TuberculosisNCT03230409
Impact of Nursing Interventions on Adherence to Treatment With Anti-tuberculosis Drugs in Children and Adolescents
A study testing Leaflet written in the patient's/family mother tongue, A follow-up telephone call and Eidus-Hamilton Test in people with Tuberculosis, run by Hospital Sant Joan de Deu.
Trial summary
This study evaluates the efficacy of nursing interventions on adherence to antituberculosis medication in a paediatric cohort (aged 0-18 years) and identifies the risk factors for non-compliance. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages Up to 18 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Tuberculosis
- What is being tested?
- Leaflet written in the patient's/family mother tongue, A follow-up telephone call and Eidus-Hamilton Test
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 359 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- 1 Jan 2014to 15 Jan 2017
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages Up to 18 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult
Who may be able to join
- In both phases, all children and adolescents (aged <18 years) starting anti-TB treatment due to close contact with a TB patient (primary chemoprophylaxis), Latent Tuberculosis Infectious (LTBI) or Tuberculosis (TB) disease were eligible to participate in the study.
Who cannot join
- Referral from another center after anti-TB treatment had already begun
- Patients with other chronic diseases requiring hospital follow-up and/or other chronic therapies
- Known poor previous adherence to anti-TB treatment (if treatment was repeated or restarted)
- A significant language barrier that prevented the child or his/her relatives from properly understanding the nature of the study.
About this study
This study evaluates the efficacy of nursing interventions on adherence to antituberculosis medication in a paediatric cohort (aged 0-18 years) and identifies the risk factors for non-compliance.
There are two phases in the study; Phase 1: retrospective descriptive analysis in children and young people receiving antituberculosis treatment (non-intervention group); and Phase 2: quasi-experimental, longitudinal, prospective study (intervention group). The results of the two phases will be compared.
Read the detailed description
The study was carried out in the outpatient tuberculosis (TB) Unit of a tertiary-care pediatric center in Catalonia (Northeast Spain), which is a referral center for pediatric TB (Hospital Sant Joan de Déu) in the Southern Barcelona Health Care Region (Regió Sanitària Barcelona Sud) (1,346,000 inhabitants, 16.5% of whom are under 18 years of age).The TB incidence rate in Catalonia has decreased from 21.6 per 100,000 population in 2004 to 14.4 in 2015 (7.3 cases per 100,000 population of pediatric age)(Rodés, Espinilla, \& García, 2016).
In both phases, all children and adolescents (aged <18 years) starting anti-tuberculosis (anti-TB) treatment due to close contact with a TB patient (primary chemoprophylaxis), Latent Tuberculosis Infection (LTBI) or TB disease were eligible to participate in the study. Directly Observed Treatment (DOT) is not routinely available in Spain, and its use is restricted to individual cases, as per physician decision.
The number of children and adolescents required to participate in the study was calculated using a unilateral chi-square proportion comparison test for independent samples, with a level of significance of 5% and a power of 80%, a 2/1 ratio in Phase 1/Phase 2 group sizes and assuming a significant increase of 15% in the adherence rate after the nurse-led interventions (60% in Phase 1 and 75% in Phase 2). Thus, it was calculated that 182 and 91 children and adolescents would be needed in the Phase 1 and Phase 2 groups, respectively.
Procedure and interventions:
As per national guidelines, primary chemoprophylaxis after TB contact consists of isoniazid in monotherapy until TB infection screening is repeated 10-12 weeks later. Treatment of LTBI includes either 3 months of isoniazid and rifampicin or 6-9 months of isoniazid in monotherapy, and treatment of TB disease consists of a 2-month induction phase with 4 drugs (isoniazid, rifampicin, pyrazinamide and ethambutol), followed by isoniazid and rifampicin for a minimum of 4 months.
Routine outpatient follow-up visits were scheduled as follows: (a) in patients receiving primary chemoprophylaxis or LTBI treatment: baseline visit, and 2 weeks and 3 months later (end of treatment in most cases); (b) in patients treated for TB disease: baseline visit, 2 weeks later and on a monthly basis thereafter.
Four nurse-led interventions were implemented after Phase 1: 2 educational interventions (leaflet in mother tongue and a follow-up open telephone call) and 2 monitoring interventions (the Eidus-Hamilton test and a written questionnaire about adherence to anti-TB treatment), which were exclusively carried out by 2 study nurses.
