High-risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes With Excess BlastsMYRAGENCT03217903
High Risk Myelodysplasia Treated by Azacytidine : Genetic and Epigenetic (MYRAGE)
A study testing Myelogram in people with High-risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes With Excess Blasts, run by Central Hospital, Nancy, France at 2 sites in France.
Trial summary
Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) are the most frequent myeloid neoplasms in Western Countries.They mainly affect patients aged 65 years or older. This is a very heterogenous group of diseases, which prognosis is evaluated with International Prognosis Scoring System. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- High-risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes With Excess Blasts
- What is being tested?
- Myelogram
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 32 participants
- Where
- 2 sitesFrance
- Study dates
- 12 Oct 2017to 1 Jan 2022
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- patient benefiting from social welfcare
- patient followed at the University Hospital of Nancy
- patient aged 18 years or older
- patient informed on research organization and having signed an informed inclusion consent
- definitive diagnosis of high risk myelodysplastic syndrome with excess blasts
- eligibility to an Azacytidine therapy as first-line treatment
Who cannot join
- personal history or current other cancer
- immediate acute myeloid leukemia
- personal history of demethylation treatment
- pregnant or breast feeding women
- life-theatening condition
- guardianship
- imprisoned patients
Trial locations and contacts
2 sites in 1 country.
France2 sites, 2 recruiting
- Not yet recruiting
CHRU de Nancy
Nancy, 54035
Julien BROSEUS, MCU-PH
- Recruiting
BROSEUS
Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy
Julien BROSEUS
About this study
Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) are the most frequent myeloid neoplasms in Western Countries.They mainly affect patients aged 65 years or older. This is a very heterogenous group of diseases, which prognosis is evaluated with International Prognosis Scoring System. High risk MDS present with high frequency of transformation into acute myeloid leukemia. Treatment of high risk MDS often is based on hypomethylating agents, such as 5'-azacytidine (Azacytidine), with a complete response in approximativel 20% of cases..
This treatment is based on 4-week cycles, with daily injection during the first week and rest during the 3 next weeks of the cycle.
Read more
Azacytidine efficacy is commonly evaluated with clinical and biological parameters determined by the International Working Group 2006. These parameters are usually evaluated after at least 6 cycles of treatments.
There is a response with Azacytidine treatment in 60% of cases, including 40% of partial responses and 20% of complete responses. In 40% of patients, there is no response, which means that the disases is stable or in progression under therapy.
In this regard, early evaluation of treatment response is an issue. We want to improve our knowledge about early response criteria in Azacytidine-treated high-risk MDS, focusing on SMD with excess blasts, which represent 30 to 40% of total MDS.
Then, the investigator team want to compare DNA methylation profile at diagnosis and after 3 cycles of Azacytidine treatment.
Main objective :
Identify DNA methylation profiles related to response to Azacytidine therapy, after only 3 cycles of treatment, in high risk MDS with excess blasts.
Secondary objective :
Identify at diagnosis DNA methylation profiles that are predicitive of response to Azacytidin, in high risk MDS with excess blasts.
