AzTrials
AzTrials

Reflux EsophagitisNCT03214081

Special Drug Use Surveillance of Vonoprazan for "Maintenance Therapy of Reflux Esophagitis: Long-term Use"

An observational study of Reflux Esophagitis, run by Takeda at 1 site in Japan.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this survey is to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of long-term administration of vonoprazan tablets when used as maintenance therapy for reflux esophagitis in routine clinical settings. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Any age
Conditions the study is for
Reflux Esophagitis
What is being tested?
Vonoprazan
Type of treatment
Pill or oral medicine
How many people
1,237 participants
Where
1 siteJapan
Study dates
1 Mar 2016to 31 Aug 2018
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages Any age
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Study population: The study population will consist of participants with a diagnosis of reflux esophagitis and received dose of vonoprazan in the routine medical care.

Who may be able to join

  • Participants who require maintenance therapy for relapsed/recurrent reflux esophagitis

Who cannot join

  • Participants meeting the criteria of grade A to D according to the Los Angeles classification (Hoshihara's modification), by means of endoscopy at the initiation of maintenance therapy with vonoprazan tablets
  • Participants with a previous history of hypersensitivity to ingredients in vonoprazan tablets
  • Participants taking atazanavir sulfate or rilpivirine hydrochloride

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Japan1 site
  • Takeda Selected Site

    Tokyo

Other trials in Japan

About this study

Official title: Special Drug Use Surveillance of Takecab Tablets for "Maintenance Therapy of Reflux Esophagitis: Long-term Use"

The purpose of this survey is to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of long-term administration of vonoprazan tablets when used as maintenance therapy for reflux esophagitis in routine clinical settings.

Read the detailed description

The drug being tested in this survey is called vonoprazan. Vonoprazan is being tested to treat patients who have reflux esophagitis.

This survey will look at the safety and effectiveness of long-term administration of vonoprazan tablets when used as maintenance therapy for reflux esophagitis in routine clinical settings. The survey will enroll approximately 1000 participants.

  • Vonoprazan 10 mg or 20 mg

This multi-center observational trial will be conducted in Japan.

Being tested
Vonoprazan
Medical subject headings
Esophagitis, Peptic

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • VonoprazanDrug

    Also called Takecab tablets, TAK-438

    Vonoprazan tablets

Study groups in NCT03214081
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Vonoprazan 10 mg or 20 mgUsually, for adults, 10 mg of vonoprazan administered orally once daily. If that dosing proved insufficient, the dosage may have been increased up to 20 mg once daily. Participants received vonoprazan as part of a routine medical care.
Receives: Drug: Vonoprazan

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Percentage of Participants Who Had One or More Adverse Drug Reactions

    An adverse event (AE) is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. Adverse drug reaction refers to AE related to administered drug.

    Measured: Up to 12 months

Secondary outcomes (11)
  1. Endoscopic Relapse Rate

    Endoscopic relapse rate was defined as a percentage of participants who met the criteria of Grade A to D in the modified Los Angeles (LA) classification. The modified LA classification graded endoscopic findings as follows- Grade N: normal mucosa; Grade M: minimal changes to the mucosa, such as erythema and/or whitish turbidity; Grade A: non-confluent mucosal breaks <5 mm in length; Grade B: nonconfluent mucosal breaks ≥ 5 mm in length; Grade C: confluent mucosal breaks <75% circumferential; Grade D: confluent mucosal breaks >=75% circumferential.

    Measured: From the initiation of the maintenance therapy to Month 12 (or discontinuation of the therapy), up to 12 months

  2. Number of Participants With Recorded Severity of Subjective Symptoms of Heartburn

    Presence or absence and severity of subjective symptoms were collected from participants during medical interviews of each visit as none (asymptomatic), mild (occasionally or slightly symptomatic), moderate (considerably symptomatic), severe (unendurably symptomatic), and unknown. Number of participants who had mild, moderate, or severe heartburn at each time points were reported.

    Measured: Baseline, Month 6 and at Month 12

  3. Number of Participants With Recorded Severity of Subjective Symptoms of Acid Reflux

    Presence or absence and severity of subjective symptoms were collected from participants during medical interviews of each visit as none (asymptomatic), mild (occasionally or slightly symptomatic), moderate (considerably symptomatic), severe (unendurably symptomatic), and unknown. Number of participants who had mild, moderate, or severe acid reflux at each time points were reported.

    Measured: Baseline, Month 6 and at Month 12

  4. Number of Participants With Recorded Severity of Subjective Symptoms of Postprandial Fullness

    Presence or absence and severity of subjective symptoms were collected from participants during medical interviews of each visit as none (asymptomatic), mild (occasionally or slightly symptomatic), moderate (considerably symptomatic), severe (unendurably symptomatic), and unknown. Number of participants who had mild, moderate, or severe postprandial fullness at each time points were reported.

