AzTrials
AzTrials

Stress, PsychologicalNCT03233750

Simulation-Based Stress Inoculation Training

A study testing Stress Inoculation Training and Crisis Resource Management in people with Stress, Psychological, run by Ottawa Hospital Research Institute at 1 site in Canada.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Previous research has shown that health professionals can experience stress responses during high acuity events such as trauma resuscitations. These stress responses can lead to impaired clinical performance. The goal of this proposed project is to adapt Stress Inoculation Training (SIT) to the healthcare setting. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 25 to 45 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Stress, Psychological
What is being tested?
Stress Inoculation Training and Crisis Resource Management
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
20 participants
Where
1 siteCanada
Study dates
15 Sep 2017to 30 Aug 2019
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 25 to 45 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Emergency medicine residents enrolled in post graduate training at the University of Toronto or the University of Ottawa

Who cannot join

  • endocrine disease or medication that can affect cortisol levels or responses

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Canada1 site
  • University of Ottawa Skills and Simulation Centre

    Ottawa, Ontario, K1Y 4E9

Other trials in Canada

About this study

Official title: Preparing for High Acuity Events: Simulation-Based Stress Inoculation Training

Previous research has shown that health professionals can experience stress responses during high acuity events such as trauma resuscitations. These stress responses can lead to impaired clinical performance. The goal of this proposed project is to adapt Stress Inoculation Training (SIT) to the healthcare setting. Stress Inoculation Training is a cognitive-behavioural approach to stress management that has proven effective in reducing stress and improving performance in domains outside of healthcare.

Thirty-two emergency medicine residents will be randomly divided into two groups. The SIT group will receive the simulation-based stress inoculation training. We will measure the effectiveness of the training by looking at reduction of stress levels and improvements in clinical performance in a pre-intervention and a post-intervention simulated trauma scenario. The control group will be exposed to the same simulation scenarios and pre/post intervention scenarios as the SIT group, but will not receive the stress inoculation training.

Read the detailed description

Health care contains many stressors for health professionals, both chronic and acute. There is accumulating evidence that clinical performance can be significantly impaired by stress responses during acute events, both in the psychology and healthcare domains. Paramedics, medical residents and surgeons have all shown impaired performance when faced with high acuity situations that triggered subjective and physiological stress responses. Impairments have been observed in the ability to perform drug calculations, trauma and cardiac resuscitations, in technical skills, as well as on tasks that rely on memory recall. In some cases, the magnitude of the stress response has been associated with the degree of performance impairments. In many studies in which performance impairments have been observed, baseline levels of performance were acceptable, suggesting that these impairments are not due to a lack of relevant knowledge or skills required to provide patient care in these situations.

The findings of impaired performance with stress responses suggests that training for high acuity events needs to go beyond training that is oriented solely towards the acquisition of clinical skills and knowledge. Training needs to also include interventions aimed at developing the trainees' ability to cope with stressors and to minimize their personal stress responses. In the psychology, aviation and military domains, several approaches have been developed to optimize performance during stressful events. These can be categorized either as skills-based training (providing individuals or teams with the specific skills required during a crisis) or as stress management interventions (modifying the individual's appraisal of potentially stressful situations).

The implementation of skill based training, such as crisis resource management (CRM), has resulted in improved performance in team interactions. However, CRM-type of training requires that health professionals be able to remember those skills that were learned, yet memory recall is often impaired under stress. As for overlearning, it can lead to rigid approaches to problem solving, and is less likely to be efficient in dynamic situations that require flexibility in approaches and judgment. Therefore, educators also need to develop complementary approaches to train health professionals in recognizing stress responses and in managing and minimizing their emotional responses. Stress management approaches are focused on reducing the emotional and physiological response itself. The premise is that by reducing the stress response, the cognitive facilities (including recall of relevant knowledge and skills) required during a high acuity situation are more likely to remain intact.

Two important predictors of stress responses to high acuity events are individuals' coping styles and their cognitive appraisals of the situation. Task-oriented coping styles, as well as appraisals of perceived resources being equal to or above the perceived demands of a situation, are associated with lower stress responses in high acuity events. As such, stress management approaches focused on coping styles and cognitive structuring are likely to reduce the subjective and physiological stress responses of clinicians and trainees during high acuity events.

A promising method of reducing stress responses and performance impairments under acutely stressful conditions is stress inoculation training (SIT). This 3-phase cognitive-behavioural approach to stress management has proven effective in domains outside of healthcare. SIT has been found to be effective in reducing general state anxiety, performance anxiety (anxiety specific to the skills being addressed in the training), and in enhancing performance under stress. SIT appears to be effective when run with groups of 8-10 participants and it can be implemented successfully without an inordinate number of training sessions. Finally, the beneficial effects of the SIT can generalize to novel stress conditions and novel tasks, which is crucial for any applied area in which the conditions of real life environments are often dynamic, ambiguous and emergent.

The proposed study consists of the adaptation and evaluation of a simulation-based stress inoculation training (SIT) intervention for Emergency Medicine and Surgery residents during trauma rotations.

SPECIFIC AIMS AND HYPOTHESES The study hypothesis is that residents who have received the SIT intervention will have lower stress levels and higher performance levels during a post-intervention simulated trauma scenario than will residents in a control group.

