SepsisBLING IIINCT03213990
Beta-Lactam InfusioN Group Study
A study testing Continuous infusion and Intermittent infusion in people with Sepsis, run by The George Institute at 103 sites in 7 countries.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to find out whether continuous infusion of beta-lactam antibiotics or intermittent infusion or beta-lactam antibiotics, offers more health advantages to patients or if there is no difference. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Sepsis
- What is being tested?
- Continuous infusion and Intermittent infusion
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 7,203 participants
- Where
- 103 sitesin 7 countries
- Study dates
- 26 Mar 2018to 29 Jun 2023
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Documented site of infection or strong suspicion of infection
- At the time of the assessment of suitability for the study, the treating physician expects the patient will require treatment in the ICU that extends beyond the next calendar day
- The treating physician has chosen piperacillin-tazobactam or meropenem to treat the episode of infection
- The treating physician is uncertain if administration of the chosen antibiotic by intermittent or continuous infusion is superior
- One or more organ dysfunction entry criteria in the previous 24 hours
- i. Mean arterial pressure < 60 mmHg for at least 1 hour
Show all 9Show fewer
- ii. Vasopressors required for > 4 hours
- iii. Respiratory support using supplemental high flow nasal prongs, continuous positive airway pressure, bilevel positive airway pressure or invasive mechanical ventilation for at least 1 hour
- iv. Serum creatinine concentration > 220 µmol/L
Who cannot join
- Age less than 18 years
- Receipt of piperacillin-tazobactam or meropenem for more than 24 hours during current infectious episode
- Patients who are known or suspected to be pregnant
- Patient has a known allergy to piperacillin-tazobactam or meropenem or penicillin
- Receiving renal replacement therapy at the time of assessment for eligibility
- The treating physician is not committed to provision of advanced life-support, including mechanical ventilation, dialysis and vasopressor administration, for at least the next 48 hours
- Death is deemed imminent and inevitable
- The patient has previously been enrolled in BLING III
Trial locations and contacts
103 sites in 7 countries.
103 sites in 7 countries
United Kingdom54 sites
Stoke Mandeville Hospital
Aylesbury, Buckinghamshire, HP21 8AL
Basingstoke and North Hampshire Hospital
Basingstoke, Hampshire, RG24 9NA
Queen Elizabeth Medical Centre
Birmingham, West Midlands, B12 2TH
Blackpool Victoria Hospital
Blackpool, Lancashire, FY3 8NR
Royal Bolton Hospital
Bolton, Greater Manchester, BL4 0JR
Bristol Royal Infirmary
Bristol, BS1 3NU
University Hospital of Wales
Cardiff, Wales, CF14 4XW
Broomfield Hospital
Chelmsford, Essex, CM1 7ET
The Royal Marsden
Chelsea, London, SW3 6JJ
Countess of Chester Hospital
Chester, Cheshire, CH21UL
Golden Jubilee National Hospital
Clydebank, Glasgow, G81 4HX
University Hospital Coventry & Warwickshire
Coventry, Warwickshire, CV2 2DX
Northumbria Specialist Emergency Hospital
Cramlington
Darent Valley Hospital
Dartford, England, DA28DA
Dorset County Hospital
Dorchester, Dorset, DT1 2JY
Ninewells Hospital
Dundee
Frimley Park Hospital
Frimley, Surrey, GU16 7UJ
Medway Maritime Hospital
Gillingham, Kent, ME7 5NY
Glasgow Royal Infirmary
Glasgow
Royal Surrey County Hospital
Guildford, Surrey, GU2 7XX
Hereford County Hospital
Hereford, Herefordshire, HR1 2ER
Hull Royal Infirmary
Hull, HU3 2JZ
Ipswich Hospital
Ipswich, East Suffolk, IP4 5PD
Kingston Hospital
Kingston upon Thames, Kent, KT2 7QB
Guy's & St Thomas' Hospital London
Lambeth, London, SE1 7EH
Kings College Hospital
London, Brixton, SE5 9RS
Charing Cross Hospital
London, Hammersmith, SW6 8RF
St Marys Hospital