Whenever the Eidus-Hamilton test or the written questionnaire were consistent with sub-optimal adherence, immediate feedback was given to the parents and the patient the study nurse underlined the importance of adherence, assessed any potential hindrances and answered any questions. A follow-up visit or telephone call was scheduled 7-10 days later.
The level of adherence to anti-TB treatment was be identified retrospectively in Phase 1 of the study, as the risk factors associated with adherence in our cohort. Once Phase 2 was completed, the results were be compared with those of Phase 1 and the success of the new nurse-led interventions assessed.
Final results will be used to design the definitive Nurse-led Follow-up Programme that will be implemented in the TB Unit.
- Conditions
- Tuberculosis
- Being tested
- Leaflet written in the patient's/family mother tongue, A follow-up telephone call, Eidus-Hamilton Test, A written questionnaire
- Keywords
- Tuberculosis, Latent Tuberculosis Infection, Adherence, Nursing, Pediatrics, Public Health.
- Medical subject headings
- Tuberculosis, Latent Tuberculosis
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Leaflet written in the patient's/family mother tongueBehavioural
At baseline visit, the parents or carers of the children and/or the young patients themselves (in the case of adolescents >12 years of age), were given a leaflet including questions and answers about the most common doubts that people have about anti-TB treatment (what to do if you forget a dose, if you vomit, if you have stomach ache, etc.). The study nurse read and reviewed the leaflet with the family. This leaflet was available in 10 different languages: Spanish and Catalan (the two official languages of the country), English, French, German, Russian, Romanian, Chinese, Urdu and Arabic.
A follow-up telephone callBehavioural
A follow-up open telephone call was made 7-10 days after the baseline visit and whenever the patient failed to attend the scheduled visits. The parents and/or patient were informed about this. This call was made to reinforce the information, answer any questions that may have arisen and insist on the importance of proper follow-up.
Eidus-Hamilton TestBiological
E-H test was performed twice, 2 weeks after the baseline visit and at the end of treatment. To prevent patients from only taking their medication occasionally, directly before their visits, they were not informed of the purpose of the urine test. This test is a rapid, simple point-of-care method to detect urinary acetyl-isoniazid, the main metabolite of isoniazid, up to 12-24 hours following isoniazid administration and is used as a surrogate marker of treatment adherence. The test consists of placing 4 drops of a 10%potassium cyanide solution and 9 drops of a 10%chloramine solution in a test tube containing 4 drops of patient urine. The result is considered positive if a deep red color develops after 1 minute. If a pink color slowly appears,this indicates that there are only traces of the metabolite. If there is no change in color, the result is considered negative and suggests no recent isoniazid intake. The sensitivity and specificity of this test have been reported to be over 99%
A written questionnaireBehavioural
The parents or carers of the children and/or the young patients themselves were asked to complete a written questionnaire about adherence to anti-TB treatment on all the follow-up visits, which was partially adapted from two validated questionnaires on adherence to chronic therapies (SMAQ compliance test, Svarstad et al., 1999; and Hermes test, Rodríguez-Chamorro et al., 2008).
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Phase 1, Retrospective | No intervention | Routine outpatient follow-up visits were scheduled as follows: (a) in patients receiving primary chemoprophylaxis or Latent Tuberculosis Infection (LTBI) treatment: baseline visit, and 2 weeks and 3 months later (end of treatment in most cases); (b) in patients treated for Tuberculosis disease: baseline visit, 2 weeks later and on a monthly basis thereafter. |
| Phase 2, Prospective | Experimental | Four nurse-led interventions were implemented after Phase 1:
* Intervention 1: at baseline visit, the parents or carers of the children, were given a leaflet in the mother tongue. This leaflet was available in 10 different languages: Spanish and Catalan (the two official languages of the country), English, French, German, Russian, Romanian, Chinese, Urdu and Arabic.
* Intervention 2: a follow-up open telephone call was made 7-10 days after the baseline visit and whenever the patient failed to attend the scheduled visits.
* Intervention 3: the Eidus-Hamilton test was performed twice, 2 weeks after the baseline visit and at the end of treatment. To prevent patients from only taking their medication occasionally, directly before their visits, they were not informed of the purpose of the urine test.
