CLLNCT03231579
Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Electronic Patient Reported Outcomes Study
An observational study of CLL, run by Carevive Systems, Inc. at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
This multi-site study will enroll approximately 100 CLL patients across 5 cancer institutions. The aim of the project is to ensure hematology care teams that are participating in new value-based reimbursement models have an accurate understanding of the evidence and roles of new therapies for CLL and best practice… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- CLL
- What is being tested?
- Carevive CPS
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- How many people
- 85 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 21 Jul 2017to 31 Mar 2019
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Patients with a diagnosis of CLL
Who may be able to join
- All participants must be 18 years of age or older.
- Patient participants must have a diagnosis of CLL, and either be on active treatment or need first-line treatment.
- Patient participants must be able to access a web-based portal.
- All participants must be able to understand English.
Who cannot join
- Any patient who cannot understand written or spoken English.
- Any prisoner and/or other vulnerable persons as defined by NIH (45 CFR 46, Subpart B, C, and D).
- The inclusion and exclusion criteria above will be used to screen for eligibility of all patients.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: The Roles of Education and Patient Engagement to Improve Symptom Management and the Quality of Life for Patients With Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia
This multi-site study will enroll approximately 100 CLL patients across 5 cancer institutions. The aim of the project is to ensure hematology care teams that are participating in new value-based reimbursement models have an accurate understanding of the evidence and roles of new therapies for CLL and best practice supportive care protocols to proactively assess, monitor, and manage symptoms to promote successful clinical outcomes. Hematology teams at seven health systems across the U.S. will be given online clinical training on the latest evidence for treatment planning in CLL along with best supportive care practices for patients on novel CLL treatments, prior to using Carevive's patient engagement software. Once training is complete, the Carevive software will be employed in the clinic whereby CLL patients will use the Carevive patient portal to report any symptoms at and in between clinic visits. Patients will be given a user name and password to a web-based portal for 24/7 reporting of symptoms experienced. Patient-reported and clinical data will be processed by the Carevive rules engine technology to generate evidence-based supportive care plans providing patients with direction regarding self-management strategies, care coordination for relevant cancer center services, and direction on when to go to the emergency department (ED) or call their hematologist based on their institution's protocol. For patients who require ongoing and routine monitoring, such supportive care recommendations will be included in supportive care plans generated at the clinic visit. On the visits subsequent to the delivery of the care plan, patients will report on the perceived effectiveness of the intervention (or barriers to non-adherence to the intervention). Patients and clinicians will assess symptom severity at each visit for a 16-week period and both data sets will be stored and analyzed for research purposes.
Read the detailed description
Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is the most common type of adult leukemia in Western countries with 18,960 new cases and 4660 deaths expected in 2016. Rapid therapeutic advances in the past five years have changed the landscape of CLL treatment giving patients many more treatment options. Fit patients with favorable disease features such as mutated immunoglobulin heavy chain variable region (IgHV genes) have long term benefit from chemoimmunotherapy and new oral agents such as ibrutinib and idelalisib and the BCL-2 inhibitor, venetoclax, provide effective options for relapsed patients.
With recent FDA approvals, the treatment armamentarium for relapsed/refractory CLL has been transformed in the past several years. Clinicians are faced with a plethora of new treatment options and associated guideline updates, making clinical decision-making much more complex. It is challenging for the modern-day hematologist to stay current on the comparative evidence of the risks/benefits of various treatment options with so many choices. Such novel regimens are changing the survival outcomes and offering new opportunities for the long-term management of CLL. While risk-benefit profiles are favorable, diligent supportive care practices are required to promote patient engagement and successful clinical outcomes as such agents are powerful, leading to potential toxicities that must be diligently monitored.
Since new agents have had limited use in the clinic, real-world evidence on patient symptom experience is not available to guide practice and there is limited data on the effectiveness of evidence-based supportive care recommendations. This is a challenge for hematology teams, particularly because CLL patients are amongst the highest rates of emergency department (ED) visits and hospitalizations (along with lung and colon cancers). Retrospective data demonstrated that patient demographic and clinical characteristics, as well as chemotherapy choice, were associated with ER visits and hospitalizations in patients with CLL. Specifically, significant increases in ER visits and hospitalizations were associated with age, comorbidities, use of supportive care, number of CLL-related adverse events, chemotherapy duration, use of certain therapies, living in the Northeast region of the United States, and treatment following relapse.
