Pain, PostoperativePhase 3NCT03211871
Dexmedetomidine Infusion as an Analgesic Adjuvant During Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
A Phase 3 study testing Dexmedetomidine and Normal Saline Flush, 0.9% Injectable Solution_#1 in people with Pain, Postoperative, run by Bogomolets National Medical University at 1 site in Ukraine.
Trial summary
The aim of this study was to evaluate efficacy and safety of dexmedetomidine infusion during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The randomized, single-center, controlled study was carried out from May 2016 to June 2017 at department of surgery, anesthesiology and intensive care, Postgraduate Institute of Bogomolets… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 79 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Pain, Postoperative
- What is being tested?
- Dexmedetomidine and Normal Saline Flush, 0.9% Injectable Solution_#1
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 60 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUkraine
- Study dates
- 1 May 2016to 1 Oct 2017
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 79 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- patients elected for laparoscopic cholecystectomy
- age between 18 and 79 years
- either sex
- ASA physical status I to II
Who cannot join
- age outside the specified range
- pregnancy or lactation
- severe systemic disease (ASA III physical status or more)
- patients on b-blockers or calcium channel blockers
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Ukraine1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Kyiv Clinical City Hospital #1
Kyiv, 02140
Iurii Kuchyn, Prof, 380677275825, kuchyn2@gmail.com
About this study
Official title: Dexmedetomidine Infusion as an Analgesic Adjuvant During Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: Randomized Controlled Study
The aim of this study was to evaluate efficacy and safety of dexmedetomidine infusion during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The randomized, single-center, controlled study was carried out from May 2016 to June 2017 at department of surgery, anesthesiology and intensive care, Postgraduate Institute of Bogomolets National Medical University.
Read the detailed description
Dexmedetomidine provide sedative, sympatholytic and analgesic effect, so it could be used as an adjuvant to improve analgesia, hemodynamic response to intubation and pneumoperitoneum, decrease the number of opioid-associated adverse effects.
The aim of this study was to evaluate efficacy and safety of dexmedetomidine infusion during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
The randomized, single-center, controlled study was carried out from May 2016 to June 2017 at department of surgery, anesthesiology and intensive care, Postgraduate Institute of Bogomolets National Medical University. Study design was approved by Ethical Committee at Bogomolets National Medical University (approval code 56).
60 patients elected for LCE were included in the study. The inclusion criteria were: age between 18 and 79 years, either sex, American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) physical status I to II. The exclusion criteria were age outside the specified range, pregnancy or lactation, severe systemic disease (ASA III physical status), patients on b-blockers or calcium channel blockers.
After the primary patient assessment, eligible participants were assigned in a 1:1 ratio to either the intervention (Group D) or control (Group C) groups using random assignment in blocks of four. The randomization sequence was generated using a computer algorithm [19]. Randomization and data analysis were conducted by an independent blinded member of the research team.
Group D received dexmedetomidine infusion 0,5 mcg/kg/h from induction in anesthesia to extubation, group C (control) received normal saline infusion. To prepare the infusion, dexmedetomidine 2ml containing 100mcg of the drug was diluted up to 50 ml with normal saline resulting in final concentration of 4mcg/kg. Dexmedetomidine or normal saline infusion was given through infusion pump.
After taking the patient to the operation room, vital signs monitor Philips and Bispectral Index (BIS) monitoring were attached (pulse, heart rate, electrocardiography (ECG), arterial pressure (AP), oxygen saturation). Peripheral intravenous cannula was inserted for intravenous fluids and infusion pump (separate line). Patients did not receive premedication. Before induction they receive dexketoprofen 50mg IV and omeprazole 40mg.
Pre-oxygenation was performed for 2 min, induction in anesthesia - with propofol 2mg/kg IV and succinyl choline 1,5mg/kg IV. After intubation anesthesia was maintained with sevoflurane and atracurium bromide. The patients were ventilated with circle system with goal CO2 35-45 mm Hg. BIS-monitor target was between 40 and 60. Anesthetics and drug infusion were stopped with the end of surgery.
