AzTrials
AzTrials

Melanoma (Skin)Phase 3IL-2NCT03233828

Pre-Treatment of Highly Suspicious Pigmented Skin Lesions With Interleukin-2

A Phase 3 study testing Aldesleukin and Saline in people with Melanoma (Skin) and Melanoma in Situ, run by Carman Giacomantonio at 1 site in Canada.

Terminated

Stopped early. The study ended before it was planned to and will not resume.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This study is meant to assess the use of intralesional IL-2 to modulate the immunological response to suspected melanoma, or melanoma in situ, in an effort to increase lymphocyte infiltration and decrease disease metastasis. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 80 years
Conditions the study is for
Melanoma (Skin), Melanoma in Situ
What is being tested?
Aldesleukin and Saline
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
1 participants
Where
1 siteCanada
Study dates
30 Oct 2019to 27 Nov 2019
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 80 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • The participant population will include patients characterized by: nodular/polypoid features, bleeding/ulcerated lesions, excluding face and vulvo-genital lesions.

Who cannot join

  • Participants who are not: currently immunocompromized, on immuno-therapy for other diagnosis, have known inflammatory or autoimmune diseases or are otherwise incapacitated.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Canada1 site
  • Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Centre

    Halifax, Nova Scotia, B3H3G1

Other trials in Canada

About this study

This study is meant to assess the use of intralesional IL-2 to modulate the immunological response to suspected melanoma, or melanoma in situ, in an effort to increase lymphocyte infiltration and decrease disease metastasis.

Patients that are clinically diagnosed with suspected Melanoma or Melanoma in situ will be assigned to either a treatment or control arm. The treatment group will be subjected to two intralesional IL-2 injections, whereas the control group will be subjected to two intralesional injections of saline.

Read more

The proteomic and metabolomic profiles of both groups will be analyzed using urine and blood samples in an effort to assess the systemic immunological response, if any, to the treatment. Also, upon disease confirmation and staging by a qualified pathologist, lesions will be assessed for lymphocyte infiltration using immunohistochemical methods.

This study will determine whether pre-treatment of IL-2 on lesions (clinically diagnosed as melanoma or melanoma in situ) is effective in generating an adaptive immune response, and whether that immune response may play a role in preventing disease metastasis.

Read the detailed description

This study is primarily designed to determine if tumor specific immunity can be generated in patients with highly suspicious pigmented lesions in response to intralesional IL-2, and whether that immunity can confer resistance to melanoma metastasis. Patients will be identified by qualified dermatologists and interviews will be held at the surgery clinic (4th floor Dickson Center) QEII HSC, NSHA.

The standard wait time from consultation to surgical biopsy is up to 4 weeks. Investigators will ensure that patients are seen immediately upon notification from participating dermatologist and all research components of the study are completed within the normally anticipated wait time. Through utilization of this standard wait time, intralesional IL-2 can potentially affect an immune response, that otherwise could not be achieved after the biopsy is completed. Given that the study is conducted within the normal wait time, it doesn't deviate from the normal standard of care. Following the study protocol, patients will receive intralesional injections on Day 1(Week 1 Visit) and Day 8 (Week 2 Visit), and excisional biopsies will be performed on Day 15 (Week 3 Visit), well within the accepted wait time from consultation to biopsy. The intralesional injections and collection of biospecimens beyond the biopsy deviate from but does not delay the normal standard of care. Two additional visits are required in addition to the initial consultation.

This study is a randomized, controlled, double-blind study. Patients with highly suspicious pigmented lesions will be randomly assigned by an algorithm to one of two groups: 1) treatment group patients will be treated intralesionally with IL-2 (Proleukin (Aldesleukin), Novartis Pharmaceuticals Canada Inc.) at a dose of 500,000 International Units (IU) in 0.1ml of sterilized saline (0.9%, m/v) for 2 treatment cycles 1 week apart (Day 1 and Day 7); 2) control group patients will be treated intralesionally with sterilized saline (0.9%, m/v) of the same volume (0.1ml). Randomization will be generated by a Random Block algorithm for each patient, and instruction preparation for each patient will be sent to pharmacy. IL-2 (Proleukin) will be obtained from Novartis by the pharmacy, paid for by Dr. Carman Giacomantonio's research services account. The pharmacy will be given instruction to prepare either IL-2 treatment or injectable control (saline). The pharmacy will assign a codified ID which will be provided along with the syringe with the patient name labeled as "Interleukin-2/Placebo" (thus blinding study to clinician and patient). As a pilot study, the principle of the design is to test the feasibility of proceeding to a larger and more expensive trial following the methodology and protocol proposed. As such there will be a minimum of 20 (10 treatment, 10 placebo) participants (up to a maximum of 60). It is estimated that statistical significance will be reached with 20 patients, however if it is not reached after 20 patients, an additional 10 (5 treatment, 5 control) patients will be enrolled. If significance is still not reached after 30 patients, an additional 10 patients will be enrolled and so on up to a maximum of 60 patients. If after 60 patients, significance is not achieved then further recruitment under the current protocol would not be logical and therefore the methodology would need to be revised or study discontinued.