* Intervention 4: a written questionnaire about adherence to anti-TB treatment on all the follow-up visits. Receives: Behavioral: Leaflet written in the patient's/family mother tongue; Behavioral: A follow-up telephone call; Biological: Eidus-Hamilton Test; Behavioral: A written questionnaire |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Adherence to treatment
Non-adherence was defined as the presence of any of the following situations:
- At the follow-up visits, it was calculated and/or the children or relatives stated that they had failed to take >20% of the previously prescribed anti-TB treatment.
- The child failed to attend two or more of the scheduled visits without justification.
- DOT was indicated for any reason.
- The child or relatives intentionally stopped the previously prescribed anti-TB treatment.
- The Eidus-Hamilton urine test was negative on one or more follow-up visits.
- The written questionnaire showed that compliance was below 80% of the prescribed anti-TB treatment.
Measured: Through the study completion, an average of 3 months for those patients starting anti-TB treatment due to close contact with a TB patient (primary chemoprophylaxis) or LTBI and 6-9 months for those with TB disease.
Secondary outcomes (1)
Risk Factors
To identify epidemiological, clinical or social markers that make it possible to predict good or poor adherence to anti-TB treatment in children and young people.
Measured: Through the study completion, an average of 3 months for those patients starting anti-TB treatment due to close contact with a TB patient (primary chemoprophylaxis) or LTBI and 6-9 months for those with TB disease.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted26 Jul 2017
- Study start1 Jan 2014
- Primary completion30 Sep 2016
- Study completion15 Jan 2017
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (8)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for TuberculosisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Factorial
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Participant
- Enrolment
- 359 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Hospital Sant Joan de Deu
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Official Barcelona Nurses Association (COIB)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Eva Maria Guix-Comellas, Professor, Principal investigator, Univeristat de Barcelona
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03230409
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- PIC-68-13
- Status last verified
- Jul 2017
- First submitted
- 21 Jul 2017
- Last updated
- 26 Jul 2017
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: The Study Protocol has been published in Journal of Advanced Nursing
Publications
Amlabu V, Mulligan C, Jele N, Evans A, Gray D, Zar HJ, McIlleron H, Smith P. Isoniazid/acetylisoniazid urine concentrations: markers of adherence to isoniazid preventive therapy in children. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2014 May;18(5):528-30. doi: 10.5588/ijtld.13.0730.
PubMed 24903787Cass AD, Talavera GA, Gresham LS, Moser KS, Joy W. Structured behavioral intervention to increase children's adherence to treatment for latent tuberculosis infection. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2005 Apr;9(4):415-20.
PubMed 15830747Chang SH, Eitzman SR, Nahid P, Finelli ML. Factors associated with failure to complete isoniazid therapy for latent tuberculosis infection in children and adolescents. J Infect Public Health. 2014 Mar-Apr;7(2):145-52. doi: 10.1016/j.jiph.2013.11.001. Epub 2013 Dec 19.
PubMed 24361084Cruz AT, Starke JR. Increasing adherence for latent tuberculosis infection therapy with health department-administered therapy. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2012 Feb;31(2):193-5. doi: 10.1097/INF.0b013e318236984f.
PubMed 21979799Garfield S, Clifford S, Eliasson L, Barber N, Willson A. Suitability of measures of self-reported medication adherence for routine clinical use: a systematic review. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2011 Nov 3;11:149. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-11-149.
PubMed 22050830Guix-Comellas EM, Rozas L, Velasco-Arnaiz E, Morin-Fraile V, Force-Sanmartin E, Noguera-Julian A. Adherence to Antituberculosis Drugs in Children and Adolescents in A Low-Endemic Setting: A Retrospective Series. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2017 Jun;36(6):616-618. doi: 10.1097/INF.0000000000001508.
PubMed 28030525M'imunya JM, Kredo T, Volmink J. Patient education and counselling for promoting adherence to treatment for tuberculosis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 May 16;2012(5):CD006591. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006591.pub2.
PubMed 22592714Guix-Comellas EM, Rozas-Quesada L, Velasco-Arnaiz E, Ferres-Canals A, Estrada-Masllorens JM, Force-Sanmartin E, Noguera-Julian A. Impact of nursing interventions on adherence to treatment with antituberculosis drugs in children and young people: A nonrandomized controlled trial. J Adv Nurs. 2018 May 3. doi: 10.1111/jan.13692. Online ahead of print.
PubMed 29726024
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 26 Jul 2017. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Impact of Nursing Interventions on Adherence to Treatment With Anti-tuberculosis Drugs in Children and Adolescents
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03230409
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- PIC-68-13
- Conditions
- Tuberculosis
- Keywords
- Tuberculosis, Latent Tuberculosis Infection, Adherence, Nursing, Pediatrics, Public Health.