The outcomes of CLL treatment have been found to vary with age, with poorer outcomes in older patients. However, the elderly population is highly heterogeneous - ranging from "fit" to "frail". A number of recent studies conclude that while chronological age is an important consideration when making treatment decisions for hematologic malignancies, functional status is more predictive of treatment outcomes. A review of 83 CLL treatment articles published from 1949 to 2011 reported fit patients had more treatment options than the frail elderly and most studies included patients younger than 65 years. It has been noted by a number of researchers that elderly and frail patients with LGL are under-represented in clinical trials and there is need for data to support a tailored treatment plan.
This study will explore the symptom assessment and management practices of providers caring for individuals receiving new and active therapy for CLL, and will also employ a two-part intervention (with both patients and providers) to evaluate the impact of a novel existing technology, the Carevive Care Planning System (CPS), on supportive care and symptom management. The primary objective of this study is to evaluate adherence to evidence-based practices for symptom assessment and management (i.e., "symptom care behaviors") of physicians and nurses (providers) caring for individuals receiving active treatment for CLL. The intervention will include personalized supportive care and symptom management plans for patients auto-generated by the Carevive CPS based on each individual's data. The care plans were created based on nationally recognized National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) supportive care guidelines and validated by CLL nurse and physician experts.
- Conditions
- CLL
- Being tested
- Carevive CPS
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Carevive CPSBehavioural
This intervention will focus on the use of the Carevive CPS, enabling providers to deliver evidence-based and personalized treatment care plans to their CLL patients on/starting treatment. The Carevive CPS collects electronic patient reported outcomes (ePROs) and clinical data, reported and generated by clinical staff and/or peer-reviewed evidence, and includes patient education, resources, and referrals developed by cancer clinicians and researchers.
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Patient perception of the overall effectiveness, acceptability, and usability of bi-directional web-based technology to self-report symptom prevalence and severity and receive management recommendations
Patients will be asked to rate how acceptable, effective, and usable the web-based technology was using a 5-item system usability measure. The data will then be analyzed in order to describe the patient perceptions of the intervention
Measured: Year 1
Longitudinal symptom experience of patients with CLL
Data collected on the Carevive CPS using the PRO-CTCAE and ESASr tools will be analyzed in order to describe the longitudinal symptom experience
Measured: Year 1
Secondary outcomes (2)
ER utilization and hospitalization in elderly patients with CLL
To explore how frequently older adults with CLL are hospitalized or visit the ER as a result of the CLL diagnosis
Measured: Year 1
Patterns of change in provider decision making over time for patients with CLL
To describe how provider decision making patterns change over time for providers who are treating the CLL patients in the study
Measured: Year 1
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted27 Jul 2017
- Study start21 Jul 2017
- Primary completion1 Nov 2018
- Study completion31 Mar 2019
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (5)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for CLLStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 85 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Carevive Systems, Inc.
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03231579
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- G411
- Status last verified
- Aug 2019
- First submitted
- 21 Jul 2017
- Last updated
- 28 Aug 2019
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Brown JR, Hallek MJ, Pagel JM. Chemoimmunotherapy Versus Targeted Treatment in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia: When, How Long, How Much, and in Which Combination? Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book. 2016;35:e387-98. doi: 10.1200/EDBK_159018.
PubMed 27249745Cramer P, Hallek M, Eichhorst B. State-of-the-Art Treatment and Novel Agents in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia. Oncol Res Treat. 2016;39(1-2):25-32. doi: 10.1159/000443903. Epub 2016 Jan 22.
PubMed 26890007Kolodziej M, Hoverman JR, Garey JS, Espirito J, Sheth S, Ginsburg A, Neubauer MA, Patt D, Brooks B, White C, Sitarik M, Anderson R, Beveridge R. Benchmarks for value in cancer care: an analysis of a large commercial population. J Oncol Pract. 2011 Sep;7(5):301-6. doi: 10.1200/JOP.2011.000394.
PubMed 22211126Tucci A, Ferrari S, Bottelli C, Borlenghi E, Drera M, Rossi G. A comprehensive geriatric assessment is more effective than clinical judgment to identify elderly diffuse large cell lymphoma patients who benefit from aggressive therapy. Cancer. 2009 Oct 1;115(19):4547-53. doi: 10.1002/cncr.24490.
PubMed 19562776Bellera C, Praud D, Petit-Moneger A, McKelvie-Sebileau P, Soubeyran P, Mathoulin-Pelissier S. Barriers to inclusion of older adults in randomised controlled clinical trials on Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: a systematic review. Cancer Treat Rev. 2013 Nov;39(7):812-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2013.01.007. Epub 2013 Mar 6.
