Ankylosing SpondylitisPhase 2NCT03215277
A Study to Test the Efficacy and Safety of Bimekizumab and Certolizumab Pegol in Patients With Active Ankylosing Spondylitis
A Phase 2 study testing Bimekizumab and Certolizumab pegol in people with Ankylosing Spondylitis, run by UCB Biopharma SRL at 34 sites in 8 countries.
Trial summary
The purpose of the study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of bimekizumab compared to certolizumab pegol in the treatment of subjects with active ankylosing spondylitis (AS). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Ankylosing Spondylitis
- What is being tested?
- Bimekizumab and Certolizumab pegol
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 76 participants
- Where
- 34 sitesin 8 countries
- Study dates
- 4 Oct 2017to 25 May 2020
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Documented diagnosis of active adult-onset ankylosing spondylitis (AS) as defined by documented radiologic evidence (X-ray) fulfilling the Modified New York criteria for AS (1984) of at least 3 months' symptom duration and age of onset <45 years
- Subject has moderate to severe active disease at the Screening Visit as defined by each of the following:
- Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) score >=4
- Spinal pain >=4 on a 0 to 10 numeric rating scale (NRS) (from BASDAI Item 2)
- Subjects must have had an inadequate response to, have a contraindication to, or have been intolerant to at least 2 nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs)
- Subjects taking corticosteroids must be on a maximum daily dose of <=10mg/day oral prednisolone or equivalent
Show all 12Show fewer
- Subjects taking methotrexate (MTX; <=25 mg/week) are allowed to continue their medication if they received a stable dose for at least 12 weeks before randomization
- Subjects taking sulfasalazine (up to 3 grams/day) or hydroxychloroquine (up to 400 mg per day total) are allowed to continue their medication if started at least 12 weeks prior to randomization
- Subject who has been on an anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFα) agent must have experienced an inadequate response to previous or current treatment given at an approved dose for at least 3 months or have been intolerant to at least 1 administration of an anti-TNFα agent. Subjects may not have been on more than 1 anti-TNFα agent
- Subject has high-sensitive C-Reactive Protein (hsCRP) levels >=3 mg/L at the Screening Visit
- Female subjects must be postmenopausal, permanently sterilized or, if of childbearing potential, must be willing to use a highly effective method of contraception up till 20 weeks after last administration of investigational medicinal product (IMP)
- Male subjects with a partner of childbearing potential must be willing to use a condom when sexually active, up till 20 weeks after the last administration of IMP
Who cannot join
- Subject has received previous or current biological treatment other than TNFα inhibitor treatment
- Subjects with a total ankylosis of the spine, or a diagnosis of any other inflammatory arthritis eg, rheumatoid arthritis (RA), sarcoidosis, systemic lupus erythematosus, or reactive arthritis
- Subjects with any current sign or symptom that may indicate an active infection (except for the common cold)
- Subject has received previous or current biological treatment other than TNFα inhibitor treatment
- Subject has chronic, recurrent, recent serious / life-threatening or current infection, as defined in the protocol
- Subject has history of certain atypical infections, viral hepatitides, human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection, tuberculosis, as defined in the protocol
Show all 16Show fewer
- Subjects receiving any live vaccination within the 8 weeks prior to Baseline
- Subjects with known tuberculosis (TB) infection, at high risk of acquiring TB infection, with latent TB infection or current or history of nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTMB) infection
- Subject has immunosuppressive condition or treatment, recent history of malignancy (some exceptions) or demyelinating disease
- Subjects with concurrent malignancy or a history of malignancy during the past 5 years will be excluded, with following exceptions that may be included:
- <= 3 excised or ablated basal cell carcinomas of the skin
- One squamous cell carcinoma of the skin (stage T1 maximum) successfully excised, or ablated only (other treatments, ie, chemotherapy, do not apply), with no signs of recurrence or metastases for more than 2 years prior to Screening
- Actinic keratosis (-es)
- Squamous cell carcinoma-in-situ of the skin successfully excised, or ablated, more than 6 months prior to Screening
- Subject has history of psychiatric disorder, including suicidality (as defined in the protocol
- Subject has major abnormalities on laboratory testing, as defined in the protocol
Trial locations and contacts
34 sites in 8 countries.
