AzTrials
AzTrials

Coronary Heart DiseaseNCT03214861

Carb Quality and CHD in US Adults

An observational study of Coronary Heart Disease, run by Harvard School of Public Health (HSPH).

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This is an analysis conducted in the Nurses Health Study and the Health Professional Follow-Up Study, both prospective cohort studies, where the investigators systematically investigated the association between carbohydrate quality using a variety of metrics in relation to coronary heart disease. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 30 to 75 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Coronary Heart Disease
What is being tested?
Carbohydrate quality
How many people
117,885 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
Jun 1976to Jun 2012
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 30 to 75 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: The Nurses' Health Study (NHS) was initiated in 1976 as a prospective cohort study, where 121,701 female registered nurses between the ages of 30 and 55 years were recruited from 11 US states. The Health Professionals Follow-up Study (HPFS) was initiated in 1986 and recruited 51,529 US men between the ages of 40-75. Every two years, participants updated their information on medical history, lifestyle, and incidence of chronic diseases using validated questionnaires. Follow-up rates are at least 90% of potential person-years of follow-up and mortality follow-up is more than 98%.

Who may be able to join

  • Participants of these two cohorts

Who cannot join

  • Participants with diabetes, coronary heart disease, or cancer at baseline
  • Participants with missing exposure information at baseline
  • Participants with implausible food frequency questionnaire info (females: kcal < 500 or > 3500; males: kcal < 800 or > 4200)
  • Participants who left 10 or more items blank on the food frequency questionnaire

About this study

Official title: Carbohydrate Quality and Quantity and Risk of Coronary Heart Disease Among US Women and Men.

This is an analysis conducted in the Nurses Health Study and the Health Professional Follow-Up Study, both prospective cohort studies, where the investigators systematically investigated the association between carbohydrate quality using a variety of metrics in relation to coronary heart disease. This was a secondary data analysis of previously collected data in both cohorts.

Read the detailed description

In this study, the investigators studied the association between carbohydrate quality and coronary heart disease using prospective cohort studies among US adults. Carbohydrate quality was evaluated using a variety of metrics including carbohydrate, starch, total fiber, cereal fiber, fruit fiber, and vegetable fiber intake, as well as the ratios of carbohydrate to total fiber, carbohydrate to cereal fiber, starch to total fiber, and starch to cereal fiber. The Nurses' Health Study (NHS) and the Health Professionals Follow Up Study (HPFS) started in 1984 and 1986, respectively, and were followed-up every 2-4 years thereafter until 2012. Participants include in this study had up to 28y of follow-up. All participants were free of known diabetes mellitus, cancer or cardiovascular disease at baseline. Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to assess the relationship between dietary measures of carbohydrate quality and incident CHD (nonfatal myocardial infarction and fatal CHD).

Being tested
Carbohydrate quality
Medical subject headings
Coronary Disease

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Carbohydrate qualityOther

    This is an observational study examining the association between carbohydrate quality and coronary heart disease. The investigators used a variety of carbohydrate quality metrics to evaluate carbohydrate quality including carbohydrate, starch, total fiber, cereal fiber, fruit fiber, and vegetable fiber intakes, and the ratios of carbohydrate to total fiber, carbohydrate to cereal fiber, starch to total fiber, and starch to cereal fiber intakes.

Study groups in NCT03214861
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Nurses Health StudyThe Nurses' Health Study (NHS) was initiated in 1976 as a prospective cohort study, where 121,701 female registered nurses between the ages of 30 and 55 years were recruited from 11 US states.
Receives: Other: Carbohydrate quality
Health Professionals Follow-Up StudyThe Health Professionals Follow-up Study (HPFS) was initiated in 1986 and recruited 51,529 US men between the ages of 40-75.
Receives: Other: Carbohydrate quality

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Coronary Heart Disease (CHD)

    CHD includes both fatal and non-fatal myocardial infarction

    Measured: June 1984 - June 2012

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted12 Jul 2017
  2. Study startJun 1976
  3. Primary completionJun 2012
  4. Study completionJun 2012

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
117,885 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03214861
Sponsor's protocol ID
Carb Quality and CHD NHS HPFS
Other IDs
UM1CA186107, UM1CA167552, HL34594, HL35464, DK58845, KFAS012016
Status last verified
Jul 2017
First submitted
10 Jul 2017
Last updated
13 Oct 2017
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Mozaffarian D, Benjamin EJ, Go AS, Arnett DK, Blaha MJ, Cushman M, de Ferranti S, Despres JP, Fullerton HJ, Howard VJ, Huffman MD, Judd SE, Kissela BM, Lackland DT, Lichtman JH, Lisabeth LD, Liu S, Mackey RH, Matchar DB, McGuire DK, Mohler ER 3rd, Moy CS, Muntner P, Mussolino ME, Nasir K, Neumar RW, Nichol G, Palaniappan L, Pandey DK, Reeves MJ, Rodriguez CJ, Sorlie PD, Stein J, Towfighi A, Turan TN, Virani SS, Willey JZ, Woo D, Yeh RW, Turner MB; American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee. Heart disease and stroke statistics--2015 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2015 Jan 27;131(4):e29-322. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000152. Epub 2014 Dec 17. No abstract available.

