AzTrials
AzTrials

Diabetes MellitusNCT03224533

Walnut Consumption and Diabetes Risk

An observational study of Diabetes Mellitus, run by University of California, Los Angeles at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Multiple NHANES surveys were combined and weighted to evaluate relationships between walnut consumption and type 2 diabetes mellitus using various independent measures of diabetes status and risk. After risks were ascertained, interactions with gender were analyzed. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 80 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Diabetes Mellitus
What is being tested?
Diabetes Outcome
How many people
34,121 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
1 Jun 2015to 30 May 2017
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 80 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: The National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) is a cross-sectional, probability survey administered to the US civilian population aged from 0 to 85 years. This study used continuous NHANES data collected from 1999 to 2014, covering eight cycles of data collection (N=82,091). Participants were excluded from analysis for being under 18 (N=34,735) and not having data on either day of the 24-hour food intake (N=6,533). In an attempt to have a control group free of nut consumers, individuals who consumed peanuts, but not other nuts on the day of recall, were excluded from the analysis (N=6,702). After exclusions, our analytic sample N was 34,121, representing a population size of approximately 176 million individuals.

Who may be able to join

  • NHANES data from 1999-2014 with food recalls and dietary food intake

Who cannot join

  • not having data on either day of the 24-hour food intake
  • individuals who consumed peanuts, but not other nuts on the day of recall, were excluded from the analysis

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • University of California Los Angeles

    Los Angeles, California, 90095

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Association Between Walnut Consumption and Diabetes Risk in NHANES May be Gender Sex Specific

Multiple NHANES surveys were combined and weighted to evaluate relationships between walnut consumption and type 2 diabetes mellitus using various independent measures of diabetes status and risk. After risks were ascertained, interactions with gender were analyzed.

Read the detailed description

Background. Dietary interventions and cohort studies of tree nuts lowering glucose levels for diabetes suggest a possible effect with walnuts. Objective. To examine the associations between walnut consumption and diabetes risk through data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). Methods. NHANES survey data for 1999 through 2014 was pooled for adults with 24 hour recall dietary data. Risk of diabetes was based on self-report, medication use, fasting plasma glucose levels, and hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) levels. Individuals were characterized as reporting consumption of walnuts, mixed 'nuts', or no nuts.

Being tested
Diabetes Outcome
Keywords
nut consumption, NHANES, epidemiology, plasma glucose, hemoglobin A1c
Medical subject headings
Diabetes Mellitus

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Diabetes OutcomeDiagnostic test

    based on self report definition, fasting plasma glucose, and hemoglobin A1c

Study groups in NCT03224533
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
No NutsAll other foods that did not include walnuts or other nuts were classified as "no nuts" (NN).
Receives: Diagnostic Test: Diabetes Outcome
Other NutsFoods codes describing nuts that are not walnuts (i.e. cashew nuts, pistachios, etc.) or nut-containing foods that do not commonly contain walnuts (e.g. granola) were classified as "other nuts" (ON).
Receives: Diagnostic Test: Diabetes Outcome
Walnuts with other nutsfood codes describing nut mixes and foods that commonly include walnuts were classified as "walnuts with other nuts" (WwON)
Receives: Diagnostic Test: Diabetes Outcome
Walnuts with high certaintyFoods consisting entirely or mostly of walnuts were classified as "walnuts with high certainty" (WwHC)
Receives: Diagnostic Test: Diabetes Outcome

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Diabetes Outcome- self report

    Based on self-report as told by a doctor

    Measured: 1999-2014

  2. Diabetes Outcome- Fasting Plasma Glucose

    Based on FPG levels

    Measured: 1999-2014

  3. Diabetes Outcome- Hemoglobin A1c

    Based on HbA1c levels

    Measured: 1999-2014

  4. Diabetes Outcome- Combined Definition

    Based on both FPG and HbA1c levels

    Measured: 1999-2014

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Sex Interaction

    based on the previously stated definition outcomes

    Measured: 1999-2014

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted21 Jul 2017
  2. Study start1 Jun 2015
  3. Primary completion30 May 2017
  4. Study completion30 May 2017

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Case-control
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrolment
34,121 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03224533
Sponsor's protocol ID
WALNUT6DIABETES
Status last verified
Jul 2017
First submitted
15 Jul 2017
Last updated
21 Jul 2017
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Brennan AM, Sweeney LL, Liu X, Mantzoros CS. Walnut consumption increases satiation but has no effect on insulin resistance or the metabolic profile over a 4-day period. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2010 Jun;18(6):1176-82. doi: 10.1038/oby.2009.409. Epub 2009 Nov 12.

    PubMed 19910942
  • Kalgaonkar S, Almario RU, Gurusinghe D, Garamendi EM, Buchan W, Kim K, Karakas SE. Differential effects of walnuts vs almonds on improving metabolic and endocrine parameters in PCOS. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2011 Mar;65(3):386-93. doi: 10.1038/ejcn.2010.266. Epub 2010 Dec 15.