PubMed 23473865
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 28 Aug 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- The Roles of Education and Patient Engagement to Improve Symptom Management and the Quality of Life for Patients With Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03231579
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- G411
- Conditions
- CLL
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 85 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Carevive Systems, Inc.Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 21 Jul 2017 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Nov 2018 (actual)
- Study completion
- 31 Mar 2019 (actual)
- First posted
- 27 Jul 2017 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This multi-site study will enroll approximately 100 CLL patients across 5 cancer institutions. The aim of the project is to ensure hematology care teams that are participating in new value-based reimbursement models have an accurate understanding of the evidence and roles of new therapies for CLL and best practice supportive care protocols to proactively assess, monitor, and manage symptoms to promote successful clinical outcomes. Hematology teams at seven health systems across the U.S. will be given online clinical training on the latest evidence for treatment planning in CLL along with best supportive care practices for patients on novel CLL treatments, prior to using Carevive's patient engagement software. Once training is complete, the Carevive software will be employed in the clinic whereby CLL patients will use the Carevive patient portal to report any symptoms at and in between clinic visits. Patients will be given a user name and password to a web-based portal for 24/7 reporting of symptoms experienced. Patient-reported and clinical data will be processed by the Carevive rules engine technology to generate evidence-based supportive care plans providing patients with direction regarding self-management strategies, care coordination for relevant cancer center services, and direction on when to go to the emergency department (ED) or call their hematologist based on their institution's protocol. For patients who require ongoing and routine monitoring, such supportive care recommendations will be included in supportive care plans generated at the clinic visit. On the visits subsequent to the delivery of the care plan, patients will report on the perceived effectiveness of the intervention (or barriers to non-adherence to the intervention). Patients and clinicians will assess symptom severity at each visit for a 16-week period and both data sets will be stored and analyzed for research purposes.
Detailed description
Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is the most common type of adult leukemia in Western countries with 18,960 new cases and 4660 deaths expected in 2016. Rapid therapeutic advances in the past five years have changed the landscape of CLL treatment giving patients many more treatment options. Fit patients with favorable disease features such as mutated immunoglobulin heavy chain variable region (IgHV genes) have long term benefit from chemoimmunotherapy and new oral agents such as ibrutinib and idelalisib and the BCL-2 inhibitor, venetoclax, provide effective options for relapsed patients.
With recent FDA approvals, the treatment armamentarium for relapsed/refractory CLL has been transformed in the past several years. Clinicians are faced with a plethora of new treatment options and associated guideline updates, making clinical decision-making much more complex. It is challenging for the modern-day hematologist to stay current on the comparative evidence of the risks/benefits of various treatment options with so many choices. Such novel regimens are changing the survival outcomes and offering new opportunities for the long-term management of CLL. While risk-benefit profiles are favorable, diligent supportive care practices are required to promote patient engagement and successful clinical outcomes as such agents are powerful, leading to potential toxicities that must be diligently monitored.
Since new agents have had limited use in the clinic, real-world evidence on patient symptom experience is not available to guide practice and there is limited data on the effectiveness of evidence-based supportive care recommendations. This is a challenge for hematology teams, particularly because CLL patients are amongst the highest rates of emergency department (ED) visits and hospitalizations (along with lung and colon cancers). Retrospective data demonstrated that patient demographic and clinical characteristics, as well as chemotherapy choice, were associated with ER visits and hospitalizations in patients with CLL. Specifically, significant increases in ER visits and hospitalizations were associated with age, comorbidities, use of supportive care, number of CLL-related adverse events, chemotherapy duration, use of certain therapies, living in the Northeast region of the United States, and treatment following relapse.
The outcomes of CLL treatment have been found to vary with age, with poorer outcomes in older patients. However, the elderly population is highly heterogeneous - ranging from "fit" to "frail". A number of recent studies conclude that while chronological age is an important consideration when making treatment decisions for hematologic malignancies, functional status is more predictive of treatment outcomes. A review of 83 CLL treatment articles published from 1949 to 2011 reported fit patients had more treatment options than the frail elderly and most studies included patients younger than 65 years. It has been noted by a number of researchers that elderly and frail patients with LGL are under-represented in clinical trials and there is need for data to support a tailored treatment plan.
This study will explore the symptom assessment and management practices of providers caring for individuals receiving new and active therapy for CLL, and will also employ a two-part intervention (with both patients and providers) to evaluate the impact of a novel existing technology, the Carevive Care Planning System (CPS), on supportive care and symptom management. The primary objective of this study is to evaluate adherence to evidence-based practices for symptom assessment and management (i.e., "symptom care behaviors") of physicians and nurses (providers) caring for individuals receiving active treatment for CLL. The intervention will include personalized supportive care and symptom management plans for patients auto-generated by the Carevive CPS based on each individual's data. The care plans were created based on nationally recognized National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) supportive care guidelines and validated by CLL nurse and physician experts.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Patients with a diagnosis of CLL
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- All participants must be 18 years of age or older.