London, Paddington, W2 1NY
Hammersmith Hospital
London, Shepherds Bush, W12 0HS,
Whittington Health
London, N19 5NF
Maidstone Hospital
Maidstone, England, ME169QQ
James Cook University Hospital South Tees
Middlesbrough, South Tees, TS4 3BW
Milton Keynes University Hospital
Milton Keynes, Buckinghamshire, MK6 5LD
Royal Victoria Infirmary
Newcastle, Northhumberland, NE1 4LP
Newcastle Freeman Hospital
Newcastle, Northumberland, NE7 7DN
The Queens Medical Centre
Nottingham, Nottinghamshire, NG7 2UH
Princess Royal University Hospital
Orpington, Bromley, BR6 8ND
Derriford Hospital
Plymouth, England, PL68DH
Poole Hospital
Poole, Dorset, BH15 2JB
Queen Alexandra Hospital
Portsmouth, Hampshire, PO6 3LY
Whiston Hospital
Rainhill, Prescot, L35 5DR
Royal Berkshire Hospital
Reading, Berkshire, RG1 5AN
Queen's Hospital
Romford
Tunbridge Wells Hospital
Royal Tunbridge Wells, Kent, TN2 4QJ
Salford Royal Hospital
Salford, M6 8HD
Southampton General Hospital
Southampton, Hampshire, SO16 6YD
University Hospital of North Tees
Stockton-on-Tees, Durham, TS19 8PE
Sunderland Royal Hospital
Sunderland, Tyne and Wear, SR4 7TP
Kingsmill Hospital
Sutton in Ashfield, Nottinghamshire, NG17 4JL
St Georges Hospital
Tooting, London, SW17 0QT
Pinderfields General Hospital
Wakefield, West Yorkshire, WF1 4DG
Watford General Hospital
Watford, Hertfordshire, WD18 0HB
The Royal London Hospital
Whitechapel, London, E1 1BB
Royal Hampshire County Hospital
Winchester, Hampshire, SO22 5DG
Australia25 sites
The Queen Elizabeth Hospital
Adelaide, South Australia
The Wesley Hospital
Auchenflower, Queensland, 4066
Bankstown Hospital
Bankstown, New South Wales, 2200
Bendigo Hospital
Bendigo, Victoria, 3550
Blacktown Hospital
Blacktown, New South Wales, 2148
Box Hill Hospital - Eastern Health
Box Hill, Victoria, 3128
Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital
Brisbane, Queensland
Caboolture Hospital
Caboolture, Queensland, 4510
Royal Prince Alfred Hospital
Camperdown, New South Wales, 2050
Royal Darwin Hospital
Casuarina, Northern Territory, 0811
St Vincents Hosptial
Darlinghurst, New South Wales, 2010
Lyell McEwin Hospital
Elizabeth Vale, South Australia, 5112
Geelong University Hospital
Geelong, Victoria, 3220
Gosford Hospital
Gosford, New South Wales, 2250
Austin Hospital
Heidelberg, Victoria, 3084
Royal Hobart Hospital
Hobart, Tasmania, 7001
Logan Hospital
Meadowbrook, Queensland, 4131
Royal Melbourne Hospital
Melbourne, Victoria, 3050
John Hunter Hospital
New Lambton Heights, New South Wales, 2305
Redcliffe Hospital
Redcliffe, Queensland, 4020
Royal North Shore Hospital
Saint Leonards, New South Wales, 2065
Gold Coast University Hospital
Southport, Queensland, 4215
St George Hospital
Sydney, New South Wales
Westmead Hospital
Westmead, New South Wales, 2145
Princess Alexandra Hospital
Woolloongabba, Queensland, 4102
Belgium8 sites
ZNA Stuivenberg
Antwerp, 2060
Universitair ziekenhuis Antwerpen
Antwerp, 2610
Hôpital Erasme
Brussels, Anderlecht, , 1070
Universitair ziekenhuis Brussel
Brussels, 1090
Civil Hospital Marie Curie
Charleroi
Maria Middelares
Ghent, 9000
Universitair ziekenhuis Gent
Ghent, 9000
Clinique Saint Pierre
Ottignies, 1340
New Zealand6 sites
Auckland City Hospital - CVICU
Auckland, 1142
Auckland City Hospital - DCCM
Auckland, 1142
Middlmore Hospital
Auckland
Christchurch Hospital
Christchurch, 8011
Waikato Hospital
Hamilton, 3240
Wellington Hospital
Wellington, 6021
France5 sites
Centre Hospitalier Henri Duffaut
Avignon, Vaucluse, 84902
Brabois
Nancy
Nimes University Hospital
Nîmes, Nimes, 30900
Poitiers University Hospital
Poitiers
Ch Salon de Provence
Salon-de-Provence, Bouche Du Rhone, 13300
Sweden3 sites
Helsingborg Hospital
Helsingborg, 25223
Skane Lund University Hospital
Lund, 22242
Skane University Malmo Hospital
Malmö, 21421
Malaysia2 sites
Hospital Universiti Sains Malaysia
Kota Bharu, Kelantan, 16150
University Malaya Medical Centre