    PubMed 21157477
  • Katz DL, Davidhi A, Ma Y, Kavak Y, Bifulco L, Njike VY. Effects of walnuts on endothelial function in overweight adults with visceral obesity: a randomized, controlled, crossover trial. J Am Coll Nutr. 2012 Dec;31(6):415-23. doi: 10.1080/07315724.2012.10720468.

    PubMed 23756586
  • Ma Y, Njike VY, Millet J, Dutta S, Doughty K, Treu JA, Katz DL. Effects of walnut consumption on endothelial function in type 2 diabetic subjects: a randomized controlled crossover trial. Diabetes Care. 2010 Feb;33(2):227-32. doi: 10.2337/dc09-1156. Epub 2009 Oct 30.

    PubMed 19880586
  • Mukuddem-Petersen J, Stonehouse Oosthuizen W, Jerling JC, Hanekom SM, White Z. Effects of a high walnut and high cashew nut diet on selected markers of the metabolic syndrome: a controlled feeding trial. Br J Nutr. 2007 Jun;97(6):1144-53. doi: 10.1017/S0007114507682944. Epub 2007 Mar 7.

    PubMed 17381974
  • Tapsell LC, Batterham MJ, Teuss G, Tan SY, Dalton S, Quick CJ, Gillen LJ, Charlton KE. Long-term effects of increased dietary polyunsaturated fat from walnuts on metabolic parameters in type II diabetes. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2009 Aug;63(8):1008-15. doi: 10.1038/ejcn.2009.19. Epub 2009 Apr 8.

    PubMed 19352378
  • Tapsell LC, Gillen LJ, Patch CS, Batterham M, Owen A, Bare M, Kennedy M. Including walnuts in a low-fat/modified-fat diet improves HDL cholesterol-to-total cholesterol ratios in patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2004 Dec;27(12):2777-83. doi: 10.2337/diacare.27.12.2777.

    PubMed 15562184
  • Wu L, Piotrowski K, Rau T, Waldmann E, Broedl UC, Demmelmair H, Koletzko B, Stark RG, Nagel JM, Mantzoros CS, Parhofer KG. Walnut-enriched diet reduces fasting non-HDL-cholesterol and apolipoprotein B in healthy Caucasian subjects: a randomized controlled cross-over clinical trial. Metabolism. 2014 Mar;63(3):382-91. doi: 10.1016/j.metabol.2013.11.005. Epub 2013 Nov 12.

    PubMed 24360749
  • Moravej H, Salehi A, Razavi Z, Moein MR, Etemadfard H, Karami F, Ghahremani F. Chemical Composition and the Effect of Walnut Hydrosol on Glycemic Control of Patients With Type 1 Diabetes. Int J Endocrinol Metab. 2016 Jan 30;14(1):e34726. doi: 10.5812/ijem.34726. eCollection 2016 Jan.

    PubMed 27335580
  • Bullard KM, Ali MK, Imperatore G, Geiss LS, Saydah SH, Albu JB, Cowie CC, Sohler N, Albright A, Gregg EW. Receipt of Glucose Testing and Performance of Two US Diabetes Screening Guidelines, 2007-2012. PLoS One. 2015 Apr 30;10(4):e0125249. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0125249. eCollection 2015.

    PubMed 25928306
  • Guo K, Zhou Z, Jiang Y, Li W, Li Y. Meta-analysis of prospective studies on the effects of nut consumption on hypertension and type 2 diabetes mellitus. J Diabetes. 2015 Mar;7(2):202-12. doi: 10.1111/1753-0407.12173. Epub 2014 Jul 29.

    PubMed 24893671
  • Luo C, Zhang Y, Ding Y, Shan Z, Chen S, Yu M, Hu FB, Liu L. Nut consumption and risk of type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular disease, and all-cause mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Clin Nutr. 2014 Jul;100(1):256-69. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.113.076109. Epub 2014 May 21.

    PubMed 24847854
  • Zhou D, Yu H, He F, Reilly KH, Zhang J, Li S, Zhang T, Wang B, Ding Y, Xi B. Nut consumption in relation to cardiovascular disease risk and type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective studies. Am J Clin Nutr. 2014 Jul;100(1):270-7. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.113.079152. Epub 2014 May 7.

    PubMed 24808491
  • Pan A, Sun Q, Manson JE, Willett WC, Hu FB. Walnut consumption is associated with lower risk of type 2 diabetes in women. J Nutr. 2013 Apr;143(4):512-8. doi: 10.3945/jn.112.172171. Epub 2013 Feb 20.

    PubMed 23427333
  • Guo F, Moellering DR, Garvey WT. Use of HbA1c for diagnoses of diabetes and prediabetes: comparison with diagnoses based on fasting and 2-hr glucose values and effects of gender, race, and age. Metab Syndr Relat Disord. 2014 Jun;12(5):258-68. doi: 10.1089/met.2013.0128. Epub 2014 Feb 10.

    PubMed 24512556

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Diabetes Mellitus, run by University of California, Los Angeles at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 21 Jul 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Diabetes Outcome- self report (time frame: 1999-2014). The study lists 4 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03224533, which also lists 15 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 21 Jul 2017.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in