Neck PainNCT03223285
Diaphragm's Manual Therapy in Patients With Chronic Neck Pain
A study testing Real Treatment Group in people with Neck Pain, run by Università degli Studi di Ferrara at 1 site in Italy.
Trial summary
The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of diaphragm's manual therapy in addition to cervical spine manual therapy in terms of pain, cervical spine range of motion, trigger points pain pressure threshold, disability and quality of life in patient with chronic aspecific neck pain. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Neck Pain
- What is being tested?
- Real Treatment Group
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 40 participants
- Where
- 1 siteItaly
- Study dates
- 16 May 2017to 31 Dec 2018
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Neck pain since at least 3 months
- Age > 18 years and < 65 years
- Male or Female
Who cannot join
- Pregnancy
- Contraindications for manual therapy or inability to complete the treatment
- Patients who received a physiotherapy or osteopathic treatment during the last 3 months
- Medical diagnosis of rheumatologic disease
- Medical diagnosis of respiratory disease (COPD, asthma)
- Spine surgery
Show all 14Show fewer
- Medical diagnosis of past or present cancer
- Thoracic or abdominal surgery in the last 3 years
- Whiplash injuries
- Previous cervical fracture
- Cervical anatomical changes
- Thrombotic events
- Body temperature greater than 37 degrees in the previous 48 hours
- Obesity (BMI greater than 30)
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Diaphragm's Manual Therapy Reduce Pain in Patients With Chronic Neck Pain: a Randomised Controlled Trial
The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of diaphragm's manual therapy in addition to cervical spine manual therapy in terms of pain, cervical spine range of motion, trigger points pain pressure threshold, disability and quality of life in patient with chronic aspecific neck pain.
- Conditions
- Neck Pain
- Being tested
- Real Treatment Group, Sham Treatment Group
- Keywords
- Cervical spine;, Diaphragm;, Manual Therapy, Pain, Range of Motion
- Medical subject headings
- Neck Pain, Pain
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Real Treatment GroupBehavioural
Real Diaphragm manoeuvres The experimental manoeuvres include the Doming The Diaphragm Technique as described by Digiovanna (2004), Chila (2011) and Yao (2014) and the Manual Diaphragm Release Technique as described by Ricard (2009), De Coster (2005) and Roha (2015). Both manoeuvres are performed in two sets of 10 repetitions, within a 1-minute interval.
Multifaced physiotherapy/osteopathic treatment includes: vertebral mobilisations (C0-D1), high-velocity low-amplitude (HVLA) thrusts of the cervical spine, soft tissue techniques
Sham Treatment GroupBehavioural
Sham Diaphragm manoeuvre: the physiotherapist will simply lie hands on the rib cage, and rest along the anterolateral costal margin below rib 7, during normal breathing of the patient for 40 breathes.
Multifaced physiotherapy/osteopathic treatment includes: vertebral mobilisations (C0-D1), high-velocity low-amplitude (HVLA) thrusts of the cervical spine, soft tissue techniques
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Real Treatment Group | Experimental | Patients included in this group will receive 3 multifaced physiotherapy/osteopathic treatments + experimental manoeuvres, 1 treatment/week. Each session will last about 30 minutes. Receives: Behavioral: Real Treatment Group |
| Sham Treatment Group | Sham comparator | Patients included in this group will receive 3 multifaced physiotherapy/osteopathic treatments + sham manoeuvres, 1 treatment/week. Each session will last about 30 minutes. Receives: Behavioral: Sham Treatment Group |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change in Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS)
The NPRS is an 11-point scale from 0-10 (0 = no pain; 10 = the most intense pain imaginable).
Measures the subjective intensity of pain. Patients verbally select a value that is most in line with the intensity of pain that they have experienced in the last 24 hours.
Measured: Week 0, 1, 2, 3, 13, 25
Secondary outcomes (5)
Change in Range of motion (ROM)
Using the Baseline Bubble Inclinometer (Mayer 1993, Cleland, 2006), placed on the vertex of the head, taken the ROM with the patient sitting straight (flexion, extension and lateral inclinations) and supine (rotations).
Measured: Week 0, 1, 2, 3, 13, 25
Change in Pain pressure threshold
Using a LIZARD Ahi-o-meter (CE), the change of the pain on the trigger points is measured, with the patient in sitting position, in upper trapezium and sternocleidomastoid muscle bilaterally, by the detection of trigger points from a map.
Measured: Week 0, 1, 2, 3, 13, 25
Change in Neck Disability Index (NDI)
The Neck Disability Index (NDI) is a self-report questionnaire used to determine how neck pain affects a patient's daily life and to assess the self-rated disability of patients with neck pain.
Measured: Week 0, 3, 13, 25
Change in Medical outcomes study short form 36 (SF-36)
The SF-36 is a generic patient-reported outcome measure aimed at quantifying health status, and is often used as a measure of health-related quality of life.
Measured: Week 0, 3, 13, 25
Adverse events
Through an interview, potential adverse effects are evaluated during and after the physiotherapy treatment.
Measured: Week 2, 3, 13, 25
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted21 Jul 2017
- Study start16 May 2017
- Primary completion16 May 2018
- Study completion31 Dec 2018
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Neck PainStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 40 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Università degli Studi di Ferrara
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Marco Da Roit, Università degli Studi di Ferrara
- Investigators
- Marco Da Roit, PT, MSc, Principal investigator, Università degli Studi di Ferrara, Physiotherapy Degree CourseGiulia Simoni, PT, OMT, MSc, Principal investigator, Università degli Studi di Ferrara, Physiotherapy Degree Course
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03223285
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- Pilota_cervicalgia_diaframma
- Status last verified
- May 2019
- First submitted
- 4 Jul 2017
- Last updated
- 29 May 2019
- Results posted
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Publications
Simoni G, Bozzolan M, Bonnini S, Grassi A, Zucchini A, Mazzanti C, Oliva D, Caterino F, Gallo A, Da Roit M. Effectiveness of standard cervical physiotherapy plus diaphragm manual therapy on pain in patients with chronic neck pain: A randomized controlled trial. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2021 Apr;26:481-491. doi: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2020.12.032. Epub 2021 Feb 16.