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 359 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Hospital Sant Joan de DeuUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Official Barcelona Nurses Association (COIB)
- Study start
- 1 Jan 2014
- Primary completion
- 30 Sep 2016 (actual)
- Study completion
- 15 Jan 2017 (actual)
- First posted
- 26 Jul 2017 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study evaluates the efficacy of nursing interventions on adherence to antituberculosis medication in a paediatric cohort (aged 0-18 years) and identifies the risk factors for non-compliance.
There are two phases in the study; Phase 1: retrospective descriptive analysis in children and young people receiving antituberculosis treatment (non-intervention group); and Phase 2: quasi-experimental, longitudinal, prospective study (intervention group). The results of the two phases will be compared.
Detailed description
The study was carried out in the outpatient tuberculosis (TB) Unit of a tertiary-care pediatric center in Catalonia (Northeast Spain), which is a referral center for pediatric TB (Hospital Sant Joan de Déu) in the Southern Barcelona Health Care Region (Regió Sanitària Barcelona Sud) (1,346,000 inhabitants, 16.5% of whom are under 18 years of age).The TB incidence rate in Catalonia has decreased from 21.6 per 100,000 population in 2004 to 14.4 in 2015 (7.3 cases per 100,000 population of pediatric age)(Rodés, Espinilla, \& García, 2016).
In both phases, all children and adolescents (aged <18 years) starting anti-tuberculosis (anti-TB) treatment due to close contact with a TB patient (primary chemoprophylaxis), Latent Tuberculosis Infection (LTBI) or TB disease were eligible to participate in the study. Directly Observed Treatment (DOT) is not routinely available in Spain, and its use is restricted to individual cases, as per physician decision.
The number of children and adolescents required to participate in the study was calculated using a unilateral chi-square proportion comparison test for independent samples, with a level of significance of 5% and a power of 80%, a 2/1 ratio in Phase 1/Phase 2 group sizes and assuming a significant increase of 15% in the adherence rate after the nurse-led interventions (60% in Phase 1 and 75% in Phase 2). Thus, it was calculated that 182 and 91 children and adolescents would be needed in the Phase 1 and Phase 2 groups, respectively.
Procedure and interventions:
As per national guidelines, primary chemoprophylaxis after TB contact consists of isoniazid in monotherapy until TB infection screening is repeated 10-12 weeks later. Treatment of LTBI includes either 3 months of isoniazid and rifampicin or 6-9 months of isoniazid in monotherapy, and treatment of TB disease consists of a 2-month induction phase with 4 drugs (isoniazid, rifampicin, pyrazinamide and ethambutol), followed by isoniazid and rifampicin for a minimum of 4 months.
Routine outpatient follow-up visits were scheduled as follows: (a) in patients receiving primary chemoprophylaxis or LTBI treatment: baseline visit, and 2 weeks and 3 months later (end of treatment in most cases); (b) in patients treated for TB disease: baseline visit, 2 weeks later and on a monthly basis thereafter.
Four nurse-led interventions were implemented after Phase 1: 2 educational interventions (leaflet in mother tongue and a follow-up open telephone call) and 2 monitoring interventions (the Eidus-Hamilton test and a written questionnaire about adherence to anti-TB treatment), which were exclusively carried out by 2 study nurses.
Whenever the Eidus-Hamilton test or the written questionnaire were consistent with sub-optimal adherence, immediate feedback was given to the parents and the patient the study nurse underlined the importance of adherence, assessed any potential hindrances and answered any questions. A follow-up visit or telephone call was scheduled 7-10 days later.
The level of adherence to anti-TB treatment was be identified retrospectively in Phase 1 of the study, as the risk factors associated with adherence in our cohort. Once Phase 2 was completed, the results were be compared with those of Phase 1 and the success of the new nurse-led interventions assessed.