Kuala Lumpur, Selangor, 59100
About this study
Official title: A Phase III Randomised Controlled Trial of Continuous Beta-lactam Infusion Compared With Intermittent Beta-lactam Dosing in Critically Ill Patients
The purpose of this study is to find out whether continuous infusion of beta-lactam antibiotics or intermittent infusion or beta-lactam antibiotics, offers more health advantages to patients or if there is no difference.
The investigators will be looking to see whether patients receiving beta-lactams via one administration method or the other have a better chance of recovering from their illness. They will also be looking at long term outcomes such as quality-of-life and healthcare resource use.
Read more
Sepsis is caused by toxic substances (toxins) from bacteria and other organism entering the bloodstream from a site of infection. In some people, the infection can progress to sepsis and septic shock where the functions of organs in the body are affected. Patients suffering from sepsis and septic shock are commonly managed in the intensive care unit (ICU) where they are prescribed antibiotics as standard therapy, as well as other therapies to support the functions of the body.
Beta-lactam antibiotics are a group of antibiotics commonly used to treat infection in patients with sepsis and septic shock.
Currently, beta-lactam antibiotics are most commonly given to patients be intermittent infusions, that is, given at regular intervals throughout 24 hours. New research suggests that giving beta-lactam antibiotics as a continuous infusion may mean that antibiotic concentrations in the blood remain more consistent and may be more effective at killing bacteria.
However, the benefit to the patient by giving beta-lactams via continuous infusion has not been tested in a high-quality, large clinical trial.
Read the detailed description
Aim To conduct a multicentre randomised, controlled trial (RCT) to determine whether continuous infusion of a beta-lactam antibiotic (piperacillin-tazobactam or meropenem) results in decreased all cause Day 90 mortality compared with intermittent beta-lactam antibiotic infusion in critically ill patients with sepsis.
Hypothesis The BLING III Study will test the hypothesis that patients managed in the ICU with sepsis, the administration of beta-lactam antibiotics via continuous infusion decreases Day 90 mortality compared with intermittent infusion Design This BLING III study is a prospective, multicentre, open, phase III, RCT. Participants commenced on one of two beta-lactam antibiotics (piperacillin-tazobactam or meropenem) will be randomised to receive the beta-lactam antibiotic via either continuous infusion or intermittent infusion over 30 minutes for the treatment course while in the ICU for up to 90 days after randomisation. For participants where the beta-lactam antibiotic is subsequently changed from piperacillin-tazobactam to meropenem or vice versa for ongoing treatment of the infectious episode, the new prescription will continue to be administered in the allocated method (continuous infusion or intermittent infusion over 30 minutes).
Permuted block randomisation with variable block sizes and stratified by site will be conducted via a password-protected, secure web-based interface.
The primary endpoint for this trial will be death from all causes at 90 days.
7,000 patients will be enrolled into this study from approximately 70 ICUs worldwide, with approximately 35 ICUs in Australian and New Zealand hospitals.
For eligible patients, the administration method of beta-lactam antibiotic, either piperacillin-tazobactam or meropenem, will be randomised to either continuous infusion or intermittent infusion over 30 minutes. The choice of beta-lactam antibiotic and the dose and dosing interval (i.e. the dose the patient will receive in 24 hours) will be determined by the treating physician prior to randomisation.
