Rheumatoid ArthritisULTRAPRONCT03228342
Ultrasound Impact in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patient Reported Outcomes
A study testing MusculoSkeletal Ultrasound in people with Rheumatoid Arthritis and Patient Reported Outcomes, run by Clínica de Artritis Temprana at 1 site in Mexico.
Trial summary
Evaluate the impact of MusculoSkeletal Ultrasound added to Rheumatoid Arthritis patients classified in remission/low disease activity in terms of Patient Reported Outcomes. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 16 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Rheumatoid Arthritis, Patient Reported Outcomes, Musculoskeletal Ultrasound
- What is being tested?
- MusculoSkeletal Ultrasound
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 94 participants
- Where
- 1 siteMexico
- Study dates
- 3 May 2017to 28 Jan 2019
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 16 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- A clinical diagnosis of RA made at the discretion of the attending experienced rheumatologist.
- Patients classified in remission/low disease activity
Who cannot join
- <16 years old.
- Patient with recent trauma in the evaluated joints.
- Luxation in the MCP, PIP or MTP joints.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Mexico1 site
Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán
Mexico City, 14000
About this study
Official title: The Impact of Musculoskeletal Ultrasound-added to Clinical Evaluations- on Patient Reported Outcomes: A Prospective Study of Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients Classified in Remission/Low Disease Activity (ULTRAPRO)
Evaluate the impact of MusculoSkeletal Ultrasound added to Rheumatoid Arthritis patients classified in remission/low disease activity in terms of Patient Reported Outcomes.
- Being tested
- MusculoSkeletal Ultrasound
- Keywords
- Rheumatoid Arthritis, Ultrasound, Impact
- Medical subject headings
- Arthritis, Rheumatoid, Tooth, Impacted
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
MusculoSkeletal UltrasoundDiagnostic test
Patient will be assess with ultrasound (GUS-7 score) and the results will be informed to his/her attending Rheumatologist.
The Patient Reported Outcomes will be evaluated a 0,6 and 12 months after randomization.
MusculoSkeletal UltrasoundDiagnostic test
Patient will be assess with ultrasound (GUS-7 score) and the results will not be informed to his/her attending Rheumatologist.
The Patient Reported Outcomes will be evaluated a 0,6 and 12 months after randomization.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Ultrasound shared | Experimental | Patient will be assessed with ultrasound (GUS-7 score) Receives: Diagnostic Test: MusculoSkeletal Ultrasound |
| Ultrasound not shared | Experimental | Patient will be assessed with ultrasound (GUS-7 score) Receives: Diagnostic Test: MusculoSkeletal Ultrasound |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change from Baseline of the Patient Reported Outcome (HAQ)
Minimal Clinically Significant change in HAQ
Measured: From baseline at 6 months
Change from Baseline of the Patient Reported Outcome (RADAI)
Minimal Clinically Significant change in RADAI
Measured: from baseline at 6 months
Change from Baseline of the Patient Reported Outcome (SF-36)
Minimal Clinically Significant change in SF-36
Measured: from baseline at 6 months
Change from Baseline of the Patient Reported Outcome (VAS-Patient)
Minimal Clinically Significant change in VAS-Patient
Measured: from baseline at 6 months
Secondary outcomes (6)
Ultrasound findings in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients Classified in Remission/Low Disease Activity
Describe ultrasound findings at the moment of inclusion in the study.
Measured: Baseline
Clinical relapse: Proportion of patients with relapse after the intervention in both groups
Describe the proportion of patients with relapse after the intervention in both groups.
