AzTrials
AzTrials

Infantile HemangiomaPhase 3NCT03237637

Comparative Study to Evaluate the Effectiveness of Atenolol and Propranolol in the Treatment of Infantile Hemangiomas

A Phase 3 study testing oral propranolol and oral atenolol in people with Infantile Hemangioma, run by Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh at 1 site in India.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Through this study, the investigators shall compare the effectiveness of atenolol with propranolol in the treatment of IH. In addition, the investigators shall try to elucidate the mechanism of action of beta blockers by assessing their action on triggers such as hypoxia. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages Up to 12 months
Conditions the study is for
Infantile Hemangioma
What is being tested?
oral propranolol and oral atenolol
Type of treatment
Pill or oral medicine
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
60 participants
Where
1 siteIndia
Study dates
24 Mar 2017to Dec 2018
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages Up to 12 months
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child

Who may be able to join

  • Children diagnosed with problematic infantile hemangiomas
  • Potentially disfiguring infantile hemangiomas at any site.
  • Functionally threatening infantile hemangiomas near the eyes, nose, natural orifices, limbs, genitalia.
  • Ulcerated infantile hemangiomas.
  • Segmental infantile hemangiomas.
  • Uncomplicated progressive infantile hemangiomas with unpredictable future course.
Show all 9Show fewer
  • Age group: less than 1 year of age.
  • Either sex
  • Multiple hemangiomas

Who cannot join

  • Infants with heart disease, cardiac arrhythmias
  • Broncho -obstructive disease.
  • Premature infants with corrected age less than 40 weeks.
  • Known hypoglycemia
  • Diabetes mellitus
  • Hypertension
Show all 10Show fewer
  • Hypotension
  • Liver failure
  • Visceral hemangiomas
  • PHACES syndrome

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Raihan Ashraf, MBBS contact

9980811682 ext. +91

raihanash91@gmail.com

RAHUL MAHAJAN, MBBS, MD, MNAMS contact

1722756465 ext. +91

drrahulpgi@yahoo.com

India1 site, 1 recruiting
  • PGIMER

    Chandigarh, 160012

    Raihan Ashraf, MBBS, 1722756564 ext. +91, raihanash91@gmail.com

    Rahul Mahajan, MBBS, MD, MNAMS, drrahulpgi@yahoo.com

    Recruiting

Other trials in India

About this study

Through this study, the investigators shall compare the effectiveness of atenolol with propranolol in the treatment of IH. In addition, the investigators shall try to elucidate the mechanism of action of beta blockers by assessing their action on triggers such as hypoxia. The study design will be a parallel group comparative study wherein patients of IH will be randomized into two groups. One group will receive propranolol and the other atenolol for a maximum period of 9 months. The patients will then be followed up regularly for regression of the IH based on Physician global assessment, hemangioma activity score(HAS), serial photography and lesional ultrasonography. Any side effects encountered during the treatment period will also be noted. Also serial measurements of hypoxia inducible factor 1 alpha(HIF-1α) will be made to ascertain the mechanism of action of the drugs.

Read the detailed description

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES:

  1. To compare the effectiveness and safety of oral atenolol versus oral propranolol in the treatment of infantile hemangiomas.
  2. To elucidate the mechanism of action of atenolol and propranolol in the treatment of infantile hemangiomas.

STUDY DESIGN MATERIALS AND METHODS:

This investigator-initiated, prospective, observer blinded, parallel group comparative study on the effect of oral medication in infantile cutaneous hemangiomas is being conducted in the Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Leprology, and Pediatric Surgery, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, after getting approval from the institutional Research and Ethics Committee.

Sample size: As this is a pilot study, an arbitrary sample size of 60 (30 in each group) was decided to be kept.

BASELINE CLINICAL ASSESSMENT:

Children satisfying the inclusion and exclusion criteria will be recruited into the study after obtaining an informed consent from the parents. Upon recruitment, each lesion will be evaluated clinically for size, colour, consistency and the phase of evolution- whether proliferative, plateau or regressing. Photographs will be taken along with Physician Global assessment scale and hemangioma activity score (HAS).26 Heart rate, BP, oxygen saturation, ECG , respiratory rate and random blood sugar will be recorded to rule out treatment contraindications. In patients with eyelid involvement, ophthalmologic examinations will be done. These observations will be noted in the case record form.

All patients will be admitted for 48 hours at initiation of treatment and escalation of dosage to record and monitor all parameters- heart rate, BP, blood sugar, oxygen saturation and respiratory rate.