The primary efficacy outcomes were number of patients with severe pain, time to first rescue analgesia and postoperative morphine consumption. Severe pain was estimated as VAS≥7 during 30% or more time in first 48 hours after surgery. Time to first rescue analgesia was estimated as time from end of anesthesia to the time postoperatively when patient ask for analgesia or have VAS≥4. Injection morphine hydrochlorides 10mg subcutaneously was used as a rescue analgesic. NSAIDs (dexketoprofen 150mg per day) were prescribed routinely.
Secondary efficacy outcomes included:
- Time from end of surgery to extubation
- Lengths of postanesthesia unit/general ward stay
- Incidence of chronic postoperative pain During first 48 hours after surgery patients in both groups were evaluated by the nursing stuff using the Richmond agitation sedation scale (RASS) for sedation, visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain assessment (every 2 hours or prior to rescue analgesia).
Safety was assessed by monitoring vital signs and recording adverse events. During anesthesia all patients receive continuous ECG, BIS, pulse oximetry, capnography monitoring. AP was measured every 3-5min. Arterial blood gases were checked by doctor prescription. An adverse event was recorded if systolic blood pressure was <90 or >160 mmHg or if heart rate was <50 or >110 beats/min; desaturation was estimated as peripheral oxygen saturation (or SaO2) <90%. Interventions for bradycardia, tachycardia, hypertension and hypotension comprised titration or interruption of study agent, or additional drug therapy.
Statistical analysis was performed using R software. Categorical data are presented as proportions and continuous data as medians with 25-75% interquartile ranges (IQRs). Chi-square testing demonstrated that all of the study variables were discrete. To assess significance levels, a two-tailed Mann-Whitney U-test and Fisher's exact test were used. A p-value of <0.05 was considered significant.
- Conditions
- Pain, Postoperative
- Being tested
- Dexmedetomidine, Normal Saline Flush, 0.9% Injectable Solution_#1
- Keywords
- pain management, dexmedetomidine
- Medical subject headings
- Pain, Postoperative, Agnosia
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
DexmedetomidineDrug
Intraoperative intravenous dexmedetomidine infusion 0,5 mcg/kg/h
Normal Saline Flush, 0.9% Injectable Solution_#1Drug
Intraoperative intravenous normal saline infusion
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Group D | Active comparator | Group D received dexmedetomidine infusion 0,5 mcg/kg/h from induction in anesthesia to extubation Receives: Drug: Dexmedetomidine |
| Croup C | Placebo comparator | group C (control) received normal saline infusion Receives: Drug: Normal Saline Flush, 0.9% Injectable Solution_#1 |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
number of patients with severe pain
number of patients with severe pain estimated as VAS≥7 during 30% or more time in first 48 hours after surgery
Measured: 48 hours after surgery
Time to first rescue analgesia
time from end of anesthesia to the time postoperatively when patient ask for analgesia or have VAS≥4
Measured: 24 hours after surgery
morphine consumption
total morphine consumption after surgery in mg
Measured: 48 hours
Secondary outcomes (2)
Time of extubation
Time from end of surgery to extubation
Measured: 24 hours after surgery
Incidence of chronic postoperative pain
number of patients with chronic postoperative pain
Measured: 6 month after surgery
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted7 Jul 2017
- Study start1 May 2016
- Primary completion1 Aug 2017 (estimated)
- Study completion1 Oct 2017 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Pain, PostoperativeStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- After the primary patient assessment, eligible participants were assigned in a 1:1 ratio to either the intervention (Group D) or control (Group C) groups using random assignment in blocks of four.
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 60 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Bogomolets National Medical University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Kateryna Bielka, Bogomolets National Medical University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03211871
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 87678
- Status last verified
- Jul 2017
- First submitted
- 4 Jul 2017
- Last updated
- 7 Jul 2017
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided: IPD will not be available
Publications
Bielka K, Kuchyn I, Babych V, Martycshenko K, Inozemtsev O. Dexmedetomidine infusion as an analgesic adjuvant during laparoscopic small es, Cyrillicholecystectomy: a randomized controlled study. BMC Anesthesiol. 2018 Apr 20;18(1):44. doi: 10.1186/s12871-018-0508-6.