Measured: baseline and 6 months
Change from Baseline of the Patient Reported Outcome (HAQ)
Minimal Clinically Significant change in HAQ
Measured: from baseline at 12 months
Change from Baseline of the Patient Reported Outcome (RADAI)
Minimal Clinically Significant change in RADAI
Measured: from baseline at 12 months
Change from Baseline of the Patient Reported Outcome (SF-36)
Minimal Clinically Significant change in SF-36
Measured: from baseline at 12 months
Change from Baseline of the Patient Reported Outcome (VAS-Patient)
Minimal Clinically Significant change in VAS-Patient
Measured: from baseline at 12 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted24 Jul 2017
- Study start3 May 2017
- Primary completion28 Jan 2019
- Study completion28 Jan 2019
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (21)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Rheumatoid ArthritisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 94 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Clínica de Artritis Temprana
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Medicas y Nutricion Salvador Zubiran
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Virginia Pascual, MD, Study director, INCMNSZ
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03228342
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- IRE-2218-17/19-1
- Acronym
- ULTRAPRO
- Status last verified
- Jan 2019
- First submitted
- 3 May 2017
- Last updated
- 30 Jan 2019
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Publications
Plaza M, Nowakowska-Plaza A, Pracon G, Sudol-Szopinska I. Role of ultrasonography in the diagnosis of rheumatic diseases in light of ACR/EULAR guidelines. J Ultrason. 2016 Mar;16(64):55-64. doi: 10.15557/JoU.2016.0006. Epub 2016 Mar 29.
PubMed 27104003Wakefield RJ, Gibbon WW, Conaghan PG, O'Connor P, McGonagle D, Pease C, Green MJ, Veale DJ, Isaacs JD, Emery P. The value of sonography in the detection of bone erosions in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a comparison with conventional radiography. Arthritis Rheum. 2000 Dec;43(12):2762-70. doi: 10.1002/1529-0131(200012)43:123.0.CO;2-#.
PubMed 11145034Nakagomi D, Ikeda K, Okubo A, Iwamoto T, Sanayama Y, Takahashi K, Yamagata M, Takatori H, Suzuki K, Takabayashi K, Nakajima H. Ultrasound can improve the accuracy of the 2010 American College of Rheumatology/European League against rheumatism classification criteria for rheumatoid arthritis to predict the requirement for methotrexate treatment. Arthritis Rheum. 2013 Apr;65(4):890-8. doi: 10.1002/art.37848.
PubMed 23334942Terslev L, von der Recke P, Torp-Pedersen S, Koenig MJ, Bliddal H. Diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of Doppler ultrasound in rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol. 2008 Jan;35(1):49-53. Epub 2007 Dec 15.
PubMed 18172922Peluso G, Michelutti A, Bosello S, Gremese E, Tolusso B, Ferraccioli G. Clinical and ultrasonographic remission determines different chances of relapse in early and long standing rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2011 Jan;70(1):172-5. doi: 10.1136/ard.2010.129924. Epub 2010 Nov 19.
PubMed 21097799Dale J, Purves D, McConnachie A, McInnes I, Porter D. Tightening up? Impact of musculoskeletal ultrasound disease activity assessment on early rheumatoid arthritis patients treated using a treat to target strategy. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2014 Jan;66(1):19-26. doi: 10.1002/acr.22218.
PubMed 24376248Smolen JS, Breedveld FC, Burmester GR, Bykerk V, Dougados M, Emery P, Kvien TK, Navarro-Compan MV, Oliver S, Schoels M, Scholte-Voshaar M, Stamm T, Stoffer M, Takeuchi T, Aletaha D, Andreu JL, Aringer M, Bergman M, Betteridge N, Bijlsma H, Burkhardt H, Cardiel M, Combe B, Durez P, Fonseca JE, Gibofsky A, Gomez-Reino JJ, Graninger W, Hannonen P, Haraoui B, Kouloumas M, Landewe R, Martin-Mola E, Nash P, Ostergaard M, Ostor A, Richards P, Sokka-Isler T, Thorne C, Tzioufas AG, van Vollenhoven R, de Wit M, van der Heijde D. Treating rheumatoid arthritis to target: 2014 update of the recommendations of an international task force. Ann Rheum Dis. 2016 Jan;75(1):3-15. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2015-207524. Epub 2015 May 12.
PubMed 25969430Galicia-Hernandez G, Parra-Salcedo F, Ugarte-Martinez P, Contreras-Yanez I, Ponce-de-Leon A, Pascual-Ramos V. Sustained moderate-to-high disease activity and higher Charlson score are predictors of incidental serious infection events in RA patients treated with conventional disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs: a cohort study in the treat-to-target era. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2016 Mar-Apr;34(2):261-9. Epub 2016 Mar 3.