RANDOMISATION, ALLOCATION, CONCEALMENT AND TREATMENT PROTOCOL Upon inclusion, patients will be randomized into two groups; group A and group B, using a computer generated sequence (block randomization). Efforts will be made to reduce recruitment bias by the following allocation concealment. Patients will be screened by Dr Raihan Ashraf and recruited by Dr Sanjeev Handa, Dr Dipankar De and Dr Muneer Abas. Allocation to either group will be done by Mrs Asha based on block randomization. Thereafter, Dr Rahul Mahajan will prescribe the oral drug based on the group to which the patient is allotted such that the parents of the patient are not blinded to the drug administered. The child shall be admitted to Advanced Paediatric Centre for monitoring of parameters by Dr Raihan Ashraf. At follow up assessment will be done by Dr Raihan Ashraf blinded to the randomization and allocation.

Evaluation of improvement will be done by the following means

  1. Physician Global Assessment: Score will be calculated by an independent dermatologist blinded to the management protocol with the help of photographs, at baseline and monthly thereafter. Serial Photography will be done at every 4 weeks. (The lesion will be photographed with and without flash with a standard 12 pixel digital camera at 30cm distance and approximately 180 dpi resolution)
  2. HAS. Score will be calculated at baseline and monthly thereafter.
  3. Ultrasonography : to objectively assess the size and depth of hemangioma will be done at baseline, 6 months and 9 months.

RECORDING OF ADVERSE EVENTS:

All the subjects will be reviewed at 1 month intervals. A full clinical examination will be performed during each visit, including growth chart measurements and cardiovascular status and any side effects like sleep disturbances, hypoglycemia, hypotension will be recorded in the case record form. Mild side effects will be recorded and managed. Serious side effects will be reported to the Safety committee and the patient withdrawn from the study.

LABORATORY EVALUATION Serum Hypoxia inducible factor 1α (HIF-1α) will be measured by ELISA at baseline and 9 months or completion of treatment.

PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURES:

  1. Mean difference in
  2. Number of patients achieving complete clinical clearance of lesion (PGA Score of 5) in the two groups
  3. Number of days required to achieve complete clinical clearance of lesion (PGA Score of 5) in the two groups
  4. Mean decrease in the volume of lesions in the two groups
  5. Mean decrease in HAS in the two groups
  6. Frequency of adverse effects (minor and serious) in Group A versus Group B.

SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES:

  1. Mean difference in HIF-1α levels before and after treatment in Group A and Group B.

STATISTICAL ANALYSIS The statistical analysis will be carried out using Statistical package for Social Sciences (SPSS Inc.,Chicago IL, version 15.0 Windows). The analysis will be done both for Per Protocol population( PP) as well as the Intention to Treat( ITT) population as primary population for analysis. All quantitative variables will be estimated using measures of central location (mean, median) and measures of dispersion (standard deviation and standard error). Normality of data will be checked by measures of skewness and Kolmogorov Smirnov tests of normality. For normally distributed data means will be compared using student's t test for groups. For skewed data Mann Whitney test will be applied for group. Qualitative or categorical variables will be described as frequencies and proportions. Proportions will be compared using Chi square or Fischer's exact test whichever is applicable. All statistical tests will be two sided and performed at a significance of α=0.05.

ETHICAL JUSTIFICATION Since the widespread use of propranolol for the use of infantile hemangiomas, there have come to light various side effects it may cause. Though usually mild and few, rare complications like asymptomatic hypoglycemia, hypotension and bronchial hyperreactivity can be life threatening. The proposed study aims to overcome these side effects with the use of cardio selective beta blocker atenolol which have safely been used in infants previously for cardiological indications like arrhythmias. In addition, it gives a reasonable treatment alternative for infants in whom propranolol is contraindicated. Furthermore, the exact magnitude of CNS effects resulting from propranolol use, especially in the early developmental stages is not currently known. Impairment in short- and long-term memory, psychomotor function, sleep quality and mood have been reported. These effects may not be readily recognizable and require specialized assessment of cognitive function not routinely performed. Furthermore, there may be a delay between exposure and cognitive defects. These side effects would theoretically be alleviated with the use of atenolol due to its impermeability through the blood brain barrier.

The investigations planned are necessary for the optimum management of participants. All blood samples will be taken with a 26 gauge needle so that there is minimal pain and discomfort to the patient and the amount of blood drawn for investigations will not cause any haemodynamic instability.

