Sleep ApneaNCT03217383
Predictive Accuracy of MATRx Plus in Identifying Favorable Candidates for Oral Appliance Therapy
A study testing MATRx plus in people with Sleep Apnea and Sleep Apnea, Obstructive, run by Zephyr Sleep Technologies at 1 site in Canada.
Trial summary
Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a common disease that is largely un-diagnosed and untreated. Standard treatment for obstructive sleep apnea, nasal continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP), entails use of a nose mask to deliver positive pressure which dilates the pharynx and eliminates obstruction. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 21 to 80 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Sleep Apnea, Sleep Apnea, Obstructive, Sleep Disordered Breathing
- What is being tested?
- MATRx plus
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine, Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 75 participants
- Where
- 1 siteCanada
- Study dates
- 10 Jul 2017to 3 Jul 2019
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 21 to 80 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Aged between 21 and 80 years
- Obstructive sleep apnea (ODI and AHI > 10hr-1)
- Body mass index less than 45 kg/m2
- Neck circumference less than 50 cm
- Absence of severe oxyhemoglobin desaturation during sleep as indicated by a mean value of oxygen saturation (SaO2) greater than 87 percent
- Mandibular range of motion greater than 5 mm
Show all 9Show fewer
- Adequate dentition (10 upper and 10 lower teeth)
- Ability to understand and provide informed consent
- Ability and willingness to meet the required schedule
Who cannot join
- Inability to breathe comfortably through the nose
- Central Sleep Apnea (>50% of apneas are central)
- Anticipated change in medical therapy that could alter the severity of OSA during the protocol
- Anticipated change in body weight (5% or more) during the protocol
- Symptomatic, non-respiratory sleep disorder, e.g., restless leg syndrome or chronic insomnia
- Severe respiratory disorder(s) other than sleep disordered breathing
Show all 13Show fewer
- Loose teeth, faulty restorations, or advanced periodontal disease
- Participation in other studies that could interfere with study protocol
- Pregnant or nursing
- Patients with heart failure
- Cerebral vascular incident within the last 12 months
- Use of pacemaker or other life supporting device
- Regular use of CPAP or oral appliance therapy within the last 1 month
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a common disease that is largely un-diagnosed and untreated. Standard treatment for obstructive sleep apnea, nasal continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP), entails use of a nose mask to deliver positive pressure which dilates the pharynx and eliminates obstruction. This therapy is highly efficacious and benign but is associated with low adherence, particularly in non-sleepy apneics with disease of mild and moderate severity. The principal alternative to CPAP therapy is oral appliance (OA) therapy in which a custom made mandibular advancement splint (MAS) is used to protrude the mandible during sleep, thereby opening the pharyngeal airway. OA therapy, while preferred and well accepted by most participants, is not uniformly efficacious. Additionally, uncertainty regarding the patient's response to OAT and the effective target mandibular position can lead to a significant time span between diagnosis and initiation of effective treatment. Furthermore, knowledge of the effective target mandibular position supports the use of new OA design and manufacturing processes that can further reduce the time and cost in delivering the therapy.
Zephyr Sleep Technologies (the Sponsor) has developed a method of identifying OAT responsive participants and their efficacious mandibular protrusion. Recently, Zephyr Sleep Technologies developed a portable device that avoids this requirement and can be used in a multi-night test in the home. Using a feedback controlled mandibular positioner (FCMP), the device measures and analyzes respiratory airflow and oxygen saturation and makes decisions in real-time about moving the mandible. The FCMP device was tested in a blinded, bi-phase clinical study in which participants with mild-to-severe sleep apnea (n=202) underwent two full-night studies in the home. Data from phase 1 were used to develop a predictive method, and data from phase 2 were used to prospectively test the accuracy of the predictive method. An efficacious mandibular position was also predicted, and each participant was treated with a custom oral appliance set to that position. Data from both phases were used to evaluate the feasibility of use of the device in the home.
Read more
A random forest machine learning system was used to develop and test the predictive method. The overall oral appliance success rate was 76% for phase 1 and 71% for phase 2. The overall predictive accuracy was 88%. Values for sensitivity and specificity were 85% and 93%, respectively. Positive and negative predictive values were 97% and 72%, respectively. The effective target protrusive position was identified in 86% of cases. The studies were conducted independently by the participants in their homes, though due to limitations in the early prototype design, a clinical coordinator visited the home to set up the equipment prior to each night of study. No significant problems were encountered, and no significant risks were identified. The results of the clinical trial show that the auto-titrating mandibular positioner is suitable for use in the home and accurately predicts OAT outcome as well as target protrusive position.