PubMed 26939612Backhaus M, Ohrndorf S, Kellner H, Strunk J, Backhaus TM, Hartung W, Sattler H, Albrecht K, Kaufmann J, Becker K, Sorensen H, Meier L, Burmester GR, Schmidt WA. Evaluation of a novel 7-joint ultrasound score in daily rheumatologic practice: a pilot project. Arthritis Rheum. 2009 Sep 15;61(9):1194-201. doi: 10.1002/art.24646.
PubMed 19714611Backhaus TM, Ohrndorf S, Kellner H, Strunk J, Hartung W, Sattler H, Iking-Konert C, Burmester GR, Schmidt WA, Backhaus M. The US7 score is sensitive to change in a large cohort of patients with rheumatoid arthritis over 12 months of therapy. Ann Rheum Dis. 2013 Jul;72(7):1163-9. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2012-201397. Epub 2012 Sep 6.
PubMed 22956596Scire CA, Montecucco C, Codullo V, Epis O, Todoerti M, Caporali R. Ultrasonographic evaluation of joint involvement in early rheumatoid arthritis in clinical remission: power Doppler signal predicts short-term relapse. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2009 Sep;48(9):1092-7. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kep171. Epub 2009 Jun 26.
PubMed 19561156Saleem B, Brown AK, Quinn M, Karim Z, Hensor EM, Conaghan P, Peterfy C, Wakefield RJ, Emery P. Can flare be predicted in DMARD treated RA patients in remission, and is it important? A cohort study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2012 Aug;71(8):1316-21. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2011-200548. Epub 2012 Jan 31.
PubMed 22294638Brown AK, Conaghan PG, Karim Z, Quinn MA, Ikeda K, Peterfy CG, Hensor E, Wakefield RJ, O'Connor PJ, Emery P. An explanation for the apparent dissociation between clinical remission and continued structural deterioration in rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 2008 Oct;58(10):2958-67. doi: 10.1002/art.23945.
PubMed 18821687Singh JA, Saag KG, Bridges SL Jr, Akl EA, Bannuru RR, Sullivan MC, Vaysbrot E, McNaughton C, Osani M, Shmerling RH, Curtis JR, Furst DE, Parks D, Kavanaugh A, O'Dell J, King C, Leong A, Matteson EL, Schousboe JT, Drevlow B, Ginsberg S, Grober J, St Clair EW, Tindall E, Miller AS, McAlindon T. 2015 American College of Rheumatology Guideline for the Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016 Jan;68(1):1-26. doi: 10.1002/art.39480. Epub 2015 Nov 6.
PubMed 26545940Fransen J, Langenegger T, Michel BA, Stucki G. Feasibility and validity of the RADAI, a self-administered rheumatoid arthritis disease activity index. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2000 Mar;39(3):321-7. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/39.3.321.
PubMed 10788543
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 30 Jan 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- The Impact of Musculoskeletal Ultrasound-added to Clinical Evaluations- on Patient Reported Outcomes: A Prospective Study of Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients Classified in Remission/Low Disease Activity (ULTRAPRO)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03228342
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- ULTRAPRO / IRE-2218-17/19-1
- Keywords
- Rheumatoid Arthritis, Ultrasound, Impact
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 94 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Clínica de Artritis TempranaUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Medicas y Nutricion Salvador Zubiran
- Study start
- 3 May 2017 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 28 Jan 2019 (actual)
- Study completion
- 28 Jan 2019 (actual)
- First posted
- 24 Jul 2017 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Evaluate the impact of MusculoSkeletal Ultrasound added to Rheumatoid Arthritis patients classified in remission/low disease activity in terms of Patient Reported Outcomes.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Ultrasound shared | Experimental | Diagnostic Test: MusculoSkeletal UltrasoundPatient will be assessed with ultrasound (GUS-7 score) |
| Ultrasound not shared | Experimental | Diagnostic Test: MusculoSkeletal UltrasoundPatient will be assessed with ultrasound (GUS-7 score) |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 16 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- A clinical diagnosis of RA made at the discretion of the attending experienced rheumatologist.
- Patients classified in remission/low disease activity
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- <16 years old.
- Patient with recent trauma in the evaluated joints.