For all patients, data will be collected at baseline and daily whilst in the ICU. Patients will be followed up to day 14, regardless of location in the hospital, to determine test of cure and to identify new acquisition, colonisation or infection with an multi-resistant organism. Additional follow up will occur at 90 days post randomisation.
- Conditions
- Sepsis
- Being tested
- Continuous infusion, Intermittent infusion
- Keywords
- Sepsis, Beta-lactam antibiotics
- Medical subject headings
- Sepsis
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Continuous infusionOther
Clinician prescribed beta-lactam antibiotic will be administered via continuous infusion for as long as prescribed whilst in the ICU
Intermittent infusionOther
Clinician prescribed beta-lactam antibiotic will be administered via intermittent infusion for as long as prescribed whilst in the ICU
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Continuous Infusion | Other | The prescribed Beta-lactam is administered by a continuous infusion. Receives: Other: Continuous infusion |
| Intermittent infusion | Other | the prescribed Beta-lactam is administered by intermittent infusion over 30 minutes Receives: Other: Intermittent infusion |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
All-cause mortality
Patient mortality status assessed at 90 days after randomisation
Measured: 90 Days after randomisation
Secondary outcomes (4)
Clinical Cure
Clinical cure will be defined as the completion of the beta-lactam antibiotic treatment course (on or prior to Day 14) without recommencement of antibiotic therapy within 48 hours of cessation.
Participants discharged from hospital within 14 days following randomisation will be considered to meet the definition of clinical cure. Participants who decease while receiving the antibiotic treatment course or where antibiotic therapy is ceased in the setting of death being deemed imminent and inevitable, will be assessed as not meeting the criteria for clinical cure.
Measured: Day 14 post randomisation
New acquisition, colonisation or infection
New acquisition, colonisation or infection with an Multi-resistant organism (MRO) or Clostridium difficile diarrhoea
Measured: up to 14 days post randomisation or hospital discharge, whichever is sooner
All cause ICU mortality
Patient mortality status assessed at ICU discharge
Measured: up to 90 days
All cause hospital mortality
Patient mortality status assessed at hospital discharge
Measured: up to 90 days
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted11 Jul 2017
- Study start26 Mar 2018
- Primary completion12 Apr 2023
- Study completion29 Jun 2023
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for SepsisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 7,203 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- The George Institute
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Health and Medical Research Council, Australia, Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Society Clinical Trials Group
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Jeffrey Lipman, Study chair, The George Institute
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03213990
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- TGI-CCT254643
- Acronym
- BLING III
- Status last verified
- Dec 2023
- First submitted
- 5 Jun 2017
- Last updated
- 12 Dec 2023
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided: Yet to be decided
Publications
Dulhunty JM, Brett SJ, De Waele JJ, Rajbhandari D, Billot L, Cotta MO, Davis JS, Finfer S, Hammond NE, Knowles S, Liu X, McGuinness S, Mysore J, Paterson DL, Peake S, Rhodes A, Roberts JA, Roger C, Shirwadkar C, Starr T, Taylor C, Myburgh JA, Lipman J; BLING III Study Investigators. Continuous vs Intermittent beta-Lactam Antibiotic Infusions in Critically Ill Patients With Sepsis: The BLING III Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2024 Aug 27;332(8):629-637. doi: 10.1001/jama.2024.9779.
PubMed 38864155Lipman J, Brett SJ, De Waele JJ, Cotta MO, Davis JS, Finfer S, Glass P, Knowles S, McGuinness S, Myburgh J, Paterson DL, Peake S, Rajbhandari D, Rhodes A, Roberts JA, Shirwadkar C, Starr T, Taylor C, Billot L, Dulhunty JM. A protocol for a phase 3 multicentre randomised controlled trial of continuous versus intermittent beta-lactam antibiotic infusion in critically ill patients with sepsis: BLING III. Crit Care Resusc. 2019 Mar;21(1):63-68.