- Being tested
- Myelogram
- Keywords
- Myelodysplastic syndromes
- Medical subject headings
- Myelodysplastic Syndromes
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
MyelogramDiagnostic test
Bone marrow aspiration after 3 cycles of Azacytidine treatment
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Patients with High-risk MDS With Excess Blasts | Experimental | Not described Receives: Diagnostic Test: Myelogram |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Methylation level of the Differentially Methylated Regions (DMR)
Measured: 3 months (after 3 cycles of treatment)
Overall response by IWG 2006 response criteria (complete remission / partial remission / non response)
Measured: At the treatment response assessment (After 6-12 cycles of treatment up to 52 weeks)
Secondary outcomes (5)
Methylation level of the Differentially Methylated Regions (DMR)
Measured: At diagnosis
Cytogenetic response by IWG 2006 response criteria (major / minor / no response)
Measured: At the treatment response assessment (After 6-12 cycles of treatment up to 52 weeks)
Hematologic improvement by IWG 2006 response criteria (major / minor / no response)
Measured: At the treatment response assessment (After 6-12 cycles of treatment up to 52 weeks)
Transfusion independence (yes/no)
Measured: At the treatment response assessment (After 6-12 cycles of treatment up to 52 weeks)
General condition improvement (yes/no)
Measured: At the treatment response assessment (After 6-12 cycles of treatment up to 52 weeks)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted14 Jul 2017
- Study start12 Oct 2017
- Primary completion1 Jan 2022 (estimated)
- Study completion1 Jan 2022 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (13)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for High-risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes With Excess BlastsStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Central Hospital, Nancy, FranceThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Screening
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 32 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Central Hospital, Nancy, France
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Inserm U954 - N-GERE (Nutrition, Genetics and Exposition to Environmental Risk)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03217903
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- MYRAGE
- Acronym
- MYRAGE
- Status last verified
- Aug 2019
- First submitted
- 3 Jul 2017
- Last updated
- 6 Aug 2019
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Publications
Arber DA, Orazi A, Hasserjian R, Thiele J, Borowitz MJ, Le Beau MM, Bloomfield CD, Cazzola M, Vardiman JW. The 2016 revision to the World Health Organization classification of myeloid neoplasms and acute leukemia. Blood. 2016 May 19;127(20):2391-405. doi: 10.1182/blood-2016-03-643544. Epub 2016 Apr 11.
PubMed 27069254Bejar R, Stevenson K, Abdel-Wahab O, Galili N, Nilsson B, Garcia-Manero G, Kantarjian H, Raza A, Levine RL, Neuberg D, Ebert BL. Clinical effect of point mutations in myelodysplastic syndromes. N Engl J Med. 2011 Jun 30;364(26):2496-506. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1013343.
PubMed 21714648Chen G, Broseus J, Hergalant S, Donnart A, Chevalier C, Bolanos-Jimenez F, Gueant JL, Houlgatte R. Identification of master genes involved in liver key functions through transcriptomics and epigenomics of methyl donor deficiency in rat: relevance to nonalcoholic liver disease. Mol Nutr Food Res. 2015 Feb;59(2):293-302. doi: 10.1002/mnfr.201400483. Epub 2014 Dec 9.
PubMed 25380481Cheson BD, Greenberg PL, Bennett JM, Lowenberg B, Wijermans PW, Nimer SD, Pinto A, Beran M, de Witte TM, Stone RM, Mittelman M, Sanz GF, Gore SD, Schiffer CA, Kantarjian H. Clinical application and proposal for modification of the International Working Group (IWG) response criteria in myelodysplasia. Blood. 2006 Jul 15;108(2):419-25. doi: 10.1182/blood-2005-10-4149. Epub 2006 Apr 11.
PubMed 16609072Delhommeau F, Dupont S, Della Valle V, James C, Trannoy S, Masse A, Kosmider O, Le Couedic JP, Robert F, Alberdi A, Lecluse Y, Plo I, Dreyfus FJ, Marzac C, Casadevall N, Lacombe C, Romana SP, Dessen P, Soulier J, Viguie F, Fontenay M, Vainchenker W, Bernard OA. Mutation in TET2 in myeloid cancers. N Engl J Med. 2009 May 28;360(22):2289-301. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0810069.
PubMed 19474426Fandy TE, Herman JG, Kerns P, Jiemjit A, Sugar EA, Choi SH, Yang AS, Aucott T, Dauses T, Odchimar-Reissig R, Licht J, McConnell MJ, Nasrallah C, Kim MK, Zhang W, Sun Y, Murgo A, Espinoza-Delgado I, Oteiza K, Owoeye I, Silverman LR, Gore SD, Carraway HE. Early epigenetic changes and DNA damage do not predict clinical response in an overlapping schedule of 5-azacytidine and entinostat in patients with myeloid malignancies. Blood. 2009 Sep 24;114(13):2764-73. doi: 10.1182/blood-2009-02-203547. Epub 2009 Jun 22.