PubMed 33992285
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 29 May 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Diaphragm's Manual Therapy Reduce Pain in Patients With Chronic Neck Pain: a Randomised Controlled Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03223285
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- Pilota_cervicalgia_diaframma
- Conditions
- Neck Pain
- Keywords
- Cervical spine;, Diaphragm;, Manual Therapy, Pain, Range of Motion
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 40 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Università degli Studi di FerraraUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 16 May 2017 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 16 May 2018 (actual)
- Study completion
- 31 Dec 2018 (actual)
- First posted
- 21 Jul 2017 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of diaphragm's manual therapy in addition to cervical spine manual therapy in terms of pain, cervical spine range of motion, trigger points pain pressure threshold, disability and quality of life in patient with chronic aspecific neck pain.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Real Treatment Group | Experimental | Behavioral: Real Treatment GroupPatients included in this group will receive 3 multifaced physiotherapy/osteopathic treatments + experimental manoeuvres, 1 treatment/week. Each session will last about 30 minutes. |
| Sham Treatment Group | Sham comparator | Behavioral: Sham Treatment GroupPatients included in this group will receive 3 multifaced physiotherapy/osteopathic treatments + sham manoeuvres, 1 treatment/week. Each session will last about 30 minutes. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 65 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Neck pain since at least 3 months
- Age > 18 years and < 65 years
- Male or Female
Key exclusion criteria (14 listed)
- Pregnancy
- Contraindications for manual therapy or inability to complete the treatment
- Patients who received a physiotherapy or osteopathic treatment during the last 3 months
- Medical diagnosis of rheumatologic disease
- Medical diagnosis of respiratory disease (COPD, asthma)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Real Treatment GroupReal Diaphragm manoeuvres The experimental manoeuvres include the Doming The Diaphragm Technique as described by Digiovanna (2004), Chila (2011) and Yao (2014) and the Manual Diaphragm Release Technique as described by Ricard (2009), De Coster (2005) and Roha (2015). Both manoeuvres are performed in two sets of 10 repetitions, within a 1-minute interval. Multifaced physiotherapy/osteopathic treatment includes: vertebral mobilisations (C0-D1), high-velocity low-amplitude (HVLA) thrusts of the cervical spine, soft tissue techniques | Behavioural | Real Treatment Group |
| Sham Treatment GroupSham Diaphragm manoeuvre: the physiotherapist will simply lie hands on the rib cage, and rest along the anterolateral costal margin below rib 7, during normal breathing of the patient for 40 breathes. Multifaced physiotherapy/osteopathic treatment includes: vertebral mobilisations (C0-D1), high-velocity low-amplitude (HVLA) thrusts of the cervical spine, soft tissue techniques | Behavioural | Sham Treatment Group |
Primary outcome
Change in Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS)
Time frame: Week 0, 1, 2, 3, 13, 25
The NPRS is an 11-point scale from 0-10 (0 = no pain; 10 = the most intense pain imaginable). Measures the subjective intensity of pain. Patients verbally select a value that is most in line with the intensity of pain that they have experienced in the last 24 hours.
5 secondary outcomes
Change in Range of motion (ROM)
Time frame: Week 0, 1, 2, 3, 13, 25
Change in Pain pressure threshold
Time frame: Week 0, 1, 2, 3, 13, 25
Change in Neck Disability Index (NDI)
Time frame: Week 0, 3, 13, 25
Change in Medical outcomes study short form 36 (SF-36)
Time frame: Week 0, 3, 13, 25
Adverse events
Time frame: Week 2, 3, 13, 25
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 29 May 2019.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 33992285Simoni G, Bozzolan M, Bonnini S, Grassi A, Zucchini A, Mazzanti C, Oliva D, Caterino F, Gallo A, Da Roit M. Effectiveness of standard cervical physiotherapy plus diaphragm manual therapy on pain in patients with chronic neck pain: A randomized controlled trial. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2021 Apr;26:481-491. doi: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2020.12.032. Epub 2021 Feb 16.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for Neck Pain
Not yet recruiting
Effects of Whole-Body Vibration and Cervical Stabilization With Core Stabilization in Young Adults With Non-Specific Low Back Pain
Nonspecific Low Back Pain
Recruiting
Strain Counter Strain and Conventional Stretching in School-aged Children With Mechanical Neck Pain Due to Prolong Screen Use
Mechanical Neck Pain
Recruiting
Effects of Alexander Technique Versus Feldenkrais Somatic Training in Patients With Text Neck Syndrome
Text Neck Syndrome
Recruiting
Longitudinal Stripping Massage vs. Percussion Device for Neck Pain: Ultrasound Study.
Chronic Neck Pain
RecruitingPhase 2
Effectiveness of Phenotype-based Pain Management Guidelines for Head and Neck Cancer Related Pain: a Pilot Study
Cancer Pain, Orofacial Pain
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Marco Da Roit, PT, MSc principal investigator
Università degli Studi di Ferrara, Physiotherapy Degree Course
Giulia Simoni, PT, OMT, MSc principal investigator
Università degli Studi di Ferrara, Physiotherapy Degree Course
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Real Treatment Group in people with Neck Pain, run by Università degli Studi di Ferrara at 1 site in Italy.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 14 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 29 May 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Italy. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change in Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) (time frame: Week 0, 1, 2, 3, 13, 25). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03223285, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 29 May 2019.