    Measured: Baseline, Month 6 and at Month 12

  5. Number of Participants With Recorded Severity of Subjective Symptoms of Early Satiation

    Presence or absence and severity of subjective symptoms were collected from participants during medical interviews of each visit as none (asymptomatic), mild (occasionally or slightly symptomatic), moderate (considerably symptomatic), severe (unendurably symptomatic), and unknown. Number of participants who had mild, moderate, or severe early satiation at each time points were reported.

    Measured: Baseline, Month 6 and at Month 12

  6. Number of Participants With Recorded Severity of Subjective Symptoms of Epigastric Pain

    Presence or absence and severity of subjective symptoms were collected from participants during medical interviews of each visit as none (asymptomatic), mild (occasionally or slightly symptomatic), moderate (considerably symptomatic), severe (unendurably symptomatic), and unknown. Number of participants who had mild, moderate, or severe epigastric pain at each time points were reported.

    Measured: Baseline, Month 6 and at Month 12

  7. Number of Participants With Recorded Severity of Subjective Symptoms of Epigastric Burning

    Presence or absence and severity of subjective symptoms were collected from participants during medical interviews of each visit as none (asymptomatic), mild (occasionally or slightly symptomatic), moderate (considerably symptomatic), severe (unendurably symptomatic), and unknown. Number of participants who had mild, moderate, or severe epigastric burning at each time points were reported.

    Measured: Baseline, Month 6 and at Month 12

  8. Number of Participants With Recorded Severity of Subjective Symptoms of Abdominal Bloating

    Presence or absence and severity of subjective symptoms were collected from participants during medical interviews of each visit as none (asymptomatic), mild (occasionally or slightly symptomatic), moderate (considerably symptomatic), severe (unendurably symptomatic), and unknown. Number of participants who had mild, moderate, or severe abdominal bloating at each time points were reported.

    Measured: Baseline, Month 6 and at Month 12

  9. Number of Participants With Recorded Severity of Subjective Symptoms of Nausea/Vomiting

    Presence or absence and severity of subjective symptoms were collected from participants during medical interviews of each visit as none (asymptomatic), mild (occasionally or slightly symptomatic), moderate (considerably symptomatic), severe (unendurably symptomatic), and unknown. Number of participants who had mild, moderate, or severe nausea/vomiting at each time points were reported.

    Measured: Baseline, Month 6 and at Month 12

  10. Number of Participants With Recorded Severity of Subjective Symptoms of Belching

    Presence or absence and severity of subjective symptoms were collected from participants during medical interviews of each visit as none (asymptomatic), mild (occasionally or slightly symptomatic), moderate (considerably symptomatic), severe (unendurably symptomatic), and unknown. Number of participants who had mild, moderate, or severe belching at each time points were reported.

    Measured: Baseline, Month 6 and at Month 12

  11. Number of Participants With Recorded Severity of Subjective Symptoms of Anorexia

    Presence or absence and severity of subjective symptoms were collected from participants during medical interviews of each visit as none (asymptomatic), mild (occasionally or slightly symptomatic), moderate (considerably symptomatic), severe (unendurably symptomatic), and unknown. Number of participants who had mild, moderate, or severe anorexia at each time points were reported.

    Measured: Baseline, Month 6 and at Month 12

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted11 Jul 2017
  2. Study start1 Mar 2016
  3. Primary completion31 Aug 2018
  4. Study completion31 Aug 2018

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
1,237 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03214081
Sponsor's protocol ID
Vonoprazan-5003
Other IDs
JapicCTI-163202
Status last verified
May 2025
First submitted
9 Jul 2017
Last updated
10 Jun 2025
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: Takeda provides access to the de-identified individual participant data (IPD) for eligible studies to aid qualified researchers in addressing legitimate scientific objectives (Takeda's data sharing commitment is available on https://clinicaltrials.takeda.com/takedas-commitment?commitment=5). These IPDs will be provided in a secure research environment following approval of a data sharing request, and under the terms of a data sharing agreement.

Publications

  • Manabe N, Matsuo M, Suzuki C. Long-term safety and effectiveness of vonoprazan as maintenance therapy for reflux esophagitis in Japan: a 12-month post-marketing surveillance study. Expert Opin Drug Saf. 2026 Apr 15:1-10. doi: 10.1080/14740338.2026.2612982. Online ahead of print.

    PubMed 41982134

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Reflux Esophagitis, run by Takeda at 1 site in Japan.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 10 Jun 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Japan. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 23 Oct 2019). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Percentage of Participants Who Had One or More Adverse Drug Reactions (time frame: Up to 12 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03214081, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 10 Jun 2025.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in