Based on the results of this study, Zephyr developed a commercially available device which has been approved for sale in Canada (Health Canada device license #97614). The device, branded MATRx plus, functions as both a sleep recorder as well as a home-based system to select patients for oral appliance therapy. This commercially available device is currently being used in three separate usability trials to quantify the usability of the device and the benefits of an improved workflow through adoption of the new technology in a dental practice.
Evidence has recently appeared to indicate that the change in pharyngeal volume caused by protrusion of the mandible, measured while awake, correlates with the change in apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) achieved by OAT, measured while asleep. This is the first convincing evidence that an awake measurement of the pharyngeal airway correlates with the improvement in respiratory status during sleep induced by an oral appliance. The implication is that a simple conebeam CT of the pharynx can predict outcome with OAT. Accordingly, we shall carry out conebeam CTs in the research protocol, both at rest position of the mandible and at 90% of maximal protrusion.
The purpose of this study is to test whether the predictive accuracy of the FCMP in the home environment is improved by the commercial design and whether patients predicted to be suitable for oral appliance therapy have long term adherence.
Read the detailed description
Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a common disease that is largely un-diagnosed and untreated. Standard treatment for obstructive sleep apnea, nasal continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP), entails use of a nose mask to deliver positive pressure which dilates the pharynx and eliminates obstruction. This therapy is highly efficacious and benign but is associated with low adherence, particularly in non-sleepy apneics with disease of mild and moderate severity. The principal alternative to CPAP therapy is oral appliance (OA) therapy in which a custom made mandibular advancement splint (MAS) is used to protrude the mandible during sleep, thereby opening the pharyngeal airway. OA therapy, while preferred and well accepted by most participants, is not uniformly efficacious. Additionally, uncertainty regarding the patient's response to OAT and the effective target mandibular position can lead to a significant time span between diagnosis and initiation of effective treatment. Furthermore, knowledge of the effective target mandibular position supports the use of new OA design and manufacturing processes that can further reduce the time and cost in delivering the therapy.
Zephyr Sleep Technologies (the Sponsor) has developed a method of identifying OAT responsive participants and their efficacious mandibular protrusion. A remotely controlled mandibular positioner (RCMP) is used during polysomnographic monitoring to vary the mandibular position. The in-lab version of the device, requiring use of a sleep technologist during a polysomnographic study, was shown to accurately predict outcome with a custom oral appliance in a triple-blind, prospective, predictive study in sixty-seven participants with mild-to-severe sleep apnea (specificity: 92%; PPV: 94%; sensitivity: 86%; NPV: 83%). In addition, the predicted target mandibular protrusive position proved efficacious in 87.5% of cases. While accurate in prospectively identifying oral appliance responders, the availability and utility of the RCMP device is limited by the requirement of a polysomnographic study.
Recently, Zephyr Sleep Technologies developed a portable device that avoids this requirement and can be used in a multi-night test in the home. Using a feedback controlled mandibular positioner (FCMP), the device measures and analyzes respiratory airflow and oxygen saturation and makes decisions in real-time about moving the mandible. The FCMP device was tested in a blinded, bi-phase clinical study in which participants with mild-to-severe sleep apnea (n=202) underwent two full-night studies in the home. Data from phase 1 were used to develop a predictive method, and data from phase 2 were used to prospectively test the accuracy of the predictive method. An efficacious mandibular position was also predicted, and each participant was treated with a custom oral appliance set to that position. Data from both phases were used to evaluate the feasibility of use of the device in the home.
A random forest machine learning system was used to develop and test the predictive method. The overall oral appliance success rate was 76% for phase 1 and 71% for phase 2. The overall predictive accuracy was 88%. Values for sensitivity and specificity were 85% and 93%, respectively. Positive and negative predictive values were 97% and 72%, respectively. The effective target protrusive position was identified in 86% of cases. The studies were conducted independently by the participants in their homes, though due to limitations in the early prototype design, a clinical coordinator visited the home to set up the equipment prior to each night of study. No significant problems were encountered, and no significant risks were identified. The results of the clinical trial show that the auto-titrating mandibular positioner is suitable for use in the home and accurately predicts OAT outcome as well as target protrusive position.