- Luxation in the MCP, PIP or MTP joints.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| MusculoSkeletal UltrasoundPatient will be assess with ultrasound (GUS-7 score) and the results will be informed to his/her attending Rheumatologist. The Patient Reported Outcomes will be evaluated a 0,6 and 12 months after randomization. | Diagnostic test | Ultrasound shared |
| MusculoSkeletal UltrasoundPatient will be assess with ultrasound (GUS-7 score) and the results will not be informed to his/her attending Rheumatologist. The Patient Reported Outcomes will be evaluated a 0,6 and 12 months after randomization. | Diagnostic test | Ultrasound not shared |
Primary outcome
Change from Baseline of the Patient Reported Outcome (HAQ)
Time frame: From baseline at 6 months
Minimal Clinically Significant change in HAQ
Change from Baseline of the Patient Reported Outcome (RADAI)
Time frame: from baseline at 6 months
Minimal Clinically Significant change in RADAI
Change from Baseline of the Patient Reported Outcome (SF-36)
Time frame: from baseline at 6 months
Minimal Clinically Significant change in SF-36
Change from Baseline of the Patient Reported Outcome (VAS-Patient)
Time frame: from baseline at 6 months
Minimal Clinically Significant change in VAS-Patient
6 secondary outcomes
Ultrasound findings in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients Classified in Remission/Low Disease Activity
Time frame: Baseline
Clinical relapse: Proportion of patients with relapse after the intervention in both groups
Time frame: baseline and 6 months
Change from Baseline of the Patient Reported Outcome (HAQ)
Time frame: from baseline at 12 months
Change from Baseline of the Patient Reported Outcome (RADAI)
Time frame: from baseline at 12 months
Change from Baseline of the Patient Reported Outcome (SF-36)
Time frame: from baseline at 12 months
Change from Baseline of the Patient Reported Outcome (VAS-Patient)
Time frame: from baseline at 12 months
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 30 Jan 2019.
- Background: PubMed 27104003Plaza M, Nowakowska-Plaza A, Pracon G, Sudol-Szopinska I. Role of ultrasonography in the diagnosis of rheumatic diseases in light of ACR/EULAR guidelines. J Ultrason. 2016 Mar;16(64):55-64. doi: 10.15557/JoU.2016.0006. Epub 2016 Mar 29.
- Background: PubMed 11145034Wakefield RJ, Gibbon WW, Conaghan PG, O'Connor P, McGonagle D, Pease C, Green MJ, Veale DJ, Isaacs JD, Emery P. The value of sonography in the detection of bone erosions in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a comparison with conventional radiography. Arthritis Rheum. 2000 Dec;43(12):2762-70. doi: 10.1002/1529-0131(200012)43:123.0.CO;2-#.
- Background: PubMed 23334942Nakagomi D, Ikeda K, Okubo A, Iwamoto T, Sanayama Y, Takahashi K, Yamagata M, Takatori H, Suzuki K, Takabayashi K, Nakajima H. Ultrasound can improve the accuracy of the 2010 American College of Rheumatology/European League against rheumatism classification criteria for rheumatoid arthritis to predict the requirement for methotrexate treatment. Arthritis Rheum. 2013 Apr;65(4):890-8. doi: 10.1002/art.37848.
- Background: PubMed 18172922Terslev L, von der Recke P, Torp-Pedersen S, Koenig MJ, Bliddal H. Diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of Doppler ultrasound in rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol. 2008 Jan;35(1):49-53. Epub 2007 Dec 15.
- Background: PubMed 21097799Peluso G, Michelutti A, Bosello S, Gremese E, Tolusso B, Ferraccioli G. Clinical and ultrasonographic remission determines different chances of relapse in early and long standing rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2011 Jan;70(1):172-5. doi: 10.1136/ard.2010.129924. Epub 2010 Nov 19.
- Background: PubMed 24376248Dale J, Purves D, McConnachie A, McInnes I, Porter D. Tightening up? Impact of musculoskeletal ultrasound disease activity assessment on early rheumatoid arthritis patients treated using a treat to target strategy. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2014 Jan;66(1):19-26. doi: 10.1002/acr.22218.