PubMed 19546476Greenberg PL, Tuechler H, Schanz J, Sanz G, Garcia-Manero G, Sole F, Bennett JM, Bowen D, Fenaux P, Dreyfus F, Kantarjian H, Kuendgen A, Levis A, Malcovati L, Cazzola M, Cermak J, Fonatsch C, Le Beau MM, Slovak ML, Krieger O, Luebbert M, Maciejewski J, Magalhaes SM, Miyazaki Y, Pfeilstocker M, Sekeres M, Sperr WR, Stauder R, Tauro S, Valent P, Vallespi T, van de Loosdrecht AA, Germing U, Haase D. Revised international prognostic scoring system for myelodysplastic syndromes. Blood. 2012 Sep 20;120(12):2454-65. doi: 10.1182/blood-2012-03-420489. Epub 2012 Jun 27.
PubMed 22740453Itzykson R, Kosmider O, Cluzeau T, Mansat-De Mas V, Dreyfus F, Beyne-Rauzy O, Quesnel B, Vey N, Gelsi-Boyer V, Raynaud S, Preudhomme C, Ades L, Fenaux P, Fontenay M; Groupe Francophone des Myelodysplasies (GFM). Impact of TET2 mutations on response rate to azacitidine in myelodysplastic syndromes and low blast count acute myeloid leukemias. Leukemia. 2011 Jul;25(7):1147-52. doi: 10.1038/leu.2011.71. Epub 2011 Apr 15.
PubMed 21494260Meldi K, Qin T, Buchi F, Droin N, Sotzen J, Micol JB, Selimoglu-Buet D, Masala E, Allione B, Gioia D, Poloni A, Lunghi M, Solary E, Abdel-Wahab O, Santini V, Figueroa ME. Specific molecular signatures predict decitabine response in chronic myelomonocytic leukemia. J Clin Invest. 2015 May;125(5):1857-72. doi: 10.1172/JCI78752. Epub 2015 Mar 30.
PubMed 25822018Nazha A, Narkhede M, Radivoyevitch T, Seastone DJ, Patel BJ, Gerds AT, Mukherjee S, Kalaycio M, Advani A, Przychodzen B, Carraway HE, Maciejewski JP, Sekeres MA. Incorporation of molecular data into the Revised International Prognostic Scoring System in treated patients with myelodysplastic syndromes. Leukemia. 2016 Nov;30(11):2214-2220. doi: 10.1038/leu.2016.138. Epub 2016 May 20.
PubMed 27311933Rasmussen KD, Jia G, Johansen JV, Pedersen MT, Rapin N, Bagger FO, Porse BT, Bernard OA, Christensen J, Helin K. Loss of TET2 in hematopoietic cells leads to DNA hypermethylation of active enhancers and induction of leukemogenesis. Genes Dev. 2015 May 1;29(9):910-22. doi: 10.1101/gad.260174.115. Epub 2015 Apr 17.
PubMed 25886910Santini V, Melnick A, Maciejewski JP, Duprez E, Nervi C, Cocco L, Ford KG, Mufti G. Epigenetics in focus: pathogenesis of myelodysplastic syndromes and the role of hypomethylating agents. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2013 Nov;88(2):231-45. doi: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2013.06.004. Epub 2013 Jul 7.
PubMed 23838480Sperling AS, Gibson CJ, Ebert BL. The genetics of myelodysplastic syndrome: from clonal haematopoiesis to secondary leukaemia. Nat Rev Cancer. 2017 Jan;17(1):5-19. doi: 10.1038/nrc.2016.112. Epub 2016 Nov 11.