PubMed 29678158
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 7 Jul 2017. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Dexmedetomidine Infusion as an Analgesic Adjuvant During Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: Randomized Controlled Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03211871
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 87678
- Conditions
- Pain, Postoperative
- Keywords
- pain management, dexmedetomidine
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 60 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Bogomolets National Medical UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 May 2016 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Aug 2017 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 1 Oct 2017 (estimated)
- First posted
- 7 Jul 2017 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The aim of this study was to evaluate efficacy and safety of dexmedetomidine infusion during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The randomized, single-center, controlled study was carried out from May 2016 to June 2017 at department of surgery, anesthesiology and intensive care, Postgraduate Institute of Bogomolets National Medical University.
Detailed description
Dexmedetomidine provide sedative, sympatholytic and analgesic effect, so it could be used as an adjuvant to improve analgesia, hemodynamic response to intubation and pneumoperitoneum, decrease the number of opioid-associated adverse effects.
The aim of this study was to evaluate efficacy and safety of dexmedetomidine infusion during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
The randomized, single-center, controlled study was carried out from May 2016 to June 2017 at department of surgery, anesthesiology and intensive care, Postgraduate Institute of Bogomolets National Medical University. Study design was approved by Ethical Committee at Bogomolets National Medical University (approval code 56).
60 patients elected for LCE were included in the study. The inclusion criteria were: age between 18 and 79 years, either sex, American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) physical status I to II. The exclusion criteria were age outside the specified range, pregnancy or lactation, severe systemic disease (ASA III physical status), patients on b-blockers or calcium channel blockers.
After the primary patient assessment, eligible participants were assigned in a 1:1 ratio to either the intervention (Group D) or control (Group C) groups using random assignment in blocks of four. The randomization sequence was generated using a computer algorithm [19]. Randomization and data analysis were conducted by an independent blinded member of the research team.
Group D received dexmedetomidine infusion 0,5 mcg/kg/h from induction in anesthesia to extubation, group C (control) received normal saline infusion. To prepare the infusion, dexmedetomidine 2ml containing 100mcg of the drug was diluted up to 50 ml with normal saline resulting in final concentration of 4mcg/kg. Dexmedetomidine or normal saline infusion was given through infusion pump.
After taking the patient to the operation room, vital signs monitor Philips and Bispectral Index (BIS) monitoring were attached (pulse, heart rate, electrocardiography (ECG), arterial pressure (AP), oxygen saturation). Peripheral intravenous cannula was inserted for intravenous fluids and infusion pump (separate line). Patients did not receive premedication. Before induction they receive dexketoprofen 50mg IV and omeprazole 40mg.
Pre-oxygenation was performed for 2 min, induction in anesthesia - with propofol 2mg/kg IV and succinyl choline 1,5mg/kg IV. After intubation anesthesia was maintained with sevoflurane and atracurium bromide. The patients were ventilated with circle system with goal CO2 35-45 mm Hg. BIS-monitor target was between 40 and 60. Anesthetics and drug infusion were stopped with the end of surgery.
The primary efficacy outcomes were number of patients with severe pain, time to first rescue analgesia and postoperative morphine consumption. Severe pain was estimated as VAS≥7 during 30% or more time in first 48 hours after surgery. Time to first rescue analgesia was estimated as time from end of anesthesia to the time postoperatively when patient ask for analgesia or have VAS≥4. Injection morphine hydrochlorides 10mg subcutaneously was used as a rescue analgesic. NSAIDs (dexketoprofen 150mg per day) were prescribed routinely.
Secondary efficacy outcomes included:
- Time from end of surgery to extubation
- Lengths of postanesthesia unit/general ward stay
- Incidence of chronic postoperative pain During first 48 hours after surgery patients in both groups were evaluated by the nursing stuff using the Richmond agitation sedation scale (RASS) for sedation, visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain assessment (every 2 hours or prior to rescue analgesia).