On Day 1 (first treatment) and 15 (excisional biopsy), all patients will have blood (4 vials) and urine (25-50 ml) samples taken. Local reactions to injections will be monitored for non- specific signs such as bleeding, arythema, infection, or irritation. Investigators do not anticipate specific changes in the pigmented lesion related to the injection in this short time period, however all changes will be noted.

On Day 15, following the second intralesional injection an excisional biopsy will be performed following standard surgical techniques, as follows: ellipse of skin encompassing the pigmented lesion extending into the subcutaneous fat will be performed to achieve a grossly clear but narrow margin of excision. This small defect will be closed primarily with interrupted sutures. The biopsied specimen will be subsequently evaluated using standard histological techniques to confirm diagnoses, assess margin status (clear or involved) and depth of lesion invasion. The depth of lesion invasion will dictate the extent of subsequent surgical excisions and margin selection according to standard National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines. Pre-biopsy intralesional injections of 0.1ml into the lesion will not alter dimensions or architecture of the lesion or impact the extent the subsequent biopsy required. Lesions that are felt to be too large for closure without tissue manipulation or creation of flaps, will be biopsied using a punch biopsy sampling technique whereby 4mm diameter discs of tissue from representative areas of the lesion will be taken to confirm the diagnosis and the depth of invasion. The depth of invasion will dictate the extent and complexity of subsequent surgery required to remove the lesion and achieve clear margins according to NCCN guidelines. The biopsied specimen will be processed as follows: using a 22G needle a fine needle aspiration biopsy will be performed (the needle will be passed through the center of the lesion two times) for RNA analysis. The remainder of the tissue will be sent to pathology for standard histological assessment. The pathologist will also report the extent of observed tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) associated with treatment compared to control injections. Blood and urine will be assessed using metabalomic and proteomic methods to assess systemic immune response to treatment.

All blood, urine, and lesion biopsy samples will be labeled with a codified number (will not contain any patient identifying information) and will be immediately transported to Dr. Carman Giacomantonio laboratory at Dalhousie University for storage. Fine needle aspiration of excised samples will be assessed for tumor genetic and epigeneitic profile. Blood and urine will be assessed for proteomic and metabolomic profiles, respectively.

All study participants will receive assessments every 4 months for 2 years and biannual assessments for years 3 to 5 after the initial intervention to assess disease progression, or the development of new melanoma, to compare between both treatment and control groups. There is no standardize test or measurable biomarker to assess established or lasting immunity. This aspect of the study is identical to the patient assessment conducted as per standard of care for melanoma patients. Again, any publications of study results will be completed devoid of any information that could be used to identify patients included in the study.

Being tested
Aldesleukin, Saline
Keywords
Intralesional Injection, Immunotherapy, Immune Response, Interleukin-2 (Aldesleukin), Tumor Infiltration, Metastasis Prevention
Medical subject headings
Melanoma

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • AldesleukinBiological

    500,000 IU in 0.1mL

  • SalineOther

    0.1 mL of sterile saline solution (0.9% m/v)

Study groups in NCT03233828
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Intralesional IL-2 InjectionExperimentalTwo subcutaneous intralesional injections of Aldesleukin, prepared by the pharmacy such that the contents will be masked, will be administered by the care provider in a clinic seven days apart.
Receives: Biological: Aldesleukin
Saline InjectionPlacebo comparatorTwo subcutaneous intralesional injections of Saline, prepared by the pharmacy such that the contents will be masked, will be administered by the care provider in a clinic seven days apart.
Receives: Other: Saline

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Assessment of Number of Patients Needed to Obtain Significance

    Data will be analyzed in order to achieve a statistically significant differentiation between treatment and control outcomes in study measures including tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) and circulating immunomodulators.

