AzTrials
AzTrials

Infertility, FemaleNCT03230084

Use of a Home-based PDG Urine Test to Confirm Ovulation

A study testing Urine PDG test in people with Infertility, Female, run by Bruyère Health Research Institute. at 1 site in Canada.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Infertility affects many people in Ontario and carries a significant amount of emotional, physical and financial burden to those who experience it. Knowing when a woman ovulates is important for improving a couple's chance to become pregnant naturally and for learning about fertility problems, such as infertility… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 42 years, women onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Infertility, Female
What is being tested?
Urine PDG test
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
25 participants
Where
1 siteCanada
Study dates
23 Aug 2017to 14 Mar 2018
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 42 years
  • Women only
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Females aged 18 to 42 years
  • Have had a menstrual cycle length of 25-35 days for the past 3 months
  • Are able to provide informed consent
  • Are willing to complete a trial diary

Who cannot join

  • Have current or recent (in the past 6 months) use of any hormonal contraception (e.g. the Pill, Norplant, Depo Provera injections)
  • Have current or recent (in the past 6 months) breastfeeding
  • Have use of emergency contraception (e.g. the morning after pill or Plan B) in the past two menstrual cycles
  • Cannot medically receive frequent blood tests, for example due to a blood clotting disorder
  • Are pregnant at the time of enrollment to study
  • Plan to donate blood during the study

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Canada1 site
  • Bruyere Research Institute

    Ottawa, Ontario, K1N5C7

Other trials in Canada

About this study

Official title: Use of a Home-based Urinary Pregnanediol 3-glucuronide (PDG) Test to Confirm Ovulation

Infertility affects many people in Ontario and carries a significant amount of emotional, physical and financial burden to those who experience it. Knowing when a woman ovulates is important for improving a couple's chance to become pregnant naturally and for learning about fertility problems, such as infertility, irregular menses, and hormonal disorders.

Currently, there are two reliable methods to confirm ovulation: a trans-vaginal ultrasound or a blood test for progesterone, which is a hormone that only rises sharply after ovulation. However, both are time consuming and expensive. Recently, an inexpensive, home-based urine test strip has been developed to confirm ovulation. The test strip works by measuring urine for a marker of Progesterone, called pregnanediol-3a-glucuronide (PDG).

The purpose of this feasibility study is to follow the use of this home-based PDG urinary test strip over the course of one menstrual cycle in 25 female participants. The results of the urine test strip will then be compared to a Progesterone blood test. Participants will be recruited from the general Ottawa, Ontario area The ultimate aim of this study is to provide information for the design of a larger study to determine the accuracy of the PDG urinary test strip. If shown to be as effective in confirming ovulation, this test would provide substantial cost saving to the Ontario health care system and a much more convenient way for women and clinicians to confirm ovulation and determine if women are fertile.

Read the detailed description

Infertility affects many people in Ontario and carries a significant amount of emotional, physical and financial burden to those who experience it. More specifically, it impacts the couple's quality of life and can have detrimental effects related to marital conflicts, couple burnout and psychological disorders including a lack of confidence and depression.

As part of the standard evaluation of infertility, ovulatory function assessment is a fundamental step. Confirmation that ovulation has actually occurred can only be determined by performing a serum Progesterone test or by using the gold standard, serial transvaginal ultrasound. However, both of these investigations require visits to a physician, specialized laboratory testing, and in the case of ultrasound are often prohibitive due to its high costs and logistical demands.

In the female body, levels of Progesterone are low in the first half of the menstrual cycle. After the ovary releases an egg (ovulation) the corpus luteum produces high levels of Progesterone. Pregnanediol-3a-glucuronide (PDG) is the major urine metabolite of Progesterone. An inexpensive, home-based PDG urine test strip to confirm ovulation has recently been developed. The PDG test measures the presence of PDG in urine, which has been shown to directly correlate with the presence Progesterone in serum (blood). According to GLOWM (The Global Library of Women's Medicine) PDG levels in urine typically rise 24-36 hours after ovulation.

Although there also exists a home-based electronic hormone monitor for measuring urinary PDG, it is not widely available and is very time-consuming for women. Newer methods to monitor PDG using a simple urinary test strip that are less time consuming would be a welcome addition to the evaluation of infertility. Additionally, urinary hormonal tests have been proven to be easy and useful adjuncts to natural fertility markers.

The primary purpose of this feasibility study is to evaluate the use of the PDG urine test in a clinical setting to determine its accuracy to confirm ovulation when compared to the serum Progesterone test. This study will follow the use of the PDG urinary test strip over the course of one menstrual cycle in 25 female participants. In order to obtain participants, this study will use a non-probability sample using an initiation to volunteer technique for women in the general Ottawa area. The ultimate aim of this study is to provide information for the design of a larger study to determine the accuracy of the PDG urinary test strip.

Being tested
Urine PDG test
Keywords
Infertility, Ovulation, Pregnanediol 3-glucuronide, Progesterone, Urine dipstick test, Feasibility study, Fertile period, Menstrual cycle, Natural family planning, Fertility awareness methods
Medical subject headings
Infertility, Female, Infertility

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Urine PDG testDevice

    Urine dipstick test that detects the presence of the urinary metabolite of progesterone, PDG.

