Hepatitis C, ChronicNCT03226509
Transforming the Cascade Of Hepatitis C Care
An observational study of Hepatitis C, Chronic, run by University of Pittsburgh at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
Several factors are barriers to effective Hepatitis C care: 1) The majority of Hepatitis C Virus (HCV)-positive patients (45-85 percent) are unaware that they are infected; 2) Only a small minority of those in need of treatment receive it; 3) Members of minorities and older patients are even less likely to receive… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Hepatitis C, Chronic
- How many people
- 325 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 1 Sep 2016to 14 Jan 2021
- How long will I take part?
- 3 Years
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: All patients with detectable HCV RNA level, currently receiving care at any of these three community health centers
Who may be able to join
- All patients with detectable HCV RNA level, currently receiving care at any of these three community health centers
Who cannot join
- Criteria for automatic specialty referral (exclusion from treatment at community health centers) Child Turcotte Pugh Class B or C Any history of decompensated liver disease or hepatocellular carcinoma Evidence of renal disease (GFR <50) or coexisting autoimmune condition HIV of hepatitis B co-infection
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
UPMC Shadyside Family Health Center
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15232
About this study
Official title: Transforming the Cascade of Hepatitis C Care
Several factors are barriers to effective Hepatitis C care: 1) The majority of Hepatitis C Virus (HCV)-positive patients (45-85 percent) are unaware that they are infected; 2) Only a small minority of those in need of treatment receive it; 3) Members of minorities and older patients are even less likely to receive needed care; and 4) Until recently, even those who were treated had a low chance of clearing the virus or achieving cure; 5) It is possible that older attitudes and expectation of futility might continue to persist among patients and provider in primary care settings.
Community Health Centers are often the most culturally appropriate and accessible choices, particularly for underserved populations, with the benefit of ongoing trust and relationships with patients. Therefore, these can be ideal places to deliver complex HCV care if they possess the needed expertise. However, most community-based primary care and community health centers lack access to Hepatitis C evaluation and treatment services, leading to a major public health problem.
Thus, investigators propose to implement and evaluate a pragmatic trial to implement and evaluate a multi-disciplinary model for HCV treatment at Currently, the treatment initiation rates at each of these sites is estimated as less than 10%. The investigators hypothesize that our project will increase the rate of participation in all the steps of the HCV care cascade and ultimately lead to more than doubled rates of treatment uptake
Read the detailed description
Primary Objective:
Determine uptake, effectiveness and safety of IFN-free, DAAs among "real world" patients, including those with multiple comorbidities, in the primary care setting.
Secondary Objective(s):
- Demonstrate the transformation of the cascade of Hepatitis C Care at 3 primary care clinics in terms of changes from baseline in rates for rates of access to HCV care including HCV screening, evaluation, treatment consideration, treatment uptake, completion, loss to follow-up, and treatment success rate.
- Advance understanding of hepatitis C related decision-making in the era of Interferon (IFN)-free Direct acting agents (DAAs) by examining the context, needs, motivators, barriers, and preferences among patients and providers to the delivery of hepatitis C treatment at primary care clinics
- Conditions
- Hepatitis C, Chronic
- Keywords
- cascade of care
- Medical subject headings
- Hepatitis C, Chronic
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Percentage of patients achieving sustained viral response 12 weeks post treatment (SVR 12) over a three year intervention period.
measure percentage of patients moving through the cascade of care to cure of condition (SVR 12)
Measured: three years
Secondary outcomes (7)
Rates of Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) screening
Percentage of at risk patients in the practice who have a completed HCV antibody test
Measured: three years
Rate of Chronic Hepatitis C evaluation
Percentage of patients with a positive HCV antibody test who have a HCV polymerase chain reaction (PCR) viral load completed
Measured: three years
Rate of treatment consideration
Percentage of consented patients with a positive HCV viral load who have a clinical evaluation and assessment of psychosocial readiness for treatment documented in the medical record
Measured: three years
Rate of treatment uptake
Percentage of patients recommended for treatment who begin medical treatment
Measured: three years
Rate of treatment completion
Percentage of patients that began treatment who complete the recommended course of therapy
Measured: three years
Rate of patients lost to follow up
Percent of consented patients with a positive HCV viral load who are lost to follow up
Measured: three years
Hepatitis C capacity building among family medicine physicians (provider practice and perceived confidence):
Endpoints related to HCV capacity building among family medicine physicians: Evaluate comfort and skill among family physicians to evaluate and treat HCV infection as measured on a qualitative survey of physicians
Measured: three years
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted21 Jul 2017
- Study start1 Sep 2016
- Primary completion30 Sep 2019
- Study completion14 Jan 2021
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Hepatitis C, ChronicStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of PittsburghThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Other
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 325 participants (actual)
- Target duration
- 3 Years
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Pittsburgh
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Norman Randall Kolb, University of Pittsburgh
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03226509
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- PRO16040427
- Status last verified
- Jan 2021
- First submitted
- 27 Feb 2017
- Last updated
- 19 Jan 2021
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 19 Jan 2021. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Transforming the Cascade of Hepatitis C Care
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03226509
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- PRO16040427
- Conditions
- Hepatitis C, Chronic
- Keywords
- cascade of care
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 325 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of PittsburghUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Sep 2016 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Sep 2019 (actual)
- Study completion
- 14 Jan 2021 (actual)
- First posted
- 21 Jul 2017 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Several factors are barriers to effective Hepatitis C care: 1) The majority of Hepatitis C Virus (HCV)-positive patients (45-85 percent) are unaware that they are infected; 2) Only a small minority of those in need of treatment receive it; 3) Members of minorities and older patients are even less likely to receive needed care; and 4) Until recently, even those who were treated had a low chance of clearing the virus or achieving cure; 5) It is possible that older attitudes and expectation of futility might continue to persist among patients and provider in primary care settings.