SIGNIFICANCE During high acuity events, such as pre-hospital, trauma and cardiac resuscitations, patient care must be provided in conditions that can be noisy, chaotic, time pressured and with uncertainty. These conditions, and the urgent nature of the care required, are very unforgiving to gaps in recall, attention or decision-making. In these environments, research has shown that health professionals experience significant stress responses and that these stress responses can lead to impairments in memory, attention and clinical performance.

Adapting a proven stress training approach to healthcare has the possibility of significantly improving care to patients during high acuity events, both in terms of care during the high acuity component of care, as well as further along in the chain of care.

INNOVATION If, as predicted, the results of this study reveal that stress inoculation training is effective for preparing emergency medicine and surgery residents, in terms of reducing their stress levels and increasing their performance during simulated trauma resuscitation, this proposed study will be further developed for a multi-centre study with outcome measures of stress and performance during actual patient events.

In the development of the course content and scenarios for the SIT training in the context, a course manual will be produced. This manual will be shared with colleagues internationally, for the purposes of adapting and validating the course internationally and in a variety of clinical contexts.

APPROACH The proposed study of stress inoculation training (SIT) intervention will be for emergency medicine and surgery residents during trauma rotations. The adaptation of SIT to the trauma context will consist of a 3-phase training intervention, conducted over one 1/2 day session.

Phase 1: Conceptualization / Educational Phase (60 minutes) The goal of this phase is to help individuals gain a better understanding of the nature of stress and its effects. This phase will focus on the provision of preparatory information, to allow the participants to form accurate expectations regarding the stress environment and stress reaction that can occur during trauma cases. The goal is to provide the participants with a sense of predictability and control. This phase will consist of descriptions of the stressors encountered in the clinical setting, the provision of information about how these stressors might make the participants feel affect performance.

Phase 2: Skill Acquisition and Rehearsal (60 minutes) The objective of this phase is the development and practice of cognitive restructuring techniques and relaxing training to reduce anxiety and enhance the individual's capacity to respond effectively to stressful situations. The cognitive restructuring techniques will provide the participants with the skills to regulate negative emotions and distracting thoughts brought on by stressors. The relaxation training will provide the participants with the skills to enhance physiological control, such as awareness and control of muscle tension and breathing. The session will include mental imagery and visualization exercises to allow the participants to practice the skills in a low stress environment.

Phase 3: Application of Coping Skills (180 minutes) In this phase, the coping skills are applied in increasingly stressful conditions that approximate the real-world stressor environment. Participants will practice the cognitive restructuring and relaxation skills in a series of simulated trauma scenarios in which they will be exposed to increasing levels of stress in a gradual manner. All of the scenarios will be developed using a combination of computerized mannequin-based simulators and standardized patients (SP). The use of simulation modalities allows investigators to carefully manipulate the levels of stressors inherent in each scenario and to control for any extraneous factors beyond the intervention that could influence stress responses and performance.

Being tested
Stress Inoculation Training, Crisis Resource Management
Medical subject headings
Stress, Psychological

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Stress Inoculation TrainingBehavioural

    see description in arm/group descriptions

  • Crisis Resource ManagementBehavioural

    During each scenario, facilitators identify performance gaps in either situation awareness, leadership, communication or resource allocations. During debriefing session, these are raised with the learner and their cognitive frames are identified and corrected as necessary.

Study groups in NCT03233750
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Stress Inoculation TrainingExperimentalPhase 1: Conceptualization / Educational Phase (60 minutes) Provision of preparatory information, to allow the participants to form accurate expectations regarding the stress environment and stress reactions. Phase 2: Skill Acquisition and Rehearsal (60 minutes) Development and practice of cognitive restructuring techniques and relaxing training to reduce anxiety and enhance the individual's capacity to respond effectively to stressful situations, in low stress conditions. Phase 3: Application of Coping Skills (180 minutes) Coping skills are applied in increasingly stressful conditions that approximate the real-world stressor environment.
Receives: Behavioral: Stress Inoculation Training
Crisis Resource Management TrainingActive comparatorThe CRM training targets the non-technical skills (e.g. behavioural and cognitive skills) required for effective teamwork during crisis situations. It focuses on communication, teamwork, situational awareness and leadership
Receives: Behavioral: Crisis Resource Management

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change in scores on State-Trait Anxiety Inventory

    Subjective stress measure

    Measured: prior to each scenairo as well as immediately at the end of each simulation scenario

  2. Change in salivary cortisol levels

    physiological indicator of stress

    Measured: prior to each scenario, as well as 20 and 30 minutes after each scenario

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Performance

    Expert scoring of clinical management of the scenario

    Measured: Experts will review the videotapes of the scenarios within one month of data collection

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted31 Jul 2017
  2. Study start15 Sep 2017
  3. Primary completion30 Aug 2019
  4. Study completion30 Aug 2019

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
This is a cohort study, comparing two interventions aimed at decreasing stress responses during acute events, with a pre and a post intervention assessment.
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
20 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03233750
Sponsor's protocol ID
20170081-01H
Status last verified
Mar 2023
First submitted
13 Jul 2017
Last updated
14 Mar 2023
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Undecided: anonymized data shared on an individual basis

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Stress Inoculation Training and Crisis Resource Management in people with Stress, Psychological, run by Ottawa Hospital Research Institute at 1 site in Canada.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 14 Mar 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Change in scores on State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (time frame: prior to each scenairo as well as immediately at the end of each simulation scenario). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 14 Mar 2023.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in