    Measured: 1 year

  2. Assessment of Metastasis

    All patients will receive assessments every 4 months for 2 years and then biannual assessments for years 3-5 after the initial intervention to assess disease metastasis in treatment and control groups. Both number of new metastases (integer value) and thickness (mm) will be measured as a part of this assessment.

    Measured: Assessments every 4 months for 2 years. Biannual assessments for years 3-5.

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. Assessment of RNA Genetic Profile

    RNA analysis of excised tissue will be compared to unaffected patient tissue obtained from the clear margins of the excisional biopsy to assess genetic changes resulting from the melanoma and treatment/placebo injections.

    Measured: RNA analysis of excised tissue up to 5 years.

  2. Assessment of Systemic Immune Response: Proteomic Analysis

    Proteomic analysis will be conducted on blood samples to assess systemic immune response to both treatment and control groups. Serum collected from patient blood samples will be used for proteomic analysis to assess protein expression, including circulating immunomodulators (cytokines and chemokines) before, and after, treatment. This study may serve to help develop diagnostic protocols and methods of assessing response to treatments.

    Measured: Proteomic analysis of serum samples up to 5 years

  3. Assessment of Systemic Immune Response: Metabolomic Analysis

    Metabolomic analysis will be conducted on urine samples to assess systemic immune response to both treatment and control groups. All tumor and tissue produce by products in waste that are excreted by the kidneys. Urine samples can be evaluated using techniques, such as Mass Spectrometric, to determine if biological compounds can be identified in association with the presence of a malignant process that would not be produced by normal tissue.This study may serve to help develop diagnostic protocols and methods of assessing response to treatments.

    Measured: Metabolomic analysis of urine samples up to 5 years

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted31 Jul 2017
  2. Study start30 Oct 2019
  3. Primary completion27 Nov 2019
  4. Study completion27 Nov 2019

Why it stopped: Low enrollment numbers.

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
Patients will be given either intralesional IL-2 or intralesional saline as a control
Masking
Triple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Investigator
Enrolment
1 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03233828
Sponsor's protocol ID
4387
Acronym
IL-2
Status last verified
Jul 2024
First submitted
26 Jul 2017
Last updated
24 Jul 2024
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Ranieri JM, Wagner JD, Wenck S, Johnson CS, Coleman JJ 3rd. The prognostic importance of sentinel lymph node biopsy in thin melanoma. Ann Surg Oncol. 2006 Jul;13(7):927-32. doi: 10.1245/ASO.2006.04.023. Epub 2006 May 22.

    PubMed 16788753
  • Sandru A, Voinea S, Panaitescu E, Blidaru A. Survival rates of patients with metastatic malignant melanoma. J Med Life. 2014 Oct-Dec;7(4):572-6.

    PubMed 25713625
  • Tsao H, Atkins MB, Sober AJ. Management of cutaneous melanoma. N Engl J Med. 2004 Sep 2;351(10):998-1012. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra041245. No abstract available.

    PubMed 15342808
  • Hersey P, Gallagher S. Intralesional immunotherapy for melanoma. J Surg Oncol. 2014 Mar;109(4):320-6. doi: 10.1002/jso.23494. Epub 2013 Dec 3.

    PubMed 24301265
  • Sloot S, Rashid OM, Sarnaik AA, Zager JS. Developments in Intralesional Therapy for Metastatic Melanoma. Cancer Control. 2016 Jan;23(1):12-20. doi: 10.1177/107327481602300104.

    PubMed 27009452
  • Boyd KU, Wehrli BM, Temple CL. Intra-lesional interleukin-2 for the treatment of in-transit melanoma. J Surg Oncol. 2011 Dec;104(7):711-7. doi: 10.1002/jso.21968. Epub 2011 Jul 8.

    PubMed 21744347

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing Aldesleukin and Saline in people with Melanoma (Skin) and Melanoma in Situ, run by Carman Giacomantonio at 1 site in Canada.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 24 Jul 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 24 Jul 2024). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Assessment of Number of Patients Needed to Obtain Significance (time frame: 1 year). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03233828, which also lists 6 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 24 Jul 2024.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in