Based on the results of this study, Zephyr developed a commercially available device which has been approved for sale in Canada (Health Canada device license #97614). The device, branded MATRx plus, functions as both a sleep recorder as well as a home-based system to select patients for oral appliance therapy. This commercially available device is currently being used in three separate usability trials to quantify the usability of the device and the benefits of an improved workflow through adoption of the new technology in a dental practice.
ProSomnus Sleep Technologies has developed a digitally designed and milled sleep appliance called the MicrO2. This device is designed to accurately represent the bite and targeted mandibular position, minimize tongue interference, maintain the targeted mandibular position throughout the night using 90-degree fin angles and use a novel titration process that can reduce error in patient/doctor titration position selection. This device coupled with a digital workflow and outcome of the FCMP is postulated to provide an increase in efficiency of delivering efficacious treatment to the patient from diagnosis to final therapy.
Evidence has recently appeared to indicate that the change in velo-pharyngeal volume caused by protrusion of the mandible, measured while awake, correlates with the change in apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) achieved by OAT, measured while asleep. This is the first convincing evidence that an awake measurement of the pharyngeal airway correlates with the improvement in respiratory status during sleep induced by an oral appliance. The implication is that a simple conebeam CT of the pharynx can predict outcome with OAT. Accordingly, we shall carry out conebeam CTs in the research protocol, both at rest position of the mandible and at 90% of maximal protrusion.
The purpose of this study is to test whether the predictive accuracy of the FCMP in the home environment is improved by the commercial design and whether patients predicted to be suitable for oral appliance therapy have long term adherence.
- Being tested
- MATRx plus
- Keywords
- Oral appliance therapy, mandibular protrusion
- Medical subject headings
- Sleep Apnea Syndromes, Sleep Apnea, Obstructive
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
MATRx plusDevice
The MATRx plus test is a 2- or 3-night home sleep test that uses temporary titration trays to move the lower jaw in response to respiratory events. The purpose of the test is to predict oral appliance therapy outcome, and to provide a protrusive position for individuals predicted to experience therapeutic success.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| MATRx plus test | Experimental | All study participants will receive the same test protocol. All participants will complete the MATRx plus theragnostic test and receive a prediction of oral appliance outcome. All participants will then receive a custom oral appliance set to the predicted protrusive position or a sham position, and outcome home sleep tests will be performed with the custom oral appliance in place to determine if the test prediction was correct. Receives: Device: MATRx plus |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Sensitivity
The hypothesis that sensitivity is greater than 0.50 (50%) when the MATRx plus device is used independently by patients in the home will be tested.
Measured: 6 weeks
Oral appliance compliance
The long-term use of the oral appliance in patients selected for oral appliance therapy by the MATRx plus device will be documented.
Measured: 12 months
Secondary outcomes (1)
Usability
The usability of the MATRx plus device in the home will be evaluated.
Measured: 3 days
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted14 Jul 2017
- Study start10 Jul 2017
- Primary completion30 Mar 2019
- Study completion3 Jul 2019
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Sleep ApneaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 75 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Zephyr Sleep Technologies
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- John Remmers, MD, Principal investigator, Zephyr Sleep Technologies
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03217383
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- ZCP201703
- Status last verified
- Mar 2021
- First submitted
- 12 Jul 2017
- Last updated
- 8 Mar 2021
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No: IPD will not be shared with other researchers.
Publications
Mosca EV, Grosse J, Remmers JE. Oral appliance therapy is highly efficacious at reducing sleep apnea-specific hypoxic burden, a metric predictive of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. J Clin Sleep Med. 2025 Jul 1;21(7):1185-1190. doi: 10.5664/jcsm.11622.
PubMed 40123555Mosca EV, Bruehlmann S, Zouboules SM, Chiew AE, Westersund C, Hambrook DA, Jahromi SAZ, Grosse J, Topor ZL, Charkhandeh S, Remmers JE. In-home mandibular repositioning during sleep using MATRx plus predicts outcome and efficacious positioning for oral appliance treatment of obstructive sleep apnea. J Clin Sleep Med. 2022 Mar 1;18(3):911-919. doi: 10.5664/jcsm.9758.
