Participants with treatment-emergent AIA were defined as participants with treatment-induced, or treatment-boosted AIAs.

    Measured: From first injection of IMP up to Week 26 or up to 1 day after last injection of IMP, whichever comes earlier, for Week 26 analysis, and from first injection of IMP up to 1 day after last injection of IMP for Week 52

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted7 Jul 2017
  2. Study start2 Aug 2017
  3. Primary completion16 Jul 2018
  4. Study completion12 Jan 2019

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
597 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03211858
Sponsor's protocol ID
EFC15081
Other IDs
2017-000091-28, U1111-1191-5775, 2017
Acronym
GEMELLI1
Status last verified
Mar 2022
First submitted
6 Jul 2017
Last updated
28 Mar 2022
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: Qualified researchers may request access to patient level data and related study documents including the clinical study report, study protocol with any amendments, blank case report form, statistical analysis plan, and dataset specifications. Patient level data will be anonymized and study documents will be redacted to protect the privacy of trial participants. Further details on Sanofi's data sharing criteria, eligible studies, and process for requesting access can be found at: https://vivli.org

Publications

  • Garg SK, Wernicke-Panten K, Wardecki M, Kramer D, Delalande F, Franek E, Sadeharju K, Monchamp T, Mukherjee B, Shah VN. Efficacy and Safety of Insulin Aspart Biosimilar SAR341402 Versus Originator Insulin Aspart in People with Diabetes Treated for 26 Weeks with Multiple Daily Injections in Combination with Insulin Glargine: A Randomized Open-Label Trial (GEMELLI 1). Diabetes Technol Ther. 2020 Feb;22(2):85-95. doi: 10.1089/dia.2019.0382.

    PubMed 31804851
  • Garg SK, Wernicke-Panten K, Wardecki M, Kramer D, Delalande F, Franek E, Sadeharju K, Monchamp T, Miossec P, Mukherjee B, Shah VN. Safety, Immunogenicity, and Glycemic Control of Insulin Aspart Biosimilar SAR341402 Versus Originator Insulin Aspart in People with Diabetes Also Using Insulin Glargine: 12-Month Results from the GEMELLI 1 Trial. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2020 Jul;22(7):516-526. doi: 10.1089/dia.2020.0008. Epub 2020 Mar 31.

    PubMed 32068436
  • Shah VN, Franek E, Wernicke-Panten K, Pierre S, Mukherjee B, Sadeharju K. Efficacy, Safety, and Immunogenicity of Insulin Aspart Biosimilar SAR341402 Compared with Originator Insulin Aspart in Adults with Diabetes (GEMELLI 1): A Subgroup Analysis by Prior Type of Mealtime Insulin. Diabetes Ther. 2021 Feb;12(2):557-568. doi: 10.1007/s13300-020-00992-x. Epub 2021 Jan 11.

    PubMed 33432547

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing Insulin aspart, NovoLog/NovoRapid and Insulin glargine (HOE901) in people with Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus-Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, run by Sanofi at 82 sites in 7 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 21 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 28 Mar 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 82 sites in United States, Hungary, Japan, Poland, Germany and 2 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 8 Aug 2019). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Change in Glycated Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) From Baseline to Week 26 (time frame: Baseline, Week 26). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03211858, which also lists 3 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 28 Mar 2022.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in