Final results will be used to design the definitive Nurse-led Follow-up Programme that will be implemented in the TB Unit.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Factorial
- Masking
- Single blind (participant)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Phase 1, Retrospective | No intervention | –Routine outpatient follow-up visits were scheduled as follows: (a) in patients receiving primary chemoprophylaxis or Latent Tuberculosis Infection (LTBI) treatment: baseline visit, and 2 weeks and 3 months later (end of treatment in most cases); (b) in patients treated for Tuberculosis disease: baseline visit, 2 weeks later and on a monthly basis thereafter. |
| Phase 2, Prospective | Experimental | Behavioral: Leaflet written in the patient's/family mother tongue, Behavioral: A follow-up telephone call, Biological: Eidus-Hamilton Test, Behavioral: A written questionnaireFour nurse-led interventions were implemented after Phase 1: * Intervention 1: at baseline visit, the parents or carers of the children, were given a leaflet in the mother tongue. This leaflet was available in 10 different languages: Spanish and Catalan (the two official languages of the country), English, French, German, Russian, Romanian, Chinese, Urdu and Arabic. * Intervention 2: a follow-up open telephone call was made 7-10 days after the baseline visit and whenever the patient failed to attend the scheduled visits. * Intervention 3: the Eidus-Hamilton test was performed twice, 2 weeks after the baseline visit and at the end of treatment. To prevent patients from only taking their medication occasionally, directly before their visits, they were not informed of the purpose of the urine test. * Intervention 4: a written questionnaire about adherence to anti-TB treatment on all the follow-up visits. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- Up to 18 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- In both phases, all children and adolescents (aged <18 years) starting anti-TB treatment due to close contact with a TB patient (primary chemoprophylaxis), Latent Tuberculosis Infectious (LTBI) or Tuberculosis (TB) disease were eligible to participate in the study.
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Referral from another center after anti-TB treatment had already begun
- Patients with other chronic diseases requiring hospital follow-up and/or other chronic therapies
- Known poor previous adherence to anti-TB treatment (if treatment was repeated or restarted)
- A significant language barrier that prevented the child or his/her relatives from properly understanding the nature of the study.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Leaflet written in the patient's/family mother tongueAt baseline visit, the parents or carers of the children and/or the young patients themselves (in the case of adolescents >12 years of age), were given a leaflet including questions and answers about the most common doubts that people have about anti-TB treatment (what to do if you forget a dose, if you vomit, if you have stomach ache, etc.). The study nurse read and reviewed the leaflet with the family. This leaflet was available in 10 different languages: Spanish and Catalan (the two official languages of the country), English, French, German, Russian, Romanian, Chinese, Urdu and Arabic. | Behavioural | Phase 2, Prospective |
| A follow-up telephone callA follow-up open telephone call was made 7-10 days after the baseline visit and whenever the patient failed to attend the scheduled visits. The parents and/or patient were informed about this. This call was made to reinforce the information, answer any questions that may have arisen and insist on the importance of proper follow-up. | Behavioural | Phase 2, Prospective |
| Eidus-Hamilton TestE-H test was performed twice, 2 weeks after the baseline visit and at the end of treatment. To prevent patients from only taking their medication occasionally, directly before their visits, they were not informed of the purpose of the urine test. This test is a rapid, simple point-of-care method to detect urinary acetyl-isoniazid, the main metabolite of isoniazid, up to 12-24 hours following isoniazid administration and is used as a surrogate marker of treatment adherence. The test consists of placing 4 drops of a 10%potassium cyanide solution and 9 drops of a 10%chloramine solution in a test tube containing 4 drops of patient urine. The result is considered positive if a deep red color develops after 1 minute. If a pink color slowly appears,this indicates that there are only traces of the metabolite. If there is no change in color, the result is considered negative and suggests no recent isoniazid intake. The sensitivity and specificity of this test have been reported to be over 99% | Biological | Phase 2, Prospective |
| A written questionnaireThe parents or carers of the children and/or the young patients themselves were asked to complete a written questionnaire about adherence to anti-TB treatment on all the follow-up visits, which was partially adapted from two validated questionnaires on adherence to chronic therapies (SMAQ compliance test, Svarstad et al., 1999; and Hermes test, Rodríguez-Chamorro et al., 2008). | Behavioural | Phase 2, Prospective |
Primary outcome
Adherence to treatment
Time frame: Through the study completion, an average of 3 months for those patients starting anti-TB treatment due to close contact with a TB patient (primary chemoprophylaxis) or LTBI and 6-9 months for those with TB disease.
Non-adherence was defined as the presence of any of the following situations: 1. At the follow-up visits, it was calculated and/or the children or relatives stated that they had failed to take >20% of the previously prescribed anti-TB treatment. 2. The child failed to attend two or more of the scheduled visits without justification. 3. DOT was indicated for any reason. 4. The child or relatives intentionally stopped the previously prescribed anti-TB treatment. 5. The Eidus-Hamilton urine test was negative on one or more follow-up visits. 6. The written questionnaire showed that compliance was below 80% of the prescribed anti-TB treatment.