Study groups in NCT03230084
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Urine PDG testExperimentalUrine pregnanediol 3-glucuronide (PDG) test strip
Receives: Device: Urine PDG test

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Sensitivity and specificity of the PDG urine test strip

    The sensitivity will be estimated as the proportion of true positives cycles, that is, cycles with appropriate recognition of the post-ovulatory phase. The specificity will be estimated as the proportion of true negatives cycles, that is, cycles with appropriate recognition of the pre-ovulatory phase.

    Measured: 1 month

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. Frequency of protocol violation

    Percentage of participants who violated protocol to show acceptability of study design to participants.

    Measured: 1 month

  2. Frequency of positive responses versus negative responses about the study procedures

    Ratio of positive responses to negative responses in the feedback questionnaire given to participants concerning the study protocol.

    Measured: 1 month

  3. Frequency of positive responses versus negative responses on the study product

    Ratio of positive responses to negative responses in the feedback questionnaire given to participants concerning the study product.

    Measured: 1 month

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted26 Jul 2017
  2. Study start23 Aug 2017
  3. Primary completion14 Mar 2018
  4. Study completion14 Mar 2018

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Device feasibility
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
25 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03230084
Sponsor's protocol ID
M16-17-027
Status last verified
Jul 2017
First submitted
24 Jul 2017
Last updated
20 Mar 2018
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Ecochard R, Leiva R, Bouchard T, Boehringer H, Direito A, Mariani A, Fehring R. Use of urinary pregnanediol 3-glucuronide to confirm ovulation. Steroids. 2013 Oct;78(10):1035-40. doi: 10.1016/j.steroids.2013.06.006. Epub 2013 Jul 4.

    PubMed 23831784
  • Messerlian C, Fishman JR. Less is more: improving outcomes and cutting costs to Quebec's assisted reproduction program. CMAJ. 2014 Apr 1;186(6):405-6. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.131672. Epub 2014 Mar 3. No abstract available.

    PubMed 24591273
  • Brown JB. Types of ovarian activity in women and their significance: the continuum (a reinterpretation of early findings). Hum Reprod Update. 2011 Mar-Apr;17(2):141-58. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmq040. Epub 2010 Oct 5.

    PubMed 20923873
  • Vigil P, Ceric F, Cortes ME, Klaus H. Usefulness of monitoring fertility from menarche. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2006 Jun;19(3):173-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jpag.2006.02.003.

    PubMed 16731410
  • Bushnik T, Cook JL, Yuzpe AA, Tough S, Collins J. Estimating the prevalence of infertility in Canada. Hum Reprod. 2012 Mar;27(3):738-46. doi: 10.1093/humrep/der465. Epub 2012 Jan 17.

    PubMed 22258658
  • Ghavi F, Jamale S, Mosalanejad L, Mosallanezhad Z. A Study of Couple Burnout in Infertile Couples. Glob J Health Sci. 2015 Aug 6;8(4):158-65. doi: 10.5539/gjhs.v8n4p158.

    PubMed 26573033
  • Evans-Hoeker E, Pritchard DA, Long DL, Herring AH, Stanford JB, Steiner AZ. Cervical mucus monitoring prevalence and associated fecundability in women trying to conceive. Fertil Steril. 2013 Oct;100(4):1033-1038.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.06.002. Epub 2013 Jul 11.

    PubMed 23850303
  • Robinson JE, Wakelin M, Ellis JE. Increased pregnancy rate with use of the Clearblue Easy Fertility Monitor. Fertil Steril. 2007 Feb;87(2):329-34. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.05.054. Epub 2006 Oct 30.

    PubMed 17074329
  • Leiva R, Bouchard T, Boehringer H, Abulla S, Ecochard R. Random serum progesterone threshold to confirm ovulation. Steroids. 2015 Sep;101:125-9. doi: 10.1016/j.steroids.2015.06.013. Epub 2015 Jun 22.

    PubMed 26111590
  • Practice Committee of American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Diagnostic evaluation of the infertile female: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril. 2012 Aug;98(2):302-7. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.05.032. Epub 2012 Jun 13.

    PubMed 22698637
  • Practice Committee of American Society for Reproductive Medicine in collaboration with Society for Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility. Optimizing natural fertility: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril. 2013 Sep;100(3):631-7. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.07.011.

    PubMed 23993665
  • Stanford JB. Revisiting the fertile window. Fertil Steril. 2015 May;103(5):1152-3. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.02.015. Epub 2015 Mar 13. No abstract available.

    PubMed 25772771
  • Leiva R, Burhan U, Kyrillos E, Fehring R, McLaren R, Dalzell C, Tanguay E. Use of ovulation predictor kits as adjuncts when using fertility awareness methods (FAMs): a pilot study. J Am Board Fam Med. 2014 May-Jun;27(3):427-9. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2014.03.130255.

    PubMed 24808123
  • Ecochard R, Boehringer H, Rabilloud M, Marret H. Chronological aspects of ultrasonic, hormonal, and other indirect indices of ovulation. BJOG. 2001 Aug;108(8):822-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2001.00194.x.

    PubMed 11510707
  • Ecochard R, Duterque O, Leiva R, Bouchard T, Vigil P. Self-identification of the clinical fertile window and the ovulation period. Fertil Steril. 2015 May;103(5):1319-25.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.01.031. Epub 2015 Feb 24.

    PubMed 25724738

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Urine PDG test in people with Infertility, Female, run by Bruyère Health Research Institute. at 1 site in Canada.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 20 Mar 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Sensitivity and specificity of the PDG urine test strip (time frame: 1 month). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03230084, which also lists 24 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 20 Mar 2018.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in