34 sites in 8 countries
Poland8 sites
As0013 708
Bialystok
As0013 709
Krakow
As0013 706
Olsztyn
As0013 703
Poznan
As0013 702
Torun
As0013 701
Warsaw
As0013 704
Warsaw
As0013 707
Wroclaw
Russia6 sites
As0013 801
Kazan'
As0013 803
Kemerovo
As0013 806
Moscow
As0013 807
Moscow
As0013 802
Yaroslavl
As0013 805
Yaroslavl
Germany5 sites
As0013 302
Berlin
As0013 306
Berlin
As0013 304
Erlangen
As0013 303
Hamburg
As0013 301
Herne
Greece5 sites
As0013 405
Athens
As0013 404
Heraklion
As0013 401
Pátrai
As0013 402
Thessaloniki
As0013 406
Thessaloniki
United States4 sites
As0013 903
Lincoln, Nebraska, 68516
As0013 906
Memphis, Tennessee, 38119
As0013 902
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 73103
As0013 908
Ormond Beach, Florida, 32174
Czechia4 sites
As0013 202
Kladno
As0013 205
Ostrava
As0013 201
Prague
As0013 203
Prague
About this study
Official title: A Multicenter, Phase 2A, Randomized, Investigator-Blind, Subject-Blind, Parallel-Group Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Bimekizumab and Certolizumab Pegol in Subjects With Active Ankylosing Spondylitis
The purpose of the study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of bimekizumab compared to certolizumab pegol in the treatment of subjects with active ankylosing spondylitis (AS).
- Conditions
- Ankylosing Spondylitis
- Being tested
- Bimekizumab, Certolizumab pegol, Placebo
- Keywords
- Ankylosing Spondylitis, Bimekizumab, AS, Certolizumab Pegol, Cimzia
- Medical subject headings
- Spondylitis, Ankylosing
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
BimekizumabDrug
Also called UCB4940, BKZ
One bimekizumab dose will be administered.
Certolizumab pegolDrug
Also called CZP, Cimzia, CDP870
Two certolizumab pegol doses will be administered. One of these doses is a loading dose.
PlaceboOther
Placebo will be provided to maintain the blinding.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Bimekizumab | Experimental | Subjects will receive several bimekizumab administrations on pre-defined time points. Placebo will be provided in this arm to mask the certolizumab pegol loading dose. Receives: Drug: Bimekizumab; Other: Placebo |
| Certolizumab pegol | Experimental | Subjects will receive several certolizumab pegol administrations on pre-defined time points. Receives: Drug: Certolizumab pegol |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change From Baseline in Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS) at Week 12
ASDAS was calculated as the sum of the results from the following components: 0.121xTotal spinal pain (Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) Question 2 result), 0.058xDuration of morning stiffness (BASDAI Question 6 result), 0.110xPGADA, 0.073xPeripheral pain/swelling (BASDAI Question 3 result), 0.579x(natural logarithm of the CRP [mg/L] + 1), Spinal pain, PGADA, duration of morning stiffness, peripheral pain/swelling were all assessed on a numerical scale (0 to 10 units). There is a minimum score of 0.980 for ASDAS (as a fixed value of 2 was assumed for values of hs-CRP below the LLOQ), but no defined upper score. The change from Baseline is calculated, a negative value indicating improvement and a positive value worsening. Posterior means and 95% credible intervals in each group are presented.
Measured: From Baseline to Week 12
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AE) During the Study Conduct
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a patient or clinical investigation participant administered a pharmaceutical product, which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE could therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal (investigational) product, whether or not related to the medicinal (investigational) product. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as any AE with a start date/time at the time of or after the first dose of IMP up until 140 days after the last dose of IMP.
Measured: From Baseline until Safety Follow-Up Visit (up to Week 64)
Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) During the Study Conduct
An SAE was any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose: - Resulted in death - Is life-threatening - Required in patient hospitalisation or prolongation of existing hospitalisation - Is a congenital anomaly or birth defect - Is an infection that requires treatment with parenteral antibiotics - Other important medical events which based on medical or scientific judgement may jeopardised the participants, or may require medical or surgical intervention to prevent any of the above. A TEAE was defined as any AE with a start date/time at the time of or after the first dose of IMP up until 140 days after the last dose of IMP.