- Background: PubMed 25969430Smolen JS, Breedveld FC, Burmester GR, Bykerk V, Dougados M, Emery P, Kvien TK, Navarro-Compan MV, Oliver S, Schoels M, Scholte-Voshaar M, Stamm T, Stoffer M, Takeuchi T, Aletaha D, Andreu JL, Aringer M, Bergman M, Betteridge N, Bijlsma H, Burkhardt H, Cardiel M, Combe B, Durez P, Fonseca JE, Gibofsky A, Gomez-Reino JJ, Graninger W, Hannonen P, Haraoui B, Kouloumas M, Landewe R, Martin-Mola E, Nash P, Ostergaard M, Ostor A, Richards P, Sokka-Isler T, Thorne C, Tzioufas AG, van Vollenhoven R, de Wit M, van der Heijde D. Treating rheumatoid arthritis to target: 2014 update of the recommendations of an international task force. Ann Rheum Dis. 2016 Jan;75(1):3-15. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2015-207524. Epub 2015 May 12.
- Background: PubMed 26939612Galicia-Hernandez G, Parra-Salcedo F, Ugarte-Martinez P, Contreras-Yanez I, Ponce-de-Leon A, Pascual-Ramos V. Sustained moderate-to-high disease activity and higher Charlson score are predictors of incidental serious infection events in RA patients treated with conventional disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs: a cohort study in the treat-to-target era. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2016 Mar-Apr;34(2):261-9. Epub 2016 Mar 3.
- Background: PubMed 19714611Backhaus M, Ohrndorf S, Kellner H, Strunk J, Backhaus TM, Hartung W, Sattler H, Albrecht K, Kaufmann J, Becker K, Sorensen H, Meier L, Burmester GR, Schmidt WA. Evaluation of a novel 7-joint ultrasound score in daily rheumatologic practice: a pilot project. Arthritis Rheum. 2009 Sep 15;61(9):1194-201. doi: 10.1002/art.24646.
- Background: PubMed 22956596Backhaus TM, Ohrndorf S, Kellner H, Strunk J, Hartung W, Sattler H, Iking-Konert C, Burmester GR, Schmidt WA, Backhaus M. The US7 score is sensitive to change in a large cohort of patients with rheumatoid arthritis over 12 months of therapy. Ann Rheum Dis. 2013 Jul;72(7):1163-9. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2012-201397. Epub 2012 Sep 6.
- Background: PubMed 19561156Scire CA, Montecucco C, Codullo V, Epis O, Todoerti M, Caporali R. Ultrasonographic evaluation of joint involvement in early rheumatoid arthritis in clinical remission: power Doppler signal predicts short-term relapse. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2009 Sep;48(9):1092-7. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kep171. Epub 2009 Jun 26.
- Background: PubMed 22294638Saleem B, Brown AK, Quinn M, Karim Z, Hensor EM, Conaghan P, Peterfy C, Wakefield RJ, Emery P. Can flare be predicted in DMARD treated RA patients in remission, and is it important? A cohort study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2012 Aug;71(8):1316-21. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2011-200548. Epub 2012 Jan 31.
Related trials for Rheumatoid Arthritis
RecruitingPhase 2
Study of PTC844 in Participants With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis
Rheumatoid Arthritis
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
An Ascending Dose Study of DKB903 in Participants With Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) and Participants With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE)
Rheumatoid Arthritis and Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
R-2487 in Patients With Sjogren's Syndrome (SjD)
Sjogren's Syndrome, Sjögren
RecruitingPhase 1
A Trial in Healthy Adult Participants and Adults With Autoimmune Diseases to Test How HBM7020 is Tolerated and How it Behaves in the Body
Rheumatoid Arthritis, Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
A Study Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of Inhaled AP01 in Participants With Progressive Pulmonary Fibrosis
Pulmonary Fibrosis, Progressive Pulmonary Fibrosis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Virginia Pascual, MD study director
INCMNSZ
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing MusculoSkeletal Ultrasound in people with Rheumatoid Arthritis and Patient Reported Outcomes, run by Clínica de Artritis Temprana at 1 site in Mexico.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 30 Jan 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Mexico. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change from Baseline of the Patient Reported Outcome (HAQ) (time frame: From baseline at 6 months). The study lists 4 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03228342, which also lists 21 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 30 Jan 2019.