PubMed 27834397
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 6 Aug 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- High Risk Myelodysplasia Treated by Azacytidine : Genetic and Epigenetic (MYRAGE)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03217903
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- MYRAGE / MYRAGE
- Keywords
- Myelodysplastic syndromes
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 32 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Central Hospital, Nancy, FranceUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Inserm U954 - N-GERE (Nutrition, Genetics and Exposition to Environmental Risk)
- Study start
- 12 Oct 2017 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Jan 2022 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 1 Jan 2022 (estimated)
- First posted
- 14 Jul 2017 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) are the most frequent myeloid neoplasms in Western Countries.They mainly affect patients aged 65 years or older. This is a very heterogenous group of diseases, which prognosis is evaluated with International Prognosis Scoring System. High risk MDS present with high frequency of transformation into acute myeloid leukemia. Treatment of high risk MDS often is based on hypomethylating agents, such as 5'-azacytidine (Azacytidine), with a complete response in approximativel 20% of cases..
This treatment is based on 4-week cycles, with daily injection during the first week and rest during the 3 next weeks of the cycle.
Azacytidine efficacy is commonly evaluated with clinical and biological parameters determined by the International Working Group 2006. These parameters are usually evaluated after at least 6 cycles of treatments.
There is a response with Azacytidine treatment in 60% of cases, including 40% of partial responses and 20% of complete responses. In 40% of patients, there is no response, which means that the disases is stable or in progression under therapy.
In this regard, early evaluation of treatment response is an issue. We want to improve our knowledge about early response criteria in Azacytidine-treated high-risk MDS, focusing on SMD with excess blasts, which represent 30 to 40% of total MDS.
Then, the investigator team want to compare DNA methylation profile at diagnosis and after 3 cycles of Azacytidine treatment.
Main objective :
Identify DNA methylation profiles related to response to Azacytidine therapy, after only 3 cycles of treatment, in high risk MDS with excess blasts.
Secondary objective :
Identify at diagnosis DNA methylation profiles that are predicitive of response to Azacytidin, in high risk MDS with excess blasts.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Screening
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Patients with High-risk MDS With Excess Blasts | Experimental | Diagnostic Test: Myelogram |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- patient benefiting from social welfcare
- patient followed at the University Hospital of Nancy
- patient aged 18 years or older
- patient informed on research organization and having signed an informed inclusion consent
- definitive diagnosis of high risk myelodysplastic syndrome with excess blasts
Key exclusion criteria (7 listed)
- personal history or current other cancer
- immediate acute myeloid leukemia
- personal history of demethylation treatment
- pregnant or breast feeding women
- life-theatening condition
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| MyelogramBone marrow aspiration after 3 cycles of Azacytidine treatment | Diagnostic test | Patients with High-risk MDS With Excess Blasts |
Primary outcome
Methylation level of the Differentially Methylated Regions (DMR)
Time frame: 3 months (after 3 cycles of treatment)
Overall response by IWG 2006 response criteria (complete remission / partial remission / non response)
Time frame: At the treatment response assessment (After 6-12 cycles of treatment up to 52 weeks)
5 secondary outcomes
Methylation level of the Differentially Methylated Regions (DMR)
Time frame: At diagnosis
Cytogenetic response by IWG 2006 response criteria (major / minor / no response)
Time frame: At the treatment response assessment (After 6-12 cycles of treatment up to 52 weeks)
Hematologic improvement by IWG 2006 response criteria (major / minor / no response)
Time frame: At the treatment response assessment (After 6-12 cycles of treatment up to 52 weeks)
Transfusion independence (yes/no)
Time frame: At the treatment response assessment (After 6-12 cycles of treatment up to 52 weeks)
General condition improvement (yes/no)
Time frame: At the treatment response assessment (After 6-12 cycles of treatment up to 52 weeks)
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 6 Aug 2019.
- Results publication: PubMed 27069254Arber DA, Orazi A, Hasserjian R, Thiele J, Borowitz MJ, Le Beau MM, Bloomfield CD, Cazzola M, Vardiman JW. The 2016 revision to the World Health Organization classification of myeloid neoplasms and acute leukemia. Blood. 2016 May 19;127(20):2391-405. doi: 10.1182/blood-2016-03-643544. Epub 2016 Apr 11.