PubMed 30857514
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 12 Dec 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Phase III Randomised Controlled Trial of Continuous Beta-lactam Infusion Compared With Intermittent Beta-lactam Dosing in Critically Ill Patients
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03213990
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- BLING III / TGI-CCT254643
- Conditions
- Sepsis
- Keywords
- Sepsis, Beta-lactam antibiotics
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 7,203 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- The George InstituteUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Health and Medical Research Council, Australia, Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Society Clinical Trials Group
- Study start
- 26 Mar 2018 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 12 Apr 2023 (actual)
- Study completion
- 29 Jun 2023 (actual)
- First posted
- 11 Jul 2017 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to find out whether continuous infusion of beta-lactam antibiotics or intermittent infusion or beta-lactam antibiotics, offers more health advantages to patients or if there is no difference.
The investigators will be looking to see whether patients receiving beta-lactams via one administration method or the other have a better chance of recovering from their illness. They will also be looking at long term outcomes such as quality-of-life and healthcare resource use.
Sepsis is caused by toxic substances (toxins) from bacteria and other organism entering the bloodstream from a site of infection. In some people, the infection can progress to sepsis and septic shock where the functions of organs in the body are affected. Patients suffering from sepsis and septic shock are commonly managed in the intensive care unit (ICU) where they are prescribed antibiotics as standard therapy, as well as other therapies to support the functions of the body.
Beta-lactam antibiotics are a group of antibiotics commonly used to treat infection in patients with sepsis and septic shock.
Currently, beta-lactam antibiotics are most commonly given to patients be intermittent infusions, that is, given at regular intervals throughout 24 hours. New research suggests that giving beta-lactam antibiotics as a continuous infusion may mean that antibiotic concentrations in the blood remain more consistent and may be more effective at killing bacteria.
However, the benefit to the patient by giving beta-lactams via continuous infusion has not been tested in a high-quality, large clinical trial.
Detailed description
Aim To conduct a multicentre randomised, controlled trial (RCT) to determine whether continuous infusion of a beta-lactam antibiotic (piperacillin-tazobactam or meropenem) results in decreased all cause Day 90 mortality compared with intermittent beta-lactam antibiotic infusion in critically ill patients with sepsis.
Hypothesis The BLING III Study will test the hypothesis that patients managed in the ICU with sepsis, the administration of beta-lactam antibiotics via continuous infusion decreases Day 90 mortality compared with intermittent infusion Design This BLING III study is a prospective, multicentre, open, phase III, RCT. Participants commenced on one of two beta-lactam antibiotics (piperacillin-tazobactam or meropenem) will be randomised to receive the beta-lactam antibiotic via either continuous infusion or intermittent infusion over 30 minutes for the treatment course while in the ICU for up to 90 days after randomisation. For participants where the beta-lactam antibiotic is subsequently changed from piperacillin-tazobactam to meropenem or vice versa for ongoing treatment of the infectious episode, the new prescription will continue to be administered in the allocated method (continuous infusion or intermittent infusion over 30 minutes).
Permuted block randomisation with variable block sizes and stratified by site will be conducted via a password-protected, secure web-based interface.
The primary endpoint for this trial will be death from all causes at 90 days.
7,000 patients will be enrolled into this study from approximately 70 ICUs worldwide, with approximately 35 ICUs in Australian and New Zealand hospitals.
For eligible patients, the administration method of beta-lactam antibiotic, either piperacillin-tazobactam or meropenem, will be randomised to either continuous infusion or intermittent infusion over 30 minutes. The choice of beta-lactam antibiotic and the dose and dosing interval (i.e. the dose the patient will receive in 24 hours) will be determined by the treating physician prior to randomisation.