According to the guidelines set up by ICMR (1994) and Helsinki declaration (modified 2000), the following will be adhered in all patients enrolled in the study:

  • The patients involved in the research project will be informed participants.
  • Each patient will be adequately informed of the aims, methods, the anticipated benefits and potential risks of the study and the discomfort it may entail to him/her and the remedies thereof.
  • Every precaution will be taken to respect the privacy of the patient, the confidentiality of the patient's information and to minimize the impact of the study on his/her physical and mental integrity and his/her personality.
  • The patient will be given the right to abstain from participation in the study or to withdraw consent to participate at any time of the study without reprisal.
  • Due care and caution will be taken at all stages of the research to ensure that the patient is put to the minimum risk, suffer from no irreversible adverse effects and, generally, benefit from and by the research or experiment.
  • Written informed consent will be obtained from all the patients included in the study.
Being tested
oral propranolol, oral atenolol
Medical subject headings
Hemangioma, Capillary

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • oral propranololDrug

    oral propranolol 1-2mg/kg/day as crushed tablets in two divided doses

  • oral atenololDrug

    oral atenolol 0.5-1mg/kg/day as crushed tablets in a single dose

Study groups in NCT03237637
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Group A- PropranololActive comparatorOral propranolol 1mg/kg/day as crushed tablets, in two divided doses, increased to 2mg/kg/day in two divided doses after 24 hours if tolerated well. Treatment will be stopped at complete clinical clearance of lesion (defined arbitrarily as >90% reduction in the size of Infantile Hemangioma as assessed by Physician Global Assessment) or after 9 months of treatment (primary end point) whichever is earlier.
Receives: Drug: oral propranolol
Group B- AtenololExperimentalOral atenolol 0.5mg/kg as a single dose, increased to 1mg/kg as a single dose after 24 hours if tolerated well. Treatment will be stopped at complete clinical clearance of lesion (defined arbitrarily as >90% reduction in the size of Infantile Hemangioma as assessed by Physician Global Assessment) or after 9 months of treatment (primary end point) whichever is earlier.
Receives: Drug: oral atenolol

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Mean difference in number of patients achieving complete clinical clearance of lesion (PGA Score of 5) in the two groups

    Physician Global Assessment

    Responses to therapy (change of thickness, color, and area) will be recorded on each follow up.The therapeutic responses will be evaluated on a score of 1-5 as follows by an independent dermatologist who will not know the therapies:

    Score 5: >90% improvement or complete clinical involution Score 4: excellent improvement(75-90% decrease) Score 3: good improvement(50-74% decrease) Score 2: minimal improvement( 25-49% decrease) Score 1: poor improvement(1-24% decrease) Score 0: failure (no difference or regrowth)

    Measured: 9 months

  2. Mean difference in number of days required to achieve complete clinical clearance of lesion (PGA Score of 5) in the two groups

    Measured: 9 months

  3. Mean difference in Hemangioma Activity Score in the two groups

    Hemangioma Activity score

    Patient name:

    Age:

    Location of infantile hemangioma:

    ("Bright red edge" should only be scored when the HOI is not totally "bright red" Skin colored after activity". Do not score in deep HOI (deep swelling) unless the HOI has changed into it after activity)

    Date

    Deep swelling:

    tense HOI(6) 'neutral' HOI at t=0 or less than 50% reduction at follow up(4) >=50% reduction at follow up (2) No more swelling at follow up (0)

    Bright red/ shining red HOI(5) OR bright red edge(4) Matt red/reddish purple HOI/ matt red edge(3) Blue HOI or Blue shining through in deep HOI(2) Grey HOI(1) Skin colored after activity(0)

    Total score:

    Number of items scored Preliminary HAS= total score/number of items scored

    Ulcer=<1cm2 (+0.5) Ulcer 1-25cm2(+1) Ulcer >=25cm2(+2) HAS= preliminary HAS + ulcer score

    Measured: 9 months

  4. Frequency of adverse effects (minor and serious) in the two groups

    Measured: 9 months

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Mean difference in HIF-1α levels before and after treatment in Group A and Group B

    Measured: 9 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted2 Aug 2017
  2. Study start24 Mar 2017
  3. Primary completionDec 2018 (estimated)
  4. Study completionDec 2018 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
60 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03237637
Sponsor's protocol ID
INT/IEC/2017/322
Status last verified
Aug 2018
First submitted
18 Jul 2017
Last updated
28 Aug 2018
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing oral propranolol and oral atenolol in people with Infantile Hemangioma, run by Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh at 1 site in India.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 9 inclusion and 10 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 28 Aug 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in India. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Raihan Ashraf, MBBS (9980811682 ext. +91, raihanash91@gmail.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Mean difference in number of patients achieving complete clinical clearance of lesion (PGA Score of 5) in the two groups (time frame: 9 months). The study lists 4 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 28 Aug 2018.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in