Measured: From Baseline until Safety Follow-Up Visit (up to Week 64)
Number of Participants Who Withdrew Due to an Adverse Event (AE) During the Study Conduct
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a patient or clinical investigation participant administered a pharmaceutical product, which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE could therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal (investigational) product, whether or not related to the medicinal (investigational) product. A TEAE was defined as any AE with a start date/time at the time of or after the first dose of IMP up until 140 days after the last dose of IMP.
Measured: From Baseline until Safety Follow-Up Visit (up to Week 64)
Secondary outcomes (2)
Number of Participants With Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score - Inactive Disease (ASDAS-ID) at Week 12
ASDAS-ID was defined by ASDAS < 1.3. ASDAS was calculated as the sum of the results from the following components: 0.121xTotal spinal pain (Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) Question 2 result), 0.058xDuration of morning stiffness (BASDAI Question 6 result), 0.110xPGADA, 0.073xPeripheral pain/swelling (BASDAI Question 3 result), 0.579x(natural logarithm of the CRP [mg/L] + 1), Spinal pain, PGADA, duration of morning stiffness, peripheral pain/swelling were all assessed on a numerical scale (0 to 10 units). There is a minimum score of 0.980 for ASDAS (as a fixed value of 2 was assumed for values of hs-CRP below the LLOQ), but no defined upper score.
Measured: Week 12
Number of Participants With Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score-Major Improvement (ASDAS-MI) at Week 12
ASDAS-MI was defined by a reduction (improvement) from Baseline in ASDAS >=2 units. ASDAS was calculated as the sum of the results from the following components: 0.121xTotal spinal pain (Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) Question 2 result), 0.058xDuration of morning stiffness (BASDAI Question 6 result), 0.110xPGADA, 0.073xPeripheral pain/swelling (BASDAI Question 3 result), 0.579x(natural logarithm of the CRP [mg/L] + 1), Spinal pain, PGADA, duration of morning stiffness, peripheral pain/swelling were all assessed on a numerical scale (0 to 10 units). There is a minimum score of 0.980 for ASDAS (as a fixed value of 2 was assumed for values of hs-CRP below the LLOQ), but no defined upper score.
Measured: Baseline, Week 12
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted12 Jul 2017
- Study start4 Oct 2017
- Primary completion25 May 2020
- Study completion25 May 2020
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Ankylosing SpondylitisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by UCB Biopharma SRLThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 76 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- UCB Biopharma SRL
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- UCB Cares, Study director, +1-844-599-2273 (UCB)
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03215277
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- AS0013
- Other IDs
- 2017-000957-37, 2017
- Status last verified
- Jul 2023
- First submitted
- 5 Jul 2017
- Last updated
- 27 Jul 2023
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: Data from this study may be requested by qualified researchers six months after product approval in the US and/or Europe, or global development is discontinued, and 18 months after trial completion. Investigators may request access to anonymized IPD and redacted study documents which may include: raw datasets, analysis-ready datasets, study protocol, blank case report form, annotated case report form, statistical analysis plan, dataset specifications, and clinical study report. Prior to use of the data, proposals need to be approved by an independent review panel at www.clinicalstudydatarequest.com and a signed data sharing agreement will need to be executed. All documents are available in English only, for a pre-specified time, typically 12 months, on a password protected portal. This plan may change if a determination is made that the data cannot be adequately anonymized.
- Expanded access
- Available
Publications
Baraliakos X, de Jongh J, Poddubnyy D, Zwezerijnen GJC, Hemke R, Glatt S, Shaw S, Ionescu L, El Baghdady A, Mann J, Maguire RP, Vaux T, de Peyrecave N, Oortgiesen M, Baeten D, van der Laken C. Impact of bimekizumab and certolizumab pegol on efficacy, safety and osteoblastic activity in radiographic axial spondyloarthritis: results from a phase IIa, multicentre, randomised, double-blind, exploratory study with PET-CT imaging. Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis. 2024 Nov 28;16:1759720X241293944. doi: 10.1177/1759720X241293944. eCollection 2024.