PubMed 34747691
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 8 Mar 2021. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Predictive Accuracy of MATRx Plus in Identifying Favorable Candidates for Oral Appliance Therapy
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03217383
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- ZCP201703
- Keywords
- Oral appliance therapy, mandibular protrusion
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 75 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Zephyr Sleep TechnologiesIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 10 Jul 2017 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Mar 2019 (actual)
- Study completion
- 3 Jul 2019 (actual)
- First posted
- 14 Jul 2017 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a common disease that is largely un-diagnosed and untreated. Standard treatment for obstructive sleep apnea, nasal continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP), entails use of a nose mask to deliver positive pressure which dilates the pharynx and eliminates obstruction. This therapy is highly efficacious and benign but is associated with low adherence, particularly in non-sleepy apneics with disease of mild and moderate severity. The principal alternative to CPAP therapy is oral appliance (OA) therapy in which a custom made mandibular advancement splint (MAS) is used to protrude the mandible during sleep, thereby opening the pharyngeal airway. OA therapy, while preferred and well accepted by most participants, is not uniformly efficacious. Additionally, uncertainty regarding the patient's response to OAT and the effective target mandibular position can lead to a significant time span between diagnosis and initiation of effective treatment. Furthermore, knowledge of the effective target mandibular position supports the use of new OA design and manufacturing processes that can further reduce the time and cost in delivering the therapy.
Zephyr Sleep Technologies (the Sponsor) has developed a method of identifying OAT responsive participants and their efficacious mandibular protrusion. Recently, Zephyr Sleep Technologies developed a portable device that avoids this requirement and can be used in a multi-night test in the home. Using a feedback controlled mandibular positioner (FCMP), the device measures and analyzes respiratory airflow and oxygen saturation and makes decisions in real-time about moving the mandible. The FCMP device was tested in a blinded, bi-phase clinical study in which participants with mild-to-severe sleep apnea (n=202) underwent two full-night studies in the home. Data from phase 1 were used to develop a predictive method, and data from phase 2 were used to prospectively test the accuracy of the predictive method. An efficacious mandibular position was also predicted, and each participant was treated with a custom oral appliance set to that position. Data from both phases were used to evaluate the feasibility of use of the device in the home.
A random forest machine learning system was used to develop and test the predictive method. The overall oral appliance success rate was 76% for phase 1 and 71% for phase 2. The overall predictive accuracy was 88%. Values for sensitivity and specificity were 85% and 93%, respectively. Positive and negative predictive values were 97% and 72%, respectively. The effective target protrusive position was identified in 86% of cases. The studies were conducted independently by the participants in their homes, though due to limitations in the early prototype design, a clinical coordinator visited the home to set up the equipment prior to each night of study. No significant problems were encountered, and no significant risks were identified. The results of the clinical trial show that the auto-titrating mandibular positioner is suitable for use in the home and accurately predicts OAT outcome as well as target protrusive position.
Based on the results of this study, Zephyr developed a commercially available device which has been approved for sale in Canada (Health Canada device license #97614). The device, branded MATRx plus, functions as both a sleep recorder as well as a home-based system to select patients for oral appliance therapy. This commercially available device is currently being used in three separate usability trials to quantify the usability of the device and the benefits of an improved workflow through adoption of the new technology in a dental practice.
Evidence has recently appeared to indicate that the change in pharyngeal volume caused by protrusion of the mandible, measured while awake, correlates with the change in apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) achieved by OAT, measured while asleep. This is the first convincing evidence that an awake measurement of the pharyngeal airway correlates with the improvement in respiratory status during sleep induced by an oral appliance. The implication is that a simple conebeam CT of the pharynx can predict outcome with OAT. Accordingly, we shall carry out conebeam CTs in the research protocol, both at rest position of the mandible and at 90% of maximal protrusion.
The purpose of this study is to test whether the predictive accuracy of the FCMP in the home environment is improved by the commercial design and whether patients predicted to be suitable for oral appliance therapy have long term adherence.