- Results publication: PubMed 21714648Bejar R, Stevenson K, Abdel-Wahab O, Galili N, Nilsson B, Garcia-Manero G, Kantarjian H, Raza A, Levine RL, Neuberg D, Ebert BL. Clinical effect of point mutations in myelodysplastic syndromes. N Engl J Med. 2011 Jun 30;364(26):2496-506. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1013343.
- Results publication: PubMed 25380481Chen G, Broseus J, Hergalant S, Donnart A, Chevalier C, Bolanos-Jimenez F, Gueant JL, Houlgatte R. Identification of master genes involved in liver key functions through transcriptomics and epigenomics of methyl donor deficiency in rat: relevance to nonalcoholic liver disease. Mol Nutr Food Res. 2015 Feb;59(2):293-302. doi: 10.1002/mnfr.201400483. Epub 2014 Dec 9.
- Results publication: PubMed 16609072Cheson BD, Greenberg PL, Bennett JM, Lowenberg B, Wijermans PW, Nimer SD, Pinto A, Beran M, de Witte TM, Stone RM, Mittelman M, Sanz GF, Gore SD, Schiffer CA, Kantarjian H. Clinical application and proposal for modification of the International Working Group (IWG) response criteria in myelodysplasia. Blood. 2006 Jul 15;108(2):419-25. doi: 10.1182/blood-2005-10-4149. Epub 2006 Apr 11.
- Results publication: PubMed 19474426Delhommeau F, Dupont S, Della Valle V, James C, Trannoy S, Masse A, Kosmider O, Le Couedic JP, Robert F, Alberdi A, Lecluse Y, Plo I, Dreyfus FJ, Marzac C, Casadevall N, Lacombe C, Romana SP, Dessen P, Soulier J, Viguie F, Fontenay M, Vainchenker W, Bernard OA. Mutation in TET2 in myeloid cancers. N Engl J Med. 2009 May 28;360(22):2289-301. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0810069.
- Results publication: PubMed 19546476Fandy TE, Herman JG, Kerns P, Jiemjit A, Sugar EA, Choi SH, Yang AS, Aucott T, Dauses T, Odchimar-Reissig R, Licht J, McConnell MJ, Nasrallah C, Kim MK, Zhang W, Sun Y, Murgo A, Espinoza-Delgado I, Oteiza K, Owoeye I, Silverman LR, Gore SD, Carraway HE. Early epigenetic changes and DNA damage do not predict clinical response in an overlapping schedule of 5-azacytidine and entinostat in patients with myeloid malignancies. Blood. 2009 Sep 24;114(13):2764-73. doi: 10.1182/blood-2009-02-203547. Epub 2009 Jun 22.
- Results publication: PubMed 22740453Greenberg PL, Tuechler H, Schanz J, Sanz G, Garcia-Manero G, Sole F, Bennett JM, Bowen D, Fenaux P, Dreyfus F, Kantarjian H, Kuendgen A, Levis A, Malcovati L, Cazzola M, Cermak J, Fonatsch C, Le Beau MM, Slovak ML, Krieger O, Luebbert M, Maciejewski J, Magalhaes SM, Miyazaki Y, Pfeilstocker M, Sekeres M, Sperr WR, Stauder R, Tauro S, Valent P, Vallespi T, van de Loosdrecht AA, Germing U, Haase D. Revised international prognostic scoring system for myelodysplastic syndromes. Blood. 2012 Sep 20;120(12):2454-65. doi: 10.1182/blood-2012-03-420489. Epub 2012 Jun 27.
- Results publication: PubMed 21494260Itzykson R, Kosmider O, Cluzeau T, Mansat-De Mas V, Dreyfus F, Beyne-Rauzy O, Quesnel B, Vey N, Gelsi-Boyer V, Raynaud S, Preudhomme C, Ades L, Fenaux P, Fontenay M; Groupe Francophone des Myelodysplasies (GFM). Impact of TET2 mutations on response rate to azacitidine in myelodysplastic syndromes and low blast count acute myeloid leukemias. Leukemia. 2011 Jul;25(7):1147-52. doi: 10.1038/leu.2011.71. Epub 2011 Apr 15.