PubMed 39620046
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 27 Jul 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Multicenter, Phase 2A, Randomized, Investigator-Blind, Subject-Blind, Parallel-Group Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Bimekizumab and Certolizumab Pegol in Subjects With Active Ankylosing Spondylitis
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03215277
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- AS0013
- Conditions
- Ankylosing Spondylitis
- Keywords
- Ankylosing Spondylitis, Bimekizumab, AS, Certolizumab Pegol, Cimzia
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 76 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- UCB Biopharma SRLIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 4 Oct 2017 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 25 May 2020 (actual)
- Study completion
- 25 May 2020 (actual)
- First posted
- 12 Jul 2017 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 27 Jul 2023
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of the study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of bimekizumab compared to certolizumab pegol in the treatment of subjects with active ankylosing spondylitis (AS).
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Bimekizumab | Experimental | Drug: Bimekizumab, Other: PlaceboSubjects will receive several bimekizumab administrations on pre-defined time points. Placebo will be provided in this arm to mask the certolizumab pegol loading dose. |
| Certolizumab pegol | Experimental | Drug: Certolizumab pegolSubjects will receive several certolizumab pegol administrations on pre-defined time points. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (12 listed)
- Documented diagnosis of active adult-onset ankylosing spondylitis (AS) as defined by documented radiologic evidence (X-ray) fulfilling the Modified New York criteria for AS (1984) of at least 3 months' symptom duration and age of onset <45 years
- Subject has moderate to severe active disease at the Screening Visit as defined by each of the following:
- Subjects must have had an inadequate response to, have a contraindication to, or have been intolerant to at least 2 nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs)
- Subjects taking corticosteroids must be on a maximum daily dose of <=10mg/day oral prednisolone or equivalent
- Subjects taking methotrexate (MTX; <=25 mg/week) are allowed to continue their medication if they received a stable dose for at least 12 weeks before randomization
Key exclusion criteria (16 listed)
- Subject has received previous or current biological treatment other than TNFα inhibitor treatment
- Subjects with a total ankylosis of the spine, or a diagnosis of any other inflammatory arthritis eg, rheumatoid arthritis (RA), sarcoidosis, systemic lupus erythematosus, or reactive arthritis
- Subjects with any current sign or symptom that may indicate an active infection (except for the common cold)
- Subject has received previous or current biological treatment other than TNFα inhibitor treatment
- Subject has chronic, recurrent, recent serious / life-threatening or current infection, as defined in the protocol
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| BimekizumabAlso: UCB4940, BKZOne bimekizumab dose will be administered. | Drug | Bimekizumab |
| Certolizumab pegolAlso: CZP, Cimzia, CDP870Two certolizumab pegol doses will be administered. One of these doses is a loading dose. | Drug | Certolizumab pegol |
| PlaceboPlacebo will be provided to maintain the blinding. | Other | Bimekizumab |
Primary outcome
Change From Baseline in Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS) at Week 12
Time frame: From Baseline to Week 12
ASDAS was calculated as the sum of the results from the following components: 0.121xTotal spinal pain (Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) Question 2 result), 0.058xDuration of morning stiffness (BASDAI Question 6 result), 0.110xPGADA, 0.073xPeripheral pain/swelling (BASDAI Question 3 result), 0.579x(natural logarithm of the CRP [mg/L] + 1), Spinal pain, PGADA, duration of morning stiffness, peripheral pain/swelling were all assessed on a numerical scale (0 to 10 units). There is a minimum score of 0.980 for ASDAS (as a fixed value of 2 was assumed for values of hs-CRP below the LLOQ), but no defined upper score. The change from Baseline is calculated, a negative value indicating improvement and a positive value worsening. Posterior means and 95% credible intervals in each group are presented.
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AE) During the Study Conduct
Time frame: From Baseline until Safety Follow-Up Visit (up to Week 64)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a patient or clinical investigation participant administered a pharmaceutical product, which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE could therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal (investigational) product, whether or not related to the medicinal (investigational) product. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as any AE with a start date/time at the time of or after the first dose of IMP up until 140 days after the last dose of IMP.
Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) During the Study Conduct
Time frame: From Baseline until Safety Follow-Up Visit (up to Week 64)
An SAE was any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose: - Resulted in death - Is life-threatening - Required in patient hospitalisation or prolongation of existing hospitalisation - Is a congenital anomaly or birth defect - Is an infection that requires treatment with parenteral antibiotics - Other important medical events which based on medical or scientific judgement may jeopardised the participants, or may require medical or surgical intervention to prevent any of the above. A TEAE was defined as any AE with a start date/time at the time of or after the first dose of IMP up until 140 days after the last dose of IMP.
Number of Participants Who Withdrew Due to an Adverse Event (AE) During the Study Conduct
Time frame: From Baseline until Safety Follow-Up Visit (up to Week 64)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a patient or clinical investigation participant administered a pharmaceutical product, which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE could therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal (investigational) product, whether or not related to the medicinal (investigational) product. A TEAE was defined as any AE with a start date/time at the time of or after the first dose of IMP up until 140 days after the last dose of IMP.
2 secondary outcomes
Number of Participants With Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score - Inactive Disease (ASDAS-ID) at Week 12
Time frame: Week 12
Number of Participants With Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score-Major Improvement (ASDAS-MI) at Week 12
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 27 Jul 2023.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 39620046Baraliakos X, de Jongh J, Poddubnyy D, Zwezerijnen GJC, Hemke R, Glatt S, Shaw S, Ionescu L, El Baghdady A, Mann J, Maguire RP, Vaux T, de Peyrecave N, Oortgiesen M, Baeten D, van der Laken C. Impact of bimekizumab and certolizumab pegol on efficacy, safety and osteoblastic activity in radiographic axial spondyloarthritis: results from a phase IIa, multicentre, randomised, double-blind, exploratory study with PET-CT imaging. Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis. 2024 Nov 28;16:1759720X241293944. doi: 10.1177/1759720X241293944. eCollection 2024.
- Product InformationLink provided by the sponsor.
- Product InformationLink provided by the sponsor.
- FDA Safety Alerts and RecallsLink provided by the sponsor.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. Data from this study may be requested by qualified researchers six months after product approval in the US and/or Europe, or global development is discontinued, and 18 months after trial completion. Investigators may request access to anonymized IPD and redacted study documents which may include: raw datasets, analysis-ready datasets, study protocol, blank case report form, annotated case report form, statistical analysis plan, dataset specifications, and clinical study report. Prior to use of the data, proposals need to be approved by an independent review panel at www.clinicalstudydatarequest.com and a signed data sharing agreement will need to be executed. All documents are available in English only, for a pre-specified time, typically 12 months, on a password protected portal. This plan may change if a determination is made that the data cannot be adequately anonymized.
Related trials for Ankylosing Spondylitis
RecruitingPhase 1
A Study of HB0017 Injection in Healthy Volunteers to Evaluate Safety and Tolerability of a Single Subcutaneous Injection in Low-Body-Weight Subjects; and Pharmacokinetics at Different Subcutaneous Injection Sites at the Same Dose
Psoriasis, Ankylosing Spondylitis
RecruitingObservational study
Pain Phenotyping of Rheumatic Diseases - An Observational Study
Rheumatic Diseases, Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic
RecruitingObservational study
Identification of Serum Level of Glutathione Peroxidase 4
Spondyloarthropathy
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
A Study of GKL-006Allo Injection in Patients With Ankylosing Spondylitis
Ankylosing Spondylitis
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Neuropathic Spinal Pain in Ankylosing Spondylitis
Ankylosing Spondylitis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
UCB Cares study director
+1-844-599-2273 (UCB)
34 sites in 8 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing Bimekizumab and Certolizumab pegol in people with Ankylosing Spondylitis, run by UCB Biopharma SRL at 34 sites in 8 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 12 inclusion and 16 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 27 Jul 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 34 sites in Poland, Russia, Germany, Greece, United States and 3 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 27 Jul 2023). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change From Baseline in Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS) at Week 12 (time frame: From Baseline to Week 12). The study lists 4 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03215277, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 27 Jul 2023.