1 secondary outcome
Risk Factors
Time frame: Through the study completion, an average of 3 months for those patients starting anti-TB treatment due to close contact with a TB patient (primary chemoprophylaxis) or LTBI and 6-9 months for those with TB disease.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 26 Jul 2017.
- Background: PubMed 24903787Amlabu V, Mulligan C, Jele N, Evans A, Gray D, Zar HJ, McIlleron H, Smith P. Isoniazid/acetylisoniazid urine concentrations: markers of adherence to isoniazid preventive therapy in children. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2014 May;18(5):528-30. doi: 10.5588/ijtld.13.0730.
- Background: PubMed 15830747Cass AD, Talavera GA, Gresham LS, Moser KS, Joy W. Structured behavioral intervention to increase children's adherence to treatment for latent tuberculosis infection. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2005 Apr;9(4):415-20.
- Background: PubMed 24361084Chang SH, Eitzman SR, Nahid P, Finelli ML. Factors associated with failure to complete isoniazid therapy for latent tuberculosis infection in children and adolescents. J Infect Public Health. 2014 Mar-Apr;7(2):145-52. doi: 10.1016/j.jiph.2013.11.001. Epub 2013 Dec 19.
- Background: PubMed 21979799Cruz AT, Starke JR. Increasing adherence for latent tuberculosis infection therapy with health department-administered therapy. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2012 Feb;31(2):193-5. doi: 10.1097/INF.0b013e318236984f.
- Background: PubMed 22050830Garfield S, Clifford S, Eliasson L, Barber N, Willson A. Suitability of measures of self-reported medication adherence for routine clinical use: a systematic review. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2011 Nov 3;11:149. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-11-149.
- Background: PubMed 28030525Guix-Comellas EM, Rozas L, Velasco-Arnaiz E, Morin-Fraile V, Force-Sanmartin E, Noguera-Julian A. Adherence to Antituberculosis Drugs in Children and Adolescents in A Low-Endemic Setting: A Retrospective Series. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2017 Jun;36(6):616-618. doi: 10.1097/INF.0000000000001508.
- Background: PubMed 22592714M'imunya JM, Kredo T, Volmink J. Patient education and counselling for promoting adherence to treatment for tuberculosis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 May 16;2012(5):CD006591. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006591.pub2.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 29726024Guix-Comellas EM, Rozas-Quesada L, Velasco-Arnaiz E, Ferres-Canals A, Estrada-Masllorens JM, Force-Sanmartin E, Noguera-Julian A. Impact of nursing interventions on adherence to treatment with antituberculosis drugs in children and young people: A nonrandomized controlled trial. J Adv Nurs. 2018 May 3. doi: 10.1111/jan.13692. Online ahead of print.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. The Study Protocol has been published in Journal of Advanced Nursing
Related trials for Tuberculosis
RecruitingPhase 4
Short-term Antibiotic Therapy in Mycobacterium Avium Complex Pulmonary Disease
Mycobacterium Avium Complex Pulmonary Disease
RecruitingObservational study
Paradoxical Tuberculosis Reactions in Patients Without HIV Infection
Tuberculosis
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Re-evaluating the Duration in Children of TB Treatment
Tuberculosis
RecruitingPhase 1/2
A Study of Daily Rifapentine Combined With Isoniazid (1HP) for Tuberculosis Prevention in Children Less Than 13 Years of Age With and Without HIV
Tuberculosis
Active, not recruitingPhase 3
Protecting Households On Exposure to Newly Diagnosed Index Multidrug-Resistant Tuberculosis Patients
Tuberculosis, MDR
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Eva Maria Guix-Comellas, Professor principal investigator
Univeristat de Barcelona
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Leaflet written in the patient's/family mother tongue, A follow-up telephone call and Eidus-Hamilton Test in people with Tuberculosis, run by Hospital Sant Joan de Deu.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 26 Jul 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Adherence to treatment (time frame: Through the study completion, an average of 3 months for those patients starting anti-TB treatment due to close contact with a TB patient (primary chemoprophylaxis) or LTBI and 6-9 months for those with TB disease.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03230409, which also lists 8 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 26 Jul 2017.