Community Health Centers are often the most culturally appropriate and accessible choices, particularly for underserved populations, with the benefit of ongoing trust and relationships with patients. Therefore, these can be ideal places to deliver complex HCV care if they possess the needed expertise. However, most community-based primary care and community health centers lack access to Hepatitis C evaluation and treatment services, leading to a major public health problem.
Thus, investigators propose to implement and evaluate a pragmatic trial to implement and evaluate a multi-disciplinary model for HCV treatment at Currently, the treatment initiation rates at each of these sites is estimated as less than 10%. The investigators hypothesize that our project will increase the rate of participation in all the steps of the HCV care cascade and ultimately lead to more than doubled rates of treatment uptake
Detailed description
Primary Objective:
Determine uptake, effectiveness and safety of IFN-free, DAAs among "real world" patients, including those with multiple comorbidities, in the primary care setting.
Secondary Objective(s):
- Demonstrate the transformation of the cascade of Hepatitis C Care at 3 primary care clinics in terms of changes from baseline in rates for rates of access to HCV care including HCV screening, evaluation, treatment consideration, treatment uptake, completion, loss to follow-up, and treatment success rate.
- Advance understanding of hepatitis C related decision-making in the era of Interferon (IFN)-free Direct acting agents (DAAs) by examining the context, needs, motivators, barriers, and preferences among patients and providers to the delivery of hepatitis C treatment at primary care clinics
Study design
- Observational model
- Other
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Target follow-up
- 3 Years
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- All patients with detectable HCV RNA level, currently receiving care at any of these three community health centers
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- All patients with detectable HCV RNA level, currently receiving care at any of these three community health centers
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Criteria for automatic specialty referral (exclusion from treatment at community health centers) Child Turcotte Pugh Class B or C Any history of decompensated liver disease or hepatocellular carcinoma Evidence of renal disease (GFR <50) or coexisting autoimmune condition HIV of hepatitis B co-infection
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Primary outcome
Percentage of patients achieving sustained viral response 12 weeks post treatment (SVR 12) over a three year intervention period.
Time frame: three years
measure percentage of patients moving through the cascade of care to cure of condition (SVR 12)
7 secondary outcomes
Rates of Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) screening
Time frame: three years
Rate of Chronic Hepatitis C evaluation
Time frame: three years
Rate of treatment consideration
Time frame: three years
Rate of treatment uptake
Time frame: three years
Rate of treatment completion
Time frame: three years
Rate of patients lost to follow up
Time frame: three years
Hepatitis C capacity building among family medicine physicians (provider practice and perceived confidence):
Time frame: three years
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 19 Jan 2021.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Hepatitis C, Chronic
RecruitingObservational study
Evaluation of Patients With Liver Disease
Hepatitis D, Hepatitis C
RecruitingObservational study
"Constitution of a Biological Collection to Establish Preclinical Translational Models for the Study of Tumors and Chronic Liver Diseases".
Chronic Liver Disease and Cirrhosis, Liver Cancer
Active, not recruitingPhase 4
People With CHC Who Achieved a Sustained Virological Response Following Therapy With Direct Acting Antiviral Agents
Diabetes Mellitus, Hepatitis C, Chronic
Active, not recruitingPhase 4
Sofosbuvir/Velpatasvir Treatment of Chronic Hepatitis C During Pregnancy
Hepatitis C, Chronic, Pregnancy; Infection
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
Comparative Autoantibody and Immunologic Cell Marker Study
Autoimmune Diseases, Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Hepatitis C, Chronic, run by University of Pittsburgh at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 19 Jan 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Percentage of patients achieving sustained viral response 12 weeks post treatment (SVR 12) over a three year intervention period. (time frame: three years). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 19 Jan 2021.