- Patient participants must have a diagnosis of CLL, and either be on active treatment or need first-line treatment.
- Patient participants must be able to access a web-based portal.
- All participants must be able to understand English.
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Any patient who cannot understand written or spoken English.
- Any prisoner and/or other vulnerable persons as defined by NIH (45 CFR 46, Subpart B, C, and D).
- The inclusion and exclusion criteria above will be used to screen for eligibility of all patients.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Carevive CPSThis intervention will focus on the use of the Carevive CPS, enabling providers to deliver evidence-based and personalized treatment care plans to their CLL patients on/starting treatment. The Carevive CPS collects electronic patient reported outcomes (ePROs) and clinical data, reported and generated by clinical staff and/or peer-reviewed evidence, and includes patient education, resources, and referrals developed by cancer clinicians and researchers. | Behavioural | – |
Primary outcome
Patient perception of the overall effectiveness, acceptability, and usability of bi-directional web-based technology to self-report symptom prevalence and severity and receive management recommendations
Time frame: Year 1
Patients will be asked to rate how acceptable, effective, and usable the web-based technology was using a 5-item system usability measure. The data will then be analyzed in order to describe the patient perceptions of the intervention
Longitudinal symptom experience of patients with CLL
Time frame: Year 1
Data collected on the Carevive CPS using the PRO-CTCAE and ESASr tools will be analyzed in order to describe the longitudinal symptom experience
2 secondary outcomes
ER utilization and hospitalization in elderly patients with CLL
Time frame: Year 1
Patterns of change in provider decision making over time for patients with CLL
Time frame: Year 1
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 28 Aug 2019.
- Background: PubMed 27249745Brown JR, Hallek MJ, Pagel JM. Chemoimmunotherapy Versus Targeted Treatment in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia: When, How Long, How Much, and in Which Combination? Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book. 2016;35:e387-98. doi: 10.1200/EDBK_159018.
- Background: PubMed 26890007Cramer P, Hallek M, Eichhorst B. State-of-the-Art Treatment and Novel Agents in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia. Oncol Res Treat. 2016;39(1-2):25-32. doi: 10.1159/000443903. Epub 2016 Jan 22.
- Background: PubMed 22211126Kolodziej M, Hoverman JR, Garey JS, Espirito J, Sheth S, Ginsburg A, Neubauer MA, Patt D, Brooks B, White C, Sitarik M, Anderson R, Beveridge R. Benchmarks for value in cancer care: an analysis of a large commercial population. J Oncol Pract. 2011 Sep;7(5):301-6. doi: 10.1200/JOP.2011.000394.
- Background: PubMed 19562776Tucci A, Ferrari S, Bottelli C, Borlenghi E, Drera M, Rossi G. A comprehensive geriatric assessment is more effective than clinical judgment to identify elderly diffuse large cell lymphoma patients who benefit from aggressive therapy. Cancer. 2009 Oct 1;115(19):4547-53. doi: 10.1002/cncr.24490.
- Background: PubMed 23473865Bellera C, Praud D, Petit-Moneger A, McKelvie-Sebileau P, Soubeyran P, Mathoulin-Pelissier S. Barriers to inclusion of older adults in randomised controlled clinical trials on Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: a systematic review. Cancer Treat Rev. 2013 Nov;39(7):812-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2013.01.007. Epub 2013 Mar 6.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for CLL
RecruitingPhase 1/2
A Study of AZD0486 Monotherapy or in Combination With Other Anti-Cancer Agents for Mature B-Cell Malignancies
Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia, Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Nemtabrutinib for Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL)/Small Lymphocytic Leukemia (SLL) Refractory to Covalent Bruton Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor or Pirtobrutinib and Previously Treated With a BCL2 Inhibitor
Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia, Small Lymphocytic Leukemia
RecruitingPhase 3
Testing Early Treatment for Patients With High-Risk Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL) or Small Lymphocytic Leukemia (SLL), EVOLVE CLL/SLL Study
Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia, Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma
RecruitingObservational study
Collecting Blood Samples From Patients With and Without Cancer to Evaluate Tests for Early Cancer Detection
Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia, Acute Myeloid Leukemia
RecruitingObservational study
A Multi-site Study to Evaluate the Persistence of Protective Immunity to Routine Childhood Vaccinations in Participants With B-ALL/Ly Who Have Received Blinatumomab
B-Cell ALL, B-Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukaemia
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of CLL, run by Carevive Systems, Inc. at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 28 Aug 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Patient perception of the overall effectiveness, acceptability, and usability of bi-directional web-based technology to self-report symptom prevalence and severity and receive management recommendations (time frame: Year 1). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03231579, which also lists 5 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 28 Aug 2019.