Safety was assessed by monitoring vital signs and recording adverse events. During anesthesia all patients receive continuous ECG, BIS, pulse oximetry, capnography monitoring. AP was measured every 3-5min. Arterial blood gases were checked by doctor prescription. An adverse event was recorded if systolic blood pressure was <90 or >160 mmHg or if heart rate was <50 or >110 beats/min; desaturation was estimated as peripheral oxygen saturation (or SaO2) <90%. Interventions for bradycardia, tachycardia, hypertension and hypotension comprised titration or interruption of study agent, or additional drug therapy.
Statistical analysis was performed using R software. Categorical data are presented as proportions and continuous data as medians with 25-75% interquartile ranges (IQRs). Chi-square testing demonstrated that all of the study variables were discrete. To assess significance levels, a two-tailed Mann-Whitney U-test and Fisher's exact test were used. A p-value of <0.05 was considered significant.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- After the primary patient assessment, eligible participants were assigned in a 1:1 ratio to either the intervention (Group D) or control (Group C) groups using random assignment in blocks of four.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Group D | Active comparator | Drug: DexmedetomidineGroup D received dexmedetomidine infusion 0,5 mcg/kg/h from induction in anesthesia to extubation |
| Croup C | Placebo comparator | Drug: Normal Saline Flush, 0.9% Injectable Solution_#1group C (control) received normal saline infusion |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 79 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- patients elected for laparoscopic cholecystectomy
- age between 18 and 79 years
- either sex
- ASA physical status I to II
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- age outside the specified range
- pregnancy or lactation
- severe systemic disease (ASA III physical status or more)
- patients on b-blockers or calcium channel blockers
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| DexmedetomidineIntraoperative intravenous dexmedetomidine infusion 0,5 mcg/kg/h | Drug | Group D |
| Normal Saline Flush, 0.9% Injectable Solution_#1Intraoperative intravenous normal saline infusion | Drug | Croup C |
Primary outcome
number of patients with severe pain
Time frame: 48 hours after surgery
number of patients with severe pain estimated as VAS≥7 during 30% or more time in first 48 hours after surgery
Time to first rescue analgesia
Time frame: 24 hours after surgery
time from end of anesthesia to the time postoperatively when patient ask for analgesia or have VAS≥4
morphine consumption
Time frame: 48 hours
total morphine consumption after surgery in mg
2 secondary outcomes
Time of extubation
Time frame: 24 hours after surgery
Incidence of chronic postoperative pain
Time frame: 6 month after surgery
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 7 Jul 2017.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 29678158Bielka K, Kuchyn I, Babych V, Martycshenko K, Inozemtsev O. Dexmedetomidine infusion as an analgesic adjuvant during laparoscopic small es, Cyrillicholecystectomy: a randomized controlled study. BMC Anesthesiol. 2018 Apr 20;18(1):44. doi: 10.1186/s12871-018-0508-6.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided. IPD will not be available
Related trials for Pain, Postoperative
RecruitingPhase 4
ESP Blocks for Posterior Spinal Fusion
Postoperative Pain
Recruiting
Effect of Cryotherapeutic and Nanotherapeutic Sodium Hypochlorite on Post-Operative Endodontic Pain.
Symptomatic Irreversible Pulpitis, Symptomatic Apical Periodontitis
RecruitingPhase 2
REctus Sheath Trial
Acute Pain, Postoperative Pain, Acute
Not yet recruiting
Effect of Pectoral Nerve Block (PECS) Using Magnesium Sulfate Added to Dexamethasone on Quality of Recovery and Chronic Post-Mastectomy Pain
Breast Cancer, Postoperative Pain
Active, not recruitingPhase 4
Effect of Dexmedetomidine on Postoperative Pain in Spinal Anesthesia for Cesarean Section at Assuit University Hospital
Cesarean Section
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Dexmedetomidine and Normal Saline Flush, 0.9% Injectable Solution_#1 in people with Pain, Postoperative, run by Bogomolets National Medical University at 1 site in Ukraine.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 7 Jul 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Ukraine. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Kateryna Bielka (380936693931, ekateryna.belka@gmail.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
number of patients with severe pain (time frame: 48 hours after surgery). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03211871, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 7 Jul 2017.