Detailed description
Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a common disease that is largely un-diagnosed and untreated. Standard treatment for obstructive sleep apnea, nasal continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP), entails use of a nose mask to deliver positive pressure which dilates the pharynx and eliminates obstruction. This therapy is highly efficacious and benign but is associated with low adherence, particularly in non-sleepy apneics with disease of mild and moderate severity. The principal alternative to CPAP therapy is oral appliance (OA) therapy in which a custom made mandibular advancement splint (MAS) is used to protrude the mandible during sleep, thereby opening the pharyngeal airway. OA therapy, while preferred and well accepted by most participants, is not uniformly efficacious. Additionally, uncertainty regarding the patient's response to OAT and the effective target mandibular position can lead to a significant time span between diagnosis and initiation of effective treatment. Furthermore, knowledge of the effective target mandibular position supports the use of new OA design and manufacturing processes that can further reduce the time and cost in delivering the therapy.
Zephyr Sleep Technologies (the Sponsor) has developed a method of identifying OAT responsive participants and their efficacious mandibular protrusion. A remotely controlled mandibular positioner (RCMP) is used during polysomnographic monitoring to vary the mandibular position. The in-lab version of the device, requiring use of a sleep technologist during a polysomnographic study, was shown to accurately predict outcome with a custom oral appliance in a triple-blind, prospective, predictive study in sixty-seven participants with mild-to-severe sleep apnea (specificity: 92%; PPV: 94%; sensitivity: 86%; NPV: 83%). In addition, the predicted target mandibular protrusive position proved efficacious in 87.5% of cases. While accurate in prospectively identifying oral appliance responders, the availability and utility of the RCMP device is limited by the requirement of a polysomnographic study.
Recently, Zephyr Sleep Technologies developed a portable device that avoids this requirement and can be used in a multi-night test in the home. Using a feedback controlled mandibular positioner (FCMP), the device measures and analyzes respiratory airflow and oxygen saturation and makes decisions in real-time about moving the mandible. The FCMP device was tested in a blinded, bi-phase clinical study in which participants with mild-to-severe sleep apnea (n=202) underwent two full-night studies in the home. Data from phase 1 were used to develop a predictive method, and data from phase 2 were used to prospectively test the accuracy of the predictive method. An efficacious mandibular position was also predicted, and each participant was treated with a custom oral appliance set to that position. Data from both phases were used to evaluate the feasibility of use of the device in the home.
A random forest machine learning system was used to develop and test the predictive method. The overall oral appliance success rate was 76% for phase 1 and 71% for phase 2. The overall predictive accuracy was 88%. Values for sensitivity and specificity were 85% and 93%, respectively. Positive and negative predictive values were 97% and 72%, respectively. The effective target protrusive position was identified in 86% of cases. The studies were conducted independently by the participants in their homes, though due to limitations in the early prototype design, a clinical coordinator visited the home to set up the equipment prior to each night of study. No significant problems were encountered, and no significant risks were identified. The results of the clinical trial show that the auto-titrating mandibular positioner is suitable for use in the home and accurately predicts OAT outcome as well as target protrusive position.
Based on the results of this study, Zephyr developed a commercially available device which has been approved for sale in Canada (Health Canada device license #97614). The device, branded MATRx plus, functions as both a sleep recorder as well as a home-based system to select patients for oral appliance therapy. This commercially available device is currently being used in three separate usability trials to quantify the usability of the device and the benefits of an improved workflow through adoption of the new technology in a dental practice.
ProSomnus Sleep Technologies has developed a digitally designed and milled sleep appliance called the MicrO2. This device is designed to accurately represent the bite and targeted mandibular position, minimize tongue interference, maintain the targeted mandibular position throughout the night using 90-degree fin angles and use a novel titration process that can reduce error in patient/doctor titration position selection. This device coupled with a digital workflow and outcome of the FCMP is postulated to provide an increase in efficiency of delivering efficacious treatment to the patient from diagnosis to final therapy.
Evidence has recently appeared to indicate that the change in velo-pharyngeal volume caused by protrusion of the mandible, measured while awake, correlates with the change in apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) achieved by OAT, measured while asleep. This is the first convincing evidence that an awake measurement of the pharyngeal airway correlates with the improvement in respiratory status during sleep induced by an oral appliance. The implication is that a simple conebeam CT of the pharynx can predict outcome with OAT. Accordingly, we shall carry out conebeam CTs in the research protocol, both at rest position of the mandible and at 90% of maximal protrusion.