- Results publication: PubMed 25822018Meldi K, Qin T, Buchi F, Droin N, Sotzen J, Micol JB, Selimoglu-Buet D, Masala E, Allione B, Gioia D, Poloni A, Lunghi M, Solary E, Abdel-Wahab O, Santini V, Figueroa ME. Specific molecular signatures predict decitabine response in chronic myelomonocytic leukemia. J Clin Invest. 2015 May;125(5):1857-72. doi: 10.1172/JCI78752. Epub 2015 Mar 30.
- Results publication: PubMed 27311933Nazha A, Narkhede M, Radivoyevitch T, Seastone DJ, Patel BJ, Gerds AT, Mukherjee S, Kalaycio M, Advani A, Przychodzen B, Carraway HE, Maciejewski JP, Sekeres MA. Incorporation of molecular data into the Revised International Prognostic Scoring System in treated patients with myelodysplastic syndromes. Leukemia. 2016 Nov;30(11):2214-2220. doi: 10.1038/leu.2016.138. Epub 2016 May 20.
- Results publication: PubMed 25886910Rasmussen KD, Jia G, Johansen JV, Pedersen MT, Rapin N, Bagger FO, Porse BT, Bernard OA, Christensen J, Helin K. Loss of TET2 in hematopoietic cells leads to DNA hypermethylation of active enhancers and induction of leukemogenesis. Genes Dev. 2015 May 1;29(9):910-22. doi: 10.1101/gad.260174.115. Epub 2015 Apr 17.
- Results publication: PubMed 23838480Santini V, Melnick A, Maciejewski JP, Duprez E, Nervi C, Cocco L, Ford KG, Mufti G. Epigenetics in focus: pathogenesis of myelodysplastic syndromes and the role of hypomethylating agents. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2013 Nov;88(2):231-45. doi: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2013.06.004. Epub 2013 Jul 7.
Related trials for High-risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes With Excess Blasts
RecruitingPhase 2
Personalized NK Cell Therapy in CBT
Accelerated Phase Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia, BCR-ABL1 Positive, Acute Biphenotypic Leukemia
RecruitingPhase 2
Fludarabine Phosphate, Cytarabine, Filgrastim-sndz, Gemtuzumab Ozogamicin, and Idarubicin Hydrochloride in Treating Patients With Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia or High-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome
Acute Myeloid Leukemia With Inv(16)(p13.1q22); CBFB-MYH11, Acute Myeloid Leukemia With t(16;16)(p13.1;q22); CBFB-MYH11
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Azacitidine With or Without Lenalidomide or Vorinostat in Treating Patients With Higher-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes or Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia
Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia, Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia-1
RecruitingPhase 2
Azacitidine and Enasidenib in Treating Patients With IDH2-Mutant Myelodysplastic Syndrome
Acute Myeloid Leukemia, Blasts 20-30 Percent of Bone Marrow Nucleated Cells
Active, not recruitingPhase 1/2
A Single-Arm, Open Phase I Clinical Study of Selinexor in Combination With Azacitidine for the Treatment of High-Risk AML/MDS Patients After Allo-HSCT
Acute Myeloid Leukaemia (AML), MDS (Myelodysplastic Syndrome)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
2 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Myelogram in people with High-risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes With Excess Blasts, run by Central Hospital, Nancy, France at 2 sites in France.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 6 Aug 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 2 sites in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Julien BROSÉUS, MD, PhD ((+ 33) 3 83 15 49 14, j.broseus@chru-nancy.fr), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Methylation level of the Differentially Methylated Regions (DMR) (time frame: 3 months (after 3 cycles of treatment)). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03217903, which also lists 13 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 6 Aug 2019.