    PubMed 25520374
  • Huffman MD, Capewell S, Ning H, Shay CM, Ford ES, Lloyd-Jones DM. Cardiovascular health behavior and health factor changes (1988-2008) and projections to 2020: results from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys. Circulation. 2012 May 29;125(21):2595-602. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.111.070722. Epub 2012 Apr 30.

    PubMed 22547667
  • Yang L, Colditz GA. Prevalence of Overweight and Obesity in the United States, 2007-2012. JAMA Intern Med. 2015 Aug;175(8):1412-3. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.2405. No abstract available.

    PubMed 26098405
  • Long-Term Trends in Diagnosed Diabetes. CDC's Division of Diabetes Translation. National Diabetes Surveillance System. October 2011. http://www.cdc.gov/diabetes/statistics

  • Mozumdar A, Liguori G. Persistent increase of prevalence of metabolic syndrome among U.S. adults: NHANES III to NHANES 1999-2006. Diabetes Care. 2011 Jan;34(1):216-9. doi: 10.2337/dc10-0879. Epub 2010 Oct 1.

    PubMed 20889854
  • Stampfer MJ, Hu FB, Manson JE, Rimm EB, Willett WC. Primary prevention of coronary heart disease in women through diet and lifestyle. N Engl J Med. 2000 Jul 6;343(1):16-22. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200007063430103.

    PubMed 10882764
  • Akesson A, Larsson SC, Discacciati A, Wolk A. Low-risk diet and lifestyle habits in the primary prevention of myocardial infarction in men: a population-based prospective cohort study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 Sep 30;64(13):1299-306. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.06.1190.

    PubMed 25257629
  • U.S. Department of Agriculture and the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Nutrition and your health. Dietary guidelines for Americans. 1980.

  • McGuire S. U.S. Department of Agriculture and U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Dietary Guidelines for Americans, 2010. 7th Edition, Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, January 2011. Adv Nutr. 2011 May;2(3):293-4. doi: 10.3945/an.111.000430. Epub 2011 Apr 30. No abstract available.

    PubMed 22332062
  • Siri-Tarino PW, Sun Q, Hu FB, Krauss RM. Meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies evaluating the association of saturated fat with cardiovascular disease. Am J Clin Nutr. 2010 Mar;91(3):535-46. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.2009.27725. Epub 2010 Jan 13.

    PubMed 20071648
  • Li Y, Hruby A, Bernstein AM, Ley SH, Wang DD, Chiuve SE, Sampson L, Rexrode KM, Rimm EB, Willett WC, Hu FB. Saturated Fats Compared With Unsaturated Fats and Sources of Carbohydrates in Relation to Risk of Coronary Heart Disease: A Prospective Cohort Study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015 Oct 6;66(14):1538-1548. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2015.07.055.

    PubMed 26429077
  • Yu D, Shu XO, Li H, Xiang YB, Yang G, Gao YT, Zheng W, Zhang X. Dietary carbohydrates, refined grains, glycemic load, and risk of coronary heart disease in Chinese adults. Am J Epidemiol. 2013 Nov 15;178(10):1542-9. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwt178. Epub 2013 Sep 5.

    PubMed 24008907
  • Rebello SA, Koh H, Chen C, Naidoo N, Odegaard AO, Koh WP, Butler LM, Yuan JM, van Dam RM. Amount, type, and sources of carbohydrates in relation to ischemic heart disease mortality in a Chinese population: a prospective cohort study. Am J Clin Nutr. 2014 Jul;100(1):53-64. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.113.076273. Epub 2014 Apr 30.

    PubMed 24787492
  • Liu S, Willett WC, Stampfer MJ, Hu FB, Franz M, Sampson L, Hennekens CH, Manson JE. A prospective study of dietary glycemic load, carbohydrate intake, and risk of coronary heart disease in US women. Am J Clin Nutr. 2000 Jun;71(6):1455-61. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/71.6.1455.

    PubMed 10837285
  • Yang Q, Zhang Z, Gregg EW, Flanders WD, Merritt R, Hu FB. Added sugar intake and cardiovascular diseases mortality among US adults. JAMA Intern Med. 2014 Apr;174(4):516-24. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.13563.

    PubMed 24493081

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Coronary Heart Disease, run by Harvard School of Public Health (HSPH).

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 13 Oct 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Coronary Heart Disease (CHD) (time frame: June 1984 - June 2012). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03214861, which also lists 44 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 13 Oct 2017.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in