The purpose of this study is to test whether the predictive accuracy of the FCMP in the home environment is improved by the commercial design and whether patients predicted to be suitable for oral appliance therapy have long term adherence.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| MATRx plus test | Experimental | Device: MATRx plusAll study participants will receive the same test protocol. All participants will complete the MATRx plus theragnostic test and receive a prediction of oral appliance outcome. All participants will then receive a custom oral appliance set to the predicted protrusive position or a sham position, and outcome home sleep tests will be performed with the custom oral appliance in place to determine if the test prediction was correct. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 21 to 80 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (9 listed)
- Aged between 21 and 80 years
- Obstructive sleep apnea (ODI and AHI > 10hr-1)
- Body mass index less than 45 kg/m2
- Neck circumference less than 50 cm
- Absence of severe oxyhemoglobin desaturation during sleep as indicated by a mean value of oxygen saturation (SaO2) greater than 87 percent
Key exclusion criteria (13 listed)
- Inability to breathe comfortably through the nose
- Central Sleep Apnea (>50% of apneas are central)
- Anticipated change in medical therapy that could alter the severity of OSA during the protocol
- Anticipated change in body weight (5% or more) during the protocol
- Symptomatic, non-respiratory sleep disorder, e.g., restless leg syndrome or chronic insomnia
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| MATRx plusThe MATRx plus test is a 2- or 3-night home sleep test that uses temporary titration trays to move the lower jaw in response to respiratory events. The purpose of the test is to predict oral appliance therapy outcome, and to provide a protrusive position for individuals predicted to experience therapeutic success. | Device | MATRx plus test |
Primary outcome
Sensitivity
Time frame: 6 weeks
The hypothesis that sensitivity is greater than 0.50 (50%) when the MATRx plus device is used independently by patients in the home will be tested.
Oral appliance compliance
Time frame: 12 months
The long-term use of the oral appliance in patients selected for oral appliance therapy by the MATRx plus device will be documented.
1 secondary outcome
Usability
Time frame: 3 days
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 8 Mar 2021.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 40123555Mosca EV, Grosse J, Remmers JE. Oral appliance therapy is highly efficacious at reducing sleep apnea-specific hypoxic burden, a metric predictive of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. J Clin Sleep Med. 2025 Jul 1;21(7):1185-1190. doi: 10.5664/jcsm.11622.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 34747691Mosca EV, Bruehlmann S, Zouboules SM, Chiew AE, Westersund C, Hambrook DA, Jahromi SAZ, Grosse J, Topor ZL, Charkhandeh S, Remmers JE. In-home mandibular repositioning during sleep using MATRx plus predicts outcome and efficacious positioning for oral appliance treatment of obstructive sleep apnea. J Clin Sleep Med. 2022 Mar 1;18(3):911-919. doi: 10.5664/jcsm.9758.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No. IPD will not be shared with other researchers.
Related trials for Sleep Apnea
RecruitingObservational study
Locus Coeruleus and CCHS (Congenital Central Hypoventilation Syndrome)
Ondine Syndrome (Congenital Central Hypoventilation Syndrome)
RecruitingObservational study
Development and Validation of a Multimodal Deep Learning Model Using Peripheral Oxygen Saturation and Ballistocardiography Signals for Predicting Apnea-Hypopnea Index in Obstructive Sleep Apnea
Obstructive Sleep Apnea
Not yet recruiting
Comprehensive Opioid Management and Breathing During Sleep
Sleep-Disordered Breathing, Chronic Opioid Use
Recruiting
Janus II Feasibility
Sleep Apnea
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study to Learn About the Monthly Dosing Study Medicine Called Berobenatide in Adults With Breathing Problems During Sleep and Overweight or Obesity Who Do Not Use a Breathing Machine (PAP) (VESPER-OSA 2)
Apnea, Sleep Disorders
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
John Remmers, MD principal investigator
Zephyr Sleep Technologies
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing MATRx plus in people with Sleep Apnea and Sleep Apnea, Obstructive, run by Zephyr Sleep Technologies at 1 site in Canada.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 9 inclusion and 13 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 8 Mar 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Sensitivity (time frame: 6 weeks). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03217383, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 8 Mar 2021.