For all patients, data will be collected at baseline and daily whilst in the ICU. Patients will be followed up to day 14, regardless of location in the hospital, to determine test of cure and to identify new acquisition, colonisation or infection with an multi-resistant organism. Additional follow up will occur at 90 days post randomisation.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Continuous Infusion | Other | Other: Continuous infusionThe prescribed Beta-lactam is administered by a continuous infusion. |
| Intermittent infusion | Other | Other: Intermittent infusionthe prescribed Beta-lactam is administered by intermittent infusion over 30 minutes |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (9 listed)
- Documented site of infection or strong suspicion of infection
- At the time of the assessment of suitability for the study, the treating physician expects the patient will require treatment in the ICU that extends beyond the next calendar day
- The treating physician has chosen piperacillin-tazobactam or meropenem to treat the episode of infection
- The treating physician is uncertain if administration of the chosen antibiotic by intermittent or continuous infusion is superior
- One or more organ dysfunction entry criteria in the previous 24 hours
Key exclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Age less than 18 years
- Receipt of piperacillin-tazobactam or meropenem for more than 24 hours during current infectious episode
- Patients who are known or suspected to be pregnant
- Patient has a known allergy to piperacillin-tazobactam or meropenem or penicillin
- Receiving renal replacement therapy at the time of assessment for eligibility
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Continuous infusionClinician prescribed beta-lactam antibiotic will be administered via continuous infusion for as long as prescribed whilst in the ICU | Other | Continuous Infusion |
| Intermittent infusionClinician prescribed beta-lactam antibiotic will be administered via intermittent infusion for as long as prescribed whilst in the ICU | Other | Intermittent infusion |
Primary outcome
All-cause mortality
Time frame: 90 Days after randomisation
Patient mortality status assessed at 90 days after randomisation
4 secondary outcomes
Clinical Cure
Time frame: Day 14 post randomisation
New acquisition, colonisation or infection
Time frame: up to 14 days post randomisation or hospital discharge, whichever is sooner
All cause ICU mortality
Time frame: up to 90 days
All cause hospital mortality
Time frame: up to 90 days
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 12 Dec 2023.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 38864155Dulhunty JM, Brett SJ, De Waele JJ, Rajbhandari D, Billot L, Cotta MO, Davis JS, Finfer S, Hammond NE, Knowles S, Liu X, McGuinness S, Mysore J, Paterson DL, Peake S, Rhodes A, Roberts JA, Roger C, Shirwadkar C, Starr T, Taylor C, Myburgh JA, Lipman J; BLING III Study Investigators. Continuous vs Intermittent beta-Lactam Antibiotic Infusions in Critically Ill Patients With Sepsis: The BLING III Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2024 Aug 27;332(8):629-637. doi: 10.1001/jama.2024.9779.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 30857514Lipman J, Brett SJ, De Waele JJ, Cotta MO, Davis JS, Finfer S, Glass P, Knowles S, McGuinness S, Myburgh J, Paterson DL, Peake S, Rajbhandari D, Rhodes A, Roberts JA, Shirwadkar C, Starr T, Taylor C, Billot L, Dulhunty JM. A protocol for a phase 3 multicentre randomised controlled trial of continuous versus intermittent beta-lactam antibiotic infusion in critically ill patients with sepsis: BLING III. Crit Care Resusc. 2019 Mar;21(1):63-68.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided. Yet to be decided
Related trials for Sepsis
RecruitingPhase 3
Selective Antibiotics When Symptoms Develop Versus Universal Antibiotics for Preterm Neonates
Sepsis, PROM, Preterm (Pregnancy)
RecruitingObservational study
Metabolic and Functional Study of γδ T Cells in Critically Ill Patients
Sepsis, Critical Illness
Not yet recruiting
Blood Purification in Septic Children
Sepsis, Blood Purification
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Biomarker-enhanced Artificial Intelligence Based Pediatric Sepsis Screening Tool
Sepsis
RecruitingPhase 3
A Trial of Adjunctive Fludrocortisone (50mcg, 100mcg or Placebo) in Critically Ill Patients With Septic Shock Receiving Hydrocortisone, Evaluating Survival and Functional Recovery and the Influence of Transcriptomic Response
Septic Shock
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Jeffrey Lipman study chair
The George Institute
103 sites in 7 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Continuous infusion and Intermittent infusion in people with Sepsis, run by The George Institute at 103 sites in 7 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 9 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 12 Dec 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 103 sites in United Kingdom, Australia, Belgium, New Zealand, France and 2 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
All-cause mortality (time frame: 90 Days after randomisation). